Which part of "share" didn't you understand?

Which part of "share" didn't you understand?

Summary: It seems like everyone is just dying to add social features to their online tools these days. One example: Google recent move to expose your "shared" items from Google Reader to your Gmail contacts.

SHARE:

It seems like everyone is just dying to add social features to their online tools these days. One example: Google recent move to expose your "shared" items from Google Reader to your Gmail contacts. Actually, I don't think that this is such a bad idea, but there are other opinions about that.

Scoble thinks that the Reader team should have done a better job of implementing granular privacy controls. Part of me agrees with him, but I wonder, how will we all ever manage fine grained privacy controls on hundreds of sites? You thought having to keep passwords straight for all those sites was tough?

I'm more inclined to wonder who exactly people thought they were "sharing" their news items with and whether they understood the meaning of share. I never had any expectation but that anything I shared would be publicly accessible--not because I looked, but because that's what "share" communicated to me.

The real answer is user-control, but not in the form of fine grained privacy controls, as Robert suggests. Rather, when the data is on a server you control and being shared in ways that you determined, then you get the fine grained privacy control that you want and only have to do it in one place.

If you're using someone else's service, for free, and expecting that you'll get control over everything then you're just not facing the practical reality of the situation.

Topics: CXO, Browser, Collaboration, IT Employment

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

4 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Free Lunch

    I share the sentiments. If get p o r n o in RSS and share it to the 'friends' and cry over the privacy, I must say "JUST Dont". It upto users to keep a tab on what they do online.


    http://smugglaz.spaces.live.com/
    dope.smugglaz@...
  • RE: Which part of

    http://fhonearth.blogspot.com/2007/12/google-answers-with-persuasion-no-real.html

    Yes, Google can do whatever they want with my data, as long as they respect the TOS. But this issue isn't about technical details. It's about trust, the expectations users had on them, and how they have been shattered by Google's newly developed arrogance.

    For example, they can technically and legally delete all users emails from gmail, but if they did, you wouldn't except a nice reaction from people. Or more trust for Google.

    Two buttons would had solved this whole drama: "Yes, I want to send my shared posts to all my gmail contacts", and "Yes, I want to receive shared post from all my gmail contacts". But Google just wanted to push hard. They assumed a yes, and there is no way to say no.
    shoktai@...
  • RE: Which part of

    i think it,s a great post.
    http://www.1websitedesign.net
    arslanhassan999@...
  • RE: Which part of

    i think it,s great to see your blog.
    http://laptops.baysworld.com
    arslanhassan999@...