How to build the perfect Android tablet, part 4: Resolution and aspect ratio
Summary: The perfect tablet should be wide enough to view typical web pages in landscape mode, but not so wide that it looks weird when turned on its side. Here's how to pick the right compromise.
In part 2 of this series I stressed the importance of a responsive multi-touch screen to the success of upcoming Android tablets (or any tablet shaped device that competes with the iPad). For this installment I want to return to the display and discuss a different, um, aspect with you. My pick for the 4th most important feature of the perfect tablet is:
#4: A high resolution display that is wide but not *too* wide
One of the top reasons to have a mobile internet-capable device, be it a tablet or smart phone, is to browse the web. Unfortunately the web doesn't look so great on most mobile displays unless the web site has been specifically formatted for the small screen. The reason is that the vast majority of web sites were created for desktop and laptop monitors which are both wide and tall.
What is the resolution of the monitor you are using right now? You're probably using it in landscape mode, which means the width is more than the height. According to one site, 96% of web users in 2010 have a display which is 1024 pixels wide by 768 pixels tall or bigger, and 69% use displays that are at least 1280 pixels wide. Web developers design their sites to look good on the majority of screens, so most web sites expect at least 1024x768. If you screen is smaller than that, then the result can often be hard to read. Either the text is too small, or you'll have to do a lot of scrolling to see it, or both.
For example, one of the sites I frequently visit is dzone.com (I used to run an Eclipse forum for them a few years ago). Unfortunately the site is almost unusable on my Nexus One, which has a resolution of 800x480. Try viewing this page on your phone to see what I mean. I know that with proper use of style sheets you can design a site that will be friendly to many different resolutions, but flexible sites like that are few and far between. Therefore, for best results on the real web, a width of 1024 pixels is pretty much the minimum you should accept in a tablet.
How about height? The ratio of width / height is called the aspect ratio. There's a great chart on Wikipedia showing all the standard aspect ratios, but here are some common screen sizes and ratios you might be familiar with:
| Device | Resolution | Ratio |
|---|---|---|
| Nexus One | 800x480 | 1.67 (5:3) |
| Droid 2 | 854x480 | 1.78 (16:9) |
| iPhone 4 | 960x640 | 1.5 (3:2) |
| Samsung Tab | 1024x600 | 1.71 |
| iPad, older laptops | 1024x768 | 1.33 (4:3) |
| TV Hi-def 720p | 1280x720 | 1.78 (16:9) |
| Apple MacBook | 1280x800 | 1.6 |
| MacBook Pro | 1440x900 | 1.6 |
| WSXGA+ | 1680x1050 | 1.6 |
| TV Hi-def 1080p | 1920x1080 | 1.78 (16:9) |
| Theatrical standard | n/a | 1.85 |
| Anamorphic wide screen | n/a | 2.39 |
Interestingly, the "golden ratio" is 1.618, which is right in the middle of my range. Who am I to argue with centuries of artists, architects, and mathematicians? Given a width of 1024 or 1280 pixels, and factoring in commonly available LCD panel sizes, I recommend picking one of the following screen sizes for your new tablet:
1024x600: A little on the wide side for my tastes, but should be adequate for web browsing. 1280x800: Tall enough to watch 720p video without scaling, and wide enough for any web site you're likely to encounter.
To summarize, avoid tablets that are 800 or even 854 pixels wide or less. I'm not saying they won't be functional and useful for some purposes, but we're talking perfection here, folks. Also, I'd avoid anything much above 1280 for now. Without zooming, you'll find that most of the web sites out there on the net will be too tiny to read.
Finally, don't get fixated on the 1.78 (16:9) ratio just because High Definition TV uses that. A little letterboxing while watching Avatar is a small price to pay for a much more generally usable device that can be viewed in any orientation. Your TV doesn't have to work on its side in portrait mode, but your tablet does.
See all the articles in the "Perfect Android Tablet" series:
What would you build into *your* perfect Android tablet? Share your thoughts in the comment area below. In a week or two, I'll have one final feature idea to share with you.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
Good series Ed! I am waiting for a 11 inch or slightly bigger Android
Part 0
I have had two MS tablets and while battery life is an issue, so is waiting forever for the d*mn tablet to come to life or waiting for it to turn off before you can put it away. With windoze, boot up (particularly if it was setup in a corporate environment) can take forever while it searches for networks, drives and apps that are not accessible on the road. Similarly, when you want to quickly turn it off and stow the device (like on an airplane), true shutdown can take forever or you have to stow it while the drive is whirring and the machine is running hot risking damage to the tablet.
Instant on/off
RE: How to build the perfect Android tablet, part 4: Resolution and aspect ratio
On all of the devices that support "instant on/off", they're not really off, they're just in extreme power conservation mode, using just enough energy to keep the volitile memory and CPU registers fresh so that when the owner presses the button, the screen turns on and the power steps up to the memory/cpu and it's usable. On Windows systems, the thing that takes the longest is logging back into the locked desktop of a sleeping computer.
Multi-use
Re: Multi-use
For Galaxy Tab is the Ideal Form Factor Size & Aspect Ratio!
RE: How to build the perfect Android tablet, part 4: Resolution and aspect ratio
RE: How to build the perfect Android tablet, part 4: Resolution and aspect ratio
RE: How to build the perfect Android tablet, part 4: Resolution and aspect ratio
In at least the same aspect. Why keep trying to reinvent the wheel.
800X600 is the perfect
Most people see best and concentrate best in the narrower width and larger height of 4:3, and with the 800X600 resolution, words and numbers (what a computer is designed for, after all, and not multimedia) are larger and more readable in the same size font than they would be in a large pixel count screen. Face it, we're all getting older, and SMALLER is NOT better!
RE: How to build the perfect Android tablet, part 4: Resolution and aspect ratio
Mostly agree if one does not want to view a lot of web content, and is satisfied with single-window-at-a-time app usage. I have found a Pandigital Novel Android-based 7-inch 800x600 ereader to be quite nice for that purpose, and ho-hum for most other Android web-centric apps - in other words, adequate, but not a real substitute for a netbook/notebook PC for more "serious" productivity apps like heavy web browsing or word processing docs and spreadsheets.
IMO, Google has a valid reason for not wanting to support Android on tablets and larger form factors. Get a netbook/notebook with SSD, good battery life, and optmiized window manager for the screen, and stable sleep/standby/quickboot abilities (Linux is my preference, but YMMV, if it does not work with your hardware well).
FWIW
167 or more ppi
72dpi is 800x600 on a 14"...
a typical eBook reader averages about 167ppi... or 800x600 on a 6" screen...
But that is too small for a typical website surfing device.
A tablet has a great e-book vocation...
I would go for a 167 ppi minimum with
So a 1280x800 at 9" would be great... with a browser that supports good zooming features making the site zoom adustable. (it fits in about A5 form factor 720p)...
In the larger formats I would go for a 1920x1200 A4 size (13"@175ppi)...
that would make a great eBook reader,Internet Surfing + Full HD media viewer...
feature: hot-swappable battery
:)
.
RE: How to build the perfect Android tablet, part 4: Resolution and aspect ratio
Docking station for a phone.
RE: How to build the perfect Android tablet, part 4: Resolution and aspect ratio
The device needs to support disconnected storage for my favorite web sites and blogs so I don't need a WiFi or even a 3g connection to catch up. E-ink has to be a first-class data type so I can scribble my own notes anywhere I want without needing a keyboard. I don't care about handwriting recognition, but partial background h/w recognition--just enough so that my hand-written notes could be indexed and searchable would be very nice.
I have an Edge and in spite of the fact that the hardware specs don't wow and it uses a resistive touch screen over the LCD, I simply can't put it down. It's my favorite method for keeping on top of email, reading a book, and checking web sites.
- Dave Orme
good idea about android
good idea about android
Missed market segment - those of us who own a digital camera.
Robin