Hey kids, we used less energy and more renewable tech in 2009!

By | August 30, 2010, 1:01pm PDT

Summary: Well, here’s a refreshing bit of news for a Monday afternoon: A new data set released by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory reports that we used a lot less coal and petroleum last year, compared with 2008. Meanwhile, there were demonstrable increases in the use of renewable energy sources, especially generation systems based on wind [...]

Well, here’s a refreshing bit of news for a Monday afternoon: A new data set released by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory reports that we used a lot less coal and petroleum last year, compared with 2008. Meanwhile, there were demonstrable increases in the use of renewable energy sources, especially generation systems based on wind technologies.

The researchers attribute the decrease in coal and petroleum use to lower electricity demand, a shift to natural gas as a fuel source, and wind power production offsets.

How much energy did Americans use last year? For 2009, we burned up 94.6 quadrillion British Thermal Units (BTUs), down from 99.2 quadrillion BTUs in 2008. Energy use declined across residential, commercial, industrial and transportation uses — the biggest decline coming from the last category.

That’s the good news. The bad news, if you will, is that Lawrence Livermore believes that at least part of the decline in energy use was simply attributable to the chaotic economy, which does not bode well when things turn around. Let’s hope that by that time, more renewable energy technology will be in place to pick up the slack without defaulting to “dirty” sources.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Heather Clancy is an award-winning business journalist with a passion for green technology and corporate sustainability issues.

Disclosure

Heather Clancy

Writing publicly about what the high-tech industry is actually doing to help itself and the world get greener or more sustainable is one way I figure I can contribute more meaningfully to said effort. I am also a big OMG-kind-of-fan of smart leadership, which is why the goodly folks who publish this blog let me go on about this topic and why I am always on the hunt for forward-looking business management ideas.

My daily writing is focused on looking for topics for my blogs, GreenTech Pastures and Business Brains. I also write often about emerging technology trends such as mobile computing, unified communications and cloud computing. Occasionally, I will pop up at an industry conference in some sort of speaking capacity. In cases where a speaking engagement involves a sponsor that may be covered in this blog, that fact will be disclosed in coverage as appropriate.

My corporate writing work usually consists of crafting research white papers about some aspect of technology. In the event that my commentary (in written, audio or video form) mentions a company for which I have provided consulting advice, I will disclose that fact. However, there is no connection between these projects and the topics that I am covering in my blog.

Biography

Heather Clancy

Heather Clancy is an award-winning business journalist with a passion for green technology and corporate sustainability issues. Her articles have appeared in Entrepreneur, Fortune Small Business, The International Herald Tribune and The New York Times. In a past corporate life, Heather was editor of Computer Reseller News, where she was a featured speaker about everything from software as a service to IT security to mobile computing.

Heather started her journalism life as a business writer with United Press International in New York. She holds a B.A. in English literature from McGill University in Montreal, Quebec, and has a thing for Lewis Carroll.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
6
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

They overlooked more obvious reasons
klumper 31st Aug 2010
The researchers attribute the decrease in coal and petroleum use to lower electricity demand, a shift to natural gas as a fuel source, and wind power production offsets.

People are poorer overall. Most are watching their pennies like never before, even *gasp* turning off lights behind them. These are the ones who can still afford to run the juice.

Abandoned homes and those entering foreclosure burn even less watts. Now do the math.
it takes as much coal/pretro energy to build a wind farm as it will produce it its projected lifetime, so really it's just bringing all the energy costs forward to the years in which it's built. This really makes it look good on a graph but doesnt help with reducing total consumption or CO2...
0 Votes
+ -
Message has been deleted.
fghkjk Updated - 31st Aug 2010
when I read "we burned up 94.6 quadrillion British Thermal Units" in 2009 I was shocked to the figure, i mean how can human burned up that much in a year? and it sounds like enough to pollute or destroy the world, that's really scary truth.
http://www.kwpang.com
0 Votes
+ -
Miniscule in terms of mother nature
TrishaDisha91 31st Aug 2010
Mt. St. Helens eruption released 24 megatons of thermal energy per minute for the first 12 hours of eruption (Wikipedia.)

24 megatons = 100,416 terajoules...thats the entire output of the us power grid expelled as heat and gas, per minute , for half a day by mother nature..stop thinking your sitting in the dark saves the planet.
0 Votes
+ -
Stupid report
Takalok 31st Aug 2010
Wind, if you believe the inflated "average" production figures, accounts for 1 to 2 percent of total electricity production. The Livermore report described TOTAL US energy use, of which wind is such a small percentage, it's not even statistically important.

It would be more accurate to say wind production (or lack thereof) had no impact on declining fossil fuel use. You could say, to Obama's credit, that his continued thrashing of the economy is successfully driving us all back to the stoneage, which should result in significant fossil fuel savings.
0 Votes
+ -
They overlooked more obvious reasons
klumper 31st Aug 2010
The researchers attribute the decrease in coal and petroleum use to lower electricity demand, a shift to natural gas as a fuel source, and wind power production offsets.

People are poorer overall. Most are watching their pennies like never before, even *gasp* turning off lights behind them. These are the ones who can still afford to run the juice.

Abandoned homes and those entering foreclosure burn even less watts. Now do the math.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix