The carbon footprint of spam (infographic)

Summary: Junk emails aren't just annoying, it turns out they also consume plenty of energy on the way to your trash.

Even though the rules about what is and isn't spam seem to have relaxed (does anyone else receive way more unsolicited phone calls and emails than they used to?) I'm sure that it still annoys you as much as it annoys me. Moreso because many of you are responsible for protecting your organization against it.

That's why I thought that GreenTech Pastures readers would get a kick out of this fun infographic from Web site WebpageFX that attempts to calculate the carbon footprint of all that stuff that lands in your junk folder (if you are lucky). The graphic appears below.

SPAM: More than an Annoyance Infographic

Infographic by WebpageFX

You need to exercise a certain amount of open-mindness when you consider this graphic. Really, how do we know that 1 spam email equals 3 feet of driving? But that is just the surface level. If you think about all the servers needed to send spam PLUS all the servers needed to deliver it PLUS the servers need to eradicate it, you'll realize that the IT infrastructure resources applied to the problem are not insubstantial.

Obviously it would be next to impossible to eliminate some of those anti-spam resources. For example, filtering accounts for 16 percent of the spam related energy use, but if you took it away, there would be more spam. So it is a tradeoff.

Something to think about next time your company starts looking at security budgets and what to cut.

Topic: Emerging Tech

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

3 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • RE: The carbon footprint of spam (infographic)

    Have you ever thought about how much pollution Google ads generate and who pays for that in bigger energy bills and bigger memory cards, broadband width, etc.?
    znakit
  • We can talk about it

    We can talk about it and we have for almost 12 years a law was made and it still has gotten worse. So why rehash over and over about how much resources are wasted and DO SOMETHING about it for Christ sake. I want to read about spammers going to jail i want to read about spammers getting caught i want to read about spammers loosing everything they have.Untill its all a waste of time
    Stan57
  • Spam?

    I haven't had a spam e-mail in ages. I have accounts on most of the major services (Hotmail, Google, Yahoo!, MobileMe etc.), plus business and private e-mail addresses and I think I've had, maybe, 1 spam come through the standard filters this year.
    wright_is