ie8 fix
madison

Android continues to skyrocket, Windows Mobile can do the same

By | August 12, 2010, 4:36pm PDT

Summary: The latest Gartner data shows Android with a major increase in global market share. Microsoft has the potential to do the same given their similar roll out strategy for Windows Phone 7.

I mentioned a few bits of Android news today and we now see Gartner’s latest smartphone data that shows the meteoric rise of Android over the last year from 1.8% to a whopping 17.2% with no end in sight. Symbian is down 10%, RIM is down 1%, Apple iOS is up 1%, and WM is down 4.3%. The overall smartphone market has grown significantly over the past year from 41 million to 61.6 million so there was significant growth in the market. This latest data shows me that there is real potential here for Microsoft to make a similar comeback with the launch of Windows Phone 7 (see my guide on the Technical Preview) later this year for a couple of reasons that I will explain below.

Symbian is way down because they have not had a competitive high end smartphone product for at least a year and are in transition from S60 to Symbian so product releases have been quite stagnant. RIM sales look to have been fairly steady, but companies that issue BlackBerry devices do not move as fast as consumers and some people have been waiting for BB 6. After using a BB Torch for a few days I think RIM will stay pretty flat moving forward and most likely will continue losing market share. Apple’s iOS slowed down significantly, but with their once a year release this was expected. I am sure the next quarter numbers will show a rise with the successful sales of the iPhone 4. Windows Mobile has continued to lose significant market share with no OS update as we all wait for WP7.

Android is successful because they provide a compelling OS that is available on every carrier in several different form factors. There is a lot of choice for the consumer and prices have fallen to a standard of $200 for high end subsidized smartphones. Android launched on the T-Mobile G1 in late 2008 and was pretty flat for at least the first year with few devices and few carriers with Android devices. The Verizon Motorola Droid really put Android on the map and generated the kind of excitement I expected with such a powerful OS. Google has continued to update and improve the OS too.

I think Microsoft has the opportunity to do the same thing as Android with their multi-carrier support, various form factor choices, and a compelling operating system that is focused on the end user experience while still meeting the needs of enterprise customers. The latest BlackBerry 6 OS is still not very touch friendly and I think Windows Phone 7 will be more appealing to those looking for a fun device to also use for getting work done on the go. Like Android, sales may be a bit flat at first while people come back to a Microsoft product, but Microsoft is in it for the long haul and as more devices and updates appear I think sales will increase significantly.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Matthew Miller started using a Pilot 1000 in 1997 and has been writing news, reviews, and opinion pieces ever since.

Disclosure

Matthew Miller

Matthew is a professional naval architect by day and a mobile gadget freak at all other times. He purchases his own devices and then sells them on eBay or Craigslist to buy more. Many other devices are sent for review on a 30-day loaner basis and then returned to the carrier or manufacturer. If any are provided as “long term loaner units” this will be clearly disclosed in his reviews.

Biography

Matthew Miller

Matthew Miller started using a mobile devices in 1997 and has been writing news, reviews, and opinion pieces ever since. He is a co-host with GigaOM's Kevin Tofel on the MobileTechRoundup podcast and an author of three Wiley Companion series books. Matthew started using mobile devices with a US Robotics Pilot 1000 and has owned over 125 different devices running Palm, Linux, Symbian, Newton, BlackBerry, iOS, Android, webOS, Windows Mobile, and Windows Phone operating systems. His current collection includes an HTC Radar 4G, Dell Venue Pro, Apple iPad 2, HTC Flyer, Samsung Galaxy Nexus, Nokia N9, Apple iPhone 4S, MacBook Pro, and many more, along with tons of accessories and classic devices like the Apple Newton MessagePad 2100 and Sony CLIE UX50. Matthew can be found on various discussion forums under the user name of "palmsolo".
29
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Android continues to skyrocket, Windows Mobile can do the same
non-biased Updated - 19th Aug 2010
There is a lot of talk about the cost of the OS being a factor in the manufacturers deciding if they will put out a model with WP7 versus Android. I agree this is a factor but the manufacturers are also going to look at how saturated the Android market is versus the WP7 market. It's far easier to get good sales figures when you have one of only a few models on the market with an OS (assuming people actually want the OS) than it is when you are one of dozens.
0 Votes
+ -
Android is nice, but not as polished as iPhone. Win7 Phone looks nice, but we'll have to see what the final product is like.

If they update quickly with quality features/update, Microsoft could do very well.
0 Votes
+ -
About as interesting as the Kin Launch!!!!!!!!
@DonnieBoy
Kinda like that OpenMoko phone? That's right, your saying who? Exactly!
  • Flagged
@otaddy Android is way batter than Ifone :/
I've held off getting a smart phone, waiting for the Windows Phone 7 to be released. I'd love to see this OS, in a form factor as smart looking as the new Droid 2.
0 Votes
+ -
WP7 looks very promising
P. Douglas Updated - 12th Aug 2010
Based on the WP7 apps that I've seen on YouTube, WP7 looks very promising. WP7 apps appear to be the slickest smartphone apps around, and they are definitely much richer than the competition. I don't want to jinx anything, but WP7 is looking very good. I hope MS doesn't take anything for granted, and hopefully after driving a lot of value into the WP7 ecosystem, it can increase its licensing fees for the OS to at least $40/copy - which is not even 10% of the cost of many smartphone handsets.
0 Votes
+ -
The only stuff on YouTube shows crap
wackoae 12th Aug 2010
Seriously, if you are impressed by the crap showing in YouTube ... you have very low standards of expectation.

So far, all I have see is:
#1- WinPho7 OS with an UI about the same as the failure called KIN.
#2- A few games that are just the same as what is already on the market.
#3- Apps that are not new or in anyway impressive.
@P. Douglas
MS has done a fantastic job of the UI. They simply need to get a couple of their other, more basic ducks in a row and they will have a device that is worthy of being a hit on their hands. Unfortunately, MS can screw up a good thing better than anyone else. The Zune was a device that was worthy of being a hit and look at what MS did with it. sad
0 Votes
+ -
The Kin looked very promising too.
DonnieBoy 13th Aug 2010
NT
@DonnieBoy

What was "promising" about Kin?

The TV ads were enticing dumb kids to travel to meet their Facebook 'friends'. The only promising thing about that was the newspaper sales on the strength of missing kids headlines and the lawsuits their parents would bring against MS.

It's like watching a car crash in ultra slow motion!
much better quality apps. and of course big marketing. 99.999% of buyers dont care what OS is on their phone. MS should have no problem taking a large piece of this market.
0 Votes
+ -
Really?? They don't care?? Then explain ...
wackoae Updated - 12th Aug 2010
... how come the Zune is a FAILURE and although there are over a 100 models of MP3 players models that are cheaper, the iPod brand continues to outsell them all by a very large margin.
@wackoae I would agree that most people don't care what OS is on their phone and will with what works best for them. In the MP3 market the iPod works best in most buyers opinions thus the market share but if it were another brand that worked better they would go with that one not caring whose OS it is.
0 Votes
+ -
Two points
Economister Updated - 13th Aug 2010
1. Android is free, WP7 is not. Hence MS will be at a distinct disadvantage, and even more so as smart phones become commodities. The cost of the OS will matter.

2. You keep talking about the price of the phone "with a contract". I wish you would display a bit more in depth understanding and stop spouting this misleading nonsense. The price of a phone with a contract is absolutely irrelevant. The carriers could give the damn things away and just up the monthly charge by a few $. I guess that would excite you eh?

When you go to buy a car, do you get a excited because the down payment is lower? Probably not, because you still have to pay for the damn thing.

Do your readers a favor: Deal with facts and not illusions.
manufacturers to make a phone for it.
@DonnieBoy

Then what's their income strategy? Bing Search? If that's all they want then all they'd have to do is create a fork of Android that is centered around Bing/MS rather than Google. That would be much quicker, easier, and cheaper, plus they would compete better against Apple because there would not be yet another set of apps to buy if you get another phone with a different OS.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Price with contract is primary for US buyers
palmsolo (aka Matthew Miller) 13th Aug 2010
@Economister People in the US primarily buy their phones with a contract and only those extreme enthusiasts like me pay full price so price with a contract is the standard to measure all phones by for US consumers. US consumers would balk at the no contract price ($500 to $600+ in many cases) and it has not shown to be a successful model here even if it turns out to be less expensive over the long run.

I agree that people should look at the contract price where carriers are making all of their money, but that is not a price US buyers care much about at this time.
They are the ones that will not be to excited about paying royalties to Microsoft for an un-proven OS, based on a failed music player, when Android is free, known, and proven.
0 Votes
+ -
You are contributing to the problem
Economister 13th Aug 2010
@palmsolo (aka Matthew Miller)

As a journalist, I think you have a somewhat greater responsibility. You are feeding the ignorance and allowing the deception to continue. The total cost of the deal is $2000 to $3000, and you get exited about a minuscule drop in the down payment.

There is more than enough ignorance among US consumers already. Do you really need to help make it worse? Where are your principles and integrity?
@palmsolo (aka Matthew Miller)

I agree with DonnieBoy, its the manufacturers that get to choose what OS goes on their phones and if they get better margins using Android that will be the obvious choice, especially because Microsoft has stated that the UI cannot be significantly customised so the only edge that manufacturers will have over their competitors is the hardware, which is pretty much standard across all manufacturers, or price. So it will become a race to the bottom of the market and the phones will need to be cheap.

I also cant see the appeal of the UI, the home screen is DULL, DULL, DULL, only 7 big, blocky, single colour UI elements that dont display much information at all. 90% of the screen space is wasted with nothing but monocolour boxes.

If you go into the hubs you only get arts of ords it doesn mak sens to obscu t wor . I cant see how chopping off the start or end of words can be intuitive in a UI and make things easier to use.

The 3D transitions would also get very tiring very quickly, they slow everything down and I expect they would soon become tedious when you want to get to some information quickly. I'd rather the UI respond in milliseconds than have some fancy 3D flip transition that just wastes time.
@Economister Your $2k-$3k figure is also misleading. That figure is the cost of the contract for service which includes the phone. You are not paying that much for just the phone so throwing that figure around is very misleading. Comparing the price of the service without a subsidized phone for the contract period versus the price with one in addition to the initial cost of the phone would show what is actually paid for the phone.
I hope Windows Mobile does skyrocket! Microsoft has always been good about making a unified platform so it should be easy for developers on the WP7 devices. I can't wait to see, try, hold, play, caress, fondle, and other things with the latest WP7. The UI is very slick on it. Its well organized. I really don't want an iPhone, I don't want an android phone, it looks like WP7 may be my only choice or get a dumb phone.
@Loverock Davidson
A dumb phone would fit you to a T. Go with that.
0 Votes
+ -
It's all speculation.
TripleII-21189418044173169409978279405827 13th Aug 2010
It depends on the product and the OS. Is it really compelling operating system that is focused on the end user experience while still meeting the needs of enterprise customers.?

Not from what I have read, and MS appears to be setting the bar very low before release.

http://www.zdnet.com/blog/bott/wheres-the-roadmap-for-windows-phone-7/2273
The first and most important missing piece is Clipboard support, a feature that every preview I read identified as a negative. According to Long Zheng, the Windows Phone 7 team ?knows exactly how they will be implementing copy & paste
...
The second flaw is a lack of multitasking support, where Microsft has to at least pass the Pandora test
...
And the third is the lack of support for HTML5 or Flash or Silverlight in the mobile browser. As Engadget correctly notes, the inability to play back video in the browser is a serious shortfall: ?There?s not even a YouTube app on the phone! Microsoft ? you?ve got to step it up on the video front if you want to play this game.?


After playing with the EVO at a Sprint store yesterday, which does all of the above flawlessly, (honestly, I was blown away by the speed and video quality) they really better not think "OK" will do much.

TripleII
@palmsolo
IMHO, the MS phone will flop, simply because it is so far behind in the technology. MS is a very stagnant company now with very little creative energy, and seems to be unmotivated to do anything new. Either that, or they just don't know how. Like you, I would love to see a great MS phone, but I'm not holding my breath. I think MS is living in the past big time.
0 Votes
+ -
Dont think so..
ffinder-cy 14th Aug 2010
Just consider this:

Android has over 106'000 apps
WinMobile just.. 1'200 apps

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_digital_distribution_platforms_for_mobile_devices

Forget the WinMobile 7.. specially with its UGLY Tetris looking interface..

ff
So Billy wants me to pay for OS on my phone? As I recall, it was his pathetic OS for laptops that made us an Apple family. (Apple Store clerk: "So...what brings you to Apple today?" Me: "Bill Gates." Yep, I said it and I meant it.) And WP7 is JUST the OS. Complete evaluation is not even possible until you know the hardware that goes with.
0 Votes
+ -
WinFon looks good
empirestatebuddy 17th Aug 2010
Very interested in this phone.
0 Votes
+ -
There is a lot of talk about the cost of the OS being a factor in the manufacturers deciding if they will put out a model with WP7 versus Android. I agree this is a factor but the manufacturers are also going to look at how saturated the Android market is versus the WP7 market. It's far easier to get good sales figures when you have one of only a few models on the market with an OS (assuming people actually want the OS) than it is when you are one of dozens.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix