The ROI of robocalls and why the bots keep calling
Summary: It's almost noon and I've received four political robocalls and hour since working hours began. Why do the robots call? There appears to be a return on investment there.
It's almost noon and I've received four political robocalls an hour since working hours began. Why do the robots call? There appears to be a return on investment there.
Don't laugh. You must be thinking: "What moron would vote based on a robo call?" It's not about the vote rate as much as it is reaching some fool that will listen.
Pew Research in 2008 did some robocall research. It found that 81 percent of likely caucus voters in Iowa received a pre-recorded campaign call from your friendly neighborhood robot. In New Hampshire, 68 percent of likely voters in 2008 got a robocall. In Iowa, 44 percent of folks hung up. In New Hampshire, 46 percent usually hung up.
However, 35 percent of Iowa likely voters in 2008 usually listened. In New Hampshire, 19 percent usually listened.
A more recent survey had similar findings. In other words, robocalling is a lot like spam. You cast a wide net and if you hook a few dummies you have a solid return on your investment.
While academics may think those hit rates stink, they actually are pretty good. Why? Robocalls cost near nothing.
Do a Google on robocall services and you get a screen like this:
As you can see Google must be pretty damn happy about robocall text links.
But if you actually click on these sponsored links you see why robocalls are the plague that keeps giving. Let's take the pricing of VoiceShot, which provides you with a do it yourself online call center. VoiceShot will charge you 12 cents for a successful call.
What's a successful call? A successful call is any fool that stays on the line for 60 seconds. So let's say you do 1 million robocalls. Of those calls, 300,000 jokers listen in for a minute. You just reached 300,000 for $36,000. Why wouldn't you do robocalls?
And VoiceShot isn't even the cheapest robocall service.
A company called Homeytel will do robocalls for you at less than a penny a call. Hell, anyone could do a robocall at those rates just to gripe about robocalls. Homeytel's pitch goes like this:
WHAT DO DEMOCRATS, REPUBLICANS, LIBERTARIANS, AND THE TEA PARTY HAVE IN COMMON? They all use HomeyTel voice broadcasting. Why? Because we offer the very best service plus you can exactly budget your campaigns. We have found that a 15-30 second message is more effective than a 60 second message, if the message is clear and timely. Short messages simply deliver more bang for the buck and if your voter list is clean you will realize substantial savings over a per minute usage charge. Most voter lists reach 70-90%.
NEW LOWER RATES! Due to higher usage we have been able to negotiate lower rates and we are passing the savings onto our customers. Thank you loyal customers!
OUR MOST POPULAR PACKAGE NOW LOWER THAN EVER! 100,000 calls live and answering machine, 30-second message, 3 attempts, and up to 3 free campaigns for $1,695.00. (Add $25.00 setup for each campaign over three. Add 10% for each 3 second increment over 30 seconds.)
Add it up and it's obvious why robocalls keep happening. It's cheap. And you may just be successful. Now this robocall ROI equation may change if all you have is a cell phone, but for now the low costs add up for pols.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
They don't work.
Green and Gerber (Yale) have studied political robocalls and they don't work.
More http://www.stoppoliticalcalls.org/ht/d/sp/i/23650/pid/23650
Shaun Dakin
StopPoliticalCalls.org
RE: The ROI of robocalls and why the bots keep calling
RE: ...those mailings we get and don't look at.
Do you mean those glossy and expensive mailings paid for by special interest money that I consign to the trash compactor???? Such environmental waste!!!!
I know, we should insist on an `environmental impact charge` to be imposed on political campaigns that do not use re-cyclable materials in their mailings. OH, and make it VERY high on ALL political parties.
RE: The ROI of robocalls and why the bots keep calling
RE: The ROI of robocalls and why the bots keep calling
RE: The ROI of robocalls and why the bots keep calling
RE: The ROI of robocalls and why the bots keep calling
RE: The ROI of robocalls and why the bots keep calling
RE: The ROI of robocalls and why the bots keep calling
RE: The ROI of robocalls and why the bots keep calling
RE: The ROI of robocalls and why the bots keep calling
RE: The ROI of robocalls and why the bots keep calling
RE: The ROI of robocalls and why the bots keep calling
RE: The ROI of robocalls and why the bots keep calling
RE: The ROI of robocalls and why the bots keep calling
RE: The ROI of robocalls and why the bots keep calling
RE: The ROI of robocalls and why the bots keep calling
So what you are comming straight out to say is that MS should keep the people that put out products that nobody wants to buy, right?
I am basing this on all of your past, and recent posts, so tell us why MS should keep people around that you claim have failed the company?
RE: The ROI of robocalls and why the bots keep calling
RE: The ROI of robocalls and why the bots keep calling
RE: The ROI of robocalls and why the bots keep calling
ahh... they might work. robocalls from the candidate i last voted for increased my dislike for him. but this might not be the result desired by the candidate.