ie8 fix
Click Here

What part of selling our uranium mines to Russia makes sense to you?

By | September 23, 2010, 7:48am PDT

Summary: I am not making this up. I could not possibly make this up.

Ever wonder what the first Apple II looked like? This is it. The Apple II 29-kiloton nuclear test, originally fired off at the Nevada Test Site on May 5, 1955.

The world is a very strange place. I was born just a little while before the Cuban Missile Crisis. My parents and many of your parents and grandparents were terrified of the possibility of a nuclear war starting in Cuba. I grew up where the primary nuclear avoidance strategy was called “duck and cover.” Basically, we were taught in elementary school that you stick your head between your legs and kiss your class goodbye.

The U.S.S.R., the Red Menace, Russia — this was the Evil Empire, the Supreme Enemy. The Soviets, we were told, existed solely with the desire to destroy the West. Their ideology was diametrically opposed to ours. Russia was the original red state.

China was part of the same game. China was the Soviet Union’s little commie puppet nation. China, too, was the great enemy.

We spied on them. They spied on us. We had nukes pointed at their major cities. They had nukes pointed at ours. The big discussion was about overkill — how many times over could we bomb them back to the Stone Age vs. how many times over they could do it to us.

We were not pals.

Today, the fog of war is even thicker. On one hand, we’re buddies, allies, even friends with Russia. We buy their software. Acronis’ drive imaging software comes from Russia. Many PHP add-ons we routinely use come from Russia as well. A number of quasi-legal MP3 sites are located in Russia, but frequented by Americans who are willing to pay to get their music kinda-sorta legally, but most definitely cheaply.

With China, of course, we borrow money. Trillions and trillions of dollars. Each one of us is tens of thousands of dollars in debt — to the Communists (for they are still Reds) in China.

These are strange days. And now, they’re even stranger.

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission announced this week (PDF) that they’re offering the opportunity for hearings and comment on a wee little purchase of mofo-frackin’ uranium by the Russians.

I am not making this up. I could not possibly make this up.

It turns out that JSC Atomredmetzoloto (a Russian company) is trying to buy the Uranium One Irigaray-Christensen Ranch in-situ leach uranium recovery (ISR) facility in eastern Wyoming.

Now, this is not just a Russian company. Oh, no. Atomredmetzoloto, according to the NRC, “is controlled by Rosatom, the Russian Federation’s state agency that oversees the Russian nuclear industry.”

Kudos to my friend Jorge who pointed out this little bit of news. I couldn’t have said it any better than when he said, “The world no longer makes any sense to me.”

Of course, I’m older than Jorge. The world stopped making sense to me a long time ago.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

David Gewirtz, Distinguished Lecturer at CBS Interactive, is an author, U.S. policy advisor, and computer scientist. He is featured in The History Channel special The President's Book of Secrets.

Disclosure

David Gewirtz

At various times during his adult life, David has voted for both Democrats and Republicans, and has been disappointed by both. He is deeply disturbed by how partisanship has come before patriotism in America, which gives him the freedom to pick on both sides.

David is a frequent guest on TV and radio stations across America and can usually be heard or seen on-the-air at least once a week. He writes weekly commentary and analysis for CNN’s Anderson Cooper 360 and has been interviewed by Fox News, CNN, various ABC and NBC affiliates, and Canada’s Global TV. He has been a featured guest on National Public Radio and has also been featured on Voice of America, Radio Free Europe, and Radio Liberty where his commentaries on technology, industry, and emerging nations have been broadcast into 46 countries (all in their own unique translations).

David is the executive director of U.S. Strategic Perspective Institute, a nonprofit research and policy organization. He is the Cyberterrorism Advisor for the International Association for Counterterrorism & Security Professionals, a columnist for The Journal of Counterterrorism and Homeland Security and a special contributor to Frontline Security Magazine. He is a member of the FBI’s InfraGard program, the security partnership between the FBI and industry. David is also a member of the U.S. Naval Institute and the National Defense Industrial Association, the leading defense industry association promoting national security.

David is an advisory board member for the Technical Communications and Management Certificate program at the University of California, Berkeley extension. He is also a member of the instructional faculty at the University of California, Berkeley extension.

David’s “day job” is as publisher and editor-in-chief of ZATZ publishing, an online publisher of technical magazines. Other than than his ownership stake in Component Enterprises, Inc. (the parent company of ZATZ), David has no additional industry investments.

ZATZ has many advertisers who do, in part, provide for David’s lush income and extravagant lifestyle. Most of them are IBM and Lotus aftermarket suppliers, some of them make goodies for Microsoft Outlook, and a few make all sorts of strange mobile devices and add-on products. David has been a regular judge of the IBM Awards, but has no formal financial interest in or with IBM.

Because the ZATZ online magazines often review products, David and ZATZ are sent an overwhelming stream of unsolicited, silly, and often useless products to review. Because they’re such a pain to track and ship back, these products often wind up in a dumpster or fill up the corner of a large closet. Although David has no plans to review products in connection to his ZDNet blog, if he does do a product review, he will disclose any relationship completely in that posting.

Both through ZATZ and independently, David derives a small income through various advertising and sales relationships with Amazon.com and Google. These are minor relationships and they will not impede his willingness or ability to chastise either company should they deserve it.

David has many other business relationships, but none of them relate to anything he covers in his ZDNet blog. David does have a bit of the sales-guy bug and if he’s not doing a sales deal with someone at least once a month, he goes through withdrawal. He has a number of consulting clients, but none of them relate to anything he covers for ZDNet (and if they ever do, he will either disclose that fact, or decline to write about them).

Back in the 1980s, David held the unusual title of “Godfather” at Apple. He has written and published 40 incredibly simplistic applications for Apple’s iPhone.

Although David is forbidden to disclose the terms of his iPhone developer agreement, he isn’t drinking the Apple Kool Aid, will never be confused with a metrosexual, and feels free to mock Apple, and Apple users, any time the occasion permits, on alternate Tuesdays, or if he’s bored.

Biography

David Gewirtz

In addition to hosting the ZDNet Government and ZDNet DIY-IT blogs, CBS Interactive's Distinguished Lecturer David Gewirtz is an author, U.S. policy advisor, and computer scientist. He is featured in The History Channel special The President's Book of Secrets, is one of America's foremost cyber-security experts, and is a top expert on saving and creating jobs. He is also director of the U.S. Strategic Perspective Institute as well as the founder of ZATZ Publishing.

David is a member of FBI InfraGard, the Cyberwarfare Advisor for the International Association for Counterterrorism & Security Professionals, a columnist for The Journal of Counterterrorism and Homeland Security, and has been a regular CNN contributor, and a guest commentator for the Nieman Watchdog of the Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard University. He is the author of Where Have All the Emails Gone?, the definitive study of email in the White House, as well as How To Save Jobs and The Flexible Enterprise, the classic book that served as a foundation for today's agile business movement.

28
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: What part of selling our uranium mines to Russia makes sense to you?
theguru1995@... 28th Sep 2010
@JM1981 -- this is the world that "some wish to say is the real world" Its real if you accept what is presented. I think we have a responsibility to our children. How can we allow URANIUM to be PUBLICLY traded, is this a JOKE ?
The world is not a friendly place. We wish the world was one Mr. Rogers' Neighborhood, but the only constant among nations is each governments' self-interest. I think we're the only ones who don't believe this.
We have already surreneded the 'rare earth' metals industry to China and they are beginning to restrict what the rest of the world gets. (see Wall Street Journal, they've done good work on this. Sorry, can'get link at this time.)
0 Votes
+ -
Why not?
wkulecz 23rd Sep 2010
Why not? Obama wants to gut NASA and send the rocket building jobs to Russia too. All part of the grand plan.
0 Votes
+ -
Only goes to show that Obama is more right of center...
Snooki_smoosh_smoosh 23rd Sep 2010
@wkulecz... than left. After all sending jobs to the private sector and overseas is a republican theme. On the extreme right you have people like Angle, Palin, Buck, Miller, etc who would send all good paying jobs overseas, eliminate entitlements so that you can support your grandparents, parents, and your children on your Wal-mart wages with no health care. Nice.
@JM1981 just proves that there are always fools and idiots like you among us
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
lmaas...
Snooki_smoosh_smoosh 23rd Sep 2010
... Nice, can't debate it so you resort to ad hominem's and insults, a true republican.
0 Votes
+ -
Article a little misleading.
Snooki_smoosh_smoosh 23rd Sep 2010
Uranium One Inc(UUU.TO). is a publicly traded Canadian Company, and yes this company has a subsidiary that holds that Mine. The fact of the matter is that this isn't the US Government selling the mine. Prime example of head in the sand yellow journalism. It took me 2 minutes to research this.
@JM1981 And that is the real point that the author still can't admit to himself: the Corporations are the greatest mechanism behind the ruling class' control. A control that crosses borders and envelops most governments of all forms.
Uranium One is one of the world?s largest publicly traded uranium producers with a globally
diversified portfolio of assets located in Kazakhstan, the United States, Australia and South
Africa. Kazakhstan - 9th largest country and the largest land-locked country.
Com'on... WE still have 5000+ Nuc's and so do the Ruski's and Chinese... and some others have their own fat albert's... Sell'em the Urainium... and relax... we have how to de-nuclearize it now from our (I'm a US 6 year VN Vet and been here in Ukraine 19 years now) Ukrainian scientists... It's all gonna be ok, if you 'scared-by-the-news' kids start thinking and working towards winning instead of the daily negative news!! Turn off Fox, Helloooo...
'Cause the US news seems to have missed the attempts by a Chinese company to buy the Canadian company PotashCorp (largest fertilizer provider in the world). And the efforts by a Chinese company to buy a big chunk of the Alberta tar sands.

American farmers use fertilizer. Lots and lots of fertilizer.

Despite the common misconception, the US doesn't import most of it's gas from the mid-east, but from Canada - specifically Alberta.

I'll let the Einsteins here do the math and figure out the implications of fertilizer and oil going west and not south.
who are full of sh*t, I think we can find a way to survive without Canadian fertilizer. American ingenuity will figure out a way to harness enough crap from both the Rush Limbaugh show and the Rachel Maddow show to feed generations to come.
0 Votes
+ -
First we let our most talented companies set up shop in China, so that they can steal our IP and copy it and sell it cheap on the side, now we are giving away material that can potentially be used against us.... I am begging anyone that will listen in Washington, please help and stop all this horrible yard sale of America.... sorry, this makes no sense at all....
0 Votes
+ -
Oh wow. Are you related to Palin?
Snooki_smoosh_smoosh 23rd Sep 2010
@theguru1995@... I mean really, several of us now have pointed out that this is a mine owned by a publicly traded company. If you don't like it we could always revert to communism, which is what republicans love to throw in the face of the democrats. Welcome to the real world.
@JM1981

Wow you need to go back and read the article again. No ware did it state that Uranium One Inc is a Government Held company. It stated that "U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission announced this week that they?re offering the opportunity for hearings and comment on a wee little purchase of mofo-frackin? uranium by the Russians"

This agency will have to approve any such purchase (seriously dought they will, given the Russians cooperation with Iran). I will agree with you that this article is much ado about nothing. Hearings mean nothing, just that they are going to talk about it.
@JM1981 -- this is the world that "some wish to say is the real world" Its real if you accept what is presented. I think we have a responsibility to our children. How can we allow URANIUM to be PUBLICLY traded, is this a JOKE ?
@theguru1995@... You're preaching to fools. You really think folks in Washington give a rat's *ss about selling out America !? I could even see them selling out their own mother if they can make a buck.
@theguru1995@... Please understand.. those U.S. companies operating in China, do so of there own free will. They are in China so they do not have to pay the wages and comply with the onerous safe working conditions imposed in the U.S.. Those U.S. companies know the risk of losing IP, but the cost to share holders of trying to run the business without the same low wages and poor conditions they would be forced to in America, makes it a risk worth taking. The shareholders of these companies are the ones to blame. They are the ones selling businesses to other countries just because they made a better share offer. Don't blame Washinton... blame the share holders who put profits before jobs at home.
Sorry if I rambled a bit ;}
0 Votes
+ -
Limiting judgements.
gnostication@... 23rd Sep 2010
Let go of all you know to be "good" and "bad". Let go of judgment of that. For example: the U.S. democracy is "good" while the Chinese authoritarian rule is "bad".

When you let go of judgments of "good" and "bad", you will be able to let in and observe (scientifically) what is really happening and how the world is framed/structured.
0 Votes
+ -
You're getting distracted!
tkejlboom 23rd Sep 2010
Superficial poppycock! During exigent crisis, administrations have taken over AMERICAN industries. If we're in a nuclear crisis of some sort, I'm sure that the US gov will have no compunction in taking over the Russian uranium mines first. It's a paper conceit. The mine is not actually moving to Russia.

What you SHOULD be concerned about:
Russia, Iran, and China think that the U.S. developed the internet as a WEAPON to spread propaganda to undermine their regimes. International cyber security as defined by them involve the ability for them to track, trace, and restrain free speech. They think intrusion, disruption, and theft of our networks is self defense against the spread of our ideas. They are discussing restriction of the free speech and ideas on the internet as cyber security in the UN!
0 Votes
+ -
What's the big deal?
pjotr123 23rd Sep 2010
Twenty years ago, Germany was reunited (west and central, the east is -still- Polish, Russian and Lithuanian), Poland and the Baltic nations joined NATO and the USSR split up (mostly peacefully) in a massively big way. US military bases are present in many former USSR states.

What does the sale of a uranium mine mean, compared to all that?

Greetings from The Netherlands, Pjotr.
0 Votes
+ -
We should be stockpiling globally
tonymcs@... 23rd Sep 2010
There is no justification for either nuclear power or nuclear bombs.

Except for one. Nuclear explosives may be the only way we get to divert an asteroid hitting earth.

So I suggest the UN start stockpiling the weapons wink
0 Votes
+ -
Neat little video plotting all nuclear detonations 1945-1998. It is at the bottom of this post about the fission weapons that we actually used:
http://jrepka.blogspot.com/2010/08/little-boy.html

Direct:
http://a21.video2.blip.tv/2320000849969/Ctbtomedia-2053ByIsaoHashimotoJapan762.flv?bri=7.6&brs=962
The Russians aren't particularly interested in Uranium One's Wyoming assets. The deal went down for other reasons. Also, what's with the bomb picture? Ordinary uranium ore can't explode. The U-235 isotope content is 0.7%.
0 Votes
+ -
Controversy
htouillerais 24th Sep 2010
Where controversy is more important than facts and fundamentals subjects.
This is the second article from this author that's misleading. ZDNet need to pull his credentials because he does not do his research before writing.
No big deal!
Russia already has all the nukes it needs to destroy the USA, and if the mines ever did become a problem the US govt could always control the output and even the management of the mines by legislation.

Personally, I believe uranium usage worldwide should be wound down, as the risks outweigh the benefits and there are better, renewable options. I challenge anyone who disagrees with this to name one nuclear power plant that is privately insured without some sort of government underwriting - even rocket launches with a high risk of failure can get private insurance, but the risks of nuclear are too high for private insurance.
NOTE: I'm an Australian, not a US citizen.
0 Votes
+ -
It's all too much
klumper 25th Sep 2010
Of course, I?m older than Jorge. The world stopped making sense to me a long time ago.

Ah, the time tested milestone of maturity -- and realization that some things are beyond our ephemeral reach.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix