Between the Lines

Larry Dignan, Andrew Nusca and Rachel King

Why we don't trust Devil Mountain Software (and neither should you)

By | February 21, 2010, 10:17am PST

Summary: Devil Mountain Software has been a thorn in the side of Microsoft for years and is adept at garnering headlines. The latest effort is a report claiming that 86 percent of Windows 7 PCs were gobbling up too much memory. Can you trust these findings and the company overall? The short answer: No. Here’s why.

Ed note: We were going to publish this investigation Monday morning after buttoning down a few more key facts. Given the fact that IDG just severed ties with Randall C. Kennedy over having an alter ego, we decided to publish our findings, which go beyond fictional sidekicks.

Devil Mountain Software has been a thorn in the side of Microsoft for years and is adept at garnering headlines. The latest effort is a report claiming that 86 percent of Windows 7 PCs were gobbling up too much memory. Can you trust these findings and the company overall? The short answer: No. Here’s why.

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes recapped the technical issues with Devil Mountain Software, but frankly the concerns go well beyond mere code. Kingsley-Hughes noted that Devil Mountain Software (DMS) and its Exo Performance Network (XPNet) aren’t on his “trusted list.” After a discussion with many of our ZDNet experts led by Ed Bott and Jason Perlow in recent days, it’s clear none of us trusted Devil Mountain Software.

Here’s what we’ve found from our investigation of the company:

  • Devil Mountain CTO Craig Barth is InfoWorld columnist Randall C. Kennedy.
  • Devil Mountain’s software has potential privacy issues and the company isn’t afraid to show off that it can peek into your systems.
  • A high-profile customer that “Barth” uses to legitimize Devil Mountain’s software says there is no large implementation of the application at the company (see update on page 4).
  • Numerous disclosure issues about the relationship between Devil Mountain, Kennedy and IDG, essentially the only outlet that has quoted Barth. Note: Between Saturday and Sunday, InfoWorld pulled references to Kennedy in its blog roll and said that it no longer offers the Windows Sentinel software, which is a clone of the DMS Clarity Suite.

Indeed, InfoWorld Editor in Chief Eric Knorr just confirmed the first point and IDG has severed ties with Kennedy. In a blog post, Knorr outlined Kennedy’s fate. Knorr referred our questions to Kennedy, who isn’t picking up the phone. ComputerWorld also said that it didn’t know Barth was really Kennedy.

We saved for posterity a stray screenshot that InfoWorld forgot — a Windows Sentinel plug :

Buckle in, because this tale goes from zero to X-files in minutes.

First, the background.

Who the hell is Devil Mountain Software? And can you trust them?

A small software company based in Florida, Devil Mountain Software regularly releases studies filled with detailed performance and market data about operating systems and browsers, with a special emphasis on Windows. When DMS publishes a report, it invariably makes headlines in some of the leading tech publications on the web. The company isn’t modest about its work, either: ComputerWorld reporter Gregg Keizer last week quoted a company source as boasting, “Outside of Microsoft, I don’t think anyone knows more about Windows performance than us.”

Devil Mountain Software was in the news again last week, with a report claiming that 86% of Windows 7 PCs in the network of 20,000+ machines it monitors worldwide are regularly reaching the breaking point in terms of memory usage. Our in-house Windows experts are skeptical about this data and the company in general.

We asked a team of researchers to look more carefully at Devil Mountain Software and its Exo Performance Network (XPNet) to find out more about the company and its data. What we found is alarming: Dubious claims about the company’s products and its customers; violations of privacy involving the company’s data collection software; and Web posts and interviews with a source who appears to be certainly fictitious.

In search of Craig Barth –>

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic.

Disclosure

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan has nothing to disclose. He doesn’t hold investments in the technology companies he covers.

Biography

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic. He was most recently Executive Editor of News and Blogs at ZDNet. Prior to that he was executive news editor at eWeek and news editor at Baseline. He also served as the East Coast news editor and finance editor at CNET News.com. Larry has covered the technology and financial services industry since 1995, publishing articles in WallStreetWeek.com, Inter@ctive Week, The New York Times, and Financial Planning magazine. He's a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism and the University of Delaware.

For daily updates, follow Larry on Twitter.

Talkback Most Recent of 678 Talkback(s)

  • ZDNet Gravatar
    Tom12Tom
    21st Feb 2010
  • Yeah, kudos to the reporting team.
    It's good when an agenda is exposed. It's just a shame that the person concerned has lost all credibility as a result.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Sleeper Service
    22nd Feb 2010
  • It's not a shame....
    It's a wake-up call.. When you're in a position of trust, that trust is your most valuable asset..

    This has the positive side-effect of reminding those who do the trusting to question themselves from time-to-time, and those who wish to keep the trust of others to understand how easy it is to destroy.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    daftkey
    22nd Feb 2010
  • not really, his actions are what is shameful
    This is another example of a person who felt the end justified the means, creating fraudulent data to discredit a multi-billion dollar company. I'm sure microsoft could come after him for lost sales, but I would guess his total personal worth isn't worth the effort, he's still lucky they don't make an example of him. If his actions were somehow noble, many might hail him as a hero, but to me they seem slighted and pathetic. Assuming of course the article is accurate, I would say that he is not a person of moral character.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    shadfurman
    22nd Feb 2010
  • RCK had no credibility anyways
    Is not a shame, if had ever read a Randall Kennedy article, and you knew a little about computers, you would know he had no credibility, he would go pages of article blasting Windows performance without providing any numbers at all. He lived from the Microsoft hatred and apple fanboys and escandalous articles bashing windows. Every time I would read one of his articles my blood would boil at how blatantly he lied and how biased he was. Now is over, he is no longer credible and he'll have no job, unless he uses again another pseudonym and in a few years we see another expose like this.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    ckeledjian
    22nd Feb 2010
  • "The greatest trick the Devil Mountain ever pulled...
    ...was convincing the world that Craig Barth existed. And like that, *poof*, he's gone. Underground. Nobody's ever seen him since. He becomes a myth -- a spook story that project managers tell their developers at night: 'Don't fix those bugs, and Craig Barth will test your software.'" -- Keizer Soze http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KnGo6Qm0Wt8
    ZDNet Gravatar
    Edward R. Murrow
    22nd Feb 2010
  • Great Read... hope a former mgr sees what I was...
    talking about. He made mention of both names to me and pointed me to a few of his articles and I, put in a nice way to him, told him he was crazy to believe some of the things Kennedy/Barth stated. Yeah, some of them had a little ground but no solid proof.

    Now if indeed his software was collecting more data than it should (most likely) he could have some companies by the balls if it were install. So that being said ZDnet Tech really might not hear back from Morgan Stanley.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    c79ram
    6th Mar 2010
  • Totally Agree
    A fascinating read, well researched, really shows what ZDNet can deliver when it is on form.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    darrell.penning@...
    26th Feb 2010
  • RE: Why we don't trust Devil Mountain Software (and neither should you)
    This is a late post, but I kind of find it funny that people are just now figuring this out. Right after RCK announced his Clarity Suite on InfoWorld years ago, I checked out Devil Mountain right away as it sounded like the CSA product. I simply tracked down the WHOIS on the Devil Mountain DNS entry and found that it traced back to RCK's house outside Tampa.

    On the second point, anyone who thinks InfoWorld, ComputerWorld or Network World has any kind of special journalistic integrity has been keeping their head in the sand or just uninformed.

    Gibson pushing SpinRite in his IW columns for years, Johna Johnson pushing Nemertes in NW. How did you think you got these issues for free? Did you think that ads paid for everything? IDG's free rags are free because they print semi-ad press releases, allow "editors" that own and maintain ongoing firms.

    Why RCK went to great lengths to conceal himself is unknown, but I can say it had nothing to do with any desire for some higher journalistic purpose. The Clarity Suite does expose some MS shortcomings and RCK has found his niche in exposing them. However he is no more the leach than the Windows Secrets man Livingston. He used his "Secrets" column to solicit enough free material from people to write two books and fund a website. Bet you can't find many columns where he didn't give a copy away, a little promotion i would say.

    Christine Comaford probably beat them all, but perhaps these research writers can check her out on their own.

    In summary, RCK is just one of many in the IT space who have to go to odd measures to maintain visibility for some balm they are selling. Been happening for years, someone just woke up!
    ZDNet Gravatar
    spuwho
    5th May 2010
  • ZDNet Blogger

    Wow. Just, wow.
    nt.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    zwhittaker
    21st Feb 2010
  • RE: Why we don't trust Devil Mountain Software (and neither should you)
    Wow...it felt like reading a mystery story!
    Larry, you and your guys may try for a career in sleuthing if and when next recession occurs wink
    ZDNet Gravatar
    iAbhishek
    21st Feb 2010
  • RE: Why we don't trust Devil Mountain Software (and neither should you)
    @iAbhishek Next recession? Let's worry about the current one first.
    ZDNet Gravatar
    guildwarsguy123
    31st Dec 2010
  • Enough with the Microsoft hate disease
    Randall C Kennedy is but one seriously deranged persona.
    Infoworld were all for his rabid ramblings as long as
    they generated page hits.

    They should take a look at Gregg Keizer as well. How come
    he was frequently the one to "report" from the "friends"
    at xpnet?
    ZDNet Gravatar
    honeymonster
    21st Feb 2010
  • What's strange
    is that his (latest) blog posts, don't seem to be anti-MS really, but quite the contrary.

    another person to take a look at is Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
    ZDNet Gravatar
    markbn
    21st Feb 2010
  • Randal C Kennedy, Gregg Keizer
    EDIT: My apologies for including Steven J.
    Vaughan-Nichols with the above.

    He was not anti-MS? He tried all he could to do
    a Vista on Windows 7:

    http://www.infoworld.com/d/windows/7-deadly-
    sins-windows-7-036?source=fssr

    http://www.infoworld.com/d/windows/test-center-
    benchmarks-windows-7-unmasked-543

    http://www.cio.com/article/481526/Opinion_Micro
    soft_Should_Stop_Cutting_Corners_with_Windows_7
    ?page=1&taxonomyId=3081

    http://www.infoworld.com/d/windows/windows-7-
    rtm-revenge-windows-vista-356?page=0,2

    RCK was all over the Windows 7 launch, trying
    to derail it Vista-style.

    Yes, his pals should be look at accordingly.
    Gregg Keizer is either in on the scam, or
    unfathomable naive. Reading his pieces he does
    have an argument that it is "just" the latter.
    That guy will gobble up anything he can use to
    portrait Microsoft in a bad light.

    Strike that - he seems to just post anything
    which will generate controversy.

    ZDNet Gravatar
    honeymonster
    22nd Feb 2010
    • Flagged

Talkback - Tell Us What You Think

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources