What was Mitt Romney trying to hide by destroying hard drives?

By | December 1, 2011, 5:00am PST

Summary: Although it’s up to substantial debate whether or not Mitt Romney is the most qualified to be our next president, one thing is sure: he’s certainly acting like most other presidents in his desire to hide or destroy email records.

It sounds like something out of my White House email reports. A politician, leaving office, has ordered email messages destroyed and hard drives wiped.

This is issue was brought to my attention a few days ago by a reader, but the Thanksgiving holiday kind of distracted me from the attention it was due. But yesterday, fellow Internet Press Guild member Sharon Fisher wrote an article describing how Mitt Romney had destroyed computer data when he left the Governor’s office in Massachusetts.

Why would Romney, a leading GOP presidential candidate, go out of his way to destroy information after leaving office? What is he trying to hide?

This, sadly, is not as exciting a story as it might be, because while Romney clearly wanted to keep some information confidential, he’s far from the first politician to unapologetically try to destroy information from his administration.

In fact, when I wrote Where Have All The Emails Gone? (free download) about the Bush Administration’s 5 million missing email messages, one of the most disturbing facts I discovered was that all presidents have tried to hide or destroy their messages.

Ever since there was White House email, presidents have been particularly unhappy about the preservation of email traffic. This goes all the way back to President Reagan, and if you think this is unique to the Republicans, think again. When Bill Clinton left office, then Senior Advisor on Policy and Strategy George Stephanopolous was quoted in the May 18, 1993 issue of The Washington Post as saying, “Like Bush’s White House, the Clinton White House does not want a succeeding, potentially unfriendly administration pawing through its computer memos.”

George was, of course, talking about the original Bush Administration, but the phrase “pawing through its computer memos” is the most instructive. This is how most administrations, whether federal or state, feel about computer records and email messages. They think first of their own legacies and about political positioning, rather than about America’s right to transparency and historical record.

Although it’s up to substantial debate whether or not Mitt Romney is the most qualified to be our next president, one thing is sure: he’s certainly acting like most other presidents in his desire to hide or destroy email records.

And you wonder why I have so little regard for politicians. All politicians.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

David Gewirtz, Distinguished Lecturer at CBS Interactive, is an author, U.S. policy advisor, and computer scientist. He is featured in The History Channel special The President's Book of Secrets.

Disclosure

David Gewirtz

At various times during his adult life, David has voted for both Democrats and Republicans, and has been disappointed by both. He is deeply disturbed by how partisanship has come before patriotism in America, which gives him the freedom to pick on both sides.

David is a frequent guest on TV and radio stations across America and can usually be heard or seen on-the-air at least once a week. He writes weekly commentary and analysis for CNN’s Anderson Cooper 360 and has been interviewed by Fox News, CNN, various ABC and NBC affiliates, and Canada’s Global TV. He has been a featured guest on National Public Radio and has also been featured on Voice of America, Radio Free Europe, and Radio Liberty where his commentaries on technology, industry, and emerging nations have been broadcast into 46 countries (all in their own unique translations).

David is the executive director of U.S. Strategic Perspective Institute, a nonprofit research and policy organization. He is the Cyberterrorism Advisor for the International Association for Counterterrorism & Security Professionals, a columnist for The Journal of Counterterrorism and Homeland Security and a special contributor to Frontline Security Magazine. He is a member of the FBI’s InfraGard program, the security partnership between the FBI and industry. David is also a member of the U.S. Naval Institute and the National Defense Industrial Association, the leading defense industry association promoting national security.

David is an advisory board member for the Technical Communications and Management Certificate program at the University of California, Berkeley extension. He is also a member of the instructional faculty at the University of California, Berkeley extension.

David’s “day job” is as publisher and editor-in-chief of ZATZ publishing, an online publisher of technical magazines. Other than than his ownership stake in Component Enterprises, Inc. (the parent company of ZATZ), David has no additional industry investments.

ZATZ has many advertisers who do, in part, provide for David’s lush income and extravagant lifestyle. Most of them are IBM and Lotus aftermarket suppliers, some of them make goodies for Microsoft Outlook, and a few make all sorts of strange mobile devices and add-on products. David has been a regular judge of the IBM Awards, but has no formal financial interest in or with IBM.

Because the ZATZ online magazines often review products, David and ZATZ are sent an overwhelming stream of unsolicited, silly, and often useless products to review. Because they’re such a pain to track and ship back, these products often wind up in a dumpster or fill up the corner of a large closet. Although David has no plans to review products in connection to his ZDNet blog, if he does do a product review, he will disclose any relationship completely in that posting.

Both through ZATZ and independently, David derives a small income through various advertising and sales relationships with Amazon.com and Google. These are minor relationships and they will not impede his willingness or ability to chastise either company should they deserve it.

David has many other business relationships, but none of them relate to anything he covers in his ZDNet blog. David does have a bit of the sales-guy bug and if he’s not doing a sales deal with someone at least once a month, he goes through withdrawal. He has a number of consulting clients, but none of them relate to anything he covers for ZDNet (and if they ever do, he will either disclose that fact, or decline to write about them).

Back in the 1980s, David held the unusual title of “Godfather” at Apple. He has written and published 40 incredibly simplistic applications for Apple’s iPhone.

Although David is forbidden to disclose the terms of his iPhone developer agreement, he isn’t drinking the Apple Kool Aid, will never be confused with a metrosexual, and feels free to mock Apple, and Apple users, any time the occasion permits, on alternate Tuesdays, or if he’s bored.

Biography

David Gewirtz

In addition to hosting the ZDNet Government and ZDNet DIY-IT blogs, CBS Interactive's Distinguished Lecturer David Gewirtz is an author, U.S. policy advisor, and computer scientist. He is featured in The History Channel special The President's Book of Secrets, is one of America's foremost cyber-security experts, and is a top expert on saving and creating jobs. He is also director of the U.S. Strategic Perspective Institute as well as the founder of ZATZ Publishing.

David is a member of FBI InfraGard, the Cyberwarfare Advisor for the International Association for Counterterrorism & Security Professionals, a columnist for The Journal of Counterterrorism and Homeland Security, and has been a regular CNN contributor, and a guest commentator for the Nieman Watchdog of the Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard University. He is the author of Where Have All the Emails Gone?, the definitive study of email in the White House, as well as How To Save Jobs and The Flexible Enterprise, the classic book that served as a foundation for today's agile business movement.

28
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

As I see it, the current occupant is the SECOND-biggest in history....
hippiekarl 9th Mar
Did his direct predecessor not gain the office through judicial appointment (by his DAD's Supreme Court!) after his BROTHER's state (Jeb's Florida) engaged in the most visible, obvious mass voter-fraud ever seen in this country?! Obama won many votes by offerring simple answers (slogans, mostly) for complex issues, but his predecessor flat-out STOLE one in front of everyone, then started 2 wars to change the subject....
After the last 12 years of these two fruits of the 'Two-Party System', I agree that Howdy Doody is looking more and more presidential.
0 Votes
+ -
Not only did the Clinton administration delete many documents, they also ripped the W key right off many keyboards.
@zmud I don't get it?
0 Votes
+ -
"respectfully, your President
William Farrell 1st Dec
@branrules101

George W Bush"
@branrules101 Yeah, they pulled the "W" key off a bunch of keyboards as a joke/prank.
0 Votes
+ -
I get it
baggins_z 1st Dec
When a Democrat vandalizes government property, it's just a prank.
0 Votes
+ -
It's wrong no matter who does it, but it's hard to hold anyone accoutable for it, if the responsible parties leave government employment as soon as it happens, probably never to return, except possibly as a member of the staff of another politician of the same party.

It was wrong when President Clinton's staffers did it. It was also wrong when President Bush's staffers did it.
@branrules101 The W thing is a story that got embellished way beyond anything that actually happened. Research by GAO showed no more 'damage' to equipment than would normally be expected by the amount of usage they had. http://www.salon.com/2001/05/23/vandals/
@zmud

No, it didn't. Urban myth.
If I want to read about politics I go to drudgereport,.... Stop bashing and start working on tech news/articles
0 Votes
+ -
Gun to head?
People 1st Dec
@josephvba@... I like his mix of tech and politics.

He didn't force you to read anything.
@josephvba@...
No one is forcing you to read David's posts, so bugger off. I for one find them interesting.
@josephvba@...

So, you came to the ZDNet Government blog to not read about politics? Sounds like the problem is with you, not David.
0 Votes
+ -
Did you even bother to read
use_what_works_4_U 1st Dec
@josephvba@...
The title of this particular blog is ZDNet Government and this article is most definitely about the confluence of tech and government. If you don't want to read about politics, then don't read a political blog!

Although with your astute observation of, and complaints about, the painfully obvious I suspect you are a potential candidate trying to head off the train wreck that most candidates find themselves in when they complain about the obvious rather than doing something easy and sensible (like not reading) about it.
@josephvba@...

Actually maintenance of e-mail accountability is tech, it is important, and David is actually a technical expert in the field. His book on W.'s e-mail reset is actually a pretty decent read. Download it and give it a try. It's not very long.
@josephvba@... This isn't new--apparently the n00bs at See-BS think so (on a Republican?) as ZDNet has gotten much more gratuitously political since See-BS bought them.
uhhh... I protect all my info and make sure no one has access to anything.. dispose of old emails and such and I'm not even a politician. I expect all politicians to be security conscious.. I don't see the point in pointing this out.

And this is from a Registered Republican that in no way will ever back Romney, the guys a joke and its just the Democrat loving media thats trying to force him on everyone and convince voters they have no choice.
0 Votes
+ -
@doh123
...if Mr. Romney gets the nomination?
@doh123 There is a serious issue here of public records. Nobody really cares what you do with your email, but email in government situations is a different issue. All of it is subject to public disclosure. I can understand why someone might not want the email chatter of their jobs being made public, but if that is the case then they shouldn't be using their government email.
@doh123

I'd be a bit surprised if Massachusetts didn't have a law protecting those e-mails. Legal keeps copies of ALL of HP's e-mails. Yeah, you encrypt your Touchpad, and you wipe it before you give it to your niece, but you don't eliminate every copy. If you deliberately tried to erase your e-mail trail in a major corporation, you'd be fired. It would probably be pointless as legal and IT are duping everything as they hit the exchange server, but it's definitely grounds for dismissal.
0 Votes
+ -
Let me remake the suggestion
John L. Ries Updated - 1st Dec
White House computer operations should be handled by the GSA, not the White House staff. Staffers have, for several generations, been political operatives primarily concerned with partisanship and protecting the boss' image, so every time we change administrations, we have a shredding party, no matter what the law says. And since the White House staff leave when the President's term is up, there is no incentive for it to be otherwise.

Our bureaucrats deserve some of the flack they get from us citizens, but following procedures and getting along with politicians regardless of party are a couple of the things they're good at. Having career civil servants in charge of White House computing operations would at least insure some continuity, and eliminate the sorts of transition idiocies that have become customary. And if the President doesn't like his sysadmin, he can always order the GSA to send him a new one.
1 Vote
+ -
Well,
HypnoToad72 1st Dec
Since many rightwingers say "Those innocent of crimes have nothing to hide", so the moment they make an exception they will lose every ounce of credibility.
0 Votes
+ -
Except that...
John L. Ries 1st Dec
@HypnoToad72
...I know of nothing that suggests that Republicans do it more often than do Democrats, or conservatives more often than liberals.
0 Votes
+ -
Not everything need be public
Robert Hahn 1st Dec
    "Those innocent of crimes have nothing to hide"

Except that they do. I can think of a hundred things that have nothing to do with criminal activity that a White House aide might usefully say somewhere during an Administration, but that would best be lost to posterity.

"We could leak Senator Foghorn's affair with that stripper if he doesn't go along." Except then he does go along, and there's no reason to hose up the Senator's life, his wife's life, the stripper's life, etc.

"Congressman Blather is a cad, a bounder, and a poopyhead." Except that ten years later, Congressman Blather is Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and our poor staffer needs a job and he'd be perfect for the Committee staff. Oops.
@Robert Hahn

You can't be for real. If staffers are spending their work day engineering smear campaigns or blackmail, it's not only legally protective public record, it's also, depending on the extent of the blackmail, a felony.

Ultimately, everything you can possibly make up as excuse is dismissed by one argument. Nixon. Nixon Nixon Nixon. Just because the Plumber's orders weren't PRINTED on official White House letterhead didn't mean they didn't exist and were not receiving their orders directly from the President. Precedent for using recorded data off of paper as presidential record. Nixon. He recorded all of it. Abuse of power requiring such scrupulous documentation? Nixon. Everything you say is demonstrably wrong. Nixon.
If you have privileged information on hard drives that you will no longer control you nuke the drive. They no doubt have paper shredders for the same reason.
... how many of you (David Gewirtz included) have had PRIVATE e-mail exchanges with anyone which did not need to see the light of day. Not all comments expressed in any personal conversation represent policies, plans, or even serious remarks? I'd wager that very few such exchanges are in the public interest in any way, shape, or form.

Few of us could stand the scrutiny our politicians are exposed to. None of us are perfect and we are not on-stage 24/7 so why should we expect our leaders to be accountable for an occasional careless remark or stupid idea they might have expressed years earlier in a different context.

We all make offhand comments from time to time that we would not want a wider audience to hear. As a result of this public scrutiny, our best and brightest invariably hesitate to run for public office.

Nowadays, politicians have to appeal to an extremely broad political spectrum, often composed of an electorate made up of a myriad of single-issue idealogues
who cannot be pleased unless they are told exactly what they want to hear.

To paraphrase an old saying ... you can please some of the people all of the time and you can please all of the people some of the time but you cannot please all of the people all of the time.

It's time to stop assuming that every action someone takes is a conspiracy.
Your opening statement in your article is laughable in asking is Mitt Romney qualified to be the president after the biggest fraud in history was racially elected to the White House. Are you kidding? Howdy Doody is as qualified as the current occupant...and I am a lifelong Democrat!!! Whether a Republican is on the up and up is kind of a non-issue after the last 4 years from my Democratic Party!
Did his direct predecessor not gain the office through judicial appointment (by his DAD's Supreme Court!) after his BROTHER's state (Jeb's Florida) engaged in the most visible, obvious mass voter-fraud ever seen in this country?! Obama won many votes by offerring simple answers (slogans, mostly) for complex issues, but his predecessor flat-out STOLE one in front of everyone, then started 2 wars to change the subject....
After the last 12 years of these two fruits of the 'Two-Party System', I agree that Howdy Doody is looking more and more presidential.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix