Virgin Galactic unveils SpaceShipTwo; Plans open architecture spaceship
Summary: Virgin Galactic on Wednesday unveiled designs for SpaceShipTwo and the WhiteKnightTwo, two vehicles that are designed to usher in private spaceflight. The technology behind the system will have an open architecture "like Linux," said officials.
Virgin Galactic on Wednesday unveiled designs for SpaceShipTwo and the WhiteKnightTwo, two vehicles that are designed to usher in private spaceflight. The technology behind the system will have an open architecture "like Linux," said officials.
In an event at the American Museum at Natural History
in New York (see gallery right), Virgin Galactic unveiled the first product of venture to manufacture a reusable spacecraft and its launch craft. In July 2005, Burt Rutan, President of Scaled Composites and Sir Richard Branson, founder of the Virgin Group of companies, formed a company to manufacture and design SpaceShipTwo, a suborbital craft, and WhiteKnightTwo, a launch system.
"Our vision of White Knight 2 would be part of a much longer development program. Have open architecture like Linux to allow other people to develop new vehicles and revolutionize new ind
ustrial uses of space," said Will Whitehorn, president of Virgin Galactic, Virgin's spaceline.
Whitehorn clarified the open architecture point a bit: He said that if interested parties come to Virgin and Scaled Composites they can use key points such as WhiteKnightTwo's wing to build new aircraft. "We will work with people that come to work with us to do new things with the WhiteKnightTwo. If people come to us we'll work with them."
Whitehorn added that interested parties are already in discussions about building off of the properties of WhiteKnightTwo, but wasn't going to name names. Overall, Virgin Galactic wasn't detailing technical details behind the spaceship effort.
Branson noted that the system has the architecture that could be developed into a passenger carrying system, launch payloads and further science. Branson and Rutan argue that space flight and commerce will be as big as telecommunications, the Internet and information technology in terms of innovation and economic gains.
The event is ongoing, but I thought I'd get the images up. The big model is the launch system. The smaller one is SpaceShipTwo. As Whitehorn notes: "The thing is covered with windows."
SpaceShipTwo is 60 percent complete with test flights later this year. WhiteKnightTwo is 70 percent completed. Rutan said that WhiteKnightTwo will be the largest all carbon composite plane--he noted that Boeing's 787 is 50 percent carbon composite.
The event featured a bevy of customers and a few Virgin Galactic astronauts, who were running around in black Puma jumpsuits.
Key points in SpaceShipTwo, which has five ordered by Virgin Galactic:
- Windows are 18 inches in diameter;
- Two systems move landing gear or tail so if one fails there's another system to pick up the slack;
- Designed to be flown twice a day;
- Roomy cabin with height roughly 7 feet;
- The configuration is designed to reenter the atmosphere at any angle. "This vehicle is designed to go into the atmosphere in the worst case straight in or upside down and it'll correct. This is designed to be at least as safe as the early airliners in the 1920s," said Rutan. Later in the press conference, Rutan was asked to clarify that 1920s comment. He said: "Don't believe anyone that tells you that the safety will be the same as a modern airliner, which has been around for 70 years." Rutan also noted that SpaceShipTwo will have to be 100 times more safe than government space travel.
- SpaceShipTwo and WhiteKnight are designed to be production vehicles. "If we can stay on schedule to build 40 or 50 they will reach 100,000s of people," said Rutan. "This is not a small program."
Virgin Galactic executives spent a lot of time talking about safety--how its astronauts of all ages could handle training, failsafe landings and other features. Why? Safety will be critical in luring the masses to take a spaceflight.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Beautiful
Don't count on it.
achieving an orbit let alone escape velocity.
Small steps
Astronauts get their wings only after 50 miles
So, 50 miles is considered spaceflight by NASA and the military.
Hmm the term "sub-orbital"
Definition of Edge of Space
The U.S. military defines an astronaut as someone who has flow to an altitude of 50 miles resulted two X-15 pilots were awarded their astronaut wings in 2006, as they flew higher than 50 miles in the 1960s, but at the time they were not considered to be astronauts.
Virgin Galactic is not going to be involved in this discussion as they will fly their passengers high enough to exceed either limit. The prototype, SpaceShipOne,in 2004 flew to a height of 112 kilometers twice in one week to win the $10 million Ansari X Prize. The tourist craft will also comfortably exceed the 100 km mark. If you are going to pay $200K you need bragging rights.
Assuming you fly from Albuqurque, you will probably see Los Angeles on a clear day, but not as far as San Francisco. I think it will probably be much more interesting to take the flight out of Northern Sweden and see the Aurora Borealis. If you are shelling out $200K, who care about the cost of getting to Sweden. Of course, if that proves popular, they may just raise the price of flying out of Europe.
There is discussion of developing orbital tourism flights (sub-orbital means you don't circle the earth), but a fight will initially cost several million dollars a seat.
"not even close"
As for 'not even close', yer dead wrong wilbur. It's very close. It's not orbital, but it's a stone's throw from it.
BobJ
Here's a quote for you, I can't remember who said it but im not gonna take the credit. "When a learned man says that something is possible, he is almost always right. When a learned man says something is impossible, he is almost always wrong."
Read yer history, we've been doing 'impossible' things for over 10000 years. Most of them in the last 200.
Impractical? That makes no sense
Although I seriously doubt they'll build 50 of these, I do expect that there will be some success from this venture.
Remember, the Wright Brothers were a fringe private venture too, and look where that lead. Heck, only 30 years ago, the idea of the personal computer you are now using to read this post was considered an "impractical" by almost every "expert" in the field.
Have a little faith.
30 years ago ...
30 years ago, 1978, I was playing with prototype kits and doing programming. Even then it was obvious which way things were going.
To get real 'heads in the sand' you need to go a little further back than that. I think the definitive put-down came from Tom Watson, then IBM chairman, who said in 1958: "I think there is a world market for about five computers."' And by that he meant mainframes.
It may have been obvious to you...
The point is that at any time, the "experts" in any given field can by blinded by their own sense of what they think is possible and viable.
Obvious
Any trace of DEC today? Only in museums.
BobJ
Don't think about space tourism...
Remember, what killed the Concorde wasn't the cost, it was the fact that 9/11 killed all the people who made the choice to fly supersonic because they saw "getting there fast" as less expensive than spending the time a normal commercial flight takes.
Actually...
The idea of intercontinental travel is far more intriguing. Years ago, the US government and the status-quo aerospace industry killed the ?Orient Express? because, like the Concorde, it was going to cost far too much to develop and build, and would never justify the many-tens-of-billions that it was going to cost. It would be a joy to see Rutan & Branson achieve an economically viable service for only a few hundred million.
White Knight 2 = Pegasus launch platform?
Launch Costs
I was just wondering if you knew the launch costs.
Thanks
Tourism In Space
Here, they're offering Space, which whether it's 60 miles or 100 people will want to do. The big question is can they do it at a cost that people can afford to pay and will encourage people to do it again. If not they won't build 5 aircraft, oh correction spacecraft.
After all what really was so great about climbing mountains anyways...
RE: Virgin Galactic unveils SpaceShipTwo; Plans open architecture spaceship
RE: Virgin Galactic unveils SpaceShipTwo; Plans open architecture spaceship
One thing I don't quite understand though is why NASA comes screaming into the atmosphere but the Virgin Galactic vehicle "feathers" in?
Anyway, very exciting stuff and I am glad to be alive in this era of new horizons.
A whisper versus a shout
These ships are not concerned with going further or staying longs so they can theoretically do so slower. Lots of variables to this and we are over simplifying it but you get the idea.
A whisper versus a shout
Thanks