What can Google do for Open Office

What can Google do for Open Office

Summary: The question isn't "What can Open Office do for Google?", it's "What can Google do for Open Office?"

SHARE:
TOPICS: Google
5

oogoogle.jpgThe question isn't "What can Open Office do for Google?", it's "What can Google do for Open Office?".  A number of things come to mind when thinking of how OOo can integrate with Google.  Some of them aren't likely to happen soon, but they are all possible and should be worth considering.

The most obvious, and already realized idea, is of Google providing manpower to give the software a boost.  With the brains of Google's skilled engineers, there is no doubt interesting things can happen.  The first order of business should probably be putting OOo on Jenny Craig.  The office suite is a memory hog, and is painfully slow even on "good" machines.  To be a viable alternative to MS Office there definitely needs to be some effort put into optimization.

The functionality that is most talked and speculated about is a completely online version of Open Office.  Almost all the features available in the suite are technically possible using modern browsers which are capable of utilizing rich web applications.  Companies such as Zoho have already accepted the challenge of creating a web-based office product.  Zoho is not the only company to offer these services; a number of other products have recently emerged in this space as well.

Since Google has an appetite for information, I doubt they would reject the idea of users storing information on their computers rather than their own.  The ability to save your documents on Google's servers should be as simple as using the save function and choosing "online" or "offline" storage.  As I posted in the past, Google may be considering offering a similar service which could be stand-alone.  The concept is simple; provide a free networked drive (G: drive) which can be accessed from any computer by using a valid Google account.  The storage space may be shared with your Gmail which provides gigabytes of free storage.  A similar 3rd party project already exists, however it is susceptible to even minor changes in Gmail and may cease to function without warning.

With Google being in the "search" business, the technology is available for them to incorporate their knowledge into a live research tool.  When composing a message, your "research assistant" will constantly be monitoring the web looking for information on what you are writing about.  For example, if you are writing an article about "Open Office", a handy window or panel will show you relevant articles that relate to open office that you can open and read with the click of your mouse.  It would be like that annoying paperclip, only useful and not so annoying.

Sharing information amongst groups of friends or co-workers could also increase productivity.  It can be accomplished by allowing us to save documents to the "Google Base" or by creating shared folders on your G: drive (which is still purely speculation).  Sharing documents should be as simple as choosing from a list of contacts when you save the document.  Those people who you share with could connect to your shared folder and open or edit those documents based on their permissions and have them synched up in real-time.  Microsoft just introduced a similar concept with its Windows Live.

Finding good document templates for things like resumes can be difficult (and expensive).  A large searchable template repository which can be easily accessed is an interesting idea.  When a user creates a "New Document..." they can specify the file name and optionally search the repository for templates before the document is created.  Right now in OOo you can choose from templates, but only on your local machine.  Google isn't in the business of creating content, but they could allow others to create templates and store them in the Google Base for public use.  Even corporate letterheads or standard document templates for internal memo's could be stored privately for organizations... these items would be password protected or shared between users.

Google's language tools are also getting better.  An integrated translation service which could generate copies documents in the language of your choice would be a helpful feature for some users also.  The translation service as it stands still needs work, as the target language can still be difficult to read in some cases.  The future looks promising, though, as Google continues to learn the "meaning" of what is being said in the documents stored on their servers.  When the language tools become as accurate as a human translator, this type of integrated translation solution would be a great addition to the suite.

Google has the skills, money and distribution power to help Sun make the most functional, intelligent and used office suite.  Knowing Google, I can probably even accurately predict the price of such a product/service... free, as long as you are willing to have targeted ads.  Of course, Microsoft is already poised to do similar things with its Office system, but unlike OOo doesn't come for free or have open source roots.  And, what will Yahoo do to keep up with the other two.  So far, it has aligned itself somewhat with Microsoft on the IM and content, but could make nice widgets for OOo and MS Office.

Topic: Google

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

5 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • Please just tell me why

    I would want to relinquish control of my documents and store them on a remote server? And why would I want to use a template from that server that could have been contaminated with some type of malware? No, I'm not trying to say that Google is evil, but what compelling reasons are there for me to risk these things when I can run Open Office locally?
    ebrke
    • That's up to you

      If you want to save your files locally, go ahead... if you don't want to use templates stored on the network, don't. It's all about options.

      Storing files on Google rather than locally makes it possible to access your documents from any computer without the hassle of emailing the document back and forth between computers or people. That would be the most compelling reason for me to use an online storage feature.

      As for the security risks of template repository, Maybe they will in corporate a type of document scanner that will prevent anything malicious from being uploaded.

      These are all issues that have to be addressed... but I also suspect they will be addressed before anything like this goes public.
      Garett
  • Change xml parser from libxml2 to cwxml

    (1) The licence is cleaner
    (2) It parses three times faster apparently
    (3) It supports binary XML for 100 times faster compressed binary XML.

    (2) and (3) only matter if you're a fool and try to store 100 meg of data in a spreadsheet instead of it's natural home (a LAMP SQL/web server), and having done that, you're so impatient you can't wait 90 seconds to load.
    hipparchus2001
  • PAINFULLY SLOW??

    Have you actually *used* OO2 for real work?
    I do, and on a very very cheap 1.4GHz Dell Inspiron 1200 with a very slow hard disk.

    OO2 runs great. What on earth are you using, a Pentium 90?

    George Ou's rubbishing of OO2 was based entirely on performance on load and save of a highly unrepresentative 100 meg spreadsheet. (with no formulas!). recalc search/replace and so on is very fast. George of course only bothered to talk about the load/save times, since his intention was to rubbish OO2 at any cost.

    Looks like you are doing the same!
    hipparchus2001
  • Where can I find this?

    I was searching on my Linux PC for this "G:" drive - just what IS that? ;)
    Roger Ramjet