Don't stint on datacenter physical security

Don't stint on datacenter physical security

Summary: When was the last time you actually evaluted the physical security of your datacenters from a planned attack?

SHARE:

You've spent millions of dollars on the latest technology equipment, you're running hardware-based security systems that guarantee your customers and users the security of your data, and you have active monitoring in place to proactively head off any potential environmental and power problems.  So what can go wrong?  How about a couple guys with sledgehammers and a moving van?

Vodafone, one of the largest cellular carriers in the world, lost service to millions of customers when a group of thieves, armed with sledgehammers and a van, broke into an isolated datacenter and apparently just stole  some very specific equipment; the racks of routers, with a value well into the millions.  Vodafone had to pull equipment from their testing labs in order to get their customers back online. Unsurprisingly, the system shutdown, not the theft, was what customers were complaining about, and the theft, which occurred on Sunday, still had customers offline on Monday afternoon.

It's not unusual for phone company Central Offices on the smaller side to be unmanned, locked buildings, but other than random acts of violence, they've never really been the target of equipment theft. The CO equipment was just too specialized for there to be a lot of value in it for thieves.  Copper theft was always much more of an issue. But now that these buildings contain specialized, but much more standardized, networking equipment, the black market for this equipment is huge, especially in Europe. This makes it a much more attractive target for thieves.

When you consider the imposing size and physical structure of a datacenter, you have to also look at the value of the contents, not just the equipment, but what happens if that equipment goes offline.  A fully operational 100,000 sq ft plus datacenter may only have a few people actually working in that building, with an even smaller number there in the wee hours of the morning.  Physical security may have been addressed, but how many of you have given serious thought that the physical security problem might be more than just casual vandalism?

Topics: Data Centers, Hardware, Storage

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

6 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • RE: Don't stint on datacenter physical security

    WTH is a CO? You writers at ZDNET really need to follow one of the first rules of journalism and define all acronyms the first time they are used in an article instead of assuming all your readers are familiar with them.
    jsanko
    • RE: Don't stint on datacenter physical security

      @jsanko
      Central Office
      daikon
      • RE: Don't stint on datacenter physical security

        @daikon Good post,thank you so much~~! <a href="http://www.classicchanelbags.org">classic chanel bags</a> <a href="http://www.classicchanelbags.org">chanel replica</a>
        yantangseo
  • RE: Don't stint on datacenter physical security

    Maybe read the article JSanko before reacting - Daikon was way to polite. See the previous sentence ...

    "It?s not unusual for phone company Central Offices on the smaller side to be unmanned, locked buildings, but other than random acts of violence, they?ve never really been the target of equipment theft. The CO equipment was just too ..."
    lou15
  • What no pop-up turrets?

    NT
    voltrarian
  • RE: Don't stint on datacenter physical security

    Good stuff as per usual, thanks. I do hope this kind of thing gets more exposure.<a href="http://www.minmetalschina.com/">Tool Steel</a>
    flypig0089