ie8 fix

Cutting the (power) cord

By | May 11, 2011, 7:40pm PDT

This question always pops into my head whenever I am roaming an airport desperately seeking a place to recharge my notebook computer and other gadgets: why is it that I can get all sorts of network “juice” via wireless means, while I have to rely on some cord to keep these darn things running?

Sure, you and I have both read and heard about wireless charging methods, but most of them still require some sort of contact point (they are inductive) and so far there has been little traction for these technologies. Until now. Cleantech market watcher Pike Research figures that 2012 will be the turning point for wireless charging devices, when the market will cross the $1 billion mark.

In the press release for the report, Pike Research Clint Wheelock said:

“The electrical cord is the one tether that has yet to be cut for most mobile users. Today’s early wireless charging systems mostly use inductive charging technologies that require direct contact between the charger and the device, but research is well underway on systems that will eventually transmit power wirelessly over long distances.”

It doesn’t require much imagination to dream up applications for this sort of thing: you’re already seeing some research and development related to electric vehicle charging, as one example. Consumer electronics gadgets — especially mobile phones — are also prime candidates. The delivery methods for wireless charging include everything from induction technologies, magnetic resonance, microwaves and even lasers. You might also imagination collecting power from a much more distributed “grid” than in the past. What’s to keep you from having a solar or wind generation source, for example, that keeps your gadgets entirely off grid.

One start-up to follow is WiTricity, which just signed a technology collaboration deal with Toyota Motor Co. last week that could result wireless electric vehicle charging stations. Other companies working on the wireless charging challenge include Powercast, which is focused on energy harvesting; eCoupled, which is focused on inductive methods; and PowerBeam, which is using optical technologies for long-distance transmission. The Wireless Power Consortium is also likely to be a force in steering the future agenda for these technologies.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Heather Clancy is an award-winning business journalist with a passion for green technology and corporate sustainability issues.

Disclosure

Heather Clancy

Writing publicly about what the high-tech industry is actually doing to help itself and the world get greener or more sustainable is one way I figure I can contribute more meaningfully to said effort. I am also a big OMG-kind-of-fan of smart leadership, which is why the goodly folks who publish this blog let me go on about this topic and why I am always on the hunt for forward-looking business management ideas.

My daily writing is focused on looking for topics for my blogs, GreenTech Pastures and Business Brains. I also write often about emerging technology trends such as mobile computing, unified communications and cloud computing. Occasionally, I will pop up at an industry conference in some sort of speaking capacity. In cases where a speaking engagement involves a sponsor that may be covered in this blog, that fact will be disclosed in coverage as appropriate.

My corporate writing work usually consists of crafting research white papers about some aspect of technology. In the event that my commentary (in written, audio or video form) mentions a company for which I have provided consulting advice, I will disclose that fact. However, there is no connection between these projects and the topics that I am covering in my blog.

Biography

Heather Clancy

Heather Clancy is an award-winning business journalist with a passion for green technology and corporate sustainability issues. Her articles have appeared in Entrepreneur, Fortune Small Business, The International Herald Tribune and The New York Times. In a past corporate life, Heather was editor of Computer Reseller News, where she was a featured speaker about everything from software as a service to IT security to mobile computing.

Heather started her journalism life as a business writer with United Press International in New York. She holds a B.A. in English literature from McGill University in Montreal, Quebec, and has a thing for Lewis Carroll.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
22
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

I think so cutting the power cord
cnstrongpower 25th Apr
Remember all of the trouble it caused for the horses (their shoes acted like antennas and they got shocked with every step power cord.) I have a hard time believing that this much energy could be put into the ether without some nasty consequences, like cancer, damaging other devices ac power cord,in usa it say"power supply cord or unexpected electric power cords
0 Votes
+ -
Mr. Tesla have done this way back
cym104 11th May 2011
?
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Cutting the (power) cord
grant@... 12th May 2011
@cym104 That was exactly my thought. Remember all of the trouble it caused for the horses (their shoes acted like antennas and they got shocked with every step.) I have a hard time believing that this much energy could be put into the ether without some nasty consequences, like cancer, damaging other devices, or unexpected electric shocks.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Cutting the (power) cord
eak2000 12th May 2011
@cym104

Plus, Tesla is all but unknown here in the US... Despite being a historical figure elsewhere.
0 Votes
+ -
I am all for this,
Bates_ 12th May 2011
but I am curious to what kind of charging speeds we can expect. For the most part, it doesn't matter too much, but I am curious to see how this technology compares to conventional charging methods.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Cutting the (power) cord
wkulecz 12th May 2011
Good God! "Green Tech" calling for horribly inefficient power delivery systems for "convenience".
0 Votes
+ -
Abracadabra
Robert Hahn 12th May 2011
@wkulecz Now now, don't let physics get in the way of the Unicorns. If we can transmit information wirelessly, transmitting clean energy vast distances without wires is only a matter of you geeks getting on the stick.

So get on it.
0 Votes
+ -
@wkulecz
0 Votes
+ -
Wireless energy transfer
Economister 12th May 2011
That is already being done regularly by the vast majority of the people in modern societies. It is called a microwave oven. Trouble is, you do not want to be inside it.

Transferring (relatively) large amounts of energy via wireless means (over a distance too long for a cord) without "cooking" life around it, may be an insurmountable challenge, unless we all want to die from cancer.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Cutting the (power) cord
Bill4 12th May 2011
@Economister
My immediate thought was that people who don't like cell phone radiation are going to love hating this!
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Cutting the (power) cord
tonymcs@... 12th May 2011
@Economister

Or you could look up the difference between ionising and non-ionising radiation.
0 Votes
+ -
Did you just learn some new terminology?
Economister Updated - 12th May 2011
@tonymcs@...

Since you brought it up:

"Non-ionizing radiation can produce non-mutagenic effects such as inciting thermal energy in biological tissue that can lead to burns." - Wikipedia.

I probably do not need to quote any affects if ionizing radiation.

And your point was?

Edit: And just to spell it out in sufficient detail for you have at least a chance at comprehension, the "cooking" reference was to non-ionizing and the "cancer" to ionizing. Which one would you prefer for your devices?
0 Votes
+ -
Oops
Robert Hahn 12th May 2011
@Economister Yes, there is a fine line between what the military calls a "directed energy weapon" and a wireless power transmitter that gets bumped by a suitcase and is aiming in the wrong direction.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Cutting the (power) cord
Onaka 15th May 2011
@Economister

Two words: Magnetic resonance.
Not a radiative technology and thus far magnetic fields haven't been shown to do damage to biological organisms. I'm pretty sure if there was going to be any danger with magnetic fields, the MRI would have shown it long ago.

So yeah, I'd like my wireless power transfer with neither burns nor cancer.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Cutting the (power) cord
terry flores 12th May 2011
@Economister

Microwave radiation doesn't generally cause cancer, but the heat generated can kill delicate tissues, especially eye and nerve tissues, measured in terms of Specific Absorption Rate (SAR). I remember a bit of it from getting trained on safety procedures for industrial microwave transmitters and waveguides. The training film was not especially pleasant to watch ...
0 Votes
+ -
I am not saying ....
Economister 12th May 2011
@terry flores

it can NEVER happen, I just have trouble seeing significant amounts of energy being transmitted to wireless devices in the consumer space. How do you prevent it from going places you do not want it to go without being close enough so that you could just plug it in anyway and eliminate the risk?
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Cutting the (power) cord
bitcrazed 12th May 2011
@terry flores - remember, we cook with microwaves today because early radar researchers discovered that birds who flew into the path of early radar transmitters cooked while in flight.

Not sure I'd be comfortable accidentally walking into a beam of energy that's charging my car to find, somewhat agonizingly, that my legs have cooked!
0 Votes
+ -
Quick and easy dinner?
Economister 12th May 2011
@bitcrazed

sad
0 Votes
+ -
Apple will have inductive charging first
MSFTWorshipper 12th May 2011
This changes everything. Again. Genius.
0 Votes
+ -
I don't think so
John L. Ries 12th May 2011
Having all that static electricity in the air can't possibly be a good thing. It wasn't a good idea when Tesla first proposed it in the 19th century. It's not a good idea now.
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Cutting the (power) cord
kowsmic@... 13th May 2011
Forbidden Planet here we come!
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Cutting the (power) cord
pbytbubbfxr@... 13th May 2011
the only way to get enough energy fast is not to transfert it wirelessly. It's to transfer it as fuel. Be it water, methanol, gasoline, whatever.
0 Votes
+ -
I think so cutting the power cord
cnstrongpower 25th Apr
Remember all of the trouble it caused for the horses (their shoes acted like antennas and they got shocked with every step power cord.) I have a hard time believing that this much energy could be put into the ether without some nasty consequences, like cancer, damaging other devices ac power cord,in usa it say"power supply cord or unexpected electric power cords

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix