Will you trust Google with your data?
Summary: Update below: Phil Wainewright raises an interesting beef in his post on SaaS data worries. In a nutshell, Phil says it's strange that people are trotting out the "your data may not be safe" argument when talking about Google Office.
Update below: Phil Wainewright raises an interesting beef in his post on SaaS data worries. In a nutshell, Phil says it's strange that people are trotting out the "your data may not be safe" argument when talking about Google Office.
Phil then notes how it's an argument against SaaS.
I wouldn't go that far. Here's why: When it comes to Google there's a perception difference when it comes to Google Office vs. other players like Salesforce.com. I trust the latter more with my data. Why? It comes down to focus.
Google Office is a side venture at best. While Google is quite capable I'd be reluctant to put all my data there. If Google loses my data there's no downside for them. If Salesforce or NetSuite blow it, there business will tank quickly. The reputation hit matters.
Another thing at work here may be that Google is getting too big. I'm not sure folks would host all of their data with Microsoft either. Anyone who has watched hosted data disappear--I have 100s of columns that have gone extinct when a Web site disappeared--picks their data keeper carefully.
Update: Phil Wainewright has another interesting post--he's full of them btw. He notes, like Rob Hyndman, that if Google lost data it would hurt its brand so you're data is likely to be safe. I don't disagree, but as an enterprise--which is my perspective--I want someone with a core competency in SaaS. I liken it to going best of breed--Salesforce and NetSuite are best of breed and Google is a SaaS rookie at this point. And as a customer, I just think it makes sense to go with a company that specializes in SaaS and is proven. Let's face it, Google is an advertising company. Perhaps Google becomes known as a SaaS company, but I'd be a slow follower here. Personally, I reckon Google Office is a distraction tactic to keep Microsoft off search.
Phil also asks whether my logic applies to Microsoft and others. The answer: Sure it does. Microsoft is trying to sell you shrink-wrapped boxes of software and it'll protect that business. Therefore, Microsoft is going to half step on the SaaS. Perhaps, it's just a game of perception, but it's there. Ditto for SAP.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Consumer vs. Enterprise
Google Office as a 'side project' is an accurate way to put it -Google's focus is still the consumer.
In an effort to create a clearer distinction between consumer SaaS and enterprise SaaS, we'll see the enterprise players (Salesforce, new players) start to widen the gap between themselves and any notion of consumer-targeted services.
No I would not.
side project...good point
Distinction without a difference
Google apps off to good start
http://www.itwire.com.au/index2.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=9865&pop=1&page=0&Itemid=1054
One of those includes Loreal. I've worked with them in the past and their tech people are first class, even the IT managers are good. Very organized.
Google's reputation is just as important as Salesforce.com. If Google lost customer data MSFT would be throwing their PR spin machine into warp drive.
I'm going to trust Google apps with one of my startup businesses. Linux and Google Apps. Micro-who?
[b]...many workers are being under serviced because of the cost of desktop solutions.[/b]
Sure. "one of your startups"
Gettting back to the article
I agree
A SOFTWARE WRITER IS A RARE BIRD INDEED