Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

WHO report: Cell phone radiation can cause cancer

By | May 31, 2011, 10:20am PDT

Summary: It’s official: cell phone radiation can actually lead to cancer, according to an extensive study by the World Health Organization.

It’s official: cell phone radiation can actually lead to cancer, according to an extensive study by the World Health Organization.

WHO’s International Agency for Research of Cancer team that worked on the study included 31 scientists from 14 countries. The results, which found that exposure to cell phones are “possibly carcinogenic to humans,” aren’t entirely shocking but rather sobering more than anything else.

The type of radiation coming out of a cell phone is called non-ionizing. It is not like an X-ray, but more like a very low-powered microwave oven.

“What microwave radiation does in most simplistic terms is similar to what happens to food in microwaves, essentially cooking the brain. So in addition to leading to a development of cancer and tumors, there could be a whole host of other effects like cognitive memory function, since the memory temporal lobes are where we hold our cell phones.”

Also see:

Additionally, this news comes right up against most major mobile phone manufacturers. Before the announcement hit on Tuesday, CNN reported:

The cell phone industry maintains that there is no conclusive evidence that cell phone radiation impacts users’ health and often sites WHO stance on the topic.

However, this is not a black-and-white or yes-or-no kind of issue. More details are expected to follow soon, but the WHO finding does not mean that all cell phone users will develop cancer because of extensive usage. Unfortunately, it will also take years to see the results of extensive cell phone radiation exposure given that mobile phones didn’t come into widespread consumer use until the last 10 to 15 years.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Rachel King is a staff writer for ZDNet based in San Francisco.

Disclosure

Rachel King

Rachel King has no business relationships, affiliations, investments, or other potential conflicts of interest relating to the content posted in this blog.

Biography

Rachel King

Rachel King is a staff writer for CBS Interactive in San Francisco. Before serving as a contributing editor at ZDNet in New York City for two years, she previously worked for The Business Insider, FastCompany.com, CNN's San Francisco bureau and the U.S. Department of State. Rachel has also written for MainStreet.com, Irish America Magazine and the New York Daily News, among others. Rachel has a B.A. in Mass Communications and History from the University of California, Berkeley and a M.S. in Journalism from Columbia University, where she served as art director for the student magazine, Plated.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
71
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: WHO report: Cell phone radiation can cause cancer
MeganLo 17th Jan
It's great to see EMF radiation awareness rises with every day, I just hope it will take us as long as it took us with tobacco to see downsides of lifestyle we are currently addicted. I would recommend the usual steps for decrease of EMF radiation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_phone_radiation_and_health and it wouldn't be bad idea to have some EMF protection that will also reduce EMF radiation our bodies are exposed to (http://personalbioprotector.com/index.html).
Boohoo, cell phones are bad for us. Know what else is bad for us? Everything. Unless you're planning to move out to Amish country, you're surrounded by all sorts of carcinogens. One more doesn't really hurt.
0 Votes
+ -
@Aerowind
but I had to cut the conversation short because I keep getting a terrible headache.

Must eb ym allogys
@Aerowind attaboy....just the argumnet cell phone companies and other dangerous goods manufacturers want the sheeple to say...."oh it's jts one more of many".

Let me ask you this....do you think products should be allowed into the market BEFORE definitive testing is done or AFTER? In other words....is it OK if companies lie to you while making money off you and then say later "oops...our bad"

Cheers
@ColdFusion_z

we have to protect ourselves as best we can, I found this product to be really effective...http://www.advancedhealingtechnologies.com/EMF.html
@Aerowind
One more does hurt. They all add up. If the cell phone industry had to pay me $1 for using a phone that has a possible cancer risk, that's no big deal. "One more doesn't really hurt." But add up every cell phone sold and that $1 becomes a very big number.

That's like saying it's okay for me to throw my empty water bottle out the window when I'm driving because one more really doesn't hurt. But if everyone with a water bottle did that, the place would be a mess.

And yes, we're surrounded by all sorts of carcinogens, but shouldn't be try to reduce that amount whenever possible?
@JohnJacob1161 - Love the water bottle analogy. You must have driven through Memphis recently. What a dump it is now, literally.
0 Votes
+ -
Message has been deleted.
Bhimiji Updated - 1st Jun
  • Flagged
@Aerowind

Nope not everything is bad for us, enjoy all the organic strawberries you want.
@kroguej@... Unless you're in Germany, where organic food has poisoned a few people.

As for the phones - sounds like being close to a transmitter increases temperatures in the brain, like slowly cooking an egg. Drop the power output, and lower the risk.
Brain tumours should be more prevalent in the country, as you get further AWAY from a repeater tower.
@Aerowind
"WHO finding does not mean that all cell phone users will develop cancer because of extensive usage."

Precisely its like the scanners at the airport the risk is very low, but you put millions of people through them and some people are going to get cancer. Call me paranoid but I almost always use bluetooth or speakerphone, can't hurt.
@kroguej@... Blue tooth isn't much better same form of radiation, the best way would be to put the receivers on the edge of the phone so it limits contact with the body, microwave radiation is the least harming you get more sitting in the sun than you do an entire day on the phone.
0 Votes
+ -
Message has been deleted.
Bhimiji Updated - 1st Jun
  • Flagged
The headline should be changed to "may cause cancer". 'Can' inplies a causual relationship that hasn't been established.
@pdskep Don't cigarette companies argue can/may as welll?
@Bodazapha Sure, but follow the science. This report specifically says there is no causal relationship found at least yet. Very few scientists outside the cigarette industry believe smoking does not cause cancer.
0 Votes
+ -
cigarettes don't automatically cause cancer. They probably raise the risk in certain segments of the population.
@fr_gough Using that argument nothing causes cancer.
accurate headline would be "Cell phone radiation may or may not cause cancer."
@pdskep

The report should read LAWS DF PHYSICS BROKEN.

As apparently non-ionising radiation is being blamed for cancer. When are they going to explain the mechanism? Do I have to avoid hot showers now?
@tonymcs@... They wouldn't do that, they're fear mongolers why would they?
0 Votes
+ -
that's BS
Linux Geek 31st May
peddled by the trial lawyers and M$ trying to scare the people from buying Android phones.
0 Votes
+ -
@Linux Geek

That's a 10!
@Linux Geek
Uh huh...and somehow Windows Phones are immune?

I think it may be time for you to start taking an anti-psychotic.
0 Votes
+ -
Message has been deleted.
Linux Geek Updated - 1st Jun
  • Flagged
@Linux Geek Let me guess... You also believe in UFO, Obama not a US citizen, OBL killed five years ago, no antenna problems on iPhones, Linux is the most widespread desktop OS, direct link between hairy hands and mas...tion, Lochness monsters,...
  • Flagged
@Linux Geek

Considering that would be against Microsoft's best interest because apparently Microsoft makes more off of Android than Windows Phone 7
0 Votes
+ -
@Linux Geek Dude, READ THE ARTICLE! There is not one damed thing mentioned in it about your little MS vs Android or iOS vs Android or Blackberry vs Android or The World vs Android issues... Stop with the trolling fanboyism for once in your life.
0 Votes
+ -
Message has been deleted.
Linux Geek Updated - 1st Jun
  • Flagged
@athynz

I am about 90% convinced now that Linux Geek is not a serious poster, I think he might actually be a MS fanboy who is trying to do a 'parody' of a fanatical Linux user...except the parody isn't funny at all and really just annoying.
0 Votes
+ -
Cell phone radiation can cause cancer is a lot different from WHO?s International Agency for Research of Cancer team that worked on the study included 31 scientists from 14 countries. The results, which found that exposure to cell phones are ?possibly carcinogenic to humans,? aren?t entirely shocking but rather sobering more than anything else. The headline is a tad misleading.

I'd be interested in knowing what devices they used in their study as far as cellular devices...
0 Votes
+ -
I love bologna!
vel0city 31st May
I thought microwaves "cook" things because 2.4GHz is the frequency that water resonates at, therefore allowing a large amount of the energy in the wave to act on the molecules. If cell phones use a much lower amount of power, and a frequency that doesn't resonate with the molecules in your brain, shouldn't most of the energy bounce off and very little of it actually "cook" your brain?

Also, if "cooking" our brain causes cancer, doesn't the warmth of our bodies cause cancer at the same time? That imparts much more energy on our brains than cell phones do.

Seems kinda bogus to me.
0 Votes
+ -
Message has been deleted.
pupkin_z Updated - 31st May
that oil is the most dangerous substance on the planet, driving an SUV is destroying the climate and carbon dioxide is the most hazardous gas in the atmosphere.
0 Votes
+ -
Message has been deleted.
Bodazapha Updated - 31st May
0 Votes
+ -
Message has been deleted.
X41 Updated - 1st Jun
0 Votes
+ -
At last!
Userama 31st May
A scientific explanation of why people talk on a cell while driving---their brains are fried!
What is the rate, .0001%? Water can cause cancer. Drink too much water and it upsets the bodies chemistry, removes too many antioxidants and increases the cancer rate. Everything can cause cancer, it is the exposure and the rate that matters.
@hayneiii@...
Certain ingredients in the water supply may cause cancer. The presence or absence of water does not in and of itself lead to abnormal (mutated) cell growth. No studies have ever indicated that water causes cancer.

No, not everything can cause cancer. That is why only certain things are classified as carcinogens.
@notme403@...

One study indicated that swallowing your own saliva can cause cancer....which leads to the question 'if your own bodily fluids are toxic....aren't we just completely screwed no matter what? And if we are just completely screwed no matter what, then who cares?'
@Doctor Demento
The idea that anyone would undertake a study of saliva as a possible carcinogen is pretty fantastic. It is unlikely that you can cite such a study. I would love to see it.
0 Votes
+ -
Your brain is a living organism with a very complex temperature mechanism control in place. With this kind of crap passing for science and people swallowing it wholesale no wonder we think carbon dioxide is the most toxic substance on the planet.
Dill pickles are deadly. All people who eat them die. Eventually.
I have to cut this message short - WiFi is messing with my brains.
0 Votes
+ -
Few years ago WHO publish report in which they claim that cell phone radiation is not dangerous. Probably they cell phones vendor didn't pay enough for positive report.
0 Votes
+ -
Sigh--here we go again sad. It seems that everyone forgets that radiation has to be ionizing to cause the genetic changes that would lead to cancer. Cell phones and microwave ovens do not operate at wavelengths that can break molecular bonds. (Things like XRays can, however) Microwaves can heat tissues, but the area of the brain that would be affected is well supplied with blood that would carry off the heat. Your brain would NOT be "cooked".
Some research orgs, bring out these findings to obtain more grant money; there are other things to worry about...
0 Votes
+ -
It is understandable that people are concerned about mobile phones, especially because they are so widely used. But so far, the published studies do not show that mobile phones could increase the risk of cancer. This conclusion is backed up by the lack of a solid biological mechanism, and the fact that brain cancer rates are not going up significantly. - Henry Scowcroft, Dr Kat Arney, Ed Yong of Cancer Research UK, 5/31/2011

http://scienceblog.cancerresearchuk.org/2011/05/31/who-verdict-on-mobile-phones-and-cancer/
So, if I wear a bluetooth headset all of the time have I reduced or eliminated the risk or is the bluetooth signal bad also?
@spaine

The signal level of the Bluetooth headset is generally quite a bit lower than of your cell phone so theoretically, it's better. On the other hand, if you are carrying your cellphone clipped to the front of your belt, it could cause issues for any potential offspring. But wearing jockey shorts is much more likely to cause such issues.
Wonder what the radiation levels are when there are 100 or so people are in a conference room or resturant all with cell phones turned on? Or maybe 60,000 or so at a sporting event? Even if one phone isn't harmful abunch probably are.
Rachel: you need to learn how to read properly:
these are the key points made in the report:
"To date, no adverse health effects have been established for mobile phone use.
Studies are ongoing to assess potential long-term effects of mobile phone use."
This does not spell "It?s official: cell phone radiation can actually lead to cancer".
0 Votes
+ -
Fact check
publicus 31st May
If it's non-ionizing, it doesn't have enough power to break molecular bonds (by definition). Therefore it cannot cause cancer.

Cooking your tissues ala a microwave is an entirely different matter.
However, if you read the actual "Interphone" study (at http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/cellphones) it specifically says the amount of energy radiated by a cell phone is too low to increase tissue temperatures.

Back to cancer:
The study says
"Interphone researchers reported that, overall, cell phone users have no increased risk for two of the most common types of brain tumor?glioma and meningioma. In addition, they found no evidence of increasing risk with progressively increasing number of calls, longer call time, or years since beginning cell phone use."

Oddly enough, the CNN article (http://www.cnn.com/2011/HEALTH/05/31/who.cell.phones/) says
"they found some evidence of increase in glioma and acoustic neuroma brain cancer for mobile phone users, but have not been able to draw conclusions for other types of cancers".
Which is exactly the opposite of what is actually in the study.

So, are we to conclude only that CNN picked up on the terms "cell phone", "radiation", and "cancer" and just... ran with it?
It's great to see EMF radiation awareness rises with every day, I just hope it will take us as long as it took us with tobacco to see downsides of lifestyle we are currently addicted. I would recommend the usual steps for decrease of EMF radiation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_phone_radiation_and_health and it wouldn't be bad idea to have some EMF protection that will also reduce EMF radiation our bodies are exposed to (http://personalbioprotector.com/index.html).

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix