What iOS 6 means for Microsoft: not a damn thing
Summary: What do Apple's WWDC announcements mean for Microsoft and its Windows 8 plans? Nothing.
Aren't you tired of people pitting Apple against Microsoft in the mobile space? I am.
Sure, the two tech giants compete directly, but one is the market leader and the other is just getting off the ground. If Microsoft just launched its mobile rocket, Apple's already on the moon.
In the desktop space, of course, it's the other way around.
So it's not really fair to write a post like Brian Caulfield did over at Forbes, attempting to gauge just how much the latest version of Apple's mobile operating system matters to the folks in Redmond.
If Microsoft screws up with its effort to stretch a new interface, dubbed ‘Metro,’ across personal computers and tablets with Windows 8, Cook won’t give anyone a reason not to switch.
This couldn't be further from the truth.
Most Americans in the publishing industry use Apple products -- I'm typing this on a Macbook Pro -- but in return the view can be extremely limited. The truth is this: worldwide, Microsoft dominates the desktop space (92% vs. Apple's 6%); Apple dominates the mobile space (relative to Microsoft), feature phones excepted; and neither company gives a lick what the other is doing.
That's not to say there isn't a lot of pressure on Microsoft to succeed with its Metro-ified Windows 8; there have not been higher expectations for the company since it released Windows XP, in the heyday of the desktop experience. (In many ways, the Windows 8 launch more closely resembles the Windows 3.1-Windows 95 progression -- a dramatic shift, but still early in the overall maturation of the desktop space.)
But the pressure is all internal. This isn't a question of whether Microsoft can beat Apple; this is a question of whether the company can get its act together to deliver a platform that really works for consumers and businesses across multiple devices.
On the desktop, it's not Windows 8 versus OS X, it's Windows 8 versus Windows 7 -- rolling out a product that's worth upgrading to.
In mobile, it's not Windows 8 versus iOS 6, it's Windows Phone 8 versus Windows Phone 7 -- rolling out a product that's mature enough to take on the competition directly.
So when Apple makes its announcements this afternoon, Microsoft might be watching, but only in passing interest. It's got bigger fish to fry -- namely, executing on its plans and making the right moves to make it easier to do so. (Should it acquire Nokia? I argue yes. So does Matthew Miller.)
Our editor-in-chief Larry Dignan says Microsoft deserves some credit for putting its cash cow on the line. I think his point illustrates mine nicely: Redmond's biggest rival right now is itself, not Apple.
Author's note: The original version of this post included mobile statistics which, in hindsight, I don't have a high degree of confidence in. I've stripped them out, though it doesn't change the argument.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
I Agree
Be wary of buying Nokia...
A fair point
In any case, that kind of decision comes down to this: is it more expensive to build, or to buy? I wonder.
You must be joking, right?
Put a different way: if Microsoft irritates you are you going to either a) swap to a different operating system, or b) not buy another computer. If Apple irritates you are you going to a) go the 'droid, or b) not bother replacing your phone? Duh.
Contrary to what ccrockett said, this is not "analysis" this is "opinion", same as you get at a bar or the lunch room.
You're speaking from one point of view.
By the way -- we don't mind being the tech industry water cooler here at ZDNet. The difference between us and the folks gathered at your office/bar/cafeteria is that we spend 8, 10, 12 hours a day immersed in all of it, talking to executives and customers and analysts to figure out what's going on (and what will go on in the near future).
Nothing wrong with basing your views on your personal experiences, or perhaps on what you've read in upstanding tech publications, but we'd like to think we're a bit more prepared than the average person to connect the dots. We're certainly trying.
You said that right
Pretty much sums up bloggers knowledge...
- This pretty much sums up bloggers knowledge about technology
Not really.
Not really +1
More likely it sums up the type of people who can appreciate a better platform.
Unlike you, who clearly can't handle the fact that even ONE person might have the temerity to be NOT inextricably wedded to Microsoft.
Of course Miller lovesWP7
Hmmm.
You mean Matt Miller aka palmsolo. Could you please provide links to validate your claim that he is Microsoft Employee.
You'd hope he was getting paid as...
Miller is a naval architect.
From Miller's Bio
@JJF
This does NOT constitute proof that Miller is a paid Microsoft employee or compensated by Microsoft in any way. I beta tested Guild Wars, City of Heroes, and Star Wars The Old Republic but I am not employed by any of the design firms or any of the game studios. All this proves is that he is biased towards Microsoft - which is obvious as he likes his WP7 device. I'm biased towards Apple as far as mobile devices as I like my iPhone, HTC as I think the Thunderbolt is the best Android device I've used, Barnes and Noble as I like my Nook Color, and yes towards Microsoft as I like Windows 7. None of that means I'm getting paid or even any swag for any of those companies.
So your fanatical conspiracy theory is - without any proof in the form of pay stubs - just that: a theory.
@JJF and other ABMers
NonFanboy
Better than being a navel architect!
I keep asking you
@JJF
Come on dude, cough up the proof! Prove me wrong! Prove that Miller is a Microsoft shill... Thing is you are unable to do so and rather than admit your hatred has no real base you'd much rather bury the truth.