Good to see confirmation that even the kernel is largely about large corporations reducing staff by formal or informal cooperation to make the software respond to business needs.
Or does someone think that these companies are taking a hobbyist's interest in making improvements intended only to benefit all?
And the most important gain: if Linux didn't exist, companies would have to make their own equivalents and compete on the quality of the result. They've been saved the necessity of hiring large numbers of staff people and responding to customer needs.
With everyone using the same product, there's no reason to make it any better than it has to be to respond to the business plan.
Still, at least most of the people working on the kernel are being paid. In the currency of the country in which they live.
The Linux Foundation on Tuesday released a report on Linux kernel development that is essentially a census of the open source operation. While much has been made about Novell’s doubling of contributions to the Linux kernel, the two biggest categories of contributors aren’t sponsored by any one company.
In other words, no one owns Linux and the development resources are amazingly distributed. The chart to the right tells the tale of the companies behind Linux development. Notice how company categories deemed none or unknown account for 26.8 percent of the changes to the Linux kernel. The Linux Foundation (press release, full report) defines “unknown” as a developer that made a change, but didn’t have a readily identifiable corporate affiliation. “None” refers to people that are doing development work on their own without pay.
Also see: Novell insists it’s winning the Linux wars
The usual suspects–Red Hat, Novell and IBM–round out the top five in percentage terms, with 11.2 percent, 8.9 percent and 8.3 percent, respectively. Novell’s big jump indicates that it has some momentum with developers. The top 10 contributors account for 70 percent of all kernel development–most of these folks are paid.
Among the key takeaways:
- A new Linux kernel is released every 2.7 months on average.
- Every Linux kernel is being developed by nearly 1,000 developers.
- The number of active kernel developers has tripled since 2005.
- Roughly 70 percent and 95 percent are being paid for their work.
- “From the 2.6.11 to the 2.6.24 kernel release (a total of 1140 days), there were, on average, 2.83 patches applied to the kernel tree per hour. And that is only the patches that were accepted. The ability to sustain this rate of change for years is unprecedented in any previous public software project.”
- 1,057 developers worked on Linux kernel 2.6.24, up from 483 for 2.6.11.
