Could the Gulf oil disaster be Halliburton's fault?

By | May 6, 2010, 8:07am PDT

Summary: It was Halliburton’s job to cement the deepwater drilling hole where all the oil’s coming out of.

No matter how I write this, some people will claim it’s political. The left-wing loons are going to think I’m siding with an evil corporation and the right-wing nut-jobs will think I’m just picking on Cheney again.

This is what it means to be an independent patriot: sometimes, you know you can’t win and you’re going to annoy both sets of wackos — and yet you do your job anyway.

So be it. Here goes.

Halliburton might be to blame for the Gulf oil spill that’s currently threatening the coasts, livelihoods, health, and seafood restaurants of many states along the Gulf of Mexico.

Halliburton hot seat

If you don’t remember Halliburton, let’s recap. Former Vice President Dick Cheney was chairman and CEO of Halliburton before he became VP. According to the U.K.’s Guardian, he left with a severance package totaling about $36 million.

Halliburton is also the company that made more than $16 billion providing services in the Iraq war and, according to the Washington Post, charged U.S. taxpayers “$45 per case of soda, double-billed on meals and allowed troops to bathe in contaminated water.”

And, finally, Halliburton is the company that, after making all that money from U.S. taxpayers, decided to move its headquarters from Houston to Dubai — saving it, potentially, “a fortune in U.S. taxes,” according to ABC’s Jake Tapper.

That Halliburton.

So here’s the thing. Halliburton does oil well stuff. They’re particularly expert at that sort of thing, which is part of why we used the company in Iraq, and part of why they’re showing up in our story, possibly inflagranti delicto.

Drill, Baby, Drill

Since we just did a short Halliburton retrospective, let’s touch quickly on the Gulf oil spill. Contrary to what a lot of people apparently think, the spill was not a leak in an oil tanker, ala Exxon Valdez. Instead, an explosion occurred on BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil rig, drilling off the coast of Louisiana.

This is not a minor spill. Deepwater was drilling in deep water, 5,000 feet down. The spill is covering about 2,500 square miles of ocean and is spewing 200,000 to a million gallons of crude into the ocean each day.

In other words, it’s bad.

So where’s Halliburton fit in with all this? It turns out, it was Halliburton’s job to cement the deepwater drilling hole where all the oil’s coming out of. There’s a lot of science here, but the gist of it is that cement is a key part of the process, sealing up the hole for part of the drilling process.

If the cement were to fail, the hole would have a hole.

This is apparently what happened off the coast of Australia about a year ago. There was a major blowout in the Timor Sea and Halliburton has been accused of performing a poor cement job.

That time, they were being accused of poor performance by parties completely outside the American political system. This time, not so much. This time, Halliburton is being “investigated” by Congress-critters Henry Waxman and Bart Stupak (yep, that Bart Stupak).

Waxman and Stupak, are, of course, Democrats. As you might imagine, with Halliburton’s ties to a former Republican administration, it could be interpreted that the Dems are merely trying to find a scapegoat and, to them, Halliburton would grill up oh-so-juicy.

This may or may not be Halliburton’s fault. While Halliburton did complete the cementing process 20 hours prior to the blowout, the company claims the final cement plug hadn’t been placed, which might mean other methods were being used for sealing and it wasn’t Halliburton’s work that failed.

At this point, no one knows. It may take quite a while to figure out the true cause of the disaster — and, sadly, probably as long to clean it all up.

No matter what, in addition to being a complete and total economic and environmental disaster, the spill is going to be a sticky mess politically as well.

Some research resources used in this article can be found here.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

David Gewirtz, Distinguished Lecturer at CBS Interactive, is an author, U.S. policy advisor, and computer scientist. He is featured in The History Channel special The President's Book of Secrets.

Disclosure

David Gewirtz

At various times during his adult life, David has voted for both Democrats and Republicans, and has been disappointed by both. He is deeply disturbed by how partisanship has come before patriotism in America, which gives him the freedom to pick on both sides.

David is a frequent guest on TV and radio stations across America and can usually be heard or seen on-the-air at least once a week. He writes weekly commentary and analysis for CNN’s Anderson Cooper 360 and has been interviewed by Fox News, CNN, various ABC and NBC affiliates, and Canada’s Global TV. He has been a featured guest on National Public Radio and has also been featured on Voice of America, Radio Free Europe, and Radio Liberty where his commentaries on technology, industry, and emerging nations have been broadcast into 46 countries (all in their own unique translations).

David is the executive director of U.S. Strategic Perspective Institute, a nonprofit research and policy organization. He is the Cyberterrorism Advisor for the International Association for Counterterrorism & Security Professionals, a columnist for The Journal of Counterterrorism and Homeland Security and a special contributor to Frontline Security Magazine. He is a member of the FBI’s InfraGard program, the security partnership between the FBI and industry. David is also a member of the U.S. Naval Institute and the National Defense Industrial Association, the leading defense industry association promoting national security.

David is an advisory board member for the Technical Communications and Management Certificate program at the University of California, Berkeley extension. He is also a member of the instructional faculty at the University of California, Berkeley extension.

David’s “day job” is as publisher and editor-in-chief of ZATZ publishing, an online publisher of technical magazines. Other than than his ownership stake in Component Enterprises, Inc. (the parent company of ZATZ), David has no additional industry investments.

ZATZ has many advertisers who do, in part, provide for David’s lush income and extravagant lifestyle. Most of them are IBM and Lotus aftermarket suppliers, some of them make goodies for Microsoft Outlook, and a few make all sorts of strange mobile devices and add-on products. David has been a regular judge of the IBM Awards, but has no formal financial interest in or with IBM.

Because the ZATZ online magazines often review products, David and ZATZ are sent an overwhelming stream of unsolicited, silly, and often useless products to review. Because they’re such a pain to track and ship back, these products often wind up in a dumpster or fill up the corner of a large closet. Although David has no plans to review products in connection to his ZDNet blog, if he does do a product review, he will disclose any relationship completely in that posting.

Both through ZATZ and independently, David derives a small income through various advertising and sales relationships with Amazon.com and Google. These are minor relationships and they will not impede his willingness or ability to chastise either company should they deserve it.

David has many other business relationships, but none of them relate to anything he covers in his ZDNet blog. David does have a bit of the sales-guy bug and if he’s not doing a sales deal with someone at least once a month, he goes through withdrawal. He has a number of consulting clients, but none of them relate to anything he covers for ZDNet (and if they ever do, he will either disclose that fact, or decline to write about them).

Back in the 1980s, David held the unusual title of “Godfather” at Apple. He has written and published 40 incredibly simplistic applications for Apple’s iPhone.

Although David is forbidden to disclose the terms of his iPhone developer agreement, he isn’t drinking the Apple Kool Aid, will never be confused with a metrosexual, and feels free to mock Apple, and Apple users, any time the occasion permits, on alternate Tuesdays, or if he’s bored.

Biography

David Gewirtz

In addition to hosting the ZDNet Government and ZDNet DIY-IT blogs, CBS Interactive's Distinguished Lecturer David Gewirtz is an author, U.S. policy advisor, and computer scientist. He is featured in The History Channel special The President's Book of Secrets, is one of America's foremost cyber-security experts, and is a top expert on saving and creating jobs. He is also director of the U.S. Strategic Perspective Institute as well as the founder of ZATZ Publishing.

David is a member of FBI InfraGard, the Cyberwarfare Advisor for the International Association for Counterterrorism & Security Professionals, a columnist for The Journal of Counterterrorism and Homeland Security, and has been a regular CNN contributor, and a guest commentator for the Nieman Watchdog of the Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard University. He is the author of Where Have All the Emails Gone?, the definitive study of email in the White House, as well as How To Save Jobs and The Flexible Enterprise, the classic book that served as a foundation for today's agile business movement.

12
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Could the Gulf oil disaster be Halliburton's fault?
efsane Updated - 11th Apr 2011
Great!!! thanks for sharing this information to us!
sesli sohbet sesli chat
0 Votes
+ -
You're talking about Cementing oil wells right? This isn't like putting a concrete cap on a well. Now it's been years since I worked for company that set up frac lines for Haliburturn, over a decade ago but cementing from I saw would not have stopped this disaster. I worked on Fracing Natural Gas wells so I'm no expert but I've seen it done and don't see how it would stop this disaster.
Thats not how it works. For the production cement job, that happened 20 hours before the blow-out, you pump cement down the casing and it comes back up the annulus. The main problem is the BOP, blow out preventer. BOP's are installed on the rigs for this specific reason, to prevent blow outs. Whenever the BOP failed, thats when there was no way to stop the disaster. Also, the casing must have failed for oil to get inside the casing. Finally, the production cement job clearly did not produce a good bond. It could have needed longer to set, could have been bad cement, or the rig crew could have poorly conditioned the well beforehand. Setting plugs at the end before they moved wells had nothing to do with the production cement job though. Like I said, the main culprit was the failed BOP, and the secondary problems were probably weak casing and a poor cement job, although I cant say that for sure. Halliburton may have some blame, but they probably are not the main culprit.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
@nbulling, @voska1, awesome!

I've been trying to understand the tech here and I'm glad you both were able to shed some light on the areas I was unclear about.

Thanks!
0 Votes
+ -
It sounds like it wasn't anything to do with Halliburton's work. It sounds like it was something unpredicted - and thus not calculated for.

Simply - just an accident. No fault.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: "just an accident. No fault."
BlueBerry Pick'n Updated - 7th May 2010
reall-Y?

I guess drilling is just plain dangerous & deadly toxic disasters waiting to happen.

I guess the polluting of international waters is probably something that should be banned internationally.

after all, its not like its actually preventable if it can 'just happen'

kinda like nuclear waste... "oopsie! millions died, guess we couldn't have prevented it... it was inevitable"

its time we worked on something less unsustainable & short-termed.

we're killing ourselves, slowly but surely.

kinda like the fact-ignorant Roman Empire's civil engineers, when they designed drinking water supplies out of lead-lined pipes.

If you don't know what you're doing, stop pretending you're competent enough to do it in the first place.

"oops! look at all those poisons & death... gosh, wish we could have prevented that! I guess you'll just have to sue my insurance company while I declare bankruptcy & open a new business entity to continue business as usual!"
0 Votes
+ -
Interesting article and seemingly knowledgeable responses in at least two cases - thanks to all for that information. While I have no experience at all with such problems, it would seem to those IN the industry that it was "simple" enough to theorize and be pretty close to the truth as it will be revealed.
But then, this entire thing is way too early in the game to be making accusations such as it's his fault and so on That's just plain silly this early in the game - going off on a knee jerk reaction and spewing words that can't be taken back. I'm afraid this isn't the author's brightest day and most will remember how this particular rumor came about.
Dumb. Just dumb.
Blaming it on poor cementing job is too far fetched. The writer clearly needed to do some research on blow outs.

In an oil well, slightly positive pressure in the borehole must always be maintained at all times. This is done by pumping drilling fluid with a specific weight at a pressure higher than the formation fluid pressure. This drilling fluid is what 'plugs' the formation fluid from blowing out, and clearly not cement!

The good thing is the writer agrees to acknowledge the 2 first excellent replies above, but this also means the whole article is invalid. Do a better research next time before pointing fingers!

-Engineer at a major oil service company (not Halliburton).
0 Votes
+ -
Peripherally only
twaynesdomain 10th May 2010
Not as anything but peripherally.
0 Votes
+ -
Blame game again...
Johnc77us 11th May 2010
Accidents happen. Problem is this country and all its vast resources are not prepared for such accidents. For fires, we have the fire department. For oil rig mishaps, we have nothing. We need better safety equipment (including an "off" switch)...
0 Votes
+ -
As the Gulf oil disaster continues, the credibility of BP to shut down the oil leak they created decreases day by day. The patience of the American public is wearing thin: how long will it be before BP must be pushed out the way to get the job done?

It is a mistake to assume, as the federal government has done up to now, that only BP has the "expertise" to do this. What has this so-called expertise accomplished? How much longer can this "expertise" be allowed to bungle the job?

I would like to suggest to the blogosphere another option: that the US government force BP out of the way, take over control of the operation, while keeping BP in an advisory role. Call in leading experts for a new plan: to plant explosive charges to seal the blowout through geological means.

The circumstances of this pollutive catastrophe are without precedent - and may therefore require unprecedented solutions. Shutting off of this eruption by implanting subsurface charges in strategic locations, determined by the best seismic and geologic information available (which BP surely must have), is beginning to appear, at least to this author's mind, the only permanent solution to this horrific ecological catastrophe.

Stronger action must be taken immediately; the longer we delay, the greater the damage will be.
?I would like to suggest to the blogosphere another option: that the US government force BP out of the way, take over control of the operation, while keeping BP in an advisory role. Call in leading experts for a new plan: to plant explosive charges to seal the blowout through geological means.?

From the congress meeting of the heads of the oil giants a few days ago it appears that BP has just as much expertise as the other players when disasters like this happen. So I doubt the US government will be able to call on anyone other than those already playing a part in the clean-up.

I sense that BP is the lead contractor and has many sub-contractors ? some or all of which may be to blame in some way. I guess that the US will sue BP and BP will sue the sub-contractors. Everyone will claim on insurances and the insurance companies will sue everyone. I call that 1-0 to the Lawyers ? the environment looses on every count.

I love the comment from BlueBerry Pick?n, ?kinda like the fact-ignorant Roman Empire's civil engineers, when they designed drinking water supplies out of lead-lined pipes.?

I wonder what on earth those civil engineers might have used as an alternative material 2000 years ago? Just for the record, those pipes weren?t lead lined, they were all lead ? just like the lead pipes that continue serve some old properties in the UK and Europe to this day. I?d call it a fantastic bit of ingenuity.

Ignorance - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignorance
0 Votes
+ -
Great!!! thanks for sharing this information to us!
sesli sohbet sesli chat

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix