iPod touch Web share triples; Windows reaches new low
Summary: Web browsing market share for the iPod touch has tripled in just five months, outpacing the iPhone and other mobile devices, according to new statistics.Though the iPod touch accounted a tiny 0.
Web browsing market share for the iPod touch has tripled in just five months, outpacing the iPhone and other mobile devices, according to new statistics.
Though the iPod touch accounted a tiny 0.05 percent of all web traffic in November, according to Net Applications, the device's use has seen steady gains that put the touchscreen Wi-Fi device at 0.15 percent -- still tiny, but a 300 percent increase in its footprint in less than six months.
Clearly, more people are discovering the iPod touch as an inexpensive portable Internet browsing device.
To compare, iPhone share also grew substantially during the period but grew 150 percent (from 0.37 percent to 0.55 percent of all Web traffic), despite having always-on 3G capability.
Make no mistake: the iPod touch is a hot piece of device, and it's a wonder why there hasn't been a serious Wi-Fi-only contender to the device from any of Apple's competitors. Sure, 3G devices are immensely lucrative for their limitless data plans, but what do consumers really want -- particularly in an economic downturn?
(Hint: not another contract.)
Also of note: Microsoft Windows' share, while still the lion's share of the market, has dropped to its lowest point since tracking began, falling to 87.9 percent. (By comparison, Mac share dipped slightly to 9.73 percent.)
Alternatively, Linux passed the 1 percent mark for the first time. [via]
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback
"hot piece of device"?
What can I say...
True, but...
Hot piece of mass? [nt]
It means two things
Second, cellphone 3G may be the trend.
Third thing...
mobile web browser.
Why ...?
So why not split Windows into its flavors? 98 and XP have about as much in common as Debian and Ubuntu... right?
Strange list. Looks like hardware marketing hype is mixed in...
AND... judging by the outcome, if I were from another planet and looked at this list...
The fact that something with a .15 jumped 300% would be unnoticed next to the fact that Windows 87.9% market share continues to be an unmitigated runaway juggernaut of success.
RE: iPod touch Web share triples; Windows reaches new low
Wow, I'm actually agreeing with Loverock. [nt]
iPod Touch
is having such great growth instead of the
iPhone."[/i]
Why, iPod sales have always outpaced individual
phone unit sales of a similar cost. With the
iPod, you don't have the issue of on-going
costs. This is great for kids, etc. that
likely can't afford a phone with a data plan.
[i]"I just wouldn't use AT&T's network. "[/i]
To each his own as they say... Geographically,
each carrier has strengths and weaknesses. If
AT&T were as bad as the vocal minority seem to
constantly suggest, nobody would use them. In
reality, I've had completely trouble free
service for years with them (Cingular before
that). Years back, I actually switch from
Verizon due to poor service - imagine that.
I'm sure both carriers are better then they
were years ago.
Get real
the iPhone has gone from 0.37% to 0.55%: that's a 0.18% increase.
So what? this is exactly in line with Apple's data (as many iPod touches sold as iPhones for the last quarter), with the iPhone's growth outstripping the iPod touch's in fact, but probably equalling if you factor in the iPhones extra 3G connectivity.
Toffing up a .10% percent increase as a 300% increase to exaggerate the iPod touch's market growth is pathetic journalism. Sharpen up ZDnet.
learn math...
Correction
would be from 0.0375% to 0.15% if I am correct.
That's still only a 0.1125% increase compared to 0.18% for the iPhone.
My maths is wrong but the article is still wrong
RE: iPod touch Web share triples; Windows reaches new low
hundred percent bigger than five isn't it?
As for the OS chart, I would agree that it is misleading on
several counts whether by intent or not. A previous person
said that one should throw the iPhone and iPod into the OS
X column and well it should. Not into the Mac column
however as that is a hardware distinction as much as iPod
and iPhone. Lumping all flavors of Windows into one then
makes sense. I'm not sure how one could evaluate how
many versions are out there running on older hardware.
Same with the OS X. How many Macs are out there running
OS 7-9? I dare say quite a few, at least enough to rival an
iPod number.
Well intentioned article attempting to digest published
numbers. Checking sources better and finding firmer, more
carefully presented numbers would have been clearer.
delete