Facebook: Legal action against employers asking for your password
Summary: Facebook wants to protect its users from employers demanding access to their accounts. The company is looking to draft new laws as well as take legal action against employers.
Update: Facebook: No plans to sue employers asking for your password
Update: Senator vows to stop employers asking for your Facebook password
Facebook today weighed in on the issue of employers asking current and prospective employees for their Facebook passwords. The company noted that doing so undermines the privacy expectations and the security of both the user and the user's friends, as well as potentially exposes the employer to legal liability.
"If you are a Facebook user, you should never have to share your password, let anyone access your account, or do anything that might jeopardize the security of your account or violate the privacy of your friends," Facebook Chief Privacy Officer for Policy Erin Egan said in a statement. "We have worked really hard at Facebook to give you the tools to control who sees your information. As a user, you shouldn't be forced to share your private information and communications just to get a job. And as the friend of a user, you shouldn't have to worry that your private information or communications will be revealed to someone you don't know and didn't intend to share with just because that user is looking for a job."
In fact, Facebook points out that sharing or soliciting a Facebook password is a violation of the social network's Statement of Rights and Responsibilities. Here's the relevant excerpt:
You will not share your password, (or in the case of developers, your secret key), let anyone else access your account, or do anything else that might jeopardize the security of your account.
The social networking giant is considering using the law to protect its 845 million users. There are two routes Menlo Park is looking at: a) getting politicians to pass a law barring employers from this practice and/or b) suing employers who are asking you for your Facebook credentials.
"Facebook takes your privacy seriously," Egan said in a statement. "We'll take action to protect the privacy and security of our users, whether by engaging policymakers or, where appropriate, by initiating legal action, including by shutting down applications that abuse their privileges. While we will continue to do our part, it is important that everyone on Facebook understands they have a right to keep their password to themselves, and we will do our best to protect that right."
This is great news for all Facebook users. Previously, the only organization protecting Facebook users from this problem was the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which refers to the practice as privacy invasion.
"It's an invasion of privacy for private employers to insist on looking at people's private Facebook pages as a condition of employment or consideration in an application process," ACLU attorney Catherine Crump said in a statement. "People are entitled to their private lives. You'd be appalled if your employer insisted on opening up your postal mail to see if there was anything of interest inside. It's equally out of bounds for an employer to go on a fishing expedition through a person's private social media account."
Update: Senator vows to stop employers asking for your Facebook password
Update: Facebook: No plans to sue employers asking for your password
See also:
- ACLU: Employers demanding Facebook passwords is privacy invasion
- School district demands Facebook password, 12-year-old girl sues
- Employer demands Facebook login credentials during interview
- When it comes to demanding Facebook passwords, there needs to be a law protecting consumers
- Employer vs Facebook: Is there a point to privacy settings?
- Why I should have the CEO's Facebook log-in credential. Now
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
The problem is
I do not think Facebook really gives a damn about your privacy, as evidenced by past Zuckerberg statements, but I guess he feels that his business is being threatened, and all of a sudden privacy matters. What a surprise.
Edit: http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/opinion/2163313/privacy
I don't...
So in that sense, it wouldn't be any different than a potential employer to ask me to bring them to my high school reunion, which obviously wouldn't happen, so why should it happen on FB? If they want to look at what I make public on FB, fine, but it's completely inappropriate for them to ask me for account credentials or force me to display my page to them as a condition of employment.
I don't think..
It is interesting how nobody here seems to have considered the possibility that your FB pages could actually HELP you land a good job if they show some very desirable skill sets and personality traits. If you have skeletons buried there however, you certainly would not want to show that to the prospective employer, but then you probably do not deserve that job either.
Like somebody said a long time ago,
I think you're right regarding your second paragraph, but I don't think people are necessarily being honest or accurate with online-anything. After all, how many personal dating profiles are comprised of 100% truthful comments? (Few...)
In short, like people said then, as they do now, behind the keyboard is not the same thing as in real life. Using facebook and others to make summary judgments on how a person might work in the office is pretty much not going to be worthwhile. Never mind that people are allowed personal lives outside their line of work. If companies want to control that, that's fine - just pay a proper wage in return. How valuable do workers think they are? And how cheap will they allow themselves to be?
Passwords? Absolutely not.
So is MDOC on the sue list?
Be nice to see FB take them to task for this.
Re suing employers
In order to sue, the entity suing must have "legal standing", the defendant must have a "legal duty" to the plaintiff and the plaintiff must have "legal damages". If someone beats up my next-door neighbor, [i]I[/i] can't sue the guy because he doesn't owe [i]me[/i] any legal duty. Therefore, I don't have "standing"--no legally recognized interest in the matter. Also, no matter what happened to my neighbor, [i]I[/i] haven't suffered any "legal damages" because [i]my[/i] rights haven't been violated.
Employers asking for passwords owe no legal duty to third parties such as Facebook and Facebook can't create such a duty by a contract with someone other than the employer (i.e., a contract between Facebook and the FB user.)
Also, "opening the floodgates" is a common legal argument. "If Facebook can sue anyone who asks for a password, then [i]every[/i] company/site/organization that uses passwords could bring a [i]separate[/i] lawsuit." Remember--"asking for passwords" would not be limited to employers. [i]Any[/i] organization concerned about its public image or putting a person in a position of trust could ask for passwords.
Anyone
Privacy is what you make of it.
If you're involved with any kind of position of security, it's expected that you're going to go through a security screening. The relevance of your Facebook profile is the same as a personal website or blog, and employers should have the right to review all and any public profiles as part of the screening process. The best solution is to not use Facebook at all for any sensitive correspondence that you don't want to be discovered by a potential employer or any government agency (NSA, etc.)
You just ...
And watch my post being voted down. I think that pretty much summarizes this place.
No...
...the BEST SOLUTION is not to use ANY of these lame social networikng sites in the first place.
Caveat
You're arguing up the wrong tree
I agree with the majority of what you've written.
CRAZY
I beleive
Farcebook concerned about privacy? What a crock!
Facebook is not concerned about our privacy ....
Facebook doesn't have a standing to sue employers.
Free to be you and me
Since they won't be giving up their password, and they won't be allowing someone else to 'access' their account, there's absolutely _no_ violation of the Statement of Rights and Responsibilities.
Everybody wins.