Flash analysis: Egypt melting down; govt fights back closing Internet

By | January 28, 2011, 1:26am PST

Summary: This is a short update on a huge event. Egypt has exploded into something resembling civil war. Here are some key elements of the crisis you need to be aware of.

This is a short update on a huge event. Egypt has exploded into something resembling civil war. Here are some key elements of the crisis you need to be aware of:

Flash analysis

We’ve seen Internet blockages before, but we haven’t seen (at least that I can recall) an entire nation go dark and offline.

There is some evidence that the Internet was the primary communication vehicle for the various protests we’re seeing in Middle Eastern nations, so it’s likely that Mubarak took the ill-advised, surprise action of simply turning it off.

CBS News video: Egypt Protests Fueled by Social Networking

That, more than anything else, will probably lose him his job, if not his head.

Egypt is not the only Middle Eastern country in turmoil. Remember that Iranian citizens used Twitter heavily back in 2008 as an attempt to turn around what they widely considered corrupt elections. Other citizens in other countries are heavily using social networking tools to organize.

Expect this to be a new and very, very dangerous hot point in geopolitics. Also, if the Suez Canal ceases operation or is damaged in some way, expect to see a huge impact on world shipping, prices of shipped goods and services, and delays. In other words, we’ll feel this one.

Note to America’s leaders

America has long allied with Mubarak and we don’t ever advocate or support the armed overthrow of a national leader.

However, I caution you to be circumspect in how supportive you are of Mubarak. Any nation with a leader in office for almost 30 years isn’t exactly promoting Democratic principles.

Further, if Egypt has shut off their Internet connection to quell protests, this is an action that must be decried with the strongest words. If you even slightly indicate support for such an action, you’ll both open a door to a reprehensible governing tactic and scare the pants off your own citizens.

Finally, avoid jumping into the fray. America’s pretty busy right now with our own problems. Let other nations particularly dependent on the Suez Canal, including most European nations, do the heavy lifting here.

Avoid spreading us too thin by involving us in yet one more worldwide crisis.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

David Gewirtz, Distinguished Lecturer at CBS Interactive, is an author, U.S. policy advisor, and computer scientist. He is featured in The History Channel special The President's Book of Secrets.

Disclosure

David Gewirtz

At various times during his adult life, David has voted for both Democrats and Republicans, and has been disappointed by both. He is deeply disturbed by how partisanship has come before patriotism in America, which gives him the freedom to pick on both sides.

David is a frequent guest on TV and radio stations across America and can usually be heard or seen on-the-air at least once a week. He writes weekly commentary and analysis for CNN’s Anderson Cooper 360 and has been interviewed by Fox News, CNN, various ABC and NBC affiliates, and Canada’s Global TV. He has been a featured guest on National Public Radio and has also been featured on Voice of America, Radio Free Europe, and Radio Liberty where his commentaries on technology, industry, and emerging nations have been broadcast into 46 countries (all in their own unique translations).

David is the executive director of U.S. Strategic Perspective Institute, a nonprofit research and policy organization. He is the Cyberterrorism Advisor for the International Association for Counterterrorism & Security Professionals, a columnist for The Journal of Counterterrorism and Homeland Security and a special contributor to Frontline Security Magazine. He is a member of the FBI’s InfraGard program, the security partnership between the FBI and industry. David is also a member of the U.S. Naval Institute and the National Defense Industrial Association, the leading defense industry association promoting national security.

David is an advisory board member for the Technical Communications and Management Certificate program at the University of California, Berkeley extension. He is also a member of the instructional faculty at the University of California, Berkeley extension.

David’s “day job” is as publisher and editor-in-chief of ZATZ publishing, an online publisher of technical magazines. Other than than his ownership stake in Component Enterprises, Inc. (the parent company of ZATZ), David has no additional industry investments.

ZATZ has many advertisers who do, in part, provide for David’s lush income and extravagant lifestyle. Most of them are IBM and Lotus aftermarket suppliers, some of them make goodies for Microsoft Outlook, and a few make all sorts of strange mobile devices and add-on products. David has been a regular judge of the IBM Awards, but has no formal financial interest in or with IBM.

Because the ZATZ online magazines often review products, David and ZATZ are sent an overwhelming stream of unsolicited, silly, and often useless products to review. Because they’re such a pain to track and ship back, these products often wind up in a dumpster or fill up the corner of a large closet. Although David has no plans to review products in connection to his ZDNet blog, if he does do a product review, he will disclose any relationship completely in that posting.

Both through ZATZ and independently, David derives a small income through various advertising and sales relationships with Amazon.com and Google. These are minor relationships and they will not impede his willingness or ability to chastise either company should they deserve it.

David has many other business relationships, but none of them relate to anything he covers in his ZDNet blog. David does have a bit of the sales-guy bug and if he’s not doing a sales deal with someone at least once a month, he goes through withdrawal. He has a number of consulting clients, but none of them relate to anything he covers for ZDNet (and if they ever do, he will either disclose that fact, or decline to write about them).

Back in the 1980s, David held the unusual title of “Godfather” at Apple. He has written and published 40 incredibly simplistic applications for Apple’s iPhone.

Although David is forbidden to disclose the terms of his iPhone developer agreement, he isn’t drinking the Apple Kool Aid, will never be confused with a metrosexual, and feels free to mock Apple, and Apple users, any time the occasion permits, on alternate Tuesdays, or if he’s bored.

Biography

David Gewirtz

In addition to hosting the ZDNet Government and ZDNet DIY-IT blogs, CBS Interactive's Distinguished Lecturer David Gewirtz is an author, U.S. policy advisor, and computer scientist. He is featured in The History Channel special The President's Book of Secrets, is one of America's foremost cyber-security experts, and is a top expert on saving and creating jobs. He is also director of the U.S. Strategic Perspective Institute as well as the founder of ZATZ Publishing.

David is a member of FBI InfraGard, the Cyberwarfare Advisor for the International Association for Counterterrorism & Security Professionals, a columnist for The Journal of Counterterrorism and Homeland Security, and has been a regular CNN contributor, and a guest commentator for the Nieman Watchdog of the Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard University. He is the author of Where Have All the Emails Gone?, the definitive study of email in the White House, as well as How To Save Jobs and The Flexible Enterprise, the classic book that served as a foundation for today's agile business movement.

20
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Interesting how Gewirtz's tune has changed
HollywoodDog Updated - 30th Jan 2011
Why it was just a month ago Gewirtz was threatening those law-abiding journalists over at Wikileaks with 'taking away the toy' of free speech:

"If we cant play nice, our toys might be taken away. The true legacy of Wikileaks might not be increased transparency in our governments. The true legacy of Wikileaks might be the destruction of the Internet freedoms we all hold so dear."

Yet when the Mubarak regime follows exactly his prescription of taking away the 'toys' of internet access and twitter and facebook, suddenly:

"If you even slightly indicate support for such an action, youll both open a door to a reprehensible governing tactic and scare the pants off your own citizens."

So, is the freedom to communicate on the internet sacrosanct, and its suspension "reprehensible" or is your right communicate a "toy" to be taken away if you embarrass Hillary Clinton?

Would you please make up your mind, Mr. G? Situational ethics? Do as you say, not as you do? OK for me, but not for thee?
why would you (US) get involved? You were involved for so many years promoting and supporting an autocrat...this is something that Egyptians need to sort out for themselves...why would you even think about getting involved??? I would think that cutting off the internet would bring this event closer to an endpoint. You are completely off your rocker to even talk about getting/not getting involved. The Egyptians will figure out what they want in the end without the 'help' of the US and especially Hillary Clinton!
@Bradish@... We will keep the Canal open if you fail to do so.
@Tommy S.
How's that? The way we did in '56 and '68?
0 Votes
+ -
Just remind me of Indonesia in '98
givemespace21 28th Jan 2011
Mubarak have been there for 30 years. Soeharto had it for 32 years in Indonesia.

Why, the most consistent presidency is indeed the US. And I agree that countries should take the US as an example for CONSISTENCY in conducting THE FORMAL DEMOCRACY - not the AGRESSIVE WARS that just killing civilians and children.

For Egyptians: shutting down the Internet itself is a sign of UNDEMOCRATIC and TYRANNIC presidency. There's no other choice: Egyptians, you are right! Do what Indonesians students and people did in '98!
@givemespace21 exactly...it was the Indonesians that sorted their own problems...Let the Tunisians, Egytptians and others sort themselves out. The US tried to sort out Iraq and Afghanistan and look what's happened and how many lives....
0 Votes
+ -
you are right but
Quebec-french 28th Jan 2011
@Bradish@...
what is dangerous is the chance that extremist take power and cause more trouble....
what i like at this moment is with tunisia the army put it self responsible for a democratic government just like turkey army is responsible to prevent religious government to?control turkey .


maybe just maybe middle east will change and become stable and democratic maybe good luck too all
According to a recent CNET News report cited by "The Raw Story", a bill sponsored by Senators Joe Lieberman and Susan Collins, would give the President powers to shut down the internet without Judicial oversight.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/01/power-shut-internet-court-oversight/

To quote from the article, "...The Protecting Cyberspace as a National Asset Act was introduced last year by Sens. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) and Susan Collins (R-ME) in an effort to combat cyber-crime and the threat of online warfare and terrorism.

Critics said the bill would allow the president to disconnect Internet networks and force private websites to comply with broad cybersecurity measures. Future US presidents would have those powers renewed indefinitely.

According to a report Monday at CNET News, the bill will be back on the Senate agenda in the new year. But a revision introduced into the bill in December would exempt the law from judicial oversight. According to critics, this change would open the law to politically-motivated abuse by any administration, no matter how narrowly the law is interpreted."

I wouldn't blame the Egyptian Government for doing what our Government wishes to do in the future. I would blame the American public for allowing the US Government to have that much control without a judicial review process in place.
0 Votes
+ -
Egypt shut down the internet so it could start firing real bullets instead of rubber ones. Dictatorships don't get overthrown unless the army sides with you, or you have a competing army of equal strength.
0 Votes
+ -
@frgough

Absolutely true!. The Politicrats here should take note that Americans have bought more guns since Obama was elected than the Armies of China and Pakistan combined have soldiers.

Thanks to the 2nd Amendment We the People have more than equal strength.

Make sure it stays that way!
@wkulecz

In a pig's eye we have 'more than equal strength'. The fact is that the Army has tanks, rocket launchers, etc. It is impossible for someone armed with only handguns, machine guns, etc. to fight back against those.

The only reason the United States has not become a dictatorship is NOT totally because of the Second Amendment. It is because the officials know that if they tried to take us down that road? Head on pike time, and the Army would be lining up with the rest of the Americans to do it.
0 Votes
+ -
Egypt is second only to Israel in US aid. We have been backing Egypts governement for decades and the people of Egypt know it.

This is how the US manages to make so many enemies around the globe. We will prop up any government or dictator when its in our percieved interests.
@NoAxToGrind Yes, because all the other governments of the world are good and noble and back countries that are not in their perceived interest.

Sheesh!
prop up and support governments out of pure selfless idealism.
0 Votes
+ -
It is known that there are unmarked well-secured rooms at several major United States Internet traffic exchange facilities of major US carriers. Guess what?????
@anthonymaw It IS? Guess what? You just bought into the latest fad of conspiracy theories.
@anthonymaw ... It IS? Cite, please - ANY form of citation from ANY half fast source would do. I'm betting it cannot be done.
0 Votes
+ -
Egypt shuts down Internet....Good!
james347 28th Jan 2011
Most people are stupid and need to be told what to do.
I don't see why we need to care OR get involved in any way. I have to admit that the krazies outnumber the thinking people by many thousancs of % so it may have been easily justified.
Without a verifiable WHY, it's nothing but ether and only barely of interest, or should be, to NA.
0 Votes
+ -
Interesting how Gewirtz's tune has changed
HollywoodDog Updated - 30th Jan 2011
Why it was just a month ago Gewirtz was threatening those law-abiding journalists over at Wikileaks with 'taking away the toy' of free speech:

"If we cant play nice, our toys might be taken away. The true legacy of Wikileaks might not be increased transparency in our governments. The true legacy of Wikileaks might be the destruction of the Internet freedoms we all hold so dear."

Yet when the Mubarak regime follows exactly his prescription of taking away the 'toys' of internet access and twitter and facebook, suddenly:

"If you even slightly indicate support for such an action, youll both open a door to a reprehensible governing tactic and scare the pants off your own citizens."

So, is the freedom to communicate on the internet sacrosanct, and its suspension "reprehensible" or is your right communicate a "toy" to be taken away if you embarrass Hillary Clinton?

Would you please make up your mind, Mr. G? Situational ethics? Do as you say, not as you do? OK for me, but not for thee?

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix