UK ICO: "Our bad...Google really did break the law"

UK ICO: "Our bad...Google really did break the law"

Summary: New findings, but no credibility from the UK's Information Commissioner's Office; just more bad press for Google Street View.


Back in July, the British government's privacy watchdog concluded that Google's collection of unencrypted WiFi data by its Street View mapping cars had not broken any laws. It was "wrong," they said, but not illegal.

Now, after both Google and the ICO (the agency that originally examined Google's actions and cleared them of wrongdoing in the UK) were taken to task by the British Parliament this week, the ICO has suddenly decided that Google did, in fact, make a "significant breach" of British privacy laws.

As reported by the BBC,

Google will not face a fine or any punishment...Instead, the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) will audit Google's data protection practices.

The move marks a U-turn for the ICO which originally ruled that no data breach had occurred.

Last week the ICO vowed to look again at the evidence, after the Canadian data agency found the search giant in breach of its law.

But as the British MP who originally called the ICO "lily-livered" pointed out,

"The ICO failed to act when it should have done, despite the fact that Google staged a significant infringement of privacy and civil liberties, by harvesting millions of e-mails, wi-fi addresses, and passwords.

"Furthermore, the ICO has already proved that it lacks the technical expertise to audit Google's activity. What confidence can we have in their audit now?

So Google gets another slap on the wrist over its controversial Street View program and yet another government agency proves that it can keep up with the pace of politics, but not with the pace of technology.

For its part, Google is promising to delete the data it collected, improve its policies, and tell its engineers to write software that is far more subtle when it invades people's privacy. Seems almost as good as their Buzz settlement, right?

Topics: Google, Government, Government US

Christopher Dawson

About Christopher Dawson

Chris Dawson is a freelance writer, consultant, and policy advocate with 20 years of experience in education, technology, and the intersection of the two.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.


Log in or register to join the discussion
  • What's about?

    I HOPE its a coming ip4 to ip6 proxy bridge, but I FEAR it's more of this Google 'grab-all-your-data' foolishness.

    I'm particularly annoying that my handset debugging environment (runs Chromium as browser simulator) seems to phone with a https connection whenever it runs.

    I'm annoyed that whenever Google & Facebook do something bad, they get nothing but a ticking off.

    It seems to me that the ICO was set up to weaking privacy laws under EU. Because it transferred the right to decide from you and me to the ICO. The ICO decides it's ok to give away other peoples information, and it decides on their behalf.
  • Google seems to have this: first do and ask later policy...

    It might behoove them to change this philosophy while they are still admired by the public
    Roque Mocan