ie8 fix
madison

Hardware 2.0

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

Building a barebones budget gaming PC for under $550

By | June 20, 2011, 5:04am PDT

One of the most requested features here on Hardware 2.0 is for a ‘Best Bang for the Buck’ budget gaming PC. Cash is tight and people want to get the best hardware possible for their hard-earned dollars.

So let’s take a look at what what your bucks can buy!

Processor

Let’s start with the heart of the PC and start with the processor. I used to recommend that gamers spend money on a fast dual-core CPU rather than invest in a quad-core piece because games rarely leveraged more than a core or two. Things have changed, so it’s time to change the advice and recommend that gamers go for a quad-core piece of silicon.

The CPU I’ve chosen for this project - AMD Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition. Here you have a Socket AM3 125W TDP, quad-core, 3.2GHz part with 4 x 512KB L2 cache, 6MB L3 cache. Being a Black Edition it means that it has an unlocked multiplier, so if you’re an overclocker you’ll be able to squeeze more from the part.

Excellent component, excellent price.

Price: $115

Motherboard

With the CPU chosen, it’s not time to choose the motherboard.

What we now want is a cheap, robust, fully-featured motherboard, and while there are quite a number of possible candidates, I’ve gone for the ASUS M4A88T-M LE. Along with all the stuff you expect on a motherboard (USB, Gigabit LAN, audio ports …), you also get cool features like HDMI, a CPU ‘Turbo Button’ and an onboard Radeon HD 4250 GPU.

Given that this motherboard comes kitted with a Radeon HD 4250 GPU, we could save cash and not fit a discrete GPU, but since this is a gaming rig that would be cutting one corner too many!

Good, solid motherboard.

Price: $80

RAM

OK, now RAM.

Since this is a gaming rig, we need a lot of RAM, and we want that RAM to be fast and we want that RAM to be stable.

The RAM I’ve chosen to go for here is 8GB of G.SKILL Ripjaws Series DDR3 1600.

Fast, stable, and sexy.

Price: $85

Graphics cards

This is a gaming PC, so we need a decent graphics card. That said, since this is a budget system we can’t just spring for a top-end AMD Radeon HD 6000 or NVIDIA GTX 500 card. We want something that is in the sub $100 mark.

For this build I’ve gone for the SAPPHIRE 100289-2L Radeon HD 5670 that comes with 1GB of DDR5 RAM fitted. Not the most awesome card out there, but it’s still good enough to keep up with the latest games out there.

Price: $90

Power Supply Unit (PSU)

Time to power this puppy.

This sort of system needs a robust, reliable PSU but you don’t need a behemoth 1000W+ to power this PC. A good sub 500W PSU is more than adequate.

I’ve picked the Thermaltake TR2 W0070RUC 430W. This is all the PSU that you need for this PC, and it comes with a decent price tag.

Price: $45

Hard drive

Storage. We want lots of storage, and we want it fast. If this wasn’t a budget system than I’d suggest a Solid-State Drive (SSD), but we’re working on a budget here.

I’ve gone for my favorite drive from my favorite vendor - The 1TB Western Digital Caviar Black WD1002FAEX. This is a super drive that offers bags of high-performance storage (thanks in part of the 7,200RPM spindles and 64MB of cache).

Price: $90

Optical drive

Finally, an optical drive. Nothing much to say about this. Go for the ASUS DRW-24B1ST DVD burner. It does the job.

Price: $20

Barebones price: $525

Additional components

A couple of additions you might be in the market for (unless you already have them):

  • PC chassis - There are so many to choose from that I’m not going to bother picking one. Since this is a budget system I personally wouldn’t spend more than about $50 on a case, but you’re free to do whatever you want.
  • Operating system - Windows 7 Home Premium SP1 64-bit OEM - #99.

Thoughts? Feedback? Questions? Hit me up in the TalkBack section below!

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes is an internationally published technology author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology.

Disclosure

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

All opinions expressed on Hardware 2.0 are those of Adrian Kingsley-Hughes. Every effort is made to ensure that the information posted is accurate. If you have any comments, queries or corrections, please contact Adrian via the email link here. Any possible conflicts of interest will be posted below. [Updated: February 23, 2010] - Adrian Kingsley-Hughes has no business relationships, affiliations, investments, or other actual/potential conflicts of interest relating to the content posted so far on this blog.

Biography

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes is an internationally published technology author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology -- whether that be by learning to program, building a PC from a pile of parts, or helping them get the most from their new MP3 player or digital camera.

Adrian has authored/co-authored technical books on a variety of topics, ranging from programming to building and maintaining PCs. His most recent books include "Build the Ultimate Custom PC", "Beginning Programming" and "The PC Doctor's Fix It Yourself Guide". He has also written training manuals that have been used by a number of Fortune 500 companies.

Adrian also runs a popular blog under the name The PC Doctor, where he covers a range of computer-related topics -- from security to repairing and upgrading.

76
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

Which games?
spdragoo@... 23rd Jan
@Wolfie2K3

Which games specifically are using this "PhysX" software that would make them run better on nVidia cards... and does the company (or companies) making these games have some sort of marketing deal with nVidia?
Everything looks decent but I would not skimp out on PSU. Spend a few extra bucks and get at least a 550W, But I would suggest at least 600W for any gaming rig.
0 Votes
+ -
@Bates_

It's not just the watts, look for a good 80+ certified rating plus good build quality. A good 80+ 400watt ps would be fine for that rig. I would only suggest a 600+ ps if you were going sli/crossfire or adding lots of other components. You need to match the efficiency rating and avg. use of your components and ps...not just throw more watts at them.
@ewell44
I'd go with a Rosewill 630W single-rail PSU for $55 myself, or a corsair 550w - single 12v rail and 85+% efficiency.
0 Votes
+ -
@Bates_ Why? You're not going to use that... If your components draw a total of 300W why would you spend extra to buy a 550W supply? My PC is similar to this one (almost identical, except with an Asus board and 2 extra drives), and hooking up an amp meter inline with the load shows it's using ~2.5A even with Oblivion running on full detail and 2 extra hard drives. That's only about 300W (at 120VAC).

You don't really need a big supply unless you plan to go for SLI. As for "certification" just buy buy a major brand with a warranty. Antec power supplies and cases are nice. I've been building my own machines for 16 years now, I've never had a power supply fail due to too much current draw... Honestly who has? I've also never had a problem returning a power supply, and I've only ever had to return 2.
@snoop0x7b

The Reason is that if you have more power available then your PSU will last you longer and have less stress related wear and tear. If you buy close to the required then the power supply works hardware to keep up, gets hotter, and really Um I find it really hard to buy a Decent supply that lacks connectors. adn teh odds are that Consumers are gonna buy a buidget to get started. Most Gamers are gonna chase the SLI and or Crossfire, so to buy a power supply sub 500 is pushing it, because the odds are with 30 AMP + requirements on Decent new GPU's spending 45 bux is gonna lead to a replacement supply in a few months anyway

Even Back in teh day 300WATTs wouldn't last on a Decent Gamer rig no matter how much the platform components cost. I remember in the GF 3days a 300 WATT PS would burn out in a year if not less.

The Point here now is to buy as much as you can afford and don't' spend less then 60 for a 500WATT supply. In the long run you will spend less, and be better ready for SLI. I do Suggest a 700 or so for any dual Card system with a 30+ AMP on the Rails, costing no less then 70 bux. With this note you can slack ont eh Eff a buit sense you have more then enough Power to sport them. Remember higher Eff. is important yes, but only becomes a really important factor when your PS is stressing
@snoop0x7b I had the Thermaltake TR2 430 watt PSU in my rig back when I had a GeForce 8600GTS, underclocked Core 2 e8400, and a single hard drive; it never got hot like the PSUs in several HPs friends of mine bought, but it did get warm. I've since upgraded the video card (Radeon 6970), added 4 more hard drives, and overclocked the processor (3.8 GHz stable); this combination would probably make the TR2 hot but my current OCZ modxstream 600w stays cold, even under load. It's probably 200 watts overkill, but I'll take overkill and stable over not overkill and questionable any day of the week.
@Bates_ just a small reminder for the 1st time builders. The other important concideration is connections. A sub 500 watt with an 80+ rating and all the right connections and extras for expansion is more important than a 500+ watt with only a few connections. I have 4 drives (2 DVDR/1HD/1SSD), Nvidia GTX460 and had to swap out my PSU since the connectors were wrong.
0 Votes
+ -
@Bates_ AGREED. It may be a little overkill at first, but later on you may decide to add another identical video card and run in SLI or CrossFire or upgrade to a more powerful card. Hveing to buy another PSU just to upgrade your card is a pain and only adds to upgrade costs later on.
0 Votes
+ -
Great article, typo fix
rich.brooks@... 20th Jun
I think:
"With the CPU chosen, it?s not time to choose the motherboard."

needs to be changed to:
"With the CPU chosen, it?s NOW time to choose the motherboard."

CAPS for highlighting. Again, great article, ty!
0 Votes
+ -
@rich.brooks@... Thanks Mr. Grammar check. Since were editing, also the price for Windows is "#90" which should obviously be "$90".
0 Votes
+ -
Message has been deleted.
rparker009 Updated - 21st Jun
@rparker009 Would you provide examples of software that doesn't like AMD?
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Building a barebones budget gaming PC for under $550
thomascwhitfield@... Updated - 20th Jun
@mikerosile MOST GAMES...but thats not to say it won't work. But usually you will get better gaming performance from Nvidia.
0 Votes
+ -
@mikerosile,

VMWare Workstation doesn't run too well on AMD. It runs, but performance is not that great.

Now, why would any gamer give a darn? A real gamer might not care, but many customers of "gamer" CPUs (like me) buy the machine for production work, actually. We learned to head to the gaming market to find bargains on strong computers. (That's why I'm reading this $550 thread, too!) If one looks at my computer purchase stats, I must be a heavy "gamer", yet the only game I ever played was Loony Pinball (15 years ago, for maybe an hour. )
@mikerosile

give you a Name, How about we say about 85% of the software out there is not Friendly with ATI. The ATI hardware just is capable of using most of it, because the basic stuff that is required is supported, doesn't mean that you are seeing everything? Proper Shader Support sucks, AA isnt' supported on ATI for Optimized nvidia Titles, No native 3D support, cards work better with Software emulation so this is why 85% of the Software isn't good for ATI. The games and 3D rendering software are hardware rendering, not software!! Effect Over all Stability and performance cuts.


Sorry it is just way easier to list that then give you a small list, because the games that support ATI are so hard to find they aren't worth rememebering.
@rparker009

.... and what kind of software would that be that doesn't like AMD crap??? Please enlighten me.
0 Votes
+ -
@ironlocal1 MOST GAMES...but thats not to say it won't work. But usually you will get better gaming performance from Nvidia.
@rparker009 Considering I have been building and using AMD since 2002, I have yet to find any software that will not run on an AMD, and if you are indicating the video card, in 9 years of building PC Gaming Systems, I have had more issues with nVidia drivers than any single product line. Not saying that AMD drivers are perfect, just less issues with programs and operating systems. But this should not turn into an AMD vs Intel or AMD vs nVidia list. Good article, agree that the power supply should be at least a 500w good quality power supply.
@techhund

I plan to build my 1st system soon, can i email you if I need any help. Thanks,
molgen6@gmail.com
@rparker009 No. That's why x86 and x86_64 are STANDARDS.
0 Votes
+ -
@rparker009 I have to partially agree. Most games are actually designed to be used with Nvidia cards. Thats why many times in the intro animations for games they have the "Nvidia... The way it was meant to be played" logo.
0 Votes
+ -
@thomascwhitfield@...

There's no special sauce... Either the card implements the correct version of DirectX or it doesn't. And if the game company is writing software that's specific to a particular GPU, they're doing it wrong. The whole point of DirectX and OpenGL is so that we (meaning us software developers) can write software and be reasonably assured that it will work with whatever graphics hardware you have. If you're writing software that uses hardware acceleration, chances are you'll use either OpenGL or DirectX to abstract that hardware for you to avoid having to "design for" something... That's why it's considered a best practice.

That logo is a sponsorship deal and not an "It doesn't work on AMD cards"... The marketing language is supposed to spread FUD.

And if a game doesn't work on AMD hardware, which implements the same documented, standardized, specs the game company has serious QA and testing issues...
0 Votes
+ -
@thomascwhitfield@...
Most games I've come across in the past couple of years that are branded with the Nvidia logo on start-up tend to support PhysX.

ATI/AMD doesn't do PhysX very well. PhysX enabled on games with an AMD/ATI card tend to run like slideshows as they have no built in support for this.

Modern Nvidia cards natively support PhysX, OTOH...

@snoop0x7b
Actually... The "secrect sauce" IS PhysX. See above..

@All
My box here consists of an AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+ chip and an Nvidia GT220 vid card and the games I play work just fine.
0 Votes
+ -
Which games?
spdragoo@... 23rd Jan
@Wolfie2K3

Which games specifically are using this "PhysX" software that would make them run better on nVidia cards... and does the company (or companies) making these games have some sort of marketing deal with nVidia?
@rparker009 Well... You will probably spend more money. And as others have noted (there is a massive base of proof throughout the industry), AMD CPUs work just fine for all applications that I have run in to, Including Games. Asus is the brand of MB that the author chose, so what is your beef with that? I have used Asus, Biostar, Gigabyte, and MSI on home builds and Intel and HP on business builds, all without problems. That market is very competitive and there are few lemons as far as I can tell.

Calling AMD crap. What is the problem? C'mon, man... Did you buy Intel stock at the wrong time? The market fluctuates. There is no objective basis for calling AMD crap.
@rparker009
Still? AMD ATI GPU's are steadily loosing support for native compatibility. the onyl games ATI is optimized in are real time and even though are far and Few. ATI GPU just sucks all around. Not to mention, the ATI doesn't fully support the nVidia Optimized Eye candy. you loose that effect, and in most cases is why the few games the ATI is faster in, that is the reason. The Cards are not having to render as much so Dah, of course they might score a few frames higher. Go Features, not Speed. Speeds nice but so are good clean reliable graphics and fluent movement!!!
@rparker009 Bang for the buck, AMD beats Intel and NVIDIA. However, I'd go Intel processor and AMD graphics if I were to build a new system; I don't like being able to heat my house with a video card.
@Champ_Kind

nVidia Doesn't run that much hotter. they are both in the same area in comparable cards. yes ATI is a bit cooler, but then they are less superior too. Naturally they would be cooler. I say that loosely because well lets face it if it works for you then it is superior for you. but to insinuate that nVidia is way hotter then ATI is just wrong. That's coming from someone who builds both platforms. Gotta remember that ATI cards are Physically incapable of Rendering the Standards used in nVidia games. AA and Physics and anything related to them. The nVidia cards are simply put processing more
Nice. Now when my friends ask me, "Hey, Alex, what parts should I buy to build a computer for games?" I'll just link this article--at least for now. wink
0 Votes
+ -
Is it true that the machine specified in this article can also be used as a Mining Farm for Bitcoin money? I read in an article that Nvidia cards don't work well for Bitcoin, so I wonder if a gaming machine with AMD CPU, ATI Card which such a low price like this could disrupt the Bitcoin economy?
0 Votes
+ -
RE: Building a barebones budget gaming PC for under $550
thomascwhitfield@... Updated - 20th Jun
@Gabriel Hernandez Disrupt the bitcoin economy??? LOL. It is very true ATI cards work much better for bitcoin mining. But serious miners have cards and setups that are much more powerful than this system. Realistically, this system is still not very good for bitcoin mining...at all. The video you are about to see has rigs with ATI 5970 cards which are $700 a piece (the cards, not the whole machine). And most of the machines in the setup have 2 of them running in CrossFire with the rest running 3 in CrossFire. Check out this video of a SERIOUS mining setup: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=eLt8Se3vVNg
0 Votes
+ -
@Gabriel Hernandez If you really want to know how good a video card would be for bitcoin mining look at the number of "Memory Stream Processors" the card has. The best cards right now have about 3200 memory stream processors. That is really good for mining. The card mentioned in this article has 400. So basically the best cards out now have 8 times the mining capability of the card in this article. And serious miners have multiple cards per rig. And multiple rigs per setup.
0 Votes
+ -
@Gabriel Hernandez Hope the info helped provide you with better insight into how hard it really is to make decent money at mining. For most people mining is not worth the trouble.
4 gb ram is plenty
@ThereThere

But even for a machine that i'm only going to use for medium-intensive video/graphics work, much less gaming, 8 gig is nice - and at today's prices, why not?

The only thing overbuilding costs is money.

Finding out when the rubber hits the road that you've under built costs more money.
0 Votes
+ -
@fairportfan I agree. Then you have to buy the parts you should have bought in the first place, and even if you sell the parts that didn't cut it, you won't get what you paid for them.
0 Votes
+ -
@ThereThere I would say 4GB of RAM is a MINIMUM nowadays. But for casual gamers, yes, 4GB is plenty.
@ThereThere:

With only 4 GB of RAM, the paging file is still required. With 8 GB, the paging file is unnecessary. No gaming system should have less than 8 GB of RAM with a 64-bit OS.
0 Votes
+ -
Message has been deleted.
materva Updated - 20th Jun
@materva
Whereas your writing style is inflammatory and insulting. Maybe I could write better than Adrian, too. However, interestingly, he is making money writing and we snobs are just making comments. (Hey, Adrian, need any snobby writers or editors over there!?)
@materva Adulthood is the point at which you realize that it's what someone's saying and not how they say it that counts.
@materva Your angry reply makes YOU look like the educationally challenged punk. Take your comments somewhere else.
0 Votes
+ -
Cavier Blue vs. Black
Greenman76 20th Jun
When researching Hard drives I found that the Cavier Black's gains over the Blue were minimal compared to the price hike. Since you're building budget putting the $30 you save getting the Blue could easily go into the PSU or Graphics card.
@Greenman76
Also you can RAID up the WD blues. You'd have to go w/ WD's Black RE edition to do that, @ approx twice the price per drive.
@billk11 Of course if you set it up in a RAID-0 that's exactly how much of your data you'll keep.
0 Votes
+ -
Aenslead
Aenslead Updated - 20th Jun
Seriously? Have you heard of real performance hardware? Core i3 is much faster in games than any AMD offer out there, even Phenom CPUs, regardless if they have more physical cores.

Also, the video card, clearly you've not gone out there a lot and are either an AMD fanboy OR spoke with an AMD fanboy. The GeForce GTX460 is found under $100, runs circles around the HD5670 (even around 5770!), has exclusive technologies like PhysX and CUDA and MUCH more stable drivers.

The atricle's idea is good. The suggestions are not.
@Aenslead
+1.

I'm rocking a HD 5770 that I got 2 years ago for 150 bucks (now it's 89 on newegg), and it's time for an upgrade now. I wouldn't recommend anything less than that, especially when it's more expensive.

nVidia GPUs are definitely the way to go right now.
@Aenslead Actually, you're incorrect about it being much faster. If you're looking at the Ghz, sure, maybe, but that's not the end all be all of CPU performance. I was looking at a benchmark test recently put on by *Gasp* ZDNet, and it showed conclusively that there is no 'significant or noticable' (to the human brain, mind you) performance gain really had when comparing overclocked AMD quad-cores of comparable Ghz value with overclocked comparable Ghz i(insert your numerical value here) Intel CPU. And have you ever noticed, that a notably slower AMD CPU than intel is able to run the same games, but those games require a much more expensive, and supposedly faster Intel chipset? Hmmm... Could it be... AMD is much more efficient, and therefore, both cost-effective and dare I say, per clock speed, powerful? Let's not even add in overclocking, which as I stated, the benchmarks prove that the gains in some situations, though rarely were notable, but not significantly astounding when rating i(anything) over it's market comparable AMD counterpart.

I personally prefer nVidia myself, but honestly, I prefer AMD for the price and performance index, as I don't have the sort of cash to throw around that some 'Intel fan-boy' might have. I don't have a remark about the GPU having more stable drivers however, given that I don't know, I've never used anything but the card I have.

I'd have to wonder, do you actually know it's got more stable drivers, or are you going by here-say based on 1 person's crap experience with a given card? In the latter case, it's not empirical and you really should research more thoroughly yourself before making broad sweeping general caveats.
0 Votes
+ -
@Tora1337 I don't think that's necessarily true... A quad core i7 (with hyperthreading) supports double the number of threads as a quadcore phenom. For what I do, more threads is more of a determining factor. For a game, that's probably true because games aren't massively concurrent.

For a long time ATI had really crappy drivers. That isn't really the case anymore. For every crash I've had with an ATI card due to a bad driver, I've had one with an nvidia card + the bad quality control incident a few years ago that caused recalls for almost every major computer manufacturer. They're probably about equal in terms of drivers.
@Tora1337
Here you go, good sir (ma'am). Age old information for your cultural assets: http://www.anandtech.com/show/4083/the-sandy-bridge-review-intel-core-i7-2600k-i5-2500k-core-i3-2100-tested/20

Intel CPUs ARE better for gaming. Sure, AMD CPUs have more cores, but seriously? Have you checked your task manager recently? Nothing ever really uses more than 2 cores at most. Not even recent games like Crysis 2.

As for the driver experience, as a system integrator I get now and then challenges of unstable computers and it's been my experience that most that come with an AMD GPU are *almost* always driver related.

Good day.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix