ie8 fix
Click Here
madison

Team Think

David Greenfield

Packet Loss Meets 2012

By | July 18, 2011, 7:38am PDT

Summary: What would happen if we couldn’t agree on the same time? Team meetings would never start on time. You might go catch a movie only to find it was over an hour earlier. Nothing would get done and the functioning of our society would grind to a halt. A frightening picture that is more [...]

What would happen if we couldn’t agree on the same time? Team meetings would never start on time. You might go catch a movie only to find it was over an hour earlier. Nothing would get done and the functioning of our society would grind to a halt.

A frightening picture that is more suitable for 2012, but applicable to our networks today. The problem stems from the overuse of packet buffers in our equipment, a problem called Bufferbloat. Developers are trained all too well to avoid dropped packets – and for good reason. A 200ms round trip delay can be turned into one second delay when packets need to be retransmitted due to packet loss. (To understand this better read this whitepaper.) So packet buffers were placed to accommodate for the overflow of packets occurs in all shared networks. Each buffer introduces some small amount of delay, though, but saves the much greater amount of delay caused by packet retransmission.

What’s happened though is that as the number of buffers have increased in our network the amount of delay they’ve introduced has also increased, explains Dave Taht, who helps run the site bufferbloat.net. The result? Left unchecked, Bufferbloat will only cause packet loss to get worse:

“As the total traffic becomes heavier, network traffic patterns will grow burstier and more chaotic. Usage of individual links will swing rapidly and crazily between emptiness and overload cascades. Latencies, and total packet times, will zig from instantaneous to check-again-next-week-please and zag back again in no predictable pattern.

Packet losses - the very problem all those buffers were put in to prevent - will begin to increase dramatically once all the buffers are full, because the occasional thousand car pileup is the only thing that can currently tell Internet routers to slow down their sending.

Bad consequences of this are legion. One of the most obvious is what latency spikes do to the service that converts things like website names to actual network addresses - DNS lookups get painfully slow. Voice-over-IP services like Skype and video streamers like YouTube become stuttery, prone to dropouts, and painful to use. Gamers get fragged more.

And it’s not just video that or gaming that going to suffer. The very functioning of the network is undermined: “NTP, ARP, DHCP, SSH, and various routing protocols. Yes, things as basic as your system clock time can get messed up!”

The folk at Buffer Bloat have their own ideas as to how to solve the problem. They identify three approaches - test for and fix Bufferbloat , decrease unmanaged buffer size, and use smarter rules in servicing the buffers.

There is a fourth approach, prevent packet loss altogether without adding delay. The WAN optimizers from Silver Peak Systems, for example, can reconstruct up to six lost packets in real time. Silver Peak does this by applying RAID-like technologies to packet transmission and insert a packet every “N” packets with a CRC check on the preceding packets. Should a packet be lost the receiving side can reconstruct the data with the help of the CRC check. You can read more about the details of the technology here. (Disclosure here: Silver Peak is a client of mine.)

Regardless of the approach, though, network architects need to pay attention towards the impact packet loss will have on your networks today – and tomorrow.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

David Greenfield is the principal in STAnalytics. a global technology-marketing consultancy where he advises enterprises on emerging technologies. He primarily functions as the product marketing manager at Silver Peak Systems.

Disclosure

Dave Greenfield

Much to the chagrin of his clients (and his wife), David Greenfield remains an independent thinker to a fault. Little wonder he's strongly considering an investment in the Trojan body armor. His firm, Strategic Technology Analytics (STAnalytics) provides independent content, insight and analysis to many companies. Current and past customers of his that may or may not be covered in the TeamThink blog include: Audiocodes, Infoblox, Objet Geometries, On-State Communications, Phone.com, Silver Peak Systems, Skype, and Spigit. He currently holds stock options in Silver Peak Systems.

Biography

Dave Greenfield

David Greenfield is the principal in STAnalytics. a global technology-marketing consultancy where he advises enterprises on emerging technologies. He has spent the past 20 years analyzing virtually every area of networking technology. His work has appeared in leading technology publication such as PC Magazine, Network Computing, IT Architect, and Data Communications in the past 10 years focused on real-time social software. He has consulted to and assisted Fortune 500 enterprises in their technology acquisitions. He was the editor and a blogger Network Computing and today works as the product marketing manager at Silver Peak Systems.

The discussion hasn’t started yet. Why don’t you begin it?

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix