Apple vs. Microsoft - Which company has the best response to problems?
Summary: It's been interesting to watch how Apple responded to the the iOS tracking 'scandal' and comparing that to how Microsoft has handled the problems surrounding updates for its Windows Phone 7 lineup.
It's been interesting to watch how Apple responded to the the iOS tracking 'scandal' and comparing that to how Microsoft has handled the problems surrounding updates for its Windows Phone 7 lineup.
Following the widespread revelation that iOS devices were collecting and storing location data Apple took a few days to assess the problem and then went public with a detailed Q&A press release outlining the issue and what the company was going to do about it. Things then went a step further as Apple CEO Steve Jobs, who is currently on medical leave of absence (for what doesn't matter, it could be an ingrowing toenail), along with Apple executives Scott Forstall and Phil Schiller, took to the phones.
The damage limitation machine was in high gear.
Note: It's interesting to note that the approach that Apple took in dealing with this issue is similar to how it dealt with the 'Antennagate' but with one key difference - there Apple tried to take the approach that the antenna issue was a problem affecting the whole industry. In address the iOS tracking issue Apple was careful not to be drawn into a wider industry discussion.
Compare this to how Microsoft has handled the issue of delayed updates for WP7 handsets and the problem with the updates bricking some handsets. Microsoft's response to this was patchy, usually via technical blogs. At no point did we see Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer come out and issue a statement. At no point was there a clear roadmap given as to how the company was going to move forward. Sure, we know that the final say on whether WP7 updates get sent to users tests with the carrier, but on the matter of updates bricking Samsung WP7 handsets, no one at Microsoft seemed to come out and take charge of the problem. I'm certain that behind the scenes there was a lot going on, but to an outsider (even an outsider paying very close attention to what was going on), it seemed like no one really cared.
The damage limitation machine seemed to be running in 'things will sort themselves out eventually' mode.
Different companies, different approach.
Which approach is best? Which gets the message across to the people that matter (consumers) the best? Which type of communication do you prefer?
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Talkback
RE: Apple vs. Microsoft - Which company has the best response to problems?
I really dont see good arguments in your comparison i?m sorry.
Why should I care about other MS products?
That MS has other products is not MY problem, but THEIRS. I bought a freekin phone, and I am only interested in getting this thing working. And I don't want to read blogs and websites, I want the things to go smoothly.
RE: Apple vs. Microsoft - Which company has the best response to problems?
RE: Apple vs. Microsoft - Which company has the best response to problems?
RE: Apple vs. Microsoft - Which company has the best response to problems?
Yes, obviously you using your sample size of 3 to conclude the WP7 has no problems should be listened to over MS themselves claiming that 10% of their phones had problems with upgrades.
RE: Apple vs. Microsoft - Which company has the best response to problems?
RE: Apple vs. Microsoft - Which company has the best response to problems?
RE: Apple vs. Microsoft - Which company has the best response to problems?
RE: Apple vs. Microsoft - Which company has the best response to problems?
- Macbook Air issues
- iPhone antenna issues
- iTunes 9 sync issues
I can on and on and on. All software and hardware has an issue at some point, because they are made by flawed human beings. You don't have a damn clue.
RE: Apple vs. Microsoft - Which company has the best response to problems?
<br><br>"best and most powerful operating system".<br>Really? I find OSX frustrating to use, atleast for me who is accustomed to Windows. <br>You only notice and appreciate the little nice things on Windows (like enhanced pointer precision and easier taskbar/taskswitching on Windows) after trying OSX. <br><br>Apart from that, when a program crashes on OSX, it just "disappears" (also valid for iOS). No notification. No nothing. The average user will be left thinking they did something wrong or hit close by accident or something (blame themselves). <br>On windows, the it tells you the program "crashed", and even tries to look for a solution. You blame the computer (as you should). <br>Is this a tactic to keep people on the Mac as you never blame it for something that goes wrong?<br><br>The development experiene on OSX/iOS: "Objective C"... is not "enjoyable" to program in (to say the least). Compare someything like that to Microsoft's C#... clean, powerful - few lines of code to solve a problem. And it is JIT compiled for the architecture and CPU capablities of the target platform (so existing .NET applications which have already been written will run "natively" on ARM). And they don't limit you to one language ... you can use Visual Basic or C++ (for .NET applications).
RE: Apple vs. Microsoft - Which company has the best response to problems?
You've never really used MS products, have you?
RE: Apple vs. Microsoft - Which company has the best response to problems?
You're joking, right? Check the web sites. Considering that Apple is probably more hardware than software, the company exceeds Microsoft and just about everyone else in vulnerabilities. Safari and iTune/QuickTime rank in the top 10 buggiest products. Why does Apple send out a 600mb+ update every 2 months? [FYI, all the updates from Microsoft last month (which was the worse on record] did not add up to 50mb.]
Maybe actually use a Microsoft product before spewing useless and unfounded garbage.
No Excuses
RE: Apple vs. Microsoft - Which company has the best response to problems?
If M$ came out and admitted their mistakes, their stockholders would get upset and their stockholders are the bottom line. That's why Micro$oft is the most perfect company in the world.
RE: Apple vs. Microsoft - Which company has the best response to problems?
RE: Apple vs. Microsoft - Which company has the best response to problems?
But who's bigger? Who has 90% of the desktop market all sewn up?
That monopoly put them in a different position.
RE: Apple vs. Microsoft - Which company has the best response to problems?
I have to agree. MS has too much going on to speak out publicly of every little issue, and the WP7 update issue did not seem to be THAT large to prompt a public statement. Also good point on the next generation updates/projects. It is assumed the issue is being worked on and anyone looking for evidence of that note can find it. Giving technical geek updates only hampers the repairs -- someone has to report the status, summarize, then release -- a complete waste of resource and a aggravating statement to find out it is still not fixed. This is the nature of technology and most people understand this.
In a morew grand scope MS allows sending failure data instantly for review (of some sort). Most issues I reported this way via Windows 7 were resolved within a month during an update cycle, no statements and no phone calls, just being patient as I know it is being addressed. MS has taken a more passive approach which I presume focuses more of that resource toward fixing the problem rather than continuing to tell people it is not yet fixed and is being worked on; nothing short of a frustrating statement to the consumer as this is obvious
2 different circumstances?
One requires finding the fault and fixing it, the other just needs a story or press statement to repair.
How are these even remotelly the same thing?
RE: Apple vs. Microsoft - Which company has the best response to problems?
RE: Apple vs. Microsoft - Which company has the best response to problems?