ie8 fix
Click Here
madison

Forrester Research

The View from Forrester Research

Online engagement: An integration play?

By | September 17, 2010, 12:13pm PDT

Summary: Call it engagement, Web experience, customer experience or WCM: it’s an exciting time to be in this market, blogs Forrester’s Stephen Powers.

I still get a lot of client inquiries on “Web content management.” In fact, the past few months have been the busiest I’ve had since I joined Forrester almost four years ago. Many clients are investing in technology for their online, public-facing initiatives, and we’ve been having some great conversations about what technologies will best fit their needs.

But those technologies include a lot more than just “Web content management.”

In fact, I was recently working with a client on what was purportedly a “WCM” selection project and what struck me was how relatively few requirements actually had to do with traditional content management. Instead, the client wanted to talk about things like content targeting, analytics, multivariate testing, social media, and mobile. That goes way beyond just managing content, doesn’t it?

The best-of-breed WCM vendors have understood this for several years, focusing a good chunk of their development efforts on the actual delivery of content, and how to engage customers, partners, and prospects in the online channel. And the big boys — notably Microsoft and IBM — are getting into the act as well, repositioning and repackaging products and enhancing them with additional modules and adjacent technologies to support engagement.

The vendors in this space aren’t necessarily offering all the pieces of the engagement stack; so integration — at least currently — needs to big a major part of an organization’s strategy. No one vendor currently offers all of the many technologies needed in a single suite. And even if they did, most large organizations simply can’t afford to rip out all their technologies to go with the offerings from a single vendor. So integration has become an important fact of life. In fact, one client told me, after a requirements review, “This is really all about integration, isn’t it?” Certainly it’s a big part of it right now, and the quality of those integrations will increasingly be a differentiator for the offerings in this space. Others, though, insist that a suite approach is the way to go in the long term (kind of reminds me of the old ECM arguments).

Definitely keep an eye on the old WCM space. Some may call it engagement, or Web experience, or plain old customer experience. But whatever you call it, it’s an exciting time to be involved in this market. I’ll be speaking more about how organizations are strategizing around engagement technologies during my keynote at our first Content and Collaboration Forum next month.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
3
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Online engagement: An integration play?
dnickelson@... 24th Sep 2010
I completely agree as well; there is no other single place outside of a companies web properties where the consumer expectation -- communicated unconsciously and in less than one second -- is that your company is correctly aligned and your marketing communications (both macro and micro) are integrated and consistent. One of the reasons I stay in web work is that in order to provide this kind of customer experience, you naturally expose technology, people and process integration gaps in the organization. I think web work provides an ideal vantage point from which to drive change toward integration, and think that the days of a "web team" or "online team" are already ending at forward thinking companies. Am already seeing some CMO's and CIO's working together to develop "experience systems" that communicate, capture, analyze and alter the technology platforms, business rules/processes, and human systems/capital in regular systematic ways to help the organization meet goals. To me, this open playing field is the best part of the work; lots of room to run and create.
0 Votes
+ -
If you want to turn people off...
peter_erskine@... 17th Sep 2010
Just let then know that you see them as a "prospect" or "target" or something to be managed. Yuck! And for that matter, the use of Sales or Corporate Gobbledegook will also turn most people 180 degrees.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Online engagement: An integration play?
christian.weichelt@... Updated - 20th Sep 2010
I couldnt agree more, Stephen! Even in my 5 years with CoreMedia, I've seen the WCM market evolve significantly. WCM is no longer just about an organization's Web site it's an interaction hub for customers and the business. To be the center of a modern Web delivery environment, WCM needs to reflect the business goals and processes of an organization not just the structure of a Website and needs to leverage and tightly integrate the existing software ecosystem. It's the interaction platform between the business, customers, employees and partners. With regard to customers, context plays a very large role in the modern Web hub, which requires incoming customer details (the customers end-device, time of day, geographic location, personal preferences, etc.) to be processed in real-time so that consistent, high-personalized experiences can be delivered across any touchpoint - be it Web, mobile, or even a social network. I agree with Stephen that many vendors do a good job on this type of delivery, but there are some other important things to consider: how do you manage that complex environment from an editorial perspective? Integration on the delivery side doesn't seem to be enough. And how can content editors become real context managers? This is what we as an industry need to continue to work on and it'll be interesting to contribute to WCM's evolution.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Online engagement: An integration play?
dnickelson@... 24th Sep 2010
I completely agree as well; there is no other single place outside of a companies web properties where the consumer expectation -- communicated unconsciously and in less than one second -- is that your company is correctly aligned and your marketing communications (both macro and micro) are integrated and consistent. One of the reasons I stay in web work is that in order to provide this kind of customer experience, you naturally expose technology, people and process integration gaps in the organization. I think web work provides an ideal vantage point from which to drive change toward integration, and think that the days of a "web team" or "online team" are already ending at forward thinking companies. Am already seeing some CMO's and CIO's working together to develop "experience systems" that communicate, capture, analyze and alter the technology platforms, business rules/processes, and human systems/capital in regular systematic ways to help the organization meet goals. To me, this open playing field is the best part of the work; lots of room to run and create.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix