Apple's new and improved MacBook Pro and MacBook Air

Summary: There was no Apple TV in sight, but Apple delivered exactly what everyone expected at today's Worldwide Developers Conference including fresh MacBooks and new versions of Mac OS X and iOS. The biggest surprise was a redesigned Apple MacBook Pro that is notably thinner and lighter, but has a super high-resolution display, faster quad-core processor and Nvidia's latest discrete graphics.

There was no Apple TV in sight, but Apple delivered exactly what everyone expected at today's Worldwide Developers Conference including fresh MacBooks and new versions of Mac OS X and iOS. The biggest surprise was a redesigned Apple MacBook Pro that is notably thinner and lighter, but has a super high-resolution display, faster quad-core processor and Nvidia's latest discrete graphics. The existing MacBook Airs and MacBook Pros have also been upgraded to Intel's Ivy Bridge across the board, though the designs remain unchanged.

The new MacBook Pro has 15.4-inch Retina display with a resolution 2,880 by 1,800 pixels (or 220 pixels per inch). At that density, Apple says the human eye can't discern the individual pixels (hence the Retina name first used with the new iPad, which has a density of 264 ppi). The company also says the IPS display has "deeper blacks," wider viewing angles, and less glare than the current displays. Just as with the new iPad, applications need to be updated to take advantage of a screen with such as high resolution. Apple has already updated some built-in apps such as Mail, Safari, iMovie and iPhoto as well as Aperture and Final Cut Pro, and it is working with other companies to update key applications and games such as Adobe Photoshop, Autodesk's AutoCAD and Diablo III.

Apple likes to summon Sir Jony Ive for a virtual teardown, and this year was no exception. By eliminating the glass cover on the display and using non-standard components, Apple was able to slim it down to about 0.7 inches and 4.5 pounds. That's almost as thin and light as the 13-inch MacBook Air, though the MacBook Pro doesn't have the same tapered design. The existing MacBooks Pro 15-inch, a better comparison, is almost an inch thick and weighs 5.6 pounds. HP's Envy Sleekbook 6t, which is perhaps closest in terms of design with its 15.6-inch display and slim chassis, is 0.8 inches thick and weighs 4.8 pounds. The Envy 6t is considerably cheaper, but it doesn't come close to matching the specs of the new MacBook Pro.

The MacBook Pro Retina starts at $2,199 with Intel's 2.3GHz Core i7 quad-core processor, 8GB of memory, Nvidia's GeForce GT 650M graphics and a 256GB solid-state drive. You can configure it with a faster processor, up to 16GB of memory and SSDs with capacities up to 768GB. To lighten the load you do give up some MacBook Pro features including the optical drive, Ethernet jack and FireWire port (there are accessories for all of these) but the Retina version has HDMI out, as well as two USB 3.0 ports, two Thunderbolt ports and an SD card slot.

The standard MacBook Pro still comes in 13- and 15-inch versions with the same starting prices. The 13-inch model (1,280 by 800 pixels) starts at $1,999 with a third-generation 2.5GHz Core i5 dual-core processor, 4GB of memory, 500GB hard drive and SuperDrive. Its big brother has a 15.4-inch 1440-by-900 displays and starts at $1,799 with a 2.3GHz Core i7 quad-core, 4GB of memory, a 500GB hard drive and SuperDrive. You can choose a higher resolution (not to mention faster processor and SSDs), but at that point you might as well splurge for the Retina display version. Though it wasn't mentioned, the 17-inch MacBook Pro desktop replacement has apparently been discontinued.

The MacBook Air also looks the same on the outside. You can't really blame Apple for this: As CEO Tim Cook accurately noted the PC industry is still trying to catch up with this iconic design--something that was apparent from the many new Ultrabooks at Computex last week. The starting prices remain the same, but the shift to Ivy Bridge should give the MacBook Air a nice performance boost. The 11-inch model starts at $999 with a 1.7GHz Core i5 dual-core chip, 4GB of memory and a 64GB SSD. The 13-inch one starts at $1,199 with a slightly faster processor and a 128GB SSD.

All of the new MacBooks are available now, but you'll have to wait until July to upgrade to Mac OS X Mountain Lion (it's free with a new MacBook or $19.99 on a current system with OS X 10.6.8 or later). Many of the new features have been known since February when Apple gave an early version to developers, but the company revealed more details today including better Facebook and Twitter integration, Reminders and Notes apps, Messages, speech dictation, improvements to iCloud to keep your documents in sync across multiple devices, a new version of Safari, and PowerNap, which updates the system while it is in standby. The latter is basically Apple's version of the Smart Connect features that Intel and Microsoft have been working on for Windows 8 Ultrabooks. PowerNap only works on the new MacBook Airs and the MacBook Pro with the Retina display.

Apple said that there are now 66 million Mac users worldwide. Of those, 26 million are running the latest version of OS X, Lion, which was released nine months ago.

Topic: Apple

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

18 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • I'll believe it when I see it

    [i] it is working with other companies to update key applications and games such as Diablo III.[/i]

    Considering the (relatively) weak GPU in the MBP, I'd like to see just how low you have to set your quality in order to get good frame rates at 2,880 by 1,800. It is one thing to say you are running Diablo II at 2880x1800 and it is another thing entirely for your GPU to calculate 5,000,000+ pixels 30+ times a second.

    My guess? We won't hear anything more about modern games running at 2880x1800 on a laptop with an NVidia 560M with only 1GB of RAM. This "announcement" will be quickly forgotten.
    toddbottom3
    • That "relatively weak GPU"

      runs the D3 they're talking about on ultra with an average of 44 FPS. Granted, it won't be as high on this. I'd say that you might have to lower everything to medium on that "relatively weak GPU" to get a decent framerate with the changes.
      Michael Alan Goff
      • That is why I put the "relatively"

        It IS relatively weak compared to what graphics cards are capable of today. I know, I have a 560M. I don't run around pretending it is a strong graphics card.

        [i]I'd say that you might have to lower everything to medium[/i]

        Which was [b]exactly[/b] my point. In order to "brag" about running Diablo III at 2880x1800, you have to turn the settings down so far that your buddy running it at 1600x1050 on ultra ends up with a far nicer end result. In order to run this thing at 2880x1800, my prediction (and you seem to agree) is that you are going to have to turn the quality [b]way[/b] down.

        Now you could go into Apple defense mode and come back with:
        [i]So turn your resolution down to 1600x1050[/i] and yes, you could but if you are just going to run it at a lower resolution, why brag about how you are [i]working with other companies to update key applications and games[/i]? There is only one reason to do this: to brag that you are running Diablo III at 2880x1800 and just hope and pray that no one asks to see what it looks like at that resolution because then you'd have to admit that it looks terrible.
        toddbottom3
      • I'd be okay with medium

        I'd think that the colors would look better with the newer display. There might also be less of a need for AA, which would give some performance gain. We'll just have to wait and see.
        Michael Alan Goff
      • Diablo 3 works at 2880x1800 with full graphic options on

        @toddbottom3: this is because D3 is actually not that much graphic hungry name. It was designed in terms of graphics back in 2008, so [b]Diablo III goes smoothly on Retina resolution with all graphic features turned on.[/b]
        DDERSSS
      • DeRSSS: Really?

        [i]Diablo III goes smoothly on Retina resolution with all graphic features turned on[/i]

        You state this as a fact. You've done it?

        No, of course not. DeRSSS, I'm calling you out once again for writing things as fact that you have absolutely no way of knowing as fact. You've been called out.
        toddbottom3
    • You know it is not the 560M but the 650M?

      Just wondering.
      Bruizer
      • sheepish grin

        No, my dyslexia has struck again.

        Just read up on the 650M. It's performance numbers are very very close to the 560M. The only advantage it seems to have is that it runs cooler, which makes sense.

        My original post stands even if I did get the precise model number wrong. Considering the 650M is not any faster than the 560M, running Diablo III at 2880x1800 with the settings turned down is good for only one thing: bragging to your buddy that you are technically speaking running Diablo III at 2880x1800. It certainly won't look any good.
        toddbottom3
  • What?

    Retina was first used with the iPhone and it was claimed to be higher than 300 ppi which made it retina... Now this has been shrinking since and the 220 ppi is good but not minimally accept sharpness of some CRTs from years past.
    slickjim
    • its not based on ppi

      its not based on the ppi, but a combination of the ppi and the normal distance your eye should be away from the screen. iPhones needed a higher ppi because they are normally held closer to the eye. iPads have a slightly less ppi because they are normally held away, and the laptop is normally considered to be even further from the eye than the iPad. The closer the normal viewing distance physcially gets to the eye, the higher the ppi count needs to be.
      doh123
      • Exactly why retina is a useless term

        [i]its not based on the ppi[/i]

        I know, that is what makes the term a garbage term. Every single display ever released has been a retina display. Since Apple gets to define what "normal" viewing distance is, they simply use circular logic.

        What is Retina display? A display that at "normal" viewing distance, a viewer can't distinguish individual pixels.

        What is "normal" viewing distance? The distance at which an Apple display can be labeled as retina.

        Apple, your marketing is brilliant. Even better is that you constantly fool people like doh.
        toddbottom3
  • Awesome

    can't wait to upgrade...Ugly PC manufacturers will soon follow Apple's path
    shellcodes_coder
    • WHAT?!?!?

      have you ever tried other brands NB? or at least have you ever seen other brands' specs? "13-inch model (1,280 by 800 pixels) starts at $1,999 with a third-generation 2.5GHz Core i5 dual-core processor, 4GB of memory, 500GB hard drive and SuperDrive. " there is nothing revolutionary, these are really basic specs and for $2000 are just a rip-off (for example, the asus ux31a, which is cheaper, has a i7-3517U @ 3.0GHz - as everyone knows by now, IB ij just a remodeled SB - a 13.3" screen with a 1920x1080 res, and a SATAIII SSD). I shouldnt care more, but I do hate when there are so many idiots around talking non-sense, I can understand cnet/zdnet bloggers that are just payed by apple for that
      dubree
      • It's all about the retina

        just sayin'
        Michael Alan Goff
  • are you sure?

    "...but the shift to Ivy Bridge should give the MacBook Air a nice performance boost". have you "really" tried the new cpu? I've just built a new IB desktop (upgrading with just ??350 for an 3570K OC@4.5 and a Z77 ASUS sabertooth) and to be honest there is no difference at all compared with a similar OC SB, based on real everyday work and not benchmark. but I guess you learned well by your employer to talk just good marketing tricks
    dubree
    • Not quite the same thing.

      "performance boost" is current MacBook Air to Ivy Bridge MacBook Air
      ManoaHI
  • D3 runs very well on my 2012 MBA

    I run D3 on the new 13" MBA (HD 4000) in native 1440x900 resolution with average 35 FPS. Granted I turn shadows off and everything else is off and low particules is ON, but the games looks amazingly good despite all the low setting. I dont know if its the screen size or screen quality but its look has good has my desktop iMac.
    herbapou
  • going

    If you're going through a custody battle, then your state may require that a guardian ad litem be assigned to your case. This is an attorney for the child basically.
    http://www.oakleysunglassesshopping.com/
    laeses