Four Reasons To Skip Web Conferences

Four Reasons To Skip Web Conferences

Summary: Remember when PowerPoints were first created how we were flooded with every special effect in the PowerPoint pail? Text would come swooping in from the right.

SHARE:
TOPICS: Browser
3

Remember when PowerPoints were first created how we were flooded with every special effect in the PowerPoint pail? Text would come swooping in from the right. Clip art would fade-in out of thin air. Sometimes, I would get downright dizzy watching the damn show.

The only thing worse that a supped-up PowerPoint is a supped-up PowerPoint run over a Web conference. As a long time journalist, I’ve sat through my share of one-on-one vendor presentations run as Web conferences and even when they've removed jazz in their PowerPoints I’ve found the technology to be more annoyance than anything else.

Logging into the darn conference can hiccup for all sorts of reasons. Did I get the right URL? Is the password accurate? Is Java enabled or not. Will it run in this particular browser? The list goes on.

Even once we get into the one-on-one, the organizer uses the technology to flip through a PowerPoint or PDF. It’s a pretty miserable use of the technology if you ask me. Pages can take forever to render. The lag between the presenter and myself interferes with the presentation as we wait for my screen to render.

You also can’t take notes on a presentation in a Web conference, so that means scribbling on a separate document or in a separate file. Some vendors have told me that they like it that way as they want a Web conference to protect their sensitive presentations from falling into the wrong hands.

Now that’s just plain dumb. If you can’t trust the person with the presenting, do you really think that a web conference will make a difference? I for one just end up printing my screens and taking notes on them for future reference

I suppose the reason for insisting on the Web conference is to give the presenter some control over the presentation. Heaven forbid that I the viewer should look ahead and see where we’re going.

At least, control better be the reason because presenters will rarely use the technology for one thing that would make sense, to cut costs. Web conference servers and service typically can provide audio conferencing over the Internet, which is normally cheaper than the PSTN equivalent. Of course, its over the Internet and folk are rightly worried about voice quality so rarely do those components get used in the one-on-ones web conferences.

In the end of the day, I usually tell vendors to just send me the presentation and then cue me through it. How 20th century, I know, but sometimes it looks like we just look for technology solutions where there’s no problem.

Don’t get me wrong. Web conferencing is a great tool for all sorts of uses. One-to-many presentations, such as quarterly earning calls or in education, are a great use of the technology. I’ve even sat in on some smaller Web conferences that made a LOT of sense (see my recent post about participating in a multi-way video/Web conference using Dialcom’s service)

And I know most of you also think that Web conferencing is worthwhile. Two reports I just completed – one for Osterman Research on messaging and collaboration and the other for InformationWeek on Unified Communications adoption -- both ranked Web conferencing as the collaboration technology of greatest interest for IT buyers.

But like every tool, Web conferencing can be over used and abused. in the wrong way. Let’s make sure that we use it in the right way.

Topic: Browser

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

3 comments
Log in or register to join the discussion
  • this is the problem with forks in general

    "...can hiccup for all sorts of reasons."

    When we don't all pick one way to do things, we, at best, over complicate the task. All too often we end up just not using the technology and we lose all that potential.
    happyharry_z
  • More than Four Reasons To USE Web Conferences

    Like any industry, web conferencing has different products with different requirements and different functionalities. To generalize on how "people" are using web conferencing is a bit of a stretch I think. Maybe this observation is more accurate to Mr. Greenfield's personal experience here in the vendor-client relationship and mostly for sales or product demonstration presentations.

    Main point: a web conference is a lot easier, cheaper and greener than flying or driving to meet in person and has become more popular as the global economy is adapting to cost-driven/green decision making. Cross that with increasing internet usage and amount of electronic work and it just makes sense to many companies to share a document with someone miles away with two clicks in one minute instead of the earth-crushing, money-sucking traditional way.

    I'll be honest and say that I don't think web conferencing can completely replace the effectiveness of face to face meetings, but it can definitely be a more realistic and efficient way of conducting business.

    Fact is, not all web conferencing products require Java or Active X or some other installation to access the conference. Some are HTML based and anyone with an internet connection can join. Some products have very intuitive and easy to use UI's where some are overwhelming and confusing for the end user.

    And keep in mind that there is a very wide variety of uses for web conferencing, from our known slideshow presentations and quarterly earnings calls to document collaboration and editing through application sharing to technical support through remote control to brainstorming sessions with whiteboards to large group training sessions to file transfers. Some products can allow two extremes of participant interactivity, from complete collaboration with the ability to add documents, make annotations, share applications and chat to other users to absolutely no interactivity with only the ability to view the main presentation area and nothing else.

    Bottom line: I wish Mr. Greenfield would admit that this article is primarily based on his personal experience and possibly even more of a frustration rant than a carefully researched analysis (after using many different web conferencing products). Too much generalization.
    Mr. Eeworld
  • More than Four Reasons to USE Web Conferencing

    Like any industry, web conferencing has different products with different requirements and different functionalities. To generalize on how "people" are using web conferencing is a bit of a stretch I think. Maybe this observation is more accurate to Mr. Greenfield's personal experience here in the vendor-client relationship and mostly for sales or product demonstration presentations.

    Main point: a web conference is a lot easier, cheaper and greener than flying or driving to meet in person and has become more popular as the global economy is adapting to cost-driven/green decision making. Cross that with increasing internet usage and amount of electronic work and it just makes sense to many companies to share a document with someone miles away with two clicks in one minute instead of the earth-crushing, money-sucking traditional way.

    I'll be honest and say that I don't think web conferencing can completely replace the effectiveness of face to face meetings, but it can definitely be a more realistic and efficient way of conducting business.

    Fact is, not all web conferencing products require Java or Active X or some other installation to access the conference. Some are HTML based and anyone with an internet connection can join. Some products have very intuitive and easy to use UI's where some are overwhelming and confusing for the end user.

    And keep in mind that there is a very wide variety of uses for web conferencing, from our known slideshow presentations and quarterly earnings calls to document collaboration and editing through application sharing to technical support through remote control to brainstorming sessions with whiteboards to large group training sessions to file transfers. Some products can allow two extremes of participant interactivity, from complete collaboration with the ability to add documents, make annotations, share applications and chat to other users to absolutely no interactivity with only the ability to view the main presentation area and nothing else.

    Bottom line: I wish Mr. Greenfield would admit that this article is primarily based on his personal experience and possibly even more of a frustration rant than a carefully researched analysis (after using many different web conferencing products). Too much generalization.
    Mr. Eeworld