ie8 fix
madison

Demise of enterprise IT departments: A pending crisis point

By | September 24, 2010, 6:36am PDT

Summary: If it no longer matters where your IT is physically located and whether or not you actually own or operate the IT systems you depend on, then what IT department do you really need and what are they really doing?

This guest post comes courtesy of Ronald Schmelzer, senior analyst at Zapthink.

By Ronald Schmelzer

In ZapThink’s deep conversations with CIOs and other IT decision makers, we find that there’s broad agreement on the multitude of forces conspiring to change every aspect of the way the enterprise does IT.

Yet at the same time, everybody’s in denial that these changes will happen to them. For us as outsiders, it certainly looks like many enterprise IT decision-makers acknowledge that the world is changing — but deny that they are part of that same world.

Of course, such executives simply have their head in the sand. If change is to occur, it will happen to the vast majority of enterprises, not just the minority.

This realization drives the Crisis Points of the ZapThink 2020 vision. However, ZapThink is not advocating that organizations should adopt any of the crisis points. Rather we are observing that these crises are coming, whether or not companies are ready for them.

In particular, we believe that companies will reach a crisis point as they seek to outsource IT. However, we aren’t advocating that companies outsource all their IT efforts. Rather, we are observing that siren call of offloading IT assets in the form of cloud computing and outsourcing is a significant trend that is leading to a crisis point.

And without a strong rudder, many companies will indeed be dashed on the rocks. This ZapFlash blog post provides greater detail on this particular crisis point: The pending demise of the enterprise IT department, or what we’ve called in previous ZapFlashes the Collapse of Enterprise IT.

Outsourcing and cloud computing:
Different parts of same story

Part of the reason for the visceral response to our Crisis Points ZapFlash is that there’s inherent fear when talking about outsourcing IT functions. Part of the fear comes from the fact that many people confuse outsourcing with offshoring.

Outsourcing is the purchasing of a service from an outside vendor to replace the performance of the task within the organization’s internal operations. Offshoring, on the other hand, is the movement of labor from a region of high cost (such as the United States) to one of comparatively lower cost (such as India).

People fear the latter because it means subcontracting existing work to other people, thus displacing jobs at home. However, the former has been going on for hundreds of years. Indeed, many companies exist solely because they are completing tasks that their customers would rather not undertake themselves.

Almost six years ago, we talked about how service oriented architecture (SOA) and outsourcing go hand in hand, for the simple reason that SOA requires organizations to think about their resources, processes, and capabilities in ways that are loosely coupled from the specifics of their implementation, location, and consumption. Indeed, the more companies implement SOA, the more they can outsource processes that are not strategic or competitive for the organization.

But it’s a mistake to assume the collapse of the enterprise IT department is due entirely to outsourcing the functions of IT to third parties.

Furthermore, the more companies outsource their functions, the more they are motivated to implement SOA to facilitate the consumption of the outsourced capabilities. So, therefore it should be no surprise that the combination of SOA and a challenging economic environment has motivated many companies to see outsourcing as a legitimate strategy for their IT organizations, regardless of whether they move to offshoring.

But it’s a mistake to assume the collapse of the enterprise IT department is due entirely to outsourcing the functions of IT to third parties. Outsourcing is a part of the story, but so is cloud computing. In much the same way that third-party firms can offload parts of IT in the outsourcing model, cloud computing offers the ability to offload other aspects of the IT department. Cloud computing provides both technological and economic benefits for distributing and offloading resources, functions, processes, and even data onto location-independent infrastructures.

While many enterprises are currently pursuing a private model for cloud computing, there are far too many economic benefits of the public model to ignore. Most likely, we will see hybrid cloud approaches, where organizations keep certain mission-critical features behind the firewall on the corporate premises while they shift the rest are to lower cost, more agile, and less costly third-party locations. The net result of this shift is continued erosion of the scope of responsibility for internal IT organizations.

The holistic perspective of the five supertrends

The demise of enterprise IT crisis point emerges from the fact that companies will rush into this vision of outsourced IT without thinking through first the dramatic impact that this transition will have throughout their organization.

For such organizations, the value of our ZapThink 2020 vision is that it pulls together multiple trends and delineates the interrelationships among them. One of the most closely related trends to the demise of the IT organization is the increased formality and dependence on governance, as organizations pull together the business side of governance (GRC, or governance, risk, and compliance), with the technology side of governance (IT governance, and to an increasing extent, SOA governance). Over time, CIOs become CGOs (Chief Governance Officers), as their focus shifts away from technology.

As the enterprise owns fewer and fewer of the organization’s IT assets, the role and responsibility of enterprise IT practitioners will be less about the mechanics of getting systems to work, integrating them with each other, and operating them, and more about the management of the one resource that remains constant: information. After all, IT is information technology, not computer or systems technology.

If you can successfully tackle these questions with a coherent, holistic strategy, then you have defused the risk inherent to movement to outsourcing and/or cloud computing.

With this perspective, it’s essential to view the shift to outsourcing and cloud computing holistically with all the other changes happening in the enterprise IT environment.

For example, the move to democratization of technology means that non-IT practitioners will be utilizing and creating IT capabilities and assets without the control of the IT organization. How will IT practitioners manage the sole enterprise IT asset (information) given that they cannot manage the systems in which that asset flows? As organizations realize the global cubicle vision of IT, how will enterprise IT practitioners and architects enable distributed information without losing GRC visibility?

As systems become increasingly interconnected with deep interoperability despite their increasing distributed nature, how can enterprise IT practitioners make sure the systems as a whole continue to provide value and avoid chaotic disruptions despite the fact that the organization doesn’t own or operate them? As organizations move to more iterative, agile forms of complex systems engineering where new capabilities emerge from compositions of existing ones, how will movements to cloud computing and outsourcing help or hurt those efforts?

If you can successfully tackle these questions with a coherent, holistic strategy, then you have defused the risk inherent to movement to outsourcing and/or cloud computing. On the other hand, if you rush into cloud computing and outsourcing strategies without thinking through all the issues we’ve discussed in this ZapFlash, you’ll be sunk before you know it.

The ZapThink take

Just like the Sirens calling to Odysseus in Homer’s Odyssey, the call of outsourcing and cloud computing will lead many enterprise IT ships to wreck on the rocks unless they can lash themselves to the masts of a holistic perspective of where the industry as a whole is heading. More importantly, the broad shifts in the industry that ZapThink’s 2020 vision of enterprise IT illuminates compels companies to think more broadly about their constant enterprise IT asset: information.

If it no longer matters where your IT is physically located and whether or not you actually own or operate the IT systems you depend on, then what IT department do you really need and what are they really doing? The answer: less hands-on technology and more governance, a sea change that represents the demise of the enterprise IT organization. Whether or not this transition develops into a full-blown crisis is entirely up to you.

This guest post comes courtesy of Ronald Schmelzer, senior analyst at Zapthink.


SPECIAL PARTNER OFFER


SOA and EA Training, Certification,

and Networking Events

In need of vendor-neutral, architect-level SOA and EA training? ZapThink’s Licensed ZapThink Architect (LZA) SOA Boot Camps provide four days of intense, hands-on architect-level SOA training and certification.

Advanced SOA architects might want to enroll in ZapThink’s SOA Governance and Security training and certification courses. Or, are you just looking to network with your peers, interact with experts and pundits, and schmooze on SOA after hours? Join us at an upcoming ZapForum event. Find out more and register for these events at http://www.zapthink.com/eventreg.html.


You may also be interested in:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Dana Gardner is president and principal analyst at Interarbor Solutions, an enterprise IT analysis, market research, and consulting firm.

Disclosure

Dana Gardner

Dana Gardner is president and principal analyst at Interarbor Solutions, LLC, a New Hampshire-based IT analysis and new media content production and consultancy firm that he founded in 2005. He produces a series of podcast/videocast/transcript/blog content shows, called BriefingsDirect[tm/sm], some of which are sponsored and which he blogs on. Such sponsored shows are declared individually as such and by what organization or company. When Dana blogs on ZDNet on companies that he does have, or has had, consulting and/or sponsorship relationships, he declares that in each blog entry. There is no connection between the negotiation of such sponsorships and the opinions expressed by Dana here on ZDNet. To date, the following organizations/companies have sponsored, or do sponsor, some BriefingsDirect content, or have consulting relationships with Dana: Active Endpoints Akamai Technologies Aster Data Systems BP Logix Business Technology Quarterly CA Compuware Electric Cloud Genuitec Gerson Lehrman Group Greenplum Hewlett-Packard iTKO JustSystems North America, Inc. Kapow Technologies LogLogic Nexaweb Technologies, Inc. The Open Group Paglo Panda Security Platform Computing Progress Software rPath Sailpoint Splunk TIBCO Software Weblayers Workday WSO2 ZDNet As a matter of CNET Networks and Interarbor Solutions policies, when Dana covers an organization that is also a sponsor of a BriefingsDirect-produced podcast, videocast or any other content, a disclosure will be included with the coverage. Updated (1/4/2010): Instead of providing a disclosure on just those editorials (blog posts, etc.) that intersect the above listed companies, we have changed the policy to include a link to this full disclosure at the end of every one of Dana's blog posts. In the case of audio or video-based coverage, such disclosures will be provided within the editorial content itself.

Biography

Dana Gardner

Dana Gardner is president and principal analyst at Interarbor Solutions, an enterprise IT analysis, market research, and consulting firm. Gardner, a leading identifier of software and cloud productivity trends and new IT business growth opportunities, honed his skills and refined his insights as an industry analyst, pundit, and news editor covering the emerging software development and enterprise infrastructure arenas for the last 18 years.

Gardner tracks and analyzes a critical set of enterprise software technologies and business development issues: Cloud computing, SOA, business process management, business intelligence, next-generation data centers, and application lifecycle optimization. His specific interests include Enterprise 2.0 and social media, cloud standards and security, as well as integrated marketing technologies and techniques.

Gardner is a former senior analyst at Yankee Group and Aberdeen Group, and a former editor-at-large and founding online news editor at InfoWorld. He is a former news editor at IDG News Service, Digital News & Review, and Design News.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
5
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Demise of enterprise IT departments: A pending crisis point
kmhudnall 27th Sep 2010
I find it curious that each time someone publishes regarding the demise of IT it draws passion for the topic out of many folks. I tend to agree that the demise of IT is going to be it's own demise. Ignoring new technologies, management techniques and delivery/consumption models is in and of itself why IT will be it's own demise and outsourced. Taking a proactive approach, blending the best and most economical delivery options and right sourcing creates the IT organization delivering value and contributing to the top line of the business rather than an anchor on the bottom line.

Successful IT organizations are service providers first, manage technology second supporting the growth of the business.

Business drives Technology --> Technology powers Busness
Michele Hudnall
0 Votes
+ -
Different Take on this point of view.
ronald.warden@... 24th Sep 2010
If the business had the governance in place would they be outsourcing? That is, if there were an identified business person that was accountable and responsible (Meaning that they could answer what the data was fit for, where the data documentation was, what MDM sets were used and what the business rules where used and why and that their name would be on any lawsuits related to misuse of the application or data.) for system A and an identified business person that was accountable and responsible for system B how hard would it be to develop a service to share data between system A and B? No Very hard at all!

Outsourcing, SaaS, SOA, buying enterprise solutions and all the other crap that attempt to shortcut the requirement that MANAGEMENT must MANAGE their resources. Simply saying that IT is managed by a CIO who works some black magic to solve business problems is a simple recipe for failure. Killing off the IT department will not solve the death by bad management.
The article misses the real challenge ! Given that one is totally ignorant of anything but finance, It is trivial to realize that the moving IT services to the external cloud might be a financially sensible idea. The unstated real problem comes when we think carefully about governance. Nobody in any IT shop knows what you are really talking about !! (Read that last sentence at least three times) It is not simply being able to cough up a list of COBIT control requirement and superficial control and reporting mechanisms, as needed to pacify executive management and external audit organizations that is adequate to satisfy the actual needs here. Governance is an intricately woven tapestry of interrelated and interdependent control/monitoring mechanisms that goes all the way down to the hundreds of thousands of technology specific configuration settings utilized within the network, server, middleware, database, and client devices used to support information flow for our organizations (Internal or "cloud"). You and I do not know how these control mechanisms are configured even within our own organizations, much less within the data centers of some external cloud maintaining entity. And anybody that thinks that 3rd party control integrity reviews are adequate to "really" protect their data is simply just too ignorant to even discuss these issues. You can pretty simply "buy" all the governance guarantee's you want from the many 3rd parties that are so very happy to sell you the "right words" for a fee, but you cannot buy actual protection for your data without doing the real heavy lifting somewhere. And unfortunately, the truth is that the only somewhere where it actually occurs, happens to be owned by the very folks that you are so convinced information should be protected from. Nasty problem, and no solutions being sold by anybody with any real 'grasp' of the depth of the nastiness.
What's the REAL difference between outsourcing and putting everything into a cloud or clouds? NOT MUCH! One is simiply an offshoot of the other with different media.
0 Votes
+ -
I learn a lot from The Crisis Points of the ZapThink 2020 Vision. I think one of the interesting changes will be relationship between IT and professional workers. In the past, in many cases they were opposite. Now professionals have direct access to software (what is the problem to order on premise software what is necessary for department project for three months?) and they also have deep understanding what for software is needed. How IT people can show their value in such cases?
blog.inlevel.com
I find it curious that each time someone publishes regarding the demise of IT it draws passion for the topic out of many folks. I tend to agree that the demise of IT is going to be it's own demise. Ignoring new technologies, management techniques and delivery/consumption models is in and of itself why IT will be it's own demise and outsourced. Taking a proactive approach, blending the best and most economical delivery options and right sourcing creates the IT organization delivering value and contributing to the top line of the business rather than an anchor on the bottom line.

Successful IT organizations are service providers first, manage technology second supporting the growth of the business.

Business drives Technology --> Technology powers Busness
Michele Hudnall

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix