Union: IBM layoffs accelerating as employees vent
Summary: IBM's employees' union is delivering blow-by-blow accounts of Big Blue's layoffs tonight. The Wall Street Journal reported earlier Wednesday that IBM is looking to cut about 5,000 positions mostly in its global business services unit as it shifts work to India (Techmeme).
IBM's employees' union is delivering blow-by-blow accounts of Big Blue's layoffs tonight.
The Wall Street Journal reported earlier Wednesday that IBM is looking to cut about 5,000 positions mostly in its global business services unit as it shifts work to India (Techmeme).
According to the Alliance@IBM site, 1,674 jobs have been cut in application services with employee reports filtering in. IBM's employee union reckons that 4,000 U.S. jobs are on the chopping block.
Among some of the notable comments:
A letter regarding the transition of work in the Hartford Insurance account:
"Starting next week several Hartford delivery teams will be working directly with fellow IBM team members from India to begin the second phase of our Global delivery solution planned for the Hartford account. The teams will be engaged in a multi-week effort to facilitate knowledge transfer to prepare for migration of specific work activities to global delivery counterparts later in 2009. Your continued support and leadership is critical to ensure our overall success and to ensure we continue to deliver high quality cost effective solutions that IBM committed to the Hartford. Please ensure you and your teams actively support this effort."
And.
I work for IBM Asia Pacific Region and currently with IBM Australia - a 26-year veteran with IBM. Just been told that I am terminated along with many others here, although the region kept reporting increase in business results!
And.
1st line manager confirmed last week that there will considerable pressure to cut jobs, regardless of current staffing levels, workloads etc. Even if a dept. is under budget they will have to cut staff. Hope they remember to be generous with those severance packages - especially considering some of the directions given to us by our managers.
And.
I'm an IBM employee who is often frustrated by the secrecy at the top and IBM's unwillingness to be honest about the layoffs.... err, resource actions. However, I don't think IBM is immune from the global economic forces that are leading to a more global workforce, the shifting of jobs from high-paying countries to lower-paying companies,etc. Do you really expect IBM to be the only company not having layoffs in this economy?
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Smiling Sam does it again
Greedy people like this are what has ruined our economy. Sending more jobs overseas in the midst of our worst economic crisis is tantamount to treason.
Re:Smiling Sam does it again
IBM is a global company. As any company has to do they have to look at growing and shrinking market places and balancing their workforce in order to stay competitive in a global marketplace.
I agree with you that greed has a lot to do with ruining the economy, but it is not limited to the executives, although they seem to be the worst offenders. Many people are looking to get the latest and greatest flat screen tv, suv, and cell phone. That greed has driven up the wage demands and made many countries in the world uncompetitive in a global marketplace.
Not to mention
How can any company hope to compete in a global economy when the very workers at these US plants threaten to put their employers out of business (via strikes) unless they receive some ridiculous compensation for even the lowest of unskilled jobs?
Why would anyone in the world purchase my products when they can purchase my competitors for half the price, the difference in cost attributed to nothing more then the employees compensation packages?
A janitor or stock person position is not a 65 thousand dollar a year job.
True, to a point
Of course, most people don't care to know that those big screen TVs or DVD players or shoes were made by a kid kept locked in a factory in a Third World country. All they care about is getting the best price.
But what bothers me most about the off-shoring trend is that it's being done in favor of lower cost solutions which maximize U.S. incomes and employment. There are many small towns that can provide a very good workforce at reduced rates. I used to work for a mortgage company that maintained a call center in North Dakota that was substantially less expensive than operating the same call center in, say, Houston, where they were based. It may not have been cheaper than offshoring, but, I think it was more responsible as a corporation. Such things are possible, if we take the time to look.
Asia working conditions
YOU'VE really bought the "global marketplace" concept, haven't you?
Instead of sending all those jobs (along with their income and tax revenue) to India and resulting in thousands of Americans unemployed, why couldn't IBM have retained all or most of them at lower salaries?
Hmmmmm?
Or at least OFFERED that kind of thing to the people being laid off?
No, better to just kick them out on the street (while mister CEO gorges on his huge bonuses), depriving THEM of their salaries, the American economy of what they would spend from those salaries, and the U.S. government of the tax revenue from those salaries. No, just send it all to some other freakin' country.
What people with your "the global market should rule all and the United States should just let our economy level out with everybody else on the planet until we're a third world country ourselves" attitude just don't get is that companies like IBM that are pulling this crap are doing it for short-term profits vs. what is good for our country and the American people in the long term.
Because salaries are just part of the problem.
doing business in America along with the 2nd
highest corporate tax rate in the world, with
assurances from the government that it's only
going to get worse.
Atlas is starting to shrug. This is just the
beginning.
Guess who has the #1 corporate tax ?
Um, I don't think so.
method, ranks around 10, whereas the US is in
the top 3.
http://www.finfacts.com/irelandbusinessnews/publ
ish/article_10003326.shtml
It's all in the spin I guess
The 39% taxation is only on the first 335k of taxable income. From 336k to 10Mil the rate is 34%, and let's face it there are not going to be too many 335k companies offshoring.
India's tax rate tops out above 40%
Not to mention that there are enough deductions and loopholes to allow big companies like IBM, Dell, Microsoft Etc to not pay anywhere near the 35%
http://www.smartmoney.com/investing/economy/high-corporate-tax-rate-is-misleading-22463/
I still don't think so; you're forgetting state taxes
kinds of taxes, as well as many localities.
It's the sum of all of these taxes that make the
US #2, not just federal.
Add to this additional taxes that have been
promised, such as a "carbon" tax and the
inevitable "inflation" tax.
Again, if this is just "spin", they why are they
so anxious to leave?
Libertarian/Conservative/Corporatism/Fascist B.S.
Of course the costs of doing business in the U.S. are higher than the costs of doing business in the country w/the highest corporate income tax in the world (India). Salaries are higher in the U.S. as they s/b for IBM and others, because IBM and other corporations are reaping the benefits a better infrastructure or 'commons' as described by America's founders. W/o the U.S. infrastructure for these corporations there would be not even be an option to cheap-source to India. In addition, a more stable legal system, roads etc. are all worth something real to any business.
A corporation's purpose is not just to make money they are also supposed to promote goods or services and they exist at society's discretion. Corporations are not natural persons and never were, they have no natural rights, they only have rights that society allows them to have.
These rights and rules of corporations could be changed tomorrow if politicians were forbidden from taking bribes (a.k.a. campaign contributions) from any corporation as they used to be forbidden.
We have rules in societies so that one does not have to live in the jungle like animals. Taxes are what corporations and natural persons pay for services to live in a civilized society. One such service is to be allowed to form corporations.
These layoffs are about nothing, but cheap wages so that the greedy bastages at the top can make more money than they can ever spend. Never forget, the founders of America were against inherited wealth and large concentrations of wealth for a reason. They knew it leads to despotism.
If you want to play association games, it's okay with me...
long as it's okay if I associate you with Karl
Marx and his less than industrious followers.
So now that the name calling is over...
India does not have the highest corporate tax
rate in the world. In fact, their effective
rate (as so many here like to call it) is well
below the US, somewhere around 10th.
But then again, you also probably think that
corporations actually pay taxes, which they
actually do not. In order to exist, they must
pass whatever expenses they have on through the
cost of their goods and services, which are
ultimately borne by consumers. So by having a
high corporate tax rate, all you are really
doing is making your corporations less
competitive against other state's corporations.
But this is hardly a line of thought that's
popular amongst statists or union cronies.
"Greedy people"?
printing trillions of dollars and have promised
higher taxes for the profitable companies that
remain? It's almost as if they are begging
industry to leave.
RE: Union: IBM layoffs accelerating as employees vent
MADOFF + STANFORD + DREIER + SATYAM + ALBERT HU = PROSKAUER ROSE
Investors who have been burned in these scams should start to seek redress from the lawyers who were involved with these scams. I personally have been trying to notify regulators and authorities of a ONE TRILLION DOLLAR scam that is putting states like New York and Florida at huge risk, as well as, companies like Intel, Lockheed, SGI and IBM. The states and companies involved in the fraud fail to acknowledge the risk exposing shareholders and citizens to impending liabilities. Investigators, courts and federal agents ignoring the crimes and evidence, including a car-bombing attempt on my life. I know how Harry Markopolos felt trying to expose Madoff in a world without regulation.
Did I hear Proskauer Rose is involved in Madoff (involved many clients too) and acted as Allen Stanford's attorney. Investors who lost money in these scams should start looking at the law firm Proskauer's assets for recovery. First, Proskauer partner Gregg Mashberg claims Madoff is a financial 9/11 for their clients, if they directed you to Madoff sue them. Then, Proskauer partner Thomas Sjoblom former enforcement dude for SEC and Allen Stanford attorney, declares PARTY IS OVER to Stanford employees and advises them to PRAY, this two days before SEC hearings. Then at hearings, he lies with Holt to SEC saying she only prepared with him but fails to mention Miami meeting at airport hanger. Then Sjoblom resigns after SEC begins investigation and sends note to SEC disaffirming all statements made by him and Proskauer, his butt on fire. If you were burned in Stanford sue Proskauer.
Proskauer Rose and Foley & Lardner are also in a TRILLION dollar FEDERAL LAWSUIT legally related to a WHISTLEBLOWER CASE also in FEDERAL COURT. Marc S. Dreier, brought in through Raymond A. Joao of Meltzer Lippe after putting 90+ patents of mine in his own name, is also a defendant in the Federal Case.
The Trillion Dollar suit according to Judge Shira Scheindlin is one of PATENT THEFT, MURDER & A CAR BOMBING. For graphics on the car bombing visit www.iviewit.tv.
The Federal Court cases
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Docket 08-4873-cv - Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al. - TRILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT
Cases @ US District Court - Southern District NY
(07cv09599) Anderson v The State of New York, et al. - WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT
(07cv11196) Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al.
(07cv11612) Esposito v The State of New York, et al.,
(08cv00526) Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, et al.,
(08cv02391) McKeown v The State of New York, et al.,
(08cv02852) Galison v The State of New York, et al.,
(08cv03305) Carvel v The State of New York, et al., and,
(08cv4053) Gizella Weisshaus v The State of New York, et al.
(08cv4438) Suzanne McCormick v The State of New York, et al.
John L. Petrec-Tolino v. The State of New York -
Short Term Thinking - Long Term Risk
Hear Hear!
agreed!!!
Mushroom Clouds
I'll bet IBM hardware was used in that weapons development program.
much worse than that