ie8 fix

Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

Welcome to AT&T's tiered pricing world: Will Verizon follow?

By | June 2, 2010, 8:11am PDT

Summary: AT&T overhauled its data plan pricing and put an end to unlimited plans, but the success or failure of such a move will depend on whether competitors like Verizon Wireless follow.

AT&T overhauled its data plan pricing and put an end to unlimited plans, but the success or failure of such a move will depend on whether competitors like Verizon Wireless follow.

The hubbub over the pricing changes is fierce. First, there’s the squawking about the end of unlimited data plans (even though AT&T is grandfathering in current users on those models). Then there’s the tethering that is finally coming to the Apple iPhone. And then there’s the usual moaning and groaning.

In a nutshell, AT&T now has a $15 data plan at for 200 MB of data; a $25 plan for 2 GB of data; and tethering for an additional $20 a month.

Analysts are already handicapping the fallout from AT&T’s move, but one big question mark revolves around Verizon Wireless. Verizon could match AT&T’s plan and include caps too. Or Verizon could use AT&T’s plan as a marketing hammer and court heavy data users to its network.

Barclay Capital analyst James Ratcliffe said in a research note:

Key will be competitive response, if other carriers (especially Verizon) use new plan as marketing tool or follow with similar moves. If Verizon doesn’t follow, it could create significant adverse selection problem for Verizon - customers who know they’re very high users could migrate to Verizon.

Simply put, heavy users going to Verizon will tax its network so maybe it has to match AT&T’s move. Does any carrier really want data hogs?

Other analysts note that Verizon is likely to follow AT&T’s lead. Oppenheimer analyst Timothy Horan said:

Tiered smartphone data pricing is positive for the entire communications industry, as data usage will continue to grow, which will provide more consistent and visible long-term revenue growth. We expect VZ and others to implement similar plans. There should be little impact on ARPUs and revenues. While we have been waiting for this move for a while, we are not sure what drove the specific timing other than probably very high-end iPad and iPhone users continuing to pressure AT&T’s network and the need to get ahead of the new iPhone with tethering capabilities.

And that brings us to a few other comments about AT&T’s pricing moves. The caps on data usage could alleviate AT&T’s network strain while encouraging more subscribers to use higher-priced plans.

Macquarie analyst Phil Cusick said:

We see three impacts over time: 1) some reduction in data ARPU per sub or at least slower growth near term, but 2) higher long-term penetration of data, and 3) more ability to monetize customer usage and less risk on the network from abusers.

Indeed, there could be real returns in moving to a tiered data model. If that’s the case, AT&T’s data pricing plan overhaul is likely to be just the first volley.

Related:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic.

Disclosure

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan has nothing to disclose. He doesn’t hold investments in the technology companies he covers.

Biography

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic. He was most recently Executive Editor of News and Blogs at ZDNet. Prior to that he was executive news editor at eWeek and news editor at Baseline. He also served as the East Coast news editor and finance editor at CNET News.com. Larry has covered the technology and financial services industry since 1995, publishing articles in WallStreetWeek.com, Inter@ctive Week, The New York Times, and Financial Planning magazine. He's a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism and the University of Delaware.

For daily updates, follow Larry on Twitter.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
27
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Welcome to AT&T's tiered pricing world: Will Verizon follow?
jackson1984-24316069205748857739440257893812 11th Oct
I may perhaps mulberry outlets should certainly state, you plucked ur phrases completely. The knowledge and info you gave are very well positioned.
0 Votes
+ -
the real problem
voyager529 2nd Jun 2010
Will be the overages. While I'm sure that the 1% of users that used north of 5GB of data on an unlimited plan are going to cry foul and AT&T will say "don't let the door hit you on the way out, thanks for the ETF", I'll also venture to guess that the majority of users are more afraid of going over the limits, and the extortionate overages that can very easily occur. Sure, "most users" can probably get by with 200MB or less per month, but how will users know how much data they've used? is there an app for that?

I think that AT&T could do well by using one of these two compromises:

1.) 200MB of 3G coverage, EDGE after that. If you wanna saturate the line at a whopping 5KBytes/sec, go for it. If you want more 3G, call and add it for that month.

1b.) have an EDGE-only tiers with double the transfer cap.

2.) Instead of rote overages, bump to the next tier automatically for that month, or give the customer the option to disable data once the limit has been reached.

And the in general thing that should be added regardless: Have the customer specify a maximum price they're willing to pay in a given month, with the option to have the bill continue to climb at the explicit permission of the account holder. $20-$30 in overages is one thing. These $7,000 cellular bills that have been discussed on ZDNet and elsewhere are quite another.

AT&T can make this work for as long as they can slightly bleed customers, but if people start getting huge bills due to data, they'll start to question whether the data is really worth the price they're paying.

Joey
@voyager529 Your "idea" is very customer centric but why is the onus on the carrier and not the consumer? Networks already give you a plethora of tools to monitor your usage. Crying negligance because you are using data within the guidelines of your data usage plan isnt acceptable. For Verizon, on my Droid there is an application that I can use put out by Verizon, I can download a 3rd party tool, I can log into Verizonwireless.com or dial #DATA (#3282). All of it will report the data usage. All the idiots running up $7k-$15k bills are the ones violating the TOS by illegally tethering and other stuff like that. Responsibility does (and rightfully should) fall on the customer - they make the tools available to them.
@JT82 1) it's not particularly obvious when you are going over quota - they should allow customers to cap data spending and even check that box by default. But they won't because the 'plan + overage' paradigm is very profitable for them. 2) The tethering thing is not 'illegal' - it is just against the TOS, which is a document in tiny tiny print. No consumer ever reads it and the telco attorneys know it.

You are right about consumer responsibility. But the telcos should also be responsible. A $7k to $15k bill is a failure on their part, as well as the consumer's.
@JT82

There is a free app (for iPhone and Blackberry) from AT&T.

http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/at-t-mywireless-mobile/id309172177?mt=8
Bad on ya, ATT! Many have stuck by you, despite troubles. And now you turn on us, as though it was our fault?!

If VZ is wise, they will NOT follow! Clearly the strain on the network is due to user demand for bandwidth. Instead of going back to the old model of limiting the user, the unlimited paradigm must reign. Users do NOT want to check in the midst of usage whether they are about to cross their monthly threshold. We're busy trying to accomplish other tasks. Build out your networks. The carrier that doesn't try to limit me will get my business.
0 Votes
+ -
It's perfectly logical
becabill 2nd Jun 2010
@techboy_z
and sounds like a great business decision to me. Nobody's going to sell you unlimited gasoline for a fixed monthly charge just because you want to drive 24/7. I hope Verizon follows and reduces costs for reasonable and moderate users. And watch out - Congress may decide the airwaves belong to the people after all and slap you with a heavy usage tax! It would be totally justified.
@becabill I use my G1 as the sole internet provider for me and my room mate. Its handy and no matter what my internet charges are a flat $30 rate.

For all of you who think ATT is doing a good thing (essentially you iPhone users) read this article :

http://getyourgadgetsgoing.com/2010/06/03/how-att-will-empty-your-pocket/

it breaks down how ATT is trying to trap you with statistics that mislead and deceive. Its true that i am an Android user but i hate to see companies take our hard earned money so this isn;t even about the whole Android-iPhone war. This is just be looking after my fellow consumers...so just check out the article the reply to me with thoughts
0 Votes
+ -
Verizon will have to do likewise
oncall 2nd Jun 2010
Taking Verizon's mifi router as an example. It's $60/5GB/mo or $39/250MB/mo mifi router with its $50/$100GB overage fees will not be competitive. They will have to come up with better options.
Verizon will definitely move to some kind of tiered pricing model. VZW CEO Lowell McAdam alluded to as much. If it's reasonable, I'm for his "buckets of megabytes" model, provided the "one device/one subcription" model goes away. Heck, I could have a smartphone, usb modem, and an embedded data card in a netbook and still stay under 5 gig a month on 3G. But I don't like paying $60+60+30=150/mo for the privilidge.
@podstolom Absolutely agree. I have the USB 3G mobile broadband at home because it is the only solution (other than satellite) above dialup speeds available where I live, but it cost's $60 a month for 5gig. In two and a half years I have never exceeded 2gigs and average about 1.4 gigs usage. It would be great if I could use a smartphone and mobile broadband on one account, as I still would never reach 5 gigs. But as you pointed out, that's $120 and more than I can justify paying, so no smart phone for me.

If they offered a "data access plan" for one price but let me use multiple devices to access that data, I would be a very happy customer.
0 Votes
+ -
Die in a fire.
Been_Done_Before 2nd Jun 2010
@lnlm54t
I hate spammers with a passion.. get a real job. stop being a monkey.
0 Votes
+ -
1. They told the FCC that their unlimited plans made certain functionality obsolete, so having services that catered to non-unlimited plans was a no go. FAIL
2. I cant imagine they would limit corporate users. Corporate accounts would flee their services.
3. Suprised apple hasnt had a cow yet. The IPhone depends on the data network and their revenue depends on the app/itunes stores which run primarily over the data network. If this doesnt get apple to abandon AT$T, i dont know what will.
4. Verizon has way more corporate users than AT$T, they will most likely stick with unlimited plans, but i imagine they may offer a cheaper limited plan. Not sure though, they are pushing the droid and being partnered with google, who owns alot of dark fiber, and the fact that they have fiber running to most of their towers, i dont see them caring about data traffic load as much.
0 Votes
+ -
@Been_Done_Before
and besides, the land - line (fiber OR copper) net isn't the limit, RF bandwidth is.
I despise AT&T, their landline AND cellular service sucks, I went to Verizon because of AT&T's abysmal coverage and reliability. Perhaps they could improve their system if they could reclaim that wasted bandwidth - more channels for more voice users. Besides, it's all digital now, so it *all data* anyway.
0 Votes
+ -
$15 for 20 minutes of video...
Feldwebel Wolfenstool 2nd Jun 2010
...simply awesome. Keep your debit card handy.
In the world of Wifi, does data really matter? I spend 90% of my time near a hotspot. I have avoided data plans thus far because I really don't want to pay $30 for the privilege to do something I can do faster for free at home or work. I think it is a good idea to allow tiered pricing. Smart phones are cool, data charges are not.
If they're smart they'll lower their all you can eat price and take a huge chunk of AT&T's customers. iphones have already become the anti hip thing. Smart iphone users will avoid renewing their contracts this summer as there will be many cooler phones out this fall for the Christmas shopping season.
0 Votes
+ -
Apply to DataConnect Plans?
evotz2 2nd Jun 2010
Do these prices apply to AT&T's DataConnect (USB) plans?

The 2GB option, while still a little low, would be more appealing to individuals who are unable to get high-speed Internet and are stuck with dialup Internet. I could see this as being an option for replacing that. Although I'd still have questions about the length of contract and whether or not if the plan automatically upgrades to an extra 1GB when you reach your quota or if you have to explicitly tell it to.

If Verizon were to follow suit, they might offer 3 or 4GB for $30/mo to help offset AT&T's model.
0 Votes
+ -
Sprint
Playdrv4me 2nd Jun 2010
Well, this will be a boon for Sprint. Since unlike LTE, ClearWi is really just a big out-door Wi-Fi network, it will allow them to talk up the ability to run 4G without limits. It will take time to be deployed throughout the country, but eventually it will have similar coverage to EVDO.

It's not like this is a surprise by the way... ATT has to re-allocate all that iPad 3G bandwidth (which is TRUE unlimited at 30.00 nonetheless) from SOMEwhere. Guess its the smart-phone users who have to carry the burden.
@Playdrv4me That is why I am on Sprint.
0 Votes
+ -
Hey--
becabill 2nd Jun 2010
@Playdrv4me
ALL wireless users are already paying the price for super-high speed users anyway.
0 Votes
+ -
Sigh...
Notas Badoff 2nd Jun 2010
So they expunge the grunge _just_ as I post.
0 Votes
+ -
Sprint Still Wins hard
Jimster480 2nd Jun 2010
They used to have truely unlimited, but now its 5GB for $15. Sprint's prices are so much better than other carriers its crazy. Unfortunately they don't have all the best phones. But it matters little to business users who need reliable phones for calls, email, and text. And can do without the million useless apps that the iPhone has.

I am on a corporate plan and my share of the bill is $24 a month. And that is including unlimited calls to any mobile phone, unlimited nights and weekends starting at 6PM, unlimited text picture and video messages, 5GB of data to be used as I please (including tethering, since its enabled by default), and 1000 Anytime Landline minutes.
0 Votes
+ -
AT&T wireless screwed up in their planning and research (if any was done at all) work leading up to the start of their 3G. They got the load and distribution numbers wrong and have not been able to address it even after a couple of years. I'm not suggesting it's a trivial fix but it's not self service triple bypass either.

The only certainty is that demand for data access over the air will continue to grow and at an accelerated rate. All AT&T is doing now is stalling and perhaps make a few bucks while they're at it. Fortunately for them and unfortunately for the consumers, the rest of the industry isn't much better.
COMPARING AT&T'S NEW RATES VERSUS VERIZON'S RATES:

FOR INDIVIDUAL PLANS IN THE UNITED STATES:

VERIZON:

Unlimited Talk = $70 a month
Unlimited Text = $20 a month
25 MB Data = $10 a month --- STUPID. Almost all users will exceed this.
5 GB Data = $30 a month
Tethering = $30 a month extra

Data over 5 GB = $50 per GB.

-----

AT&T:

Unlimited Talk = $70 a month
Unlimited Text = $20 a month
200 MB Data = $15 a month --- covers 68% of iPhone users.
2 GB Data = $25 a month --- covers 98% of iPhone users.
3 GB Data = $35 a month
Tethering = $20 a month extra

Data over 3 GB = $10 per GB.

-----

NOTES:

AT&T's rates are very favorable compared to Verizon's rates.

AT&T's Tethering rate is less than Verizon's

For the 98% of users who use less than 2 GB a month, AT&T is $5 a month cheaper than Verizon, saving $60 a year. With tethering, AT&T is $15 a month cheaper than Verizon, saving $180 a year.

Ideally, AT&T should also have a limit of 5 GB a month, like Verizon. This makes it easier to use video conferencing on the new iPhones. After all, AT&T in the 1970s did envision someday having video conferencing on phones. The 5GB limit would still be a good cutoff point for heavy data users.
0 Votes
+ -
Someone will offer unlimited plans.
tonyhunterajh 18th Jun 2010
If Verizon does the AT&T song and dance with this I'll move to another carrier who wants to give me bang for my buck instead of "banging" me in the butt!
0 Votes
+ -
Great!!! thanks for sharing this information to us!
seslisohbet seslichat
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Welcome to AT&T's tiered pricing world: Will Verizon follow?
jackson1984-24316069205748857739440257893812 11th Oct
I may perhaps mulberry outlets should certainly state, you plucked ur phrases completely. The knowledge and info you gave are very well positioned.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix