ie8 fix
Click Here
madison

The Intel/McAfee mystery and Charlie Rose...

By | August 23, 2010, 9:42pm PDT

Summary: Intel’s CEO told the Charlie Rose show that security was a top focus at Intel. This came as a surprise to top Intel execs…

I’ve been an Intel watcher from more than 25 years and I’m still trying to make sense of the McAfee deal in which Intel has offered an astounding $7.7 billion for the maker of anti-virus software.

I’ve been reading a lot of articles by people trying to make sense of the deal and haven’t found anyone that has succeeded. Even Intel’s top executives are surprised by Intel’s sudden focus on security.

Take a look at this from Ars Technica: Why Intel bought McAfee

“At the most recent Intel R&D day, Intel CTO Justin Rattner did a Q&A session with the press in which he was asked something to the effect of, “What do you spend most of your time working on these days?” Rattner didn’t hesitate in answering “security.”

He then told an anecdote about how he was watching Intel CEO Paul Otellini being interviewed by Charlie Rose, and Otellini told Rose, “I’ve given our company a charter to make [security] job one.” Rattner laughed and told us that this statement seemed to come from out of the blue, and it took him and other Intel execs by surprise. But from that day forward, Rattner was focused on security.”

How is it that Mr. Rattner, one of Intel’s top execs and in charge of its R&D Labs didn’t know that the company’s charter is to make security “job one.” Charlie Rose knew it before anyone at Intel.

Mr. Rattner said that for him and his colleagues, this focus on security came as a surprise, it came out of the blue.

What’s going on at Intel?

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Tom Foremski reports on the business and culture of Silicon Valley at the intersection of technology and media.

Disclosure

Tom Foremski

Tom Foremski is the editor and publisher of Silicon Valley Watcher and Silicon Valley Watch. Tibco Software is an advertiser.

Biography

Tom Foremski

In May 2004, Tom Foremski became the first journalist to leave a major newspaper, the Financial Times, to make a living as a full-time journalist blogger. He writes the popular news blog Silicon Valley Watcher--reporting on the business of Silicon Valley.

Tom arrived in San Francisco in 1984, and has covered US technology markets for leading computer journals around the world.

9
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

In the toilet...
nikacat 24th Aug 2010
We all knew Intel's share price already dwelt in toiletland. CEO Otellini pulled the flush handle when Intel bought McAfee. Talk to some Intel rank and file. Nobody can make sense of this deal. There has to be corruption involved at the very top. Nothing else explains the move.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: The Intel/McAfee mystery and Charlie Rose...
pauldavidgilligan 24th Aug 2010
The only thing I can think of is if INTEL are creating hardware level security protection for future generation CPU's and intend to integrate this with the software. If you can control exceptions / arguments at the hardware level then you maybe can get around some of the current issues around maintaining and protecting systems via the traditional anti-virus methods.
0 Votes
+ -
INVENTORS - DO NOT TRUST INTEL!!!
Stuart21@... 24th Aug 2010
INVENTORS - DO NOT TRUST INTEL
I invented a CPU cooler - 3 times better than best - better than water. Intel have major CPU cooling problems - "Intel's microprocessors were generating so much heat that they were melting" (iht.com) - try to talk to them - they send my communications to my competitor & will not talk to me.

Winners of major 'Corporate Social Responsibility' awardS!!!

Huh!!!!

When did RICO get repealed?"

INVENTORS - DO NOT TRUST INTEL!!!

BTW, I have the evidence - my competitor gave it to me.

BBTW, I am prepared to apologise to Intel if;
? They can show that the actions were those of a single individual in the company, acting outside corporate policy, and:
? They gain redress on my behalf.

Although playing a major role in it's facilitation, the power of the internet appears to have come as much a surprise to Intel as it has to the catholic church.

Inventors - help your fellow inventors - share your experiences with companies - good and bad.

DELETING THIS POST WOULD BE AGAINST THE INTEREST OF INVENTORS - WHO ARE TRYING TO SOLVE THE MANY PROBLEMS ON THIS PLANET.

I ACCEPT FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR VERACITY OF ABOVE.

COMPLAINTS - FORWARD TO STUART21 AT MAC.COM

APOLOGIES FROM INTEL - FORWARD ALSO TO STUART21 - BUT QUICKLY! I CAN'T HOLD MY BREATH MUCH LONGER!! happy
0 Votes
+ -
@pauldavidgilligan I think that is your idea is one part of the answer.

I think diversification, patents, customers, income and synergy are equally important. Intel = CPU's. Over the years they've done other things, but essentially, they are CPU's. Given their billions of cash on hand, and given the low state of the stock market in general, investment and diversification makes good sense, right now.

When they get McAfee, they get income from the products that McAfee sells, they get McAfee's patents, customer lists, malware data, software, and they make progress on their corporate focus on security.

As for the synergy thing that could happen, I think it is cloud-driven. People, companies and applications are moving to the cloud... and security is the most important consideration... Intel wants to give Intel CPU's a competitive advantage for driving cloud servers.

so- lots of good reasons to buy McAfee. I dont think there are very many good reasons why company executives are so out of touch with the driving forces behind it.
0 Votes
+ -
@jakerson9@...

Maybe they purchased McAfee so they'd better understand how NOT to implement security. I fully agree with utilizing hardware for securing computers, but any approach that just embed AV software into hardware is insanity.

gary
0 Votes
+ -
@gdstark13 I think that if they can project that Intel-inside contains McAfee-inside... that could benefit them hugely when cloud computing's bones are selected. I am not saying it will make them more effective, or more adept. I also think there are probably some patents they can use, some revenue they can get, and I think diversification is extremely important.

I think they are smarter than to just try to embed AV software into hardware too. I do think they should have better internal memo's about what their priorities are, though. happy
0 Votes
+ -
$7 Billion says Intel has some intelligence on the value to be created when a hardware oriented chip maker buys a purely software oriented giant. Surely there is a blue ocean being created.
0 Votes
+ -
Are we sure that we can completely dismiss corruption and bribes in this case? if so, why?
It'd make a sensible explanation for the exorbitant price Intel paid for McAfee
0 Votes
+ -
Rude awakening
klumper 24th Aug 2010
It appears that they may be having their own > XP SP2 moment. Whether it will pan out as fatefully - and well - as it did for MS, only time will tell.
0 Votes
+ -
In the toilet...
nikacat 24th Aug 2010
We all knew Intel's share price already dwelt in toiletland. CEO Otellini pulled the flush handle when Intel bought McAfee. Talk to some Intel rank and file. Nobody can make sense of this deal. There has to be corruption involved at the very top. Nothing else explains the move.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix