Facebook is the best buyer for webOS (analyst)

By | September 15, 2011, 1:17pm PDT

Summary: The idea that Facebook should buy webOS from HP has been suggested again, this time by an analyst. I disagree.

Jefferies analyst Peter Misek this morning wrote a research note to clients about who would be the best buyer for Hewlett-Packard’s WebOS software business. There have been many possible suitors named by industry experts, including Amazon, Baidu, Huawei, HTC, Nokia, Samsung, Sony Ericsson, and ZTE. Misek believes, however, Facebook would be the best buyer.

Misek thinks none of the other companies are likely to bid on what HP is offering. Here’s a relevant excerpt of the note:

Based on our analysis of prospective buyers and our checks, we believe Facebook is the best fit. Due to Facebook’s scale, developer community, and movement towards media (e.g., music) and communications (Messenger), it is possible that an acquisition of an OS asset like this could be a good option. Checks with developers indicate that they would support a potential Facebook OS, and industry sources have noted Facebook’s historic interest in a mobile OS or heavily influencing one.

This isn’t the first time I heard of such a proposition. Last time, I wrote up my thoughts about it in an article titled “Should Facebook buy webOS from HP?” Here is the conclusion I came to (you can read the whole piece for more details):

In summary, buying webOS simply doesn’t make sense for Facebook. The company would spend more time and effort rewriting the operating system and maintaining useless parts of it than it would take to simply write its own Facebook OS.

My stance hasn’t changed. What do you think?

See also:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Emil Protalinski has covered the tech industry for five years for multiple publications.

Disclosure

Emil Protalinski

Emil has nothing to disclose.

Biography

Emil Protalinski

Emil Protalinski has covered the tech industry for five years for multiple publications, including Neowin for two years and Ars Technica for three years. He has written 1,000s of articles for both, with a particular focus on scrutinizing Microsoft products and services. Recently, Emil has expanded his coverage to non-Microsoft technologies, including the social networking giant Facebook.

10
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Facebook is the best buyer for webOS (analyst)
the.nameless.drifter 16th Sep
@balsover

My reply was to Linux Geek when he stated this would make Facebook a hardware vendor. I don't think facebook requires an OS nor should it but one
0 Votes
+ -
analysts are morons
The Linux Geek 15th Sep
facebook as a hardware maker=good April fool's joke.
but it's not even March yet!
0 Votes
+ -
@The Linux Geek

When did WebOS become something other than an operating system?
@the.nameless.drifter Since when did Facebook require an OS? The service side could be running on CP/M or OS/2 and it wouldn't matter as long as the output was HTML. Where does an OS fit into Facebook's operation? I suspect that the analyst has personal interest in HP finding a buyer for their mistake and so they try to generate that interest in the market. HP get into this mess by purchasing things that it did not need. Why should Facebook make the same mistake?
0 Votes
+ -
@balsover

My reply was to Linux Geek when he stated this would make Facebook a hardware vendor. I don't think facebook requires an OS nor should it but one
0 Votes
+ -
Enough already with this ridiculous analyst garbage. Here's my analyst pick. The best buyer for WebOS would be my grandmother, because SHE'S DEAD!

Come on. Why on earth would FB buy a dying OS? It's about as likely as MSFT buying WebOS rather than make their next Windows tablet run on Samsung hardware. If you want to build something new you go to a hardware manufacturer with vision. WebOS was long in the tooth for some time and there's no interest in that IP, it's ALL liability. Look at Borders books. As soon as a printed book hits their shelves it's out of date and also a liability. No one wants ownership of that. There is no business model there. I'm sick of anaylsts churning out drivel. Put up some metrics and show why a failing business could make a worthwhile investment (or just explain how you need a big loss as a write off).
0 Votes
+ -
Here's a company that had major product in hardware integration and might find this an interesting boost along with AIR and also the onslaught against Flash.

Whether they need an OS of their own or can work in the mobile niche of others it is hard to tell. And I'm not sure an Adobe/Amazon partnership in this space would be such a bad idea.
@orcmid
+1
0 Votes
+ -
If there were more apps, WebOS would be a viable product. Personally, I think it would be better than Android. Google, are you listening?
I totally agree with you, why FB needs WebOS. FB already is integrated into WP7, and OEMs like HTC integrated that into Android released FB based phones. FB apps are available for almost all sorts of computing machines, so why do they need something more than that. I just can't understand. I never understand the thought processes of Wall Street Analysts and their predictions. Whatever they predict, we can easily say the opposite will be the outcome.
I think HTC will be bought webOS.
KitchenAid 5 Quart Stand Mixer

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix