Facebook: Paul Ceglia sent original contract to law firm in 2004

Facebook: Paul Ceglia sent original contract to law firm in 2004

Summary: Facebook claims it has found the original "authentic contract" between Zuckerberg and Ceglia, not only on Ceglia's computers, but on the email servers of a law firm.

TOPICS: Legal, Servers, Storage

At a court hearing yesterday in Buffalo, New York, Facebook explained that Paul Ceglia, a man that claims he owns half of the company, emailed the original "authentic contract" to a Chicago-based law firm, Sidley Austin, back in 2004. The social networking giant says that not only did it find this allegedly genuine contract on Ceglia's computer but on Sidley Austin's email server as well. Facebook's lawyer Orin Snyder told US Magistrate Judge Leslie Foschio that this evidence proves Ceglia fabricated the contract on which he bases his claim.

Snyder said Ceglia's behavior indicates he's getting desperate. "The noose is tightening around the neck of the plaintiff in this case and he knows it," Snyder told Foschio, according to Bloomberg.

Foschio said Ceglia must allow Facebook's experts to examine his Web-based email accounts, which he said he used to communicate with Zuckerberg in 2003 and 2004 and later saved on floppy disks. Only then will Zuckerberg be required to turn over 175 emails from his Harvard University account. Ceglia and his team have been waiting for these emails for weeks and once again they have hit a setback.

Last week, Facebook said it found "smoking-gun evidence that the purported contract at the heart of this case is a fabrication." When Facebook's lawyers asked for a resubmittal of a document to the court due to improper redaction, it turned out the blacked out text referred to an "authentic contract" and "storage devices" that Facebook says Ceglia is intentionally hiding from the company, in violation of a court order.

Facebook said it found the original "authentic contract" between Mark Zuckerberg and Paul Ceglia. Facebook then produced the original "authentic contract" on Monday, noting it doesn't even mention Facebook at all.

Originally, Ceglia's lawyers said the "authentic contract" is shielded from use in the lawsuit because it is designated as "confidential" under the rules of an agreement between the two parties. As a result, Facebook asked Foschio to overrule that designation; he agreed and ordered Ceglia to hand over documents Facebook says proves he forged the 2003 contract.

As for the "storage devices," Facebook said that forensic data shows evidence of six USB devices, which it argues were likely used to modify the authentic contract. The company's lawyers say at least one of those devices includes a folder called "Facebook Files" and an image called "Zuckerberg Contract page1.tif." Facebook believes that image is the page of the contract that was forged to include mention of an investment in the social network.

In an exclusive interview with ZDNet, Ceglia told me the original "authentic contract" Facebook says it found is really just a Photoshopped image the company planted on his computer. He says he and his lawyers reportedly knew about it for some time and willingly handed it over to Facebook. He told ZDNet that his team will prove the image in question "has no authenticating properties whatsoever."

Ceglia speculates it could have been Zuckerberg himself, or the US law firm Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe that may have done the alleged dirty work. Ceglia called Zuckerberg "an admitted forger and an admitted hacker" and explained that Zuckerberg, or someone representing him, carelessly wrote his home address on the allegedly forged document that he didn't know about or move to until more than a year after the document was supposedly written.

Last but certainly not least, Ceglia says he has conclusive proof that Zuckerberg is lying. He said that anyone with some legal expertise or technical expertise willing to help "nail him down for good" is welcome to join at PaulsCase.com, which requires registration. Via the PaulsCase wiki, Ceglia is trying to open source his lawsuit. His current lawyer is on an interim basis and Ceglia is looking for a more "collaborative" law firm to work with him.

Facebook acknowledges that Ceglia hired Zuckerberg to work for his StreetFax company in April 2003 while Zuckerberg was a freshman at Harvard. Ceglia first legally attacked Facebook in July 2010, saying the contract also included $1,000 initial funding for Facebook, and that he's entitled to more than half of the social networking giant. That last part Facebook is obviously disputing.

Facebook insists Ceglia is a known con artist. Since he first filed suit, Ceglia has been dropped by at least four law firms. He is now reportedly living in Galway, Ireland, but the lawsuit is continuing. Ceglia, who called ZDNet from Ireland, maintains that he has been unfairly painted as a con artist.

See also:

Topics: Legal, Servers, Storage

Emil Protalinski

About Emil Protalinski

Emil is a freelance journalist writing for CNET and ZDNet. Over the years,
he has covered the tech industry for multiple publications, including Ars
Technica, Neowin, and TechSpot.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • This Ceglia might be a con arstist, but Zuckerberg is such, too

    It is documented. So no sympathy goes to either side.
  • RE: Facebook: Paul Ceglia sent original contract to law firm in 2004

    Honestly I thought this seemed like really interesting case when it first came out, but neither side has come up with a drop of evidence. After years of listening to Ceglia's Winklevoss style squabbling he's finally submitted the only legitimate piece of evidence, the contract the whole thing was based on, but still demands his lawyers base his plight on evidence other than a contract. Mark is obviously a fool for throwing away the original contract, because that would've made this go away years ago. I really just don't care anymore though. I don't believe for a single moment any of this is real and for all I know it just be a publicity stunt rigged between Ceglia and Zuck somehow.
    • RE: Facebook: Paul Ceglia sent original contract to law firm in 2004

      @idontwanttopickaname So this is basically a couple of bottom feeders disputing territory. Ain't "free" enterprise grand!
      • Free enterprise is not the problem here.

        Try to keep up.
  • The difference between these two...

    Zuck is a bottom-feeder and Ceglia is a worm - proving there is something lower than a bottom-feeder. Once Ceglia's forgery is documented, I hope he rots in a jail so we can stop hearing about both of them.
    • RE: Facebook: Paul Ceglia sent original contract to law firm in 2004

      @BillDem what about the fraud on Zuckerbergs side ? i take it your referring to Ceglia being chargedfor taking money for products he was unable to deliver at the end , but you forget to say he paid all his customers abck or delivered them their products ! thats more than we can say about the big bankers and politicians who stole billions and have not and will not pay back a dime ! or how about Zuckerberg aknwoledgement of receiving money from ceglia for facebook ? will he pay what he owes ? Zuckerberg is the worm !
      • RE: Facebook: Paul Ceglia sent original contract to law firm in 2004