ie8 fix

Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

Why is Chrome so important to Google? It's a 'locked-in user'

By | April 14, 2011, 2:55pm PDT

Summary: Google execs say the lifetime value of a Chrome user is extremely valuable to the company. “Chrome is a guaranteed locked-in user for us in terms of having access to Google,” says CFO Patrick Pichette.

Google’s Chrome browser historically has looked like just another side project for the company. Sure Chrome is a speedy browser. Sure Google has garnered impressive market share in a short time. And yes Google gets to push browser development a bit.

But the real importance of Chrome—and why Google is marketing the browser so heavy around the world—boils down to the lifetime value of a Chrome user.

CFO Patrick Pichette was asked about the importance of Chrome on the company’s earnings conference call and his answer bonks you over the head.

There are really two stories on Chrome. There is a tactical question and there is a strategic question. Chrome is really pushing the Web, and it has a fantastic opportunity that, when people have adopted Chrome, they basically instead of looking for Google and looking for search, the omnibox gives them immediate access to Google search. So from a strategic perspective, it has that in Chrome OS. On a tactical basis, everybody that uses Chrome is a guaranteed locked-in user for us in terms of having access to Google.

Nikesh Arora, chief business officer at Google, also chimed in on the marketing ROI for pushing Chrome (image credit: Tinto via Flickr).

We have over 120 million daily users and 40% of them were added in the past year as a result of our marketing efforts. So you’ve seen the 30% growth quarter-over-quarter in our Chrome usage. So I think, from all perspectives, the Chrome strategy is working. The way we distribute Chrome is people get it organically or they get it based on our marketing efforts, or they see our marketing and they choose to download it, or we work with partners who help us promote Chrome to our users and to other users. So in that context, we found that marketing very often ends up with an equivalent or better ROI than us having to go to partnership deals. Sometimes you’ll see that our TAC and our marketing around Chrome is fungible. Where we spend money and marketing, we take away from TAC as it relates to Chrome. So you can expect us to continue to drive Chrome strategically because it has not just a Chrome specific benefit for us but it also impacts many of our other products that work as part of Chrome. So the lifetime value of a Chrome user is phenomenal.

Boil those comments down and the Chrome returns look something like this:

  • A Chrome user can contribute to a feedback loop that improves search quality.
  • A Chrome user will use Google extensively with little to no slippage.
  • Google can spend less on traffic acquisition costs.
  • The company doesn’t have to spend as much on distribution—think the fees for the Firefox search bar.
  • And this locked-in Google user is more likely to increase engagement as the company adds Chrome apps and social features down the line.

By the way, Chrome also gives Google a hand in browser standards, but that ROI seems decidedly naive when you consider the lifetime value of Chrome user.

Related:

Google’s first quarter earnings miss projections; Page makes brief appearance

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic.

Disclosure

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan has nothing to disclose. He doesn’t hold investments in the technology companies he covers.

Biography

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic. He was most recently Executive Editor of News and Blogs at ZDNet. Prior to that he was executive news editor at eWeek and news editor at Baseline. He also served as the East Coast news editor and finance editor at CNET News.com. Larry has covered the technology and financial services industry since 1995, publishing articles in WallStreetWeek.com, Inter@ctive Week, The New York Times, and Financial Planning magazine. He's a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism and the University of Delaware.

For daily updates, follow Larry on Twitter.

203
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Why is Chrome so important to Google? It's a 'locked-in user'
soskert 11th Oct
@DonnieBoy funding yes, but also reaping the spoils. Get a finger in every pie and slowly solidify a totalitarian grasp on the market.
sam - seo help
chrome also holds a lot of data on the hard drive of the User.... Data which I suppose is accessible..... by google

I am not a big fan of google, especially since android...

keep it as a search engine and maintain that, it will not stagnate
@sfitservices: information to advertisers (context-type, most part).
0 Votes
+ -
Its all about ad revenue
jscott418 15th Apr 2011
@denisrs No doubt. Google's bread and butter is ad revenue. Chrome and Android are just tools to get more information about people and tailor ads. I don't see this as evil. But it is what it is.
0 Votes
+ -
@jscott418

"Chrome and Android are just tools to get more information about people and tailor ads. I don't see this as evil."

It isn't -- but if my personal information is a commodity to be bought and sold I think I should be the first to get paid -- and Chrome doesn't meet my price.
innoivate. The funny thing is that Google is funding Mozilla and Opera. That is just how important that fast, standards based, browsers are to Google. They are willing to saturate the market!!!!

Funny hearing the Microsoft idiots howling as Chrome takes market share.
0 Votes
+ -
Your post are as idiotic as ever DB
John Zern 14th Apr 2011
@DonnieBoy
I was reading the posts today. You never get tired of getting beat up, it would appear. If you're a representative of the level of Google supporters, the future looks quite bright for MS, Apple, HP...
  • Flagged
@DonnieBoy Bing - Google - Bing here comes DB...wow your sad.
@DonnieBoy You know the funny thing is , since you brought up funny. If they had said MS and the User Lock in phrase you would have been ALLLLLLLL over that with your goof idiotic posts. Yet when Google says it, your all worked up and ready for date night. will please make up your liberal mind and which way you want to go.
0 Votes
+ -
@DonnieBoy And do you know what the owners of Google want - a profit. And that means Google will compete. Just like MS competed. I agree that MS did not always compete fairly. And I suspect the same will be true of Google. And Google will end up patenting stuff, simply so that it can defend itself. Google is not about FOSS it is a business interested in making a profit. It uses FOSS as a disruptive way of competing with MS and Apple. But its search engine is very proprietary. I expect Richard Stallman to attack Google before long.
@DonnieBoy How is Chrome important to Apple. Both Chrome and Safari use WebKit?
@DonnieBoy

You want to back up the claim that Google is funding Opera?
0 Votes
+ -
Opera enables Google as their search engine and gets paid for it. Same with Firefox.
0 Votes
+ -
MS Security and Botnets get no mention...
Joe.Smetona 20th Apr 2011
@DonnieBoy

...but a Google text ad will stop the presses.
@DonnieBoy ... How MUCH market share? As I understand it, the records aren't very good.
Your home is valueble for me. Thanks!??? antibiotics for sinus infection
@DonnieBoy funding yes, but also reaping the spoils. Get a finger in every pie and slowly solidify a totalitarian grasp on the market.
sam - seo help
@sfitservices
IE stores a lot of data as well. Data you can't erase.
@itguy08

Like?
@Cylon Centurion 0005
The OP originally stated that Chrome holds a lot of data on Google without giving any specifics. I believe itguy08 was trying to show that you could make a baseless claim like that about any browser.
@itguy08 Really - examples please, facts, links to examples... chirp, chrip, chirp - of the crickets.
@itguy08
And that's why I will not use either IE or Chrome. I like to keep my data as my data.
@itguy08 ... That's BS. IE doesn't store any data that you cannot erase. AFAIK, no browser does that. If you're citing hidden, system files those can definitely be erased. If you're actually an IT guy, you better brush up on things a LOT.
@itguy08 Hi, I am curious: what data is it you can't erase ?

thanks, Bill
@itguy08
becasue this way you can go back and cover your tracks after making such ridiculous statements. happy
0 Votes
+ -
Believe it or not, that's not the case
John Zern 15th Apr 2011
@anono
He makes these anti-MS claims every chance he gets. He never came across an MS blog he couldn't polute with his typical slander.
0 Votes
+ -
Kick the Chrome Habit
Schoolboy Bob 15th Apr 2011
@sfitservices
I've been finding it fairly easy to kick the Chrome habit. IE 9 feels faster (and I think tests have shown that it is), once you get used to it again you can wean yourself off of Chrome.
@Schoolboy Bob ... Chrome is just another type of browser and that's it. It's no difference than any other browser with the possible exception that I think it may be "calling home" somehow and not with cookies. It's not really "faster", it just tries to appear that way with a slightly different take on how the screen gets painted. I've removed it and it removes like any other application, leaving piles of feces here & there for the user to delete (folders & regstry entries) from the little bit of testinig I did with it.
My onle real use for it is testing of web sites for appearance compared to other browsers; mostly it's fine though.
@tom@...
The reason I originally started using was because of the way you can search directly on the omnibar and its speed, but now other browsers have imitated these features and all browsers feel the same in terms of speed (IE9 doesn't feel any faster or slower for that matter)
The reason I keep coming back to chrome despite trying other browsers once in a while is it's quick access to different search services. If I want to search something on youtube, bing, amazon etc. all I have to do is type the first letter and chrome predicts the rest, then I press tab and type in what i want to search. This actually saves a lot of time and I get quite annoyed by the lack of this feature whenever I go to any other browser. Firefox and IE9 also have no such compelling features that I miss when using chrome.
@anono
Although it isn't exactly the same, IE9 does have a row of search-engine icons in the search-suggestions pane so you can change search-engine.
Good day! I know this is kinda off topic but I was wondering which blog platform are you using for this website? I'm getting tired of Wordpress because I've had problems with hackers and I'm looking at alternatives for another platform. I would be great if you could point me in the direction of a good platform. antibiotics for sinus infection
Google want - a profit. And that means Google will compete. cheap web design Just like MS competed. I agree that MS did not always compete fairly. And I suspect the same will be true of Google. And Google will end up patenting stuff, simply so that it can defend itself. Google is not about FOSS it is a business interested in making a profit. It uses FOSS as a disruptive way of competing with MS and Apple. promotional items But its search engine is very proprietary.
HOLY ******* ***** *********** ************ *********** ******** *********** *********** ********** ********** ******! This just puts Google on a whole new level of shame....
0 Votes
+ -
Aww come on it's not THAT bad
oncall Updated - 14th Apr 2011
@Cylon Centurion 0005

It's not like they said anything that most people haven't figured out already. I mean was anybody naive enough to thing they have been pumping out freebies hand over fist for "altruistic " reasons?
0 Votes
+ -
@Cylon Centurion 0005
DonnieBoy!
I been reading his days post just now. It's scary to see there are still people like him around, you know, the ones who would put a loaded gun in their mouths and pull the trigger because somebody told them it's "a good thing, no really. Trust me, would I try to deceive you? Really, I have your best interest at heart!" wink
@John Zern Offcourse its great. Google is doing it. So it must be great and cool and WIN32 is dying *end sarcasm*
@1337

Google could come over to your house and kill your dog and people would still love Google.
@Cylon Centurion 0005
You could say Google could kill your dog and some people would still love Google. I could say MS can be convicted for anti-competitive behavior, intentionally slow down the internet as a whole for years with IE6, force a resource hog OS like Vista on to customers through OEMs, copy almost everything from competitors, be caught for lying multiple times (including just recently where they falsely accused Google apps of not having government certification) and people would still love them.

See how pointless trolling gets. Oh wait! Everything I said about MS is true.
@anono

Except Microsoft didn't lie about Google's FISMA certification. Apps isn't FISMA certified at all.
@Cylon Centurion
Fine. Hypocrisy then. BPOS isn't compliant either.
0 Votes
+ -
True that!
Will Farrell 15th Apr 2011
@John Zern happy
@1773
Thank you.. Loved it, and probably beat him to it. Nicely done.
@Cylon Centurion 0005
Google has made an official reply to Microsoft's accusation that it's not FISMA certified. I'm no lawyer but their argument seemed solid. They basically said that Google Apps for Government is the same service as Google Apps Premier but with two additional security measures. The government has also apparently accepted Google Apps for Government based on the fact that Google Apps Premier is certified.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2011/04/13/businessinsider-google-microsoft-is-the-liar-when-it-comes-to-apps-security-2011-4.DTL
@John Zern
but then, what fun is the truth if you can't bend it to your liking? happy
@Cylon Centurion 0005 "Apps isn't FISMA certified at all."
The GSA apparently disagrees with you. It's backing Google on this one.
0 Votes
+ -
It's a 'locked-in user
bezoeker 15th Apr 2011
@Cylon Centurion 0005
Yes sure.
More important. XP users should resist the pressure, make their own choses, and install/use Chromium, Firefox or Opera if they don't allready.
If with enough MS will get the signal, give in and come with a XP version of IE9. Thanks to competition, the monopoly has no longer that amount of power in the browser market.
Anyhow, for a late matching alternative, most users won't bother to go back. I you like to call that locked-in... make sure you do.
@Cylon Centurion 0005
"Locked in" is definitely a poor choice of words, since Chrome has always *as far as I remember) had a search-engine ballot on first start and in the preferences. There's definitely a bias toward Google's search, since Google users are the ones to likely choose Chrome, but there's definitely no "lock-in." You can switch browser at any time you want to. Export your bookmarks and you're done.
Like it or not, is a good strategy. Google already has the most users it can grab based on old acquisition methods. This is their cutting edge effort to gain more market share.
Chrome is very convenient. Especially Chrome 2 Phone.
0 Votes
+ -
Microsoft set the the lock in standard
Chipesh Updated - 15th Apr 2011
@Droid101
Yes, Chome 2 phone is great and is typical of Google innovation.
Of course it works great as well from my Linux Mint desktop to my phone.

Google = interoperability and open standards

Microsoft = Windows only and corrupt standards

That's the difference that blinkered, myopic, fan-boys like John Zern can't understand or accept.
0 Votes
+ -
Chipesh, I understand more then you could ever imagine
John Zern Updated - 15th Apr 2011
@Chipesh
but you've shot straight out of the barrel, the anti-MS catchphrase playbook in hand.

The difference is I see the world for what it is, people like you and DB see the world of your own creation.

You call others corrupt, yet you view and comment on everything MS related with a warped version of reality, shaped by your bias, dismissing anyone who doesn't agree with you.

Isn't that about as corrupt as one can get? And yet you label others as such?

So I guess you're the pot?

"Thanks for playing, Bob!" wink

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix