Laptops & Desktops

John Morris & Sean Portnoy

Intel readying Core i7-2700K CPU to spoil AMD Bulldozer launch?

By | September 13, 2011, 4:02am PDT

It looks like Intel may have a two-pronged approach to combating the imminent debut of AMD’s new Bulldozer desktop processors. Not only does the company plan to release its new Sandy Bridge-E “extreme” chips a few weeks after Bulldozer’s launch, but it also appears to have another CPU up its sleeve to send out against AMD’s new FX series.

CPU World sleuths noticed that Intel recently added a new box to its Material Declaration Data Sheets (MDDS) database that indicates that the company is preparing the Core i7-2700K, which would presumably replace the i7-2600K as the fastest non-extreme Sandy Bridge desktop processor. Unfortunately, there are no specs or other pertinent information about the chip, though CPU World assumes that it will be like the i7-2600K with four cores, Hyper-Threading, and 8MB L3 cache, but will carry a slightly higher clock speed.

Anandtech speculates that the pricing for the i7-2700K will be roughly $317, which will be higher than the top eight-core Bulldozers. Then again, if it can best AMD’s latest in performance testing, then enthusiasts might not mind the extra cost. The i7-2700K release could also pull the pricing of the i7-2600K down closer to the $266 price expected for the FX-8150.

In any event, it appears that Intel will have plenty of new product to battle with Bulldozer as the fourth quarter rolls on. But will it be able to blunt AMD’s momentum after it launches its latest chips?

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Sean Portnoy is a freelance technology journalist.

Disclosure

Sean Portnoy

Sean Portnoy is a freelance technology journalist; currently, all work that Sean does is on a contractural basis. Sean has also written corporate communications documents for CA.

Sean does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

Biography

Sean Portnoy

Sean Portnoy started his tech writing career at ZDNet nearly a decade ago. He then spent several years as an editor at Computer Shopper magazine, most recently serving as online executive editor. He received a B.A. from Brown University and an M.A. from the University of Southern California.
11
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Intel readying Core i7-2700K CPU to spoil AMD Bulldozer launch?
rnicholl1 14th Sep
@Damien c They have the advantage, AMD FX chips will be fully unlocked, Intel chips only have unlocked multiplier. Thus, this kind of overclock is much easier. Also, the chips tend to have twice as many cores.
Quote "CPU World sleuths noticed that Intel recently added a new box to its Material Declaration Data Sheets"

I think you're trying to mislead us!
Is it true that the Sandy Bridge processors 32nm were released without sata6 capability; to date? ( As I have also read that the latest Sandy Bridge-E processors will be without. As well as, but really not important; the pcie 3.0 interphase.

AMD will still have customers if they can facelift current website Home Page, capitalize on sata6 and pcie3.0 capability of FX processors and quad-channel memory interface. ( Currently own i72600k with lack of interest toward LGA 2011 cpu's 22nm design issues to date.)
@Rob T.
That wasn't true. But what was true is that their refusal to go to 6 SATA 6GB/s ports cost them a ton of cash- remember the recalls and switches to B3 stepping on the early motherboards?

But what they didn't have at launch was USB 3.0. Even Sandy Bridge-E (X79) doesn't have an on-chip controller.

So I hope, really hope, that Bulldozer is competitive with the i7-2600K, or at least, AT LEAST the 2500K (I don't care about the 2600K because the speed gain is minimal with HyperThreading- and the 2500K overclocks just as high).


But what I really want is a sub-100 dollar Bulldozer (or at least, about 130-150).

That would effectively delete the locked Intel i3 processors from the minds of enthusiasts, and perhaps force Intel to put out an unlocked i3 (which would be very interesting to see if it could reach as high a clock speed as its quad-core brethren).

But... I have to wait for Piledriver to come out for that. So next year (maybe).
This fall, Coach Classic ******** launched a new series, a craft exquisite ******** series, set the culmination of past inspiration and into modern accessories and the latest styling in one, stunning. Coach Chelsea ******** design exquisite, classic yet gentle to the atmosphere of the section, simple pin and accessories reflect the quiet natural beauty of Coach leather. Chelsea's early return to the Coach leather trim style, surrounded by new slim trim package, and with the LV Damier Ebene logo classic traditional with a diamond-shaped lock to enhance the overall appearance.
No specifications, only speculation.

I feel like I read a star scandal sheet.
Definitely, having the specs would help happy

www.meteortel.com
One thing that's always bugged me is AMD's lack of advertising. People that don't have a clue about PC hardware know the word Intel. Another great AMD bonus is the life cycles of there sockets. Since AM2 started there has almost always been compatibility for new motherboards. Unless you have to shave 30 seconds off from video compression times the paper specs are irrellavent.
Will that help me read email faster?
AMD just made 8.4GHz liquid chip, 5GHz air. Who cares? AMD wins.
@rnicholl1

Yeah they had to use Liquid Nitrogen and Liguid Helium, and also disable 6 core's and 2.1v to reach that speed.

Look at CPU-Z in the video.


Far as I am concerned let's see some real world benchmark's and also see how far, they go or do not go on air and water.
@Damien c They have the advantage, AMD FX chips will be fully unlocked, Intel chips only have unlocked multiplier. Thus, this kind of overclock is much easier. Also, the chips tend to have twice as many cores.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix