ie8 fix
Click Here

Googling Google

Christopher Dawson

YouTube takes on Netflix with online movie rentals

By | May 9, 2011, 7:27pm PDT

Summary: YouTube’s new movie rental site isn’t going to crush Netflix. It’s built-in social tools will certainly give it a run for it’s money, though.

YouTube has sat among the top three or four websites online for some time now. It’s the bane of system administrators’ lives, sucking up bandwidth with higher and higher resolution video, and eats capped data plans for lunch. And now, as we’ve anticipated for some time, YouTube is offering streaming video rentals from big-name studios, going head to head with Netflix.

In a blog post today, the company outlined its plans to become a dominant player in the video rental industry, even if it is a bit late to the party:

In addition to the hundreds of free movies available on the site since 2009, you will be able to find and rent some of your favorite films. From memorable hits and cult classics like CaddyshackGoodfellas,Scarface, and Taxi Driver to blockbuster new releases like InceptionThe King’s SpeechLittle FockersThe Green Hornet and Despicable Me. Movies are available to rent at industry standard pricing, and can be watched with your YouTube account on any computer…With 35 hours of video uploaded every minute to YouTube, there’s a sea of content that can add to your movie experience. Many movie pages feature YouTube Movie Extras — free behind-the-scenes videos, cast interviews, parodies, clips and remixes from YouTube’s unique community of content creators.

This actually reinforces my belief that Google doesn’t need to invent a new social platform. Not only can it aggregate content from existing social networks, but it also has YouTube. YouTube’s built-in commenting, subscriptions, and video response mechanisms make the site a robust and extremely modern social network. Video remains the next frontier on the web and it only makes sense that a social approach to video is the next frontier of social media.

YouTube is also adding content from Rotten Tomatoes to the movie rental subsite bringing in an additional layer of Web 2.0 goodness and the social tools already in YouTube will take movie viewing to a new level of social interaction. Is this a Netflix killer? Probably not. Netflix is very entrenched and offers a huge variety of movies and TV series, both streaming and on disk.

However, it has the potential to be a very worthy Netflix competitor. The only problem I see with YouTube Movies is price. While there are many free movies available, many more are $2,99 or $3.99 and aren’t available in HD (the videos are high quality, but if I had my ‘druthers, I’d be watching HD video on BluRay or streamed from vudu or Netflix. I can watch thousands of movies and TV shows for free on Netflix as part of my membership; 5 movies on YouTube would pay for my Netflix membership.

Similarly, as Redbox grows in popularity and ubiquity, When I can rent 3 BluRay new releases or four DVD new releases for the price of 1 streaming movie on YouTube, all the social hooks aren’t going to make up for the price.

Then again, Apple and Amazon are doing pretty well for themselves with their own comparably priced movie options. I see movie prices having to come down some, though, if YouTube wants to be Google’s answer to Netflix (or even to really take on iTunes movies).

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Chris Dawson is a freelance writer and consultant with years of experience in educational technology and web-based systems. In 2011, he became the Vice President of Marketing for WizIQ, Inc., a virtual classroom and learning network SaaS provider.

Disclosure

Christopher Dawson

Christopher Dawson is the Vice President of Marketing for WizIQ, Inc., by day and a freelance writer and educational technology consultant by night. Well, most of his colleagues at WizIQ are based in India, so really he's working with them whenever he can stay awake. He has worked for his local school district as a teacher and technology director, for the Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, and for Biogen, Inc. (now Biogen-IDEC, Inc.). He has also consulted with STATNet and Cytyc Corporation and retains close ties with X2 Development Corporation (now owned by Follett Software, the supplier of the student information system he administered for several years). Follett is paying him a monthly honorarium to act as a presenter for their "SIS Voices for Student Achievement" community (he produces occasional blog posts and hosts a monthly webinar on the use of student information systems to inform data-driven instruction and school-wide change. He regularly purchases and/or recommends Dell hardware. This is because Dell makes good hardware and has truly committed itself to education in innovative ways, particularly with their "Connected Classroom" initiative. It isn't because he has dealings with the company through his role at WizIQ (which he does) or because they have provided him with long-term loans of a variety of equipment for in-depth testing (which they have). Intel (reference designer for the Classmate PCs he has implemented in his local schools) has provided him with long-term loans of Classmate PCs for testing, as have Dell and Lenovo with their educational offerings. He may report on any of these companies as his experiences with them have direct bearing on educational technology; positive reports are not necessarily an endorsement and he receives no direct financial compensation from these companies or any others. Intel paid all expenses for his attendance at the 2009 Intel Classmate PC Ecosystem Summit which he attended as the sole representative of the technology press. He was invited to attend in 2010 but his wife would have killed him if he spent 3 days in Vegas geeking out and left her home alone with a new baby. Acer provided him with a 50% discount on an Aspire One netbook in early 2009 after he tested it for 30 days through their educational seed program. He liked the netbook at the time but it has since broken and sits unused in his office. Canonical sent him Ubuntu lanyards, t-shirts, and mousepads for his kids. He stole one of the lanyards and proudly hangs his keys from it and occasionally features his 8-year old wearing an oversized Ubuntu t-shirt on his Facebook profile. Gunnar Optiks sent him a pair of computer glasses to evaluate for a holiday gift guide. He is wearing them now as he types this because they never asked for them back and they rock out loud. Seriously - they work brilliantly and make it much easier to spend 20 hours a day staring at an LCD. If they ever asked for them back, he would fork over the $99 and buy a pair. Microsoft gave him 2 free copies of Office 2010 professional, a desktop clock, and a useless book on Office 2010 when he attended the launch of Office/Sharepoint 2010. He occasionally uses the SharePoint lanyard they gave him instead of the Ubuntu lanyard for his keys, but feels dirty afterwards. Adobe provided him with a pre-release version of the CS5 Master Collection for evaluation and ultimately provided a full, licensed copy for ongoing testing of educational applications of this admittedly expensive software. Like the Gunnars, if the license expires or they come out with CS6, he'd actually go out and buy it himself. Which is saying something, because he's actually pretty cheap. Any other companies wishing to send him cool things to evaluate, wear, or otherwise adorn his kids are more than welcome to; he promises to disclose it here if he keeps any of the stuff. Finally, because WizIQ is a virtual classroom and learning network provider, Chris, as VP of Marketing, frequently interacts with, seeks out deals with, and directly or indirectly competes with a whole lot of LMS, SIS, and other Education 2.0 companies. In general, he'll limit his reporting about these companies to news that does not impact his relationship with them or with WizIQ. If he reports on them, it's because what they are doing is newsworthy or worth the attention of his readers and not because he's trying to broker some deal, damage competition, or otherwise advance his position in his day job. LMS and SIS companies, along with other online learning communities, are a pretty important part of Ed Tech. If he stops reporting on them completely, there won't be a whole lot left. He'll be sure to call out any overt conflicts of interest if they are unavoidable. Finally, Follett Software Company pays him a little tiny honorarium every month to present on their SIS Voices webinars and to write the occasional blog or discussion thread for them. Since Follett recently bought X2 (maker of an awesome web-based SIS that Chris just happened to have used, served in advisory groups for, and frequently reported on), this is probably also worth disclosing.

Biography

Christopher Dawson

Christopher Dawson grew up in Seattle, back in the days of pre-antitrust Microsoft, coffeeshops owned by something other than Starbucks, and really loud, inarticulate music. He escaped to the right coast in the early 90's and received a degree in Information Systems from Johns Hopkins University. While there, he began a career in health and educational information systems, with a focus on clinical trials and related statistical programming and database modeling. This focus led him to several positions at Johns Hopkins, a couple-year stint in private industry, teaching high school math and technology, and 2 years as the technology director for his local school district. Most recently, he started his own consulting business and is now the Vice President of Marketing for WizIQ, Inc., a virtual classroom and learning network provider. He lives with his wife, five kids (yes, 5), 2 dogs, and a hateful cat in a small town in north-central Massachusetts. Although he is no longer teaching, his roles with WizIQ and ZDNet allow him to continue helping students and teachers add value to education with technology rather than merely adding to the bottom line.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
18
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

LOWER PRICE MOVIE & GAME ACCESS COMPETITION Is WELCOME
FREE-MOVIE-BIZ 28th Mar
Interesting,

Having researched the movie rental industry for years, and having owned an independent movie rental store back before BlockBuster blew us all out of business, look how the big boys have ruled retail for decades. WalMart is perfect example, and BlockBuster is now paying the price given they ignored any competition for years.

NetFix did $3.2 billion in revenues in 2011, and even with price increase announcement, and the loss of almost a million subscribers, they still increased subscriber base by almost 50%. Talk about a recession proof industry, this is it.

Streaming is going to be the future in movie rentals, just as it is for music, but not unliess the avaiable bandwidth is able to absorb all this additional traffic. Then again, how many actually have high speed internet or smart phones to download these movies. It will be years before streaming takes over industry, but any competition is good for industry after seeing BockBuster monopolize industry for years.

With so many companies jumping into industry, Amazon, Apple, Google and Youtube, will this drive prices down? I sure hope so, in fact, a newcomer is starting with NetFlix model of home direct movies, but with a BIG difference, low low prices. At just $2.08 per month, compare this to the BIG boys at $8.00 to $10.00 per month. With streaming option to be released when they go public, right now they are using a twist none of the others are promoting, word of mouth where you can earn unlimited free movies for referring a couple other people through an affiliate program like many promote thousands of businesses like Amazon and NetFlix.

Will this new low cost option put pressure on the BIG boys? Only time will tell, but given they have plans for kiosk system like RedBox, another huge success and the main reason why BlockBuster was put into bankruptcy, it will certainly get interesting when Free-Movie-Biz.com launches to public in July. With beta testing near completion and movies going out, and at only a couple bucks a month for unlimited movies, this new concept is looking good.
All the big name players have not bothered about customers outside the US particularly in Asia. So there are few or non existent streaming options available in Asia. With the rise in sales of HDTVs & good bandwidth (at least in some countries like Singapore), audiences are in a position to subscribe to such services. Apple, Amazon, Netflix etc. have completely ignored non US populations. If youtube can serve these people, there is a tremendous potential.
0 Votes
+ -
@vivektanavde The media cartel will block that one, sure enough. The controls are already in place at Youtube, all content is marked for country of origin and permissible countries of playback.
@terry flores An the media industry has miss the point of the internet, and that why torrents will rein supreme on the internet for many decades to come.
0 Votes
+ -
@vivektanavde Hello, if those outiside of the U.S. have access to the websites, wouldn't they have the ability to stream as well.

George
0 Votes
+ -
RE: YouTube takes on Netflix with online movie rentals
airamericaman Updated - 10th May 2011
@Street Speculator, No Sir. I'm an expat living in the Philippines and Streaming seems to be USA only. Many YouTube videos are blocked here as well.
0 Votes
+ -
FINE
Hasam1991 10th May 2011
But what about bandwith?? youtube videos load slooooww! either way I prefer Nexflix happy
0 Votes
+ -
@Hasam1991
Especially when these movies are $4 a piece which is half a month's fee for netflix. No thanks. I will go to redbox before I pay that much.
This means that I will finally get a decent Netflix client package for my Android phone, it will be required if they need to compete with Youtube.
It is easy to download common videos from youtube and watch them when convenient. I suppose these rental movies, which have to be paid for, will have in place some method to keep that from happening.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: YouTube takes on Netflix with online movie rentals
weskokigen Updated - 14th May 2011
@opcom Anything that is streamed, or viewed in that case, on your computer can be captured and saved as a file. As long as information is decoded and presented to you through your monitor, it can be kept. With Netflix, a monthly subscription means that people can always view the same movie over and over, and this is a kind of inherent deterrence against pirates, but if they had to pay for individual movies, I can almost guarantee there will be more "I'll save this for my collection." I too have no idea how Youtube plans address this...
0 Votes
+ -
Works on my EVO 4G flawlessly! Just watched Super Sized for free. This is a good stopgap measure while some, including me await Netflix for Android!
0 Votes
+ -
It isn't competition really.
BobsYourUnclw Updated - 10th May 2011
You just can't beat the price of Netflix. With diligence, you could probably get 15 DVDs through the mail and have the online catalog for $10/month. Even with taking into account a $80 Roku if you don't have a computer or game system connected to your HD system, 15 rentals @2.99, Netflix pays for itself in 2.03 months AND you still had all the streaming content.

They are competing with Cable companies and that's about it.
0 Votes
+ -
MS should buy Netflix also now
jinishans 10th May 2011
I feel it's not just Skype, MS should buy Netflix as well to flex it's mus. with Amazon/Apple/Google to solidify it's Zune platform and make Zune free...!
0 Votes
+ -
Sounds Cool but,
MrElectrifyer Updated - 10th May 2011
Then again, the prices do the decision making. If it were $4 for a month of free movies, then that would have been a great start; but, since it's per individual movie, neh eh...not gonna pull me away from Netflix (+ BitTorrent for those Movies I wanna keep 4 ever) silly
@MrElectrifyer Subscriptions are definitely the way to go. There is a reason Netflix is the most successful online movie service. No one likes paying for individual movies and not want to keep them.
Good news! If you?re an Android developer yilmazlar et living in Brazil, Canada, kemik kesme Russia, or 17 other kemik testeresi countries you can cancel the movers because Google kofte makinasi will now let you sell Android apps in the hamburger makinasi Market. Likewise, you folks epoksi zemin kaplama in India, Singapore, and 16 other epoksi boya places can stay right where you are dugun mekanlari because in a istanbul dugun salonlari couple of weeks you?ll be able nikah salonlari to pay for those apps. That?s right, Google sunnet salonlari announced a large expansion to nisan salonlari the Android Market today when it dugun salonlari fiyatlari added 20 new countries where developers koy web sitesi of paid apps can live and ilgaz 18 more places where web tasarim consumers of those kartal evden eve nakliyat apps can live. However the number kusbasi dograma makinasi still falls far short of the total number of countries cam balkon fiyatlari in the world. Here?s cam balkon a copy of the email acilir cati they sent out to cam balkon registered cam balkon developers.
Interesting,

Having researched the movie rental industry for years, and having owned an independent movie rental store back before BlockBuster blew us all out of business, look how the big boys have ruled retail for decades. WalMart is perfect example, and BlockBuster is now paying the price given they ignored any competition for years.

NetFix did $3.2 billion in revenues in 2011, and even with price increase announcement, and the loss of almost a million subscribers, they still increased subscriber base by almost 50%. Talk about a recession proof industry, this is it.

Streaming is going to be the future in movie rentals, just as it is for music, but not unliess the avaiable bandwidth is able to absorb all this additional traffic. Then again, how many actually have high speed internet or smart phones to download these movies. It will be years before streaming takes over industry, but any competition is good for industry after seeing BockBuster monopolize industry for years.

With so many companies jumping into industry, Amazon, Apple, Google and Youtube, will this drive prices down? I sure hope so, in fact, a newcomer is starting with NetFlix model of home direct movies, but with a BIG difference, low low prices. At just $2.08 per month, compare this to the BIG boys at $8.00 to $10.00 per month. With streaming option to be released when they go public, right now they are using a twist none of the others are promoting, word of mouth where you can earn unlimited free movies for referring a couple other people through an affiliate program like many promote thousands of businesses like Amazon and NetFlix.

Will this new low cost option put pressure on the BIG boys? Only time will tell, but given they have plans for kiosk system like RedBox, another huge success and the main reason why BlockBuster was put into bankruptcy, it will certainly get interesting when Free-Movie-Biz.com launches to public in July. With beta testing near completion and movies going out, and at only a couple bucks a month for unlimited movies, this new concept is looking good.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix