Blackboard buys Moodlerooms...And no, this isn't an early April Fools

Blackboard buys Moodlerooms...And no, this isn't an early April Fools

Summary: Is this a major play for market share, a genuine effort to promote development and cross-pollination in the LMS market, or a bit of both?

TOPICS: Open Source

My first reaction when I saw this news today was something along the lines of, "Wait, what? lolz! Gotta retweet that one!" Then, of course, I realized that it was true. Blackboard announced the acquisition of both Moodlerooms and Netspot today, along with the creation of a new "Open Source Services Group", headed by none other than Charles Severance, founding Chief Architect of the Sakai Project. Is this another case of Blackboard just buying up its competitors, a major horizontal play, or something else entirely? More importantly, is this a good thing or a bad thing?

Far less surprising than Blackboards announcement that it had just acquired two of the largest providers of the open source Moodle LMS was the reaction from competitors. Josh Coates, CEO of Instructure (maker of the Canvas LMS; many outside of the ed tech space may remember him as the founder of Mozy) characteristically didn't pull any punches, telling me Monday night that,

It looks like Blackboard is giving up on innovation and instead is focused on commoditizing the LMS. Moodle, Sakai, Angel, BB 9.1 - it's all the same to them now. They want to make their money by offering generic IT service and software. Given Blackboard's decline in LMS market share, i suppose it's the only option they had.

Of course, Blackboard, which was itself recently acquired by a private equity firm for a cool $1.64 billion, said precisely the opposite in a press release:

“Both Moodlerooms and NetSpot have built strong reputations for high quality service and support, which aligns with our deep focus in these areas and our overall commitment to providing LMS services and hosting globally,” said [Ray] Henderson, CTO and President of Academic Platforms at Blackboard. “This direction allows us to provide the choice of an open source alternative with the benefit of a team of leaders from the open source community to guide our sustained contributions and citizenship in that community.”

Leaders from Moodlerooms, NetSpot and Blackboard signed a Statement of Principles affirming that their work will continue to include regular contributions to the open source community in the form of code contributions, financial support to the Moodle Trust, and support for community gatherings including Moodlemoots.

Moodle founder, Martin Dougiamas, was measured in his response, and was quoted in the Blackboard press release:

“The decision of Moodlerooms and NetSpot to work under Blackboard may sound very strange at first to anyone in this industry...but it’s my understanding that these three companies have some good plans and synergies. I’m happy to say that Moodlerooms and NetSpot will remain Moodle Partners, and have promised to continue...participating in the community...and contributing financially to Moodle exactly as they always have.”

So is this a good thing? Well, maybe. All signs point to Moodlerooms and Netspot being allowed to continue operating in a largely independent fashion and to continue offering Moodle-based services, unlike when Blackboard acquired Wimba and Elluminate to add real-time collaboration and teaching tools to what became their Collaborate product. Their relationship with Angel customers (Angel was another LMS acquired by Blackboard) has been rocky at best, although as part of Monday's announcements, Blackboard committed to better supporting the Angel LMS.

What appears to be happening here is instead a horizontal play for market segmentation as well as new outlets for Collaborate and Edline (also, like Blackboard, recently acquired by Providence Equity Partners) which I expect will be more tightly integrated with the customized Moodle offerings from Moodlerooms and Netspot. To some extent, Josh Coates may be right: Blackboard has been losing market share and allowing Blackboard to dominate the high-margin, upper end of the LMS market while offering open source solutions for lower-margin market segments is an effective business strategy to recapture users. If Lexus, Toyota, and Scion can all be money makers for Toyota Motors, it makes sense that Blackboard Learn and Moodle can both be money makers for Blackboard.

Blackboard's deep pockets also ensure that financial contributions to the overall Moodle effort can remain strong, assuming that Blackboard doesn't decide to head in a different direction than the one it outlined on Monday. The more money that flows into Moodle, the better, given that, although growing in market share, is getting fairly long in the tooth and will have an uphill battle to compete effectively against the like of Instructure, Pearson, and Desire2Learn. What initially looks like it could have been a real blow to the competitive landscape may, in fact, enhance it, although this remains to be seen.

However, all skepticism aside, there does appear to be a real shift in mindset at Blackboard after their acquisition last year. I'll be keynoting their BBWorld DevCon this year. I say this by way of full disclosure, but the check's already in the mail and the contract is signed. I could have absolutely blasted this deal as more of Blackboard's same old competitor acquisitions and still gotten paid. I also bring this up, though, because they asked me to keynote as an educational technologist, not as a developer or employee of a Blackboard Partner (I'm both, more disclosure fer ya). They're hoping to bring forward a message about the effective use of tech for learning and the role of developers and companies like Blackboard in making it happen; my talk will be far more general than any they've had before, at their request.

Sure, this is marketing. Marketing is all about messaging and perception and Blackboard is in the business of making money. I get that all too well. But this isn't a strategy with which Blackboard has ever bothered in the past. I'm curious to see how this will all shake out, but I actually have the feeling that schools and the development communities built around educational applications will come out on top. Here's hoping I'm not wrong.

Topic: Open Source

Christopher Dawson

About Christopher Dawson

Chris Dawson is a freelance writer, consultant, and policy advocate with 20 years of experience in education, technology, and the intersection of the two.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • TLA

    Hey Chris ...

    This must be the fourth or fifth article of yours I've read that I've had to research ... now I know the tech industry is rife with TLA, but please, at least once, tell us what the heck it means ... I'm still not sure if we're talking about Learning Management Systems - just assuming.

    And Oh yeah, TLA is Three Letter Acronym.

  • Just follow the money...

    Really, does anyone expect Blackboard to give up on it's cash cow? Especially now that it has been bought by an equity firm, whose sole purpose in life is to make money? I think Blackboard is blowing smoke, and will be pushing it's "top tier" product to replace those existing Moodle installations as fast as they can. If that does not work, then I think they will eventually phase out Moodlerooms and NetSpot. They may not be able to kill Moodle, but they can shut down the companies that support it!
  • Make Money Teaching Online, Now!

    Now, is the time for teachers to come out of hiding and start making money teaching online directly without having to go through a third party called school. I call my colleagues to unite, leave Moodlerooms, Moodle partners (teachers can't afford them anyhow), Blackboard, Elluminate, Adobe Connect and other expensive teaching/learning environments and join WizIQ, Edumodo (free teaching platform), and Integrating Technology for Active Lifelong Learning (IT4ALL) so you can teach online and start charging students directly. At IT4ALL, teachers will learn to teach courses on Moodle and become a teacher administrator of their very own Moodle. Moodle installation is free, so once up, teachers can add plugins such as WizIQ for their live online classes. At IT4ALL, teachers will practice adding content and activities that includes WizIQ for their live sessions within Moodle. Read my post on making money teaching online for further information:
  • If you can't beat em,. join em

    Moodle was developed specifically to get around the limitations of Blackboard and WebCT which once had the majority use in universities.

    Moodle stands almost alone as one of the few open source success stories where a product offers all the features of most proprietary LMSs and more importantly, offers well structured code, easy customisation by programmers and a large worldwide community.

    Over the years I've used Moodle for websites and eLearning delivery and management and installed it on internal client systems as well as providing external hosting. I've been also able to customise it to suit a large variety of clients. No wonder Blackboard finally gave up ;-)
  • Panic mode....well almooost!

    I read something about this in my email this morning from a colleague and I almost panicked. For one, my unive runs on Moodle and will this mean extra costs for us in the future??!!! Then I am recently administering my kids' school website-Moodle/LMS and does this mean, I will end up shouldering costs for something I thought will be forever FREE? I see IT4ALL courses, ITCHS hosting and WizIQ membership as my worthy investments but as a parent-small school volunteer-educator-asst prof in a developing country, I can no longer afford anything else beyond that--hence the choice to go for Moodle-WizIQ. This is how much blended classes can matter to middle-class Filipino learners in the near future. So I will be here to stand on guard for the latest update on this news about Moodlerooms. And of course, I'd really like to understand it well. So am I right in understanding that Moodle will go on as an opensource platform as long as you can host it somewhere with independent folks who can provide REAL techsupport and educate you with the use of Moodle. But then, now that Moodlerooms will be w/ this bigger kapitalista, we should standby and be vigilant as a big kapitalista may in fact make decisions which will affect Moodle as a free opensource platform.
    • Moodle and Moodlerooms are not the same

      Yes, Moodle will continue to be open source and free. In fact, Blackboard's acquisition of Moodlerooms has nothing to do with the Moodle core development team. Moodlerooms is just a company that provides hosting, additional support and modules that are built on top of Moodle. You can still run Moodle without relying on Moodlerooms by hosting it yourself or going with another company for hosting and support.
  • Blackboard deep pockets = Apple deep pockets minus Innovation

    Said it all:

    "It looks like Blackboard is giving up on innovation and instead is focused on commoditizing the LMS. Moodle, Sakai, Angel, BB 9.1 - its all the same to them now. They want to make their money by offering generic IT service and software. Given Blackboards decline in LMS market share, i suppose its the only option they had."

    And don't cry for Moodle either, e-learning needs to be rebuilt from the ground up every 3 years otherwise we will just repeat the story of offline learning in which things lingered from Victorian times until nowadays because of re-use of legacy and band-aids.

    Still looking forward for the day when the comments about Open Source moves in education will change from "we have all the features of everyone else in the market" to "we just looked at things from another perspective and this is what nobody thought".
    Luis Morais
  • Independant Moodle Partner Remote-Learner's response

    Blackboard bought 2 of 52 Moodle Partners. The Moodle Project continues apace. More:
  • Engineering Tutors

    his engineering tutors study material Post is very informative; it helped me with great information so I really believe you will do much better in the future.

    <a href="">Engineering Tutors</a>