The ToyBox

Ricardo Bilton & Gloria Sin

Subscribe to The New Yorker on your iPad for $60, more titles to come

By | May 9, 2011, 8:29am PDT

Summary: Will iPad subscriptions save the magazine publishing industry?

As someone who used to work in the magazine business, I’m a bit torn about all the new titles launching on the iPad, including today’s announcement from Conde Nast that The New Yorker is now available for subscription (in-App and through the App Store) with access to its website.

On one hand, I’m happy for those who want to enjoy their favorite magazines on their iPads and at regular installments (without having to buy single issues only). New Yorker fans can now subscribe to just the digital edition plus its Web content for $5.99 per month (4 issues) or $59.99 per year. For just $10 more per year, you can get a print copy plus both the app and the password to newyorker.com, at $6.99 per month (4 issues) or $69.99 per year. Other Conde Nast titles to offer iPad subscriptions by the end of May include: Wired, Vanity Fair, Glamour, Golf Digest, Allure, Self and GQ for $1.99 per month or $19.99 per year.

That said, I’m not convinced that digital editions on iPads will save the magazine industry. Without more details, this news just raises so many more questions than answers. First of all, will the app and Web editions will be a direct copy of the print magazine, or will each version be tailored to the strengths of each platform? The New Yorker, for example, is renown for long features that hardly requires the high-resolution iPad screen to enjoy. Because online content gets updated so frequently, will access to the website date the monthly/weekly apps? Is this a sign that all popular websites like Wired.com will ultimately become walled gardens? Finally, where is the incentive for subscribers to either pay more for the app and password when the website is currently free, and print-only subscription prices are lower than the digital one?

Thoughts? Will you be subscribing to magazines on your iPad?

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Gloria Sin is a freelance journalist based in New York City.

Disclosure

Gloria Sin

I have no stocks or investments in any companies or interests which may lead to a conflict of interest in my coverage.

Biography

Gloria Sin

Gloria Sin is a New York-based freelance journalist who writes about the tech toys that you can't live without for ZDNet. She has little patience for poorly designed user experiences, and is not afraid of opening the guts of her own machines for repair or hacking her gadgets for new uses.

She has written for FastCompany.com, Popular Science, Olympic News Service; she currently covers the startup scene in the Tri-State area for NYConvergence.com.

Prior to ZDNet, Gloria was the online editor for Dance International, and dabbled in web design and social media consulting. When she is offline, you will find her at an ice rink living out her figure skating dreams. Follow her on Twitter.

3
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

I think
oncall 9th May 2011
@BillDem

The market will dictate the pricing issue in the not too distant future. I do think it is too high right now, but, as a business owner myself, I know you cannot throw your current customers (your print subscribers and advertisers) under a bus to get a bigger piece of the new action. Once you establish a new "low" price, you're kinda done and all your other customers will demand the new low price, print or digital, or they will leave. The New Yorker has an established print subscriber base, and advertisers who also help pay the bills, they must be taken care of first.
0 Votes
+ -
Maybe
oncall 9th May 2011
I did try Fortune Magazine for on issue. I did like the ability to purchase it "in-app". It seemed pretty much a straight conversion of the print issue with no iPad specific frills but it worked fine. As far as saving the industry? Of that I am doubtful, it is another revenue stream that will have to measure up against other revenue streams. The magazines have to weather the storm and adapt, they are not going to be "saved" by Apple.

However, I am starting to believe that there is hope. The sea of "free content" is becoming increasingly filled with garbage, indeed most of it is garbage right now, and more and more of it is "malicious" garbage. IMHO people will start to return to what is "safe and known" and be willing to pay for it.
Personally, I'll never pay the same or more per year for any digital magazine. The same goes for a digital version of a book. When you are saving the company vast printing, paper, and distribution costs, those savings should be passed along to the person buying the product. Digital media distribution is too often being viewed as a sneaky way to pump up profit margins by decreasing overhead and charging the same or more. What it SHOULD be viewed as is another way to increase overall sales of the product by offering it through another channel at the same margins. Intelligent consumers who realize they are being gouged will do nothing but spread the word to others, breeding ill will toward those companies trying to rip us off. Print publishers don't seem to be learning anything from the widespread hatred the recording companies have created toward themselves by ripping off customers for decades. It's a shame.
0 Votes
+ -
I think
oncall 9th May 2011
@BillDem

The market will dictate the pricing issue in the not too distant future. I do think it is too high right now, but, as a business owner myself, I know you cannot throw your current customers (your print subscribers and advertisers) under a bus to get a bigger piece of the new action. Once you establish a new "low" price, you're kinda done and all your other customers will demand the new low price, print or digital, or they will leave. The New Yorker has an established print subscriber base, and advertisers who also help pay the bills, they must be taken care of first.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix