ie8 fix

Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

Three fixes Chromebooks need to succeed

By | August 2, 2011, 7:00am PDT

Summary: Google Chromebooks showed solid momentum in early sales among consumers. However, in order to ultimately attract business users and consumers, three things will have to be fixed.

Google Chromebooks finally arrived this spring and initial sales to consumers have been respectable but Google’s Chromebook subscription plan for businesses has yet to catch on. I spent a lot of time with Google’s CR-48 prototype when it was first released and then with Samsung’s Series 5 Chromebook more recently. While Chromebooks have the potential to win corporate customers, I still think three things need to happen before Chromebooks will attract consumers and businesses in large numbers.

1. Fix Web incompatibilities

The biggest disappointment I had in dealing with Chromebooks was that a surprising number of Web sites simply don’t load correctly. Some of this has to do with the Google Chrome browser in general. There are sites that just don’t work very well in Chrome. Most of this is due to the sites not complying with Web standards (designing for IE) or to incompatibility issues with plug-ins. Much of this is beyond Google’s control, but that doesn’t help much when a site you need to access to do your job doesn’t work. That said, there are also Web sites that should work in Chromebooks but inexplicable don’t. For example, Google Analytics doesn’t load correctly (you can’t change the date range to view, for example). This is bizarre, since Analytics works just fine in Chrome on Windows and Mac. Google needs to work on fixes and workarounds to make more sites accessible on Chromebooks, since the Web is their primary feature.

2. Implement offline access

The other big functionality problem with Chromebooks is that you have to be online at all times in order to use them. If your connection gets spotty or you are somewhere that doesn’t have a good connection (or access is too expensive), then you’re stuck and the Chromebook is completely worthless. Google has promised that offline support is coming, at least for stuff like Google Apps and Google Docs (and there are reports that it’s in testing), but we’re still waiting. Google is also going to need to make an effort to get important third party developers on the bandwagon to make their sites available in offline mode in Chrome.

3. Drop the price tag

Even if Google fixes the page loading and offline problems, Chromebooks will still need one big change to make them a lot more attractive to buyers: They’ve got to get cheaper. The Samsung Series 5 is $430 (Wi-Fi) or $500 (3G) and the Acer Chromebook is $350. That’s still too much to spend for an underpowered machine that doesn’t do anything but surf the Web. At $200-$300, Chromebooks would be a lot more interesting. Businesses can lease Chromebooks for $28/month for three years, which includes some basic support and service. That gives each machine a total cost of over $1000 for the lease period. I think we’ll see just as many (if not more) businesses interested in buying these at two hundred dollars a pop and simply replacing them if they fail. Google and its hardware partners still need to get the price right on Chromebooks, and recent indications are that they may actually raise the price of Chromebooks in the next iteration. That would be a big mistake.

Further reading on Chromebooks

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Jason Hiner is the Editor in Chief of TechRepublic. He writes about the products, people, and ideas that are revolutionizing business with technology.

Disclosure

Jason Hiner

Jason Hiner has nothing to disclose. He doesn't hold investments in the technology companies he covers.

Biography

Jason Hiner

Jason Hiner is the Editor in Chief of TechRepublic, an online trade publication and peer-to-peer community for IT leaders. He is an award-winning journalist who examines the latest trends and asks the big questions about the technology industry. He previously worked as an IT manager in the health care industry.

You can also find him on Twitter, , Facebook, and at JasonHiner.com.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
41
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Three fixes Chromebooks need to succeed
Mah 13th Aug
@facebook@...
#4 Chromebooks have an admin account based web management tool, and they can be centrally managed and locked down - to a far greater extent and with greater ease than a Windows nettop. Centralized web apps are far more manageable than PXE clients running a virtual Windows desktop for example because the Windows VM desktop running on the server still has to be managed and locked down, and managing and locking down a full OS, especially Windows can be a headache.

#5 Unlike PXE clients which are just graphical displays for a conventional desktop, Chromebooks use Ajax/HTML5 as the network communication protocol. This allows them to operate off low bandwidth high latency connections such as the Internet which PXE clients can't do. Another advantage is that the server side resources and overhead for a web app is far lighter than Windows VMs running on a server. They also don't need Windows licenses for each user who just wants to access a web based enterprise app like a CRM ticket management system, or inventory control system for example as a PXE client would. These are real biggies for enterprise use.
0 Votes
+ -
Nice But...
Hasam1991 2nd Aug
Great, I might get one but can I use my iPod with it? and can I sync my iPhone with iTunes?
0 Votes
+ -
iTunes
30otnix 2nd Aug
@Hasam1991 You'll have to ask Apple that, they are in control of how and what can sync with iTunes/iPhones. Better solution would be to switch to Amazon and their real cloud solution. Then there is no need for constant syncing.
0 Votes
+ -
@30otnix
Well they work perfectly on windows.. so I had to ask...
@30otnix And you still come across the problem of what happens when you don't get a connection... Also, I went to use the Cloud Player on my wife's EVO Shift and got a "known issue" error message... this after I spent hours uploading 1.5GB to their site... not overly thrilled right now with the Amazon model!
@30otnix Or run full Linux and sync your device with something much nicer than iTunes, like Banshee. happy
@Hassam1991 Sure you did wink
@tdog219 There is always the download function Amazon provides (that would be identical to the the iCloud solution). Haven't seen your error, but bugs do happen.
@jgm I do run a full Linux on another computer, but IMHO the days of syncing should be over.
@Hasam1991

You use your iPod for business?
0 Votes
+ -
Other things are still missing
facebook@... 2nd Aug
#4 Enterprises would primarily utilize a ChromeBook in the same situations that they would use a PXE boot PC or thin client. Many of the same infrastructure components found in mature thin client products are missing from Chromebooks. Given a choice between a nettop with the management tools and a Chromebook, as an unmanaged device, enterprises will go with net tops.

#5 Chromebooks are still a solution in search of a problem to fix with them. There is no clear "vision" for the technology or any differentiators. With discretionary spending at an all time low, what does Chromebook offer that mature thin client offerings do not?
@facebook@...
They are searching for the "Problem" since late Nineties by Oracle and then Sun Micro.
0 Votes
+ -
@facebook@...
1. Ajax/HTML5 does a lot more than thin PXE boot clients, and more enterprise apps are web based, requiring a web browser rather than a simple remote display device to use them.
2. PXE boot doesn't work outside the LAN.
3. Chromebooks are manageable remotely - far more so and far more easily than Windows desktops or laptops. Google provides a web based management console to do this. Chromebooks are a replacement for Windows desktops and laptops, not a replacement for thin display clients, although with the promised Citrix and VMWare remote desktop connectors, they can do everything that thin clients can do as well.
@facebook@...
#4 Chromebooks have an admin account based web management tool, and they can be centrally managed and locked down - to a far greater extent and with greater ease than a Windows nettop. Centralized web apps are far more manageable than PXE clients running a virtual Windows desktop for example because the Windows VM desktop running on the server still has to be managed and locked down, and managing and locking down a full OS, especially Windows can be a headache.

#5 Unlike PXE clients which are just graphical displays for a conventional desktop, Chromebooks use Ajax/HTML5 as the network communication protocol. This allows them to operate off low bandwidth high latency connections such as the Internet which PXE clients can't do. Another advantage is that the server side resources and overhead for a web app is far lighter than Windows VMs running on a server. They also don't need Windows licenses for each user who just wants to access a web based enterprise app like a CRM ticket management system, or inventory control system for example as a PXE client would. These are real biggies for enterprise use.
0 Votes
+ -
I thought the price was actually going up?
0 Votes
+ -
There is no need for such a device, period. The 'Web only' thing is not going to work.
@owlnet
Wow. I am amazed by your insight. You are nearly the visionary Ballmer is.
@anono

Wow. I am amazed by your snark. You are nearly the poster my evil self is.
0 Votes
+ -
period?
sportmac 2nd Aug
@owlnet
After reading about others getting one for their parents/relatives it I took the plunge and got one for my mom who has been using a pretty old laptop. Since ALL she does is facebook and email it's perfect for her. If her network went down she wouldn't use the thing anyway no matter what was inside.
I don't have to worry about updates or viruses or anything else.
So where is this period thing of which you speak?
@sportmac that does less than equal or better specs netbooks (and laptops)?

Sorry, but his period still stand. The fact that you were dumb enough to pay more for less functionality is not negating his point.

Did you know that you can buy full blow LAPTOPS with better specs for less than the cost of the cheapest Chromebook in the market?
@wackoae I think you're missing this point. His time (not updating/fixing/explaining) windows is worth it.
0 Votes
+ -
@wackoae
Regarding the cost and less for more arguments which are trumpeted out by geeks, computer hobbyists, and Windows columnists - Windows laptops/desktops are fine for computer hobbyists and the like who are hard up for up front cash, but whose time is not worth too much.

Chromebooks zero maintenance features give you more for less in a different way - more time to actually use your computer for work or leisure, and less time wasted on configuring, updating and maintaining Windows and spending time learning how to do this. If your time is valuable then Chromebooks make sense.
0 Votes
+ -
Advice: buy a netbook
FADS_z 2nd Aug
Fixed #1: you can use any web browser.
Fixed #2: Support all offline applications.
Fixed #3: Cheaper, $200~$400 price range.

And much more...
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Three fixes Chromebooks need to succeed
Rama.NET Updated - 2nd Aug
@FADS_z
+1. Yes it doesn't have to be a Windows netbook, but that gives you more flexibility and adaptability.
@FADS_z +1! Never thought Chromebooks would take off. Even an iPad has more utility - and I never thought I'd say that.
@Imrhien .. in the market today can do more than a Chromebook.
0 Votes
+ -
No. No. No.
johnfenjackson@... 2nd Aug
"The other big functionality problem with Chromebooks is that you have to be online at all times in order to use them."
This is rather like saying the problem with a washing machine is that you need water to get the job done.

There is a word for a computer which works in offline mode ... it's called a 'portable'.

The Chromebook MUST be a cheap network terminal ... or it is dead.

In the same vein I am sick and tired of looking at so-called thin client devices ... which cost the same as a cheap desktop.

I am increasingly drawn to the idea that we need to separate the processing unit and the screen via an industry standard connection array. That way I could switch screens (if I wanted a large one) ... or switch between CB, smartphone and PC for the horsepower.

If the cheapest screen costs say $200 I only want to pay $50 for the Google processing unit.
0 Votes
+ -
I agree with the authors Chromebooks need offline mode ASAP.

Chromebooks is just taking a step back in technology. Most unexpensive laptops today can do much more than a Chromebook and have same or less price:

1) Offline work when no Internet access or you don't have enough bandwidth to be online everytime you edit a photo, edit a power point presentation or edit a large document with dozens of MB of size. With normal laptops with Ubuntu Linux you can work in offline mode, you don't need to be sending and receiving your file from the Internet everytime you save your work.

2) Better security. Since desktop OS can encrypt your documents, you can be safe that your data won't be stolen by a hacker, on Chromebooks your documents are on the Internet which is by definition unsafe, a cyber attacker can steal your documents if he is able to hack google servers and all your enterprise documents will be stolen.

3) DVD/CD Drive. On Chromebooks, you can't listen to your CD's, or view any DVD movies while you're traveling in the plane because it simply doesn't support disc drives. You also, can't burn an important data disc for your boss, since Chromebooks don't support CD/DVD burning software.

In short words, Chromebooks are going backwards in technology. Linux distributions like Ubuntu, would be 100% better and support more productive applications than Chromebooks do.
0 Votes
+ -
All your comments sounds like Ballmer's mind happy You have completely forgotten that this Chromebook is invented for niche market. You know who are these people. These are the consumers who are not techy savvy people. And they are so many of them as in "many many many" people who are NOT technical savvy. These consumers does not need to learn how to install, configure, protect, and customize their desktop. And these type of consumers only do are surfing the net, sending emails, social network... Believe me, consumers who only need these features will appreciate chromebook because it's very FASSSST and it will bring the user right away to the web.

Now, if you don't belong to these group of consumers, Google knows that. They didn't built this for you and you don't have to argue with that. The is invented intentionally for a niche market and these market is so fukcing big.
@btraquena@...
true, but that niche market is NOT the enterprise situation. so no big surprise that big business isnt buying them.
@btraquena@... And these non-tech savvy people are going to understand when a website fails to render properly, or certain pictures/videos have a little puzzle piece icon instead of the picture/video it is supposed to have? These same non-tech savvy people are also going to understand why it takes them forever to load/save a document when they are sitting in a hotel room with a shared T1 line being dominated by the dude 3 rooms down streaming Netflix? Just saying...
until you can load other software to lock the system down for Data loss prevention, AV, etc, the enterprise will not adopt it. Otherwise company information can walk right out with these machines.
@tiderulz Playing devil's advocate... Data can't be stored locally on the device, so local DLP should not be a concern. Also, the same mechanismz that prevent loading DLP and AV software SHOULD also prevent malware itself from being loaded.

On the other hand, if you're a company that is leveraging Google Docs, then you're probably not too worried about DLP anyway:)
@tdogg219
copy and paste from information rendered from a secure location isnt a worry? If applications can be loaded on the system to work offline, then data has to be able to be stored locally too, so that you can work when you dont have an internet connection.
0 Votes
+ -
In our office there are two kinds of workers: CSRs and "others". All desktops currently run Windows. In order to get any work done the CSRs need network access to answer emails or access the database. When network access is not there (maybe once or twice a year), they are DIW regardless of windows being able to run local apps. These CSR type jobs are the ones Chromebooks are aimed at. Large corporations will divide users into two categories and allocate hardware accordingly. When the savings can be quantified, companies will seriously consider chromebooks for SOME of their employees. We can be pretty sure that almost ALL of the commenters here are in the "others" group, so obviously we may not see chromebooks working, but perhaps we should look around our office and we may identify some roles that do fit for chromebooks.
0 Votes
+ -
Nor the cloud in general. While I enjoy the Internet I do not want to rely on it to be productive, nor play games, or do anything for that matter. I certainly don't want to store my data on the cloud. What happens to my data if I don't pay a subscription fee? Is all my work gone?

Pagan jim
0 Votes
+ -
If you are considering Chromebooks but need access to Windows apps, you should look at Ericom AccessNow, a pure HTML5 RDP client that enables Chromebook users to connect to any RDP host, including Terminal Server (RDS Session Host), physical desktops or VDI virtual desktops ? and run their applications and desktops in a browser.

Ericom?s AccessNow does not require Java, Flash, Silverlight, ActiveX, or any other underlying technology to be installed on end-user devices ? an HTML5 browser is all that is required.

For more info, and to download a demo, visit:
http://www.ericom.com/html5_rdp_client.asp?URL_ID=708
Respectable my butt. The sales have been bad. These things are not going to succeed, no matter what they do. Why buy this gimped, extremely overpriced product when you can buy a real OS like OS X or Windows 7. Hell, I can buy a decent laptop with Windows 7 for what these things cost.

A browser based OS? C'mon!
0 Votes
+ -
These three shortcomings were obvious long before chromebooks were released. Guess what? Problems did not go away after they came out.
0 Votes
+ -
Translation:
baggins_z 3rd Aug
Chrome needs to become a notebook computer.
0 Votes
+ -
" initial sales to consumers have been respectable"

I hadn't heard any sales figures so I went to the linked article to check it out only to find it was based on a single snapshot of Amazon's best sellers. The Acer ($350) was apparently the #4 slot. The Samsung ($499) was the #10 slot.

Hmmm. I wonder how they're doing now?

The Acer has dropped to #12 and the Samsung has dropped to #23. So much for top 10 "staying power" -- especially when many of the better selling laptops are double or triple (or more) the cost of a Chromebook.

Interestingly, if you read the reviews, many of the positive reviewers were owners of the CR-48. Is it possible that these early adopters are more enamored with the Google brand than the actual value of the product? This would explain the apparent drop off in sales.

I am still curious what a Chromebook offers that a laptop with a traditional OS running Chrome browser doesn't. If this answer were obvious to me then I would probably already own a Chromebook.
0 Votes
+ -
@Rich Miles

Update:

Acer is down to #19
Samsung is down to #32
None of these are a problem for a business.

1. Fix Web incompatibilities:
Web incompatibilities are due largely to not testing for a particular browser and due to use of proprietary browser features like ActiveX. If a company is going to use Chromebooks, then they will test and fix their website to work with the Chrome browser rather than IE. Personally I founf Chrome more compatible with websites in general than IE. It is just internal websites and websites that use proprietary technologies like Silverlight and ActiveX that have issues. Get rid of these and you get rid of the problem.

2. Implement offline access:
Offline access for Google Docs is coming. However in business usage, most people would be using Chromebooks in one of the company's offices in luggable desktop mode (the Google Campus model) rather than remote access mode from outside the office. Here you would have 100% reliable Wifi connection the company's internal LAN/WAN servers, and very high reliability connection to the Internet. You also have 3G as a backup which you don't have on a typical desktop PC. For travel use, for most but not all users, a combination of 3G and WiFi will be reliable, and Google's always connected approach means that the data is always up to date and always backed up in the Cloud. This itself is important in many cases.

3. Drop the price tag
Businesses look at TCO and efficiency advantages, not at scrimping and saving $50 on the initial cost - cash starved computer hobbyists do but not businesses. Just saving on the anti-virus subscriptions will make the Chromebook much cheaper than any Windows netbook or laptop, and the zero maintenance feature of Chromebooks will save a huge amount on labour costs for maintenance and support over Windows desktops or laptops.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix