Nikon 1 ILC cameras unveiled: V1 sports small sensor, big price

Summary: Nikon's flagship interchangeable lens compact camera, the new Nikon 1 V1, has a smaller sensor and lower resolution than similarly high-priced rivals, but packs the features into a small package.

Nikon has finally plunged into the exploding interchangeable lens compact (ILC) camera market, announcing two cameras in its new Nikon 1 line: the flagship Nikon 1 V1 and its smaller and cheaper sibling, the Nikon 1 J1.  The Nikon 1 system has been rumored and leaked for years, so most of the specs won't be news to die-hard Nikon fans. But for everyone else, the most surprising aspect of the camera will likely be the relatively small sensor and low resolution compared to most of the competition.

Nikon is referring to the new sensor size as its CX format, to distinguish it from its APS-C-size DX and full-frame FX sensors. The new CX format sensor falls somewhere in size between the sensors in Micro Four Thirds cameras (such as the Olympus PEN and Panasonic Lumix G series cameras) and that of the tiny Pentax Q (which has a sensor comparable in size to a compact point-and-shoot). By opting for a 10-megapixel CMOS sensor -- compared with 12 megapixels in Olympus, Panasonic, and Pentax models (not to mention the even higher-resolution ILCs from Sony, which have much larger sensors as well) -- Nikon may be able to mitigate the loss of image quality it might suffer by going with a smaller sensor. But image quality aside, the other big issue that a smaller sensor raises is crop factor (or focal length multiplier).

Nikon's CX sensors have a crop factor of 2.7x, which means it needs a wider-angle lens to achieve the same field of view than the Micro Four Thirds cameras (which have a multiplier of 2.0x) or the Sonys (with 1.5x), and that ultimately can limit your ability to achieve selective focus effects with a narrow depth of field at wide apertures. (In laymen's terms, you won't be able to get those nice dSLR-like shots where your subject is in focus but the background is soft.)

Still, neither of the Nikon 1 cameras looks like a slouch in terms of features. Of particular note is the new "advanced hybrid autofocus system" which delivers a whopping 73 focus points and lets you automatically switch between contrast-detect autofocus (for better performance in low light) or phase-detection autofocus (for better performance with moving subjects), depending on what your scene calls for.

Other key features include:

  • Continuous mode shooting up to 5fps in most modes; 10, 30, or 60 fps in Electronic (Hi) mode
  • Motion Snapshot mode automatically records a short video clip with your still shot and plays it back in slow-motion accompanied with music, ending with your actual still image.
  • Smart Photo Selector mode initiates continuous mode shooting and automatically selects the best five frames captured based on factors such as exposure, composition, focus, and facial recognition
  • Simultaneous capture of still images and 1080p HD video
  • 1,440,000-dot electronic viewfinder (V1 only)
  • 3-inch, 921,000-dot LCD (460,000-dot for J1)
  • ISO sensitivity range: 100-6400
  • Stereo microphone input (V1 only)
  • Accessory port for optional external flash or GPS module (V1 only)

The Nikon 1 V1 will start shipping on October 20 and sell for $899.95 with a 10-30mm f/3.5-5.6 kit lens or $1,149.95 for a two-lens kit (the 10-30mm lens plus a 10mm f/2.8 wide-angle lens or a 30-110mm f/3.8-5.6 zoom).

The Nikon 1 J1, V1's smaller, cheaper, and arguably hipper sibling has most of the same features as the V1, but has a lower-resolution LCD and doesn't have an accessories hotshoe or EVF. It's a couple of ounces lighter and a touch trimmer (including the lack of a bump-out for the V1's EVF) and will also ship on October 20 with the same lens options.  Pricing is set at $649.95 for the one-lens kit and $899.95 for each of the two-lens kits. The J1 comes in black, white, red, and pink body color options (with matching lenses), though you can only get the wide angle two-lens kit in white or red and the zoom two-lens kit in white, red, or pink. Also, you'll pay an extra $30 for the pink kit which also comes with pink lens hoods, a pink leather hand strap, and a pink wrapping cloth.

Related stories on ZDNet:

Topic: Hardware

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

21 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • RE: Nikon 1 ILC cameras unveiled: V1 sports small sensor, big price

    Crappy sensor and high price make other options far better.
    slickjim
    • RE: Nikon 1 ILC cameras unveiled: V1 sports small sensor, big price

      Price: I believe the price is on par with nearly all ILC cameras other than the Samsung NXs on closeout. If we use the Olympus E-PM1 as a benchmark, the camera is, at most, about $150 more, though you lose the flash, and a lot of the features and performance. I noticed the Pentax Q (with a 1/3" sensor) costs $800. You pay a lot of miniturization.
      tychay
  • RE: Nikon 1 ILC cameras unveiled: V1 sports small sensor, big price

    Take a look at some of the sample photos, the number of megapixel is not relevant, the images are amazing good for the small size of the camera
    huyen.dangvu51
    • RE: Nikon 1 ILC cameras unveiled: V1 sports small sensor, big price

      @huyen.dangvu51 Very good post, thanks ,<a href="http://www.cheapuggs.eu/">cheap Uggs</a>
      adijoy
  • Someone at Nikon needs to be fired.

    As a Nikon fan - this is a joke.
    GuntherGump
  • RE: Nikon 1 ILC cameras unveiled: V1 sports small sensor, big price

    The discussion in the reiew of the sensor size and depth of field is off-base. Depth of field is a function of image magnification and lens aperature. It is true that a smaller sensor requires a shorter focal lenght lens to achieve the same angle of view.
    drtinkham@...
  • you've got to be kidding.

    Well here is a stupid decision that just devalued their reputation and product line. Instead of a pink camera how about a few pink slips.
    2feral
    • RE: Nikon 1 ILC cameras unveiled: V1 sports small sensor, big price

      @ferrel1 <a href="http://www.cheapuggs.ws/">cheap Uggs</a>
      adijoy
  • RE: Nikon 1 ILC cameras unveiled: V1 sports small sensor, big price

    After extensive experience with the four thirds format which I found to not work well at all, the last thing I would try is an even smaller sensor that would certainly give me more noise and overall worse performance. Nikon made a bad business move with this toy.
    edfindley
    • RE: Nikon 1 ILC cameras unveiled: V1 sports small sensor, big price

      Re: Sensor size. This sensor is still 3-8x bigger than a pocket camera and 10x bigger than your iPhone. So if a pocket camera or iPhone is okay for you, this should blow that out of the water. If it isn't good enough for you, you should seriously consider getting a dSLR--that's what they're made for and they're cheaper than a Nikon 1 or any EVIL camera for that matter.
      tychay
  • Your writer knows nothing about resolution.

    Even an 8Mp sensor can produce huge, sharp images -- if the sensor and processing are of high quality.

    Sorry, Dr Tinkham, but you're wrong. (And you don't know how to spell aperture, either.) The review is correct -- the smaller the format, the greater the depth of field. The rule is... "Equal-diameter apertures * produce the same depth of field for equal final magnifications."

    * not f-stops -- diameters
    GrizzledGeezer
    • Some cheese with your whining

      Re: Megapixel. Dr. Tinkham is correct about megapixel, assuming no cropping a 6 megapixel image will produce an indistinguishable image as a 200mp one when blown up to 8x10" print viewing distance of one foot. Try it some time. I've had friends take a 14 mp image, crop it into a panorama (effectively becoming a 5 megapixel one) and print it on a multi-foot roll. When done right, people can't tell that it's well below the acuity limits of what the formula predicts. For (HDTV) screens and 4.6 prints, 2.5 megapixels is enough. God knows what is acceptable for Facebook postings, but it is well south of 1 megapixel. 10 is good enough IMO. Many of us have sold prints and won contents on sub 10 megapixel cameras.<br><br>The author points out that the standard seems to be 12 for 4:3 and 14 for APS-C compacts and in that respect the smaller sensor necessitates an image quality compromise.<br><br>depth-of-field: The author's explanation is correct for most and Dr. Tinkham should not have argued with it. Depth-of-field is a function of aperture, focal length, subject distance, and sensor size. If the lens is sharp enough, the megapixel of the sensor also plays a factor. (The nitpicking between aperture diameter and F-stop is outdated ever since multi-coating became popular in the 70's.) The take home message is those looking for the subject to pop from the background like a dSLR with a decent lens will do will not find it in this camera. The author provided that in a manner a reader interested in the camera could understand.
      tychay
  • RE: Nikon 1 ILC cameras unveiled: V1 sports small sensor, big price

    And to top it off, Nikon will be releasing a F-mount adapter so you can use all your old favorites. I can imagine what my 70-200 f/2.8 VR would think if it were mounted to this puny pink piss-ant! Oh, the embarrassment!
    mcgonegal
    • RE: Nikon 1 ILC cameras unveiled: V1 sports small sensor, big price

      The F mount adapter: You know people mount their Canon EF lenses on their Canon 3CCD video cameras with 1/3" sensor. This sensor is 6x bigger than that one. So you're obviously showing how ignorant you are by assuming an F mount has no utility. Furthermore the 70-200mm f/2.8 VR (which I've owned two) has a tripod mount on it so it should be well-balanced even with this dinky camera. Ever heard of birding? Astrophotography? the national enquirer? spy agencies? Use your imagination.
      tychay
  • Seriously, Nikon...

    ... I've tried your pocket cameras. They're horrible. But, I love my D90! Focus on what you already do good and do it better. So Sony made something like this... big whoop! Does someone in your company have a lunch buddy that works at Sony?

    Work on technology that brings your Pro-level cameras closer to consumer-level prices.

    Really, and I may speak for other Nikon fans (not sure), if I want nice pictures in the area of my focus - small won't EVER cut it.
    GuntherGump
    • Kodak!?

      I heard Kodak may have to sell some patents - ... Dump this silly idea of a camera and possibly invest in those patents.
      GuntherGump
    • RE: Nikon 1 ILC cameras unveiled: V1 sports small sensor, big price

      The Sony NEX: While selling well in two countries, it's being destroyed by the Olympus and the Panasonic everywhere else. The reality is the pixel peepers and assorted others who jack off to spec sheets have already bought the Sony. Those of us who care about image quality in a portable package (which the Sony DOES NOT DELIVER. Depending on the lens used, it delivers either one or the other, but not both), or actually shoot went and got an Olympus, Panasonic, Fuji X100, or a pocket P&S (Olympus XZ-1, Panasonic LX4, Canon S100, Canon G11) to compliment our dSLR.<br><br>The reality is we're not the ones buying these cameras. The people buying it are people who are upgrading from a P&S or people who never carry their dSLRs because they're too big (there are a LOT of them. For instance only 15% of dSLR owners are women, but 35% of mirrorless ILC owners are women. There are actually north of 50% women out there). Look at the trends: GF1->GF2->GF3 (smaller and less features), NEX (a line of newer cameras with more touch screens and less buttons), the Pen (the high end introduces a touch screen, the low end with less buttons is selling so well they introduced the mini).<br><br>I agree it's disappointing that the Nikon P does not rate among the category of premium pocket P&S, however the bright spot is their recent poor performance in selling anything Ashton Kutcher is fronting means that it was worth it to develop and launch the Nikon 1. Something that cannot be said for their competitor, Canon.
      tychay
  • RE: Nikon 1 ILC cameras unveiled: V1 sports small sensor, big price

    Very good post , thanks <a href="http://www.cheapuggs.eu/">cheap Uggs</a>
    adijoy
  • RE: Nikon 1 ILC cameras unveiled: V1 sports small sensor, big price

    <a href="http://www.metin2pvpserverlar.com" title="metin2 pvp serverler" target="_blank">metin2 pvp serverler</a>
    <a href="http://www.metin2turkiye.net" title="mt2" target="_blank">mt2</a>
    <a href="http://www.metin2pvpserver.net" title="metin2" target="_blank">metin2</a>
    <a href="http://www.metin2oyunu.org/hileler" title="metin2 hile" target="_blank">metin2 hile</a>
    <a href="http://www.faceara.com" title="yemek tarifleri" target="_blank">yemek tarifleri</a>
    <a href="http://www.tuztanem.com" title="guzel sozler" target="_blank">guzel sozler</a>
    <a href="http://www.sexmuhabbet.net" title="sex hikayeleri" target="_blank">sex hikayeleri</a>
    <a href="http://www.metin2oyunu.org/indir" title="metin2 indir" target="_blank">metin2 indir</a>
    <a href="http://www.metin2pvpserverlar.com" title="metin2 pvp serverlar" target="_blank">metin2 pvp serverlar</a>
    <a href="http://www.metin2turkiye.net" title="metin2 turk" target="_blank">metin2 turk</a>
    <a href="http://www.metin2pvpserver.net" title="mt2 pvp" target="_blank">mt2 pvp</a>
    <a href="http://www.faceara.com" title="face" target="_blank">face</a>
    <a href="http://www.sexmuhabbet.net" title="sex" target="_blank">sex</a>
    <a href="http://www.manolyam.net" title="mynet" target="_blank">mynet</a>
    sirnem
  • RE: Nikon 1 ILC cameras unveiled: V1 sports small sensor, big price

    Better options
    Http://www.healthymindshk.com
    powderhound123