ie8 fix
madison

Hardware 2.0

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

Days after being bought by Microsoft, Skype starts installing crapware on Windows systems without consent

By | May 30, 2011, 2:06am PDT

Summary: Just days following the announcement that Microsoft is to buy Skype for a massive $8.5 billion, the company has begun pushing crapware called ‘EasyBits Go’ onto Windows systems without consent or permission.

Just days following the announcement that Microsoft is to buy Skype for a massive $8.5 billion, the company has begun pushing crapware called ‘EasyBits Go‘ onto Windows systems without consent or permission.

Bradley Wint of Blog Technical first noticed the shenanigans:

This morning I was notified that Skype needed third-party access to an executable called easybitsgo.exe, and I was quite suspicious because I knew I had not installed in applications recently and saw no other dialog boxes with information about this app. I did a virus scan immediately thinking my system may have been over-ridden with malware similar to those fake anti-virus apps.

It turns out the program is legit and was actually installed via Skype itself. After doing a quick check , it seems the EasyBits company produces a number of game apps and is supported by many major brands including HP, Dell, Acer and Skype among others, however I did not give a care since I was not interested in having such program installed on my machine. Finally, after checking the Skype forums, it turns out many users reported a similar circumstance.

Skype’s own support forums have already began buzzing. Folks are understandably annoyed. Here’s a selection of quote giving you a feel of how users feel about the situation (here’s a clue: annoyed!):

‘This is a gross violation of trust on part of skype. I enjoy the use of skype as it allows me to keep in contact with my girlfriend who lives out of province. However, I will be removing it if there is no way to remove this intrusive injection of software.’

‘Completely unacceptable Skype! I’m sure this must be illegal? Was GO crapware condoned by skype, or is it an exploit? Either way a public apology is in order!’

‘Kinda strange that just over 2 weeks after Microsoft buys Skype this stuff starts. Kinda weird… might be some sort of connection there….’

‘This app is quite aggressive and it’s alarming to know that it is operating through skype. It’s a violation of our rights and needs to be addressed by the managers of skype.’

‘What the hell is going on today? I received a pop-upmessage in Skype with a question if I want to install some games. I closed this window with X. After some time I got another message in Skype - “EasyBitsGo.exe wants to use Skype”. What is Easy Bits Go? I closed this window again. When I went to computer’s control panel, I discovered a program Easybits which I never have installed. I uninstalled this program from control panel but when I went to C:/ Program Files I discovered a folder “Easy Bits” with today’s date. I had to remove this folder manually.’

Wow, nice one Skype, way to annoy customers.

Skype has issued a statement:

It has come to our attention that concerns have been expressed from Skype users over the update delivered to Skype Extras for Windows by Easybits software.

The software is provided by our partner EasyBits, and is part of the Skype Extras Manager. The Extras Manager has been included in Windows releases of our software since 2006. This latest update from EasyBits included elements of their desktop games organizer in error, but it neither installs nor un-installs correctly. This update has been disabled while we work with them to correct the problems and user experience.

Skype works closely with its partners to ensure that our users receive the best possible Skype experience and is working with EasyBits to ensure this issue does not happen again.

In my mind this statement doesn’t go far enough to explain how Skype allowed rogue code that ‘neither installs nor un-installs correctly’ into the Skype download package. This is part of the explanation that’s missing, and it’s certainly worrying that such dodgy code could make its way into the download.

Uninstalling this crapware is also a pain in the rear. There are instructions offered up by Blog Technical.

Skype has removed the download. No word yet on when an updated download will be available or whether a removal tool will be offered to those wanting to get rid of the EasyBits Go download.

While the deal with Microsoft is a way off from being finalized, and Microsoft management will be in no way responsible for this goof-up, it is very strange that Skype would be so careless with user’s operating systems at this time, especially when that operating system is owned by the new owners. It’s a careless move that is likely to make those ware of a Microsoft takeover of Skype even more wary.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes is an internationally published technology author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology.

Disclosure

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

All opinions expressed on Hardware 2.0 are those of Adrian Kingsley-Hughes. Every effort is made to ensure that the information posted is accurate. If you have any comments, queries or corrections, please contact Adrian via the email link here. Any possible conflicts of interest will be posted below. [Updated: February 23, 2010] - Adrian Kingsley-Hughes has no business relationships, affiliations, investments, or other actual/potential conflicts of interest relating to the content posted so far on this blog.

Biography

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes is an internationally published technology author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology -- whether that be by learning to program, building a PC from a pile of parts, or helping them get the most from their new MP3 player or digital camera.

Adrian has authored/co-authored technical books on a variety of topics, ranging from programming to building and maintaining PCs. His most recent books include "Build the Ultimate Custom PC", "Beginning Programming" and "The PC Doctor's Fix It Yourself Guide". He has also written training manuals that have been used by a number of Fortune 500 companies.

Adrian also runs a popular blog under the name The PC Doctor, where he covers a range of computer-related topics -- from security to repairing and upgrading.

77
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Days after being bought by Microsoft, Skype starts installing crapware on Windows systems without consent
felixthec4t 7th Jun
how does this headline indicate MS were responsible? .. if you morons had even a small clue about 'anything' other than jumping into one blog after another making childish comments just to see your 'name'... we'd have a good read here.. but other than passing through i, (and many others) am unlikely to return because of all you groupies looking for a reason to whine.. ha ha

yawn..
why the headline? what does microsoft have to do with this? the deal has not been approved yet. and if there is one company that does not install third party crapware, that's probably microsoft. if it wanted, it would rather install windows live stuff. this title is very misleading and the way the article is presented just shows the amateur "journalism" of the writer. Very disappointed.
0 Votes
+ -
agree
RonanSail 30th May
@gunn13 completely agree. Sensational journalism looking for easy talkbacks from the anti microsoft movement (regardless of the fact MS has nothing to so with skype until the deal is approved)
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
I would have thought ...
Adrian Kingsley-Hughes 30th May
@RonanSail ... that the pro MS and those shareholders would be more interested to be honest.
  • Flagged
@RonanSail agreed. microsoft does not install crapware and the author knows it. Zdnet is becoming the crapware these days.
0 Votes
+ -
@bnlf@...
ego.sum.stig@... 30th May
It could easily be argued that ALL Microsoft installs is "crapware." And before you get your knickers in a twist you could say the same about Apple, Oracle, IBM, Adobe etc blah blah blah.

Other than that, it'd be nice if tidbits like this story could be, you know, investigated deeply rather than just tossed on the streets without a thought as might be a United fan after a game against Barca.
0 Votes
+ -
@Adrian Kingsley-Hughes
Somehow always manage to find them.

plain
@RonanSail agreed. microsoft does not install crapware and the author knows it.

Really? Well that's news to me.

I guess there's always a 'first time', right? wink

~

Now think about it. Now that M$ owns Skype, don't-cha think they should be in control of it? That they would prevent this from happening?

moi? wink
@gunn13

Could it be because it ONLY installs on Microsoft systems, other versions of Skype aren't affected.
@bannedagain yes, but it still has nothing to do with microsoft purchase. as it is not approved yet. why would microsoft want the windows version to be worse??? idiots. hopefully these reporters wills top linking microsoft to skype headlines until it is actually related.
@gunn13 Well anything for page views isn't it? I'm amazed they didn't manage to drag the iPad in there [wink].

This place has become pathetic, just baiting one set of "fanboys" or another. As you point out this isn't a Microsoft story, but that's how it's being spun.
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
I'm pretty sure ...
Adrian Kingsley-Hughes 30th May
@gunn13 ... given that MS has spent over $8 billion on Skype, I'm pretty sure investors are interested in this sort of tarnish.
0 Votes
+ -
I know I would
Michael Alan Goff 30th May
but I doubt Microsoft really had anything to do with this, at least on a 'sure, do this' sort of way. I would think they had been planning this bad move for a while, and it just happened to have bad timing on Microsoft's part.
0 Votes
+ -
@Adrian Kingsley-Hughes First off, if what Skype said is true, this was an error. A big one, no argument, but nothing more. To be honest, Skype already is pretty invasive and annoying - one more bit of annoying is hardly that big news.

If it's intentional, then yes, it has to be called out - but if your intent was to 'inform Microsoft's investors', then perhaps a headline like, "Microsoft's new gold gets tarnished - what will the investors think?" would have been more effective and less controversial.

By implying the reason for the post rather than stating, it really does read like you're linking two things that aren't that tightly coupled - and worse, that somehow this has happened *because* Microsoft bought Skype.
@Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

To be fair, the tarnish is yours. A more accurate headline would have been "I just noticed Skype has been installing extra software on my device." or "Days after being bout by Microsoft, in a totally unrelated move, I notice Skype updates some software".

Don't install toolbars and make sure you do not hit "Next" "Next" "Next" when installing freeware or you will end up with software like this. It is not just a skype thing.
@Adrian Kingsley-Hughes I agree to that. I am just saying that the title and the article is misleading. Of course, not only the shareholders, the management including Ballmer will think about this. Since the deal announcement, there have been two negative news : the first with skype crashing which i also faced and now this one. If you should put a blame, it should be on skype. microsoft has absolutely nothing to do with this. i have read some good artcile from you, but this one was really disappointing.
@Adrian Kingsley-Hughes OK - but wouldn't you agree (after rereading the title) that's not how the title reads is it?

Perhaps we should give you a pass this time... Perhaps I was too quick to judge.
0 Votes
+ -
Deal is not done yet??!!
sagec 30th May
@Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

How hard is this? MS has not bought Skype yet.
@Adrian Kingsley-Hughes This isn't an investment blog, and in the end it doesn't change things one way or another. You don't address the fact that the title draws an implication that can't be supported by the facts (and is also denied in the body itself) just like your colleague did with an article about Skype and Asterisk. This is just as inappropriate as insinuating that AT&T has something to do with everything T-Mobile does right now.
@gunn13 no, but if this was done to "tarnish" the Skype name, the price of Skype would tumble and the brand (which Microsoft would probably replace anyway) would be worth less.

Sounds kind of like Microsoft and Yahoo with all the on/off/on again talks.
@BrentRBrian microsoft basically bought the brand. to be honest, the skype technology is nothing superior... right now, you cant even send an offline message. the p2p is cheap and efficient, but not reliable...atleast from my experience. microsoft would never dilute the brand...they would probably change the underlying technology while still keeping the name skype
0 Votes
+ -
Right
Richard Flude 30th May
The headline should read, "Skype updates break inline with MS policy".

Just another product with broken updates;-)
0 Votes
+ -
Disagree.
sleepyfool 31st May
@gunn13 Absolutely disagree. This is news. We are allowed to draw our own conclusions, and I'm quite grateful for the ability to do so.
@gunn13
If any of you dared to actually read the full headline, it states that SKYPE starts installing crapware. And yes, it's days after being bought by Microsoft. I see nothing in the headline suggesting as much.
@gunn13 Very reminiscent of many a ZDNet headline that includes Apple, iPad, iPhone, iOS or any combination of those.
0 Votes
+ -
conspiracy?
RonanSail 30th May
skype downtime last week and now this. If skype or people at skype are trying to de-value the skype name, they are going about it in the right way! A coincidence, bad luck or just increased media attention?
@gunn13 Totally agree with you. Sensationalist, poor grammar and spelling. Just all around sloppy, bad journalism (and I use that term loosely).
0 Votes
+ -
Isn't the timing newsworthy?
Userama 30th May
This is the first time Skype has done this, and it happened just shortly after the proposed sale to Microsoft, and only to Windows systems. Doesn't that make the Microsoft connection newsworthy? Seems like it does.
0 Votes
+ -
Well, clearly...
Economister 30th May
@Userama

there were discussions between MS and Skype PRIOR to the purchase. Even though the deal has not gone through yet, I think it would be extremely naive and unrealistic to think there would be no contact/discussions between MS and Skype BETWEEN deal CLOSING and APPROVAL, just to resume again upon APPROVAL.

As to the blog title, the statement is simply a fact. Whether it implicates MS or not is an entirely different question. The MS fan boys and apologists however come out in force if they see anything they construe as even marginally anti-MS. But that has been the case on this forum since the beginning of time.
0 Votes
+ -
So...
LiquidLearner 30th May
@Economister

Are you saying this is related to Microsoft or not? Or are you just trolling some more?
0 Votes
+ -
@LiquidLearner

why is that even important to you?
0 Votes
+ -
"people are rational"
Economister 30th May
@gunn13

Obviously your are an important exception confirming that rule. You and "LiquidLearner" seem to be functioning at about the same level - about as low as it gets around here.

From now on you can amuse and embarrass yourself all you want. I do have better things to do than having discussions with half-wits.
@Economister learn the meaning of the words before you write them in capital letters. the ms-skype deal has neither been approval nor closed yet. i told you there are few official trolls at zdnet, but you are special. you like to pretend to be intelligent...and that makes you cute..haha
0 Votes
+ -
Contributr
Seriously ...
Adrian Kingsley-Hughes 30th May
@owlnet ... and you don't think that a popular product installing something without user consent deserves having attention attracted to it?
0 Votes
+ -
A) You seem to have a slight dislike for Microsoft
B) The title itself lends to the idea that you think the two are connected (bad download practices and the purchase by Microsoft). As I said before, I don't think the two are connected.

Personally, I don't see the reason to get defensive. I doubt anyone at Microsoft is being kept up at night wondering what some blogger at ZDnet (any of them, not just you) are saying about them. Same with Apple, same with Google, same with everywhere else that makes software or hardware.

I just don't think they're running around hoping bloggers love them. :P
0 Votes
+ -
Naive much?
Economister 30th May
@goff256

So you do not think that MS and other large companies/industries have individuals/agents/representatives assigned to forums to influence the debate and public opinion about their company/industry?

I do have a bridge for sale.
0 Votes
+ -
No, only people like you
LiquidLearner 30th May
@Economeister

Only seem to believe things like that. You may have a bridge to sell someone, but why bother? I'm sure you believe that the government is responsible for 9/11, that aliens are taking our cows to do experiments and that the tin foil hat is the only way to keep "them" from stealing your thoughts.
0 Votes
+ -
Still insisting on .....
Economister 30th May
@LiquidLearner

REPEATEDLY displaying your juvenile, ignorant mind? Well, it is your right to do so - unfortunately. I will bow out however and you can continue to embarrass yourself all you want.
"So you do not think that MS and other large companies/industries have individuals/agents/representatives assigned to forums to influence the debate and public opinion about their company/industry?"

I believe in innocent until proven guilty. All you have is the assumption that Microsoft is evil and wrong, and that just isn't enough for anyone who dislikes bias.
0 Votes
+ -
You are missing my point.
Economister Updated - 30th May
@goff256

You were attempting to put Adrian down not too subtly by stating:

"I doubt anyone at Microsoft is being kept up at night wondering what some blogger at ZDnet (any of them, not just you) are saying about them. Same with Apple, same with Google, same with everywhere else that makes software or hardware."

I countered by stating:

"So you do not think that MS and other large companies/industries have individuals/agents/representatives assigned to forums to influence the debate and public opinion about their company/industry?"

In other words, they DO care, otherwise they would not be here trying to influence the debate. That applies to ALL major corporations/industries covered by significant forums. All you have to do is follow the Talkbacks and apply a bit of common sense. I am willing to guarantee that some of the posters here today write on behalf of MS, but of course they will deny that until they are blue in the face, otherwise they have no credibility.

This has nothing to do with innocent until proven guilty or my dislike of MS, which I incidentally readily admit, and which they have earned all on their own. It has to do with a reasonable reading of the blog and the talkbacks and applying some common sense. Overreacting talkbacks are more the rule than the exception here, unfortunately. Some of them are just mindless fan boys and some of them are here on someone else's behalf, and I despise both types.

I do not make any distinction in my distrust/dislike for MS/Apple/Google/Oracle or whomever. Corporations are in business to look after themselves/shareholders, and they do that by trying to take advantage of their customers as much as they possibly can, maybe each in their own distinct way, but the basic objectives are the same.

You may call it "innocent until proven guilty". I call it naive.

Edit: They also do it by bribing politicians into passing legislation favoring them, often to the detriment of consumers. Do you call that "innocent until proven guilty" also? If you do, I call that naive as well.
@Economister - you do really like to use a lot of words to spout nonsense. If you can prove that one person replying here is in the pay of a large corporation and are submitting replies on behalf of that corporation, then the companies are breaking the law.

Over the last several months it might be argued that Ziff Davis and its publications have been allowing these bloggers to put titles on their pieces that are obviously lures for hits, after all that is how they are paid, they draw you here and hope you will click on one of their advertisers boxes.

Adrian didn't lie, he just misconstrued the truth with a little bit of sensationalism. But he's made one mistake, Microsoft has announced that they will buy Skype subject to approvals at best there is a memorandum of understanding to the fact with an offering price per share. As to why only Microsoft was affected, the third party only works on Microsoft Windows so it wouldn't install elsewhere. What I really find strange is did they not test the update before it was pushed to users, I mean they should have identified such a glaring mistake before it even happened.

Now it wouldn't have anything to do with Microsoft but I would be looking at the 3rd party partner who will be losing his place once the deal goes through because as has been mentioned MS doesn't install crapware as part of its update system and this company would be in conflict with MS's own offerings in the gaming arena.
I am willing to guarantee that some of the posters here today write on behalf of MS, but of course they will deny that until they are blue in the face, otherwise they have no credibility.

@Economister

Of course they do! I mean, look at all the advertizing they do around here. They are very conscious of any negative image being generated around here.

And yes, they will deny until they turn blue in the face. Micro$oft blue. silly
0 Votes
+ -
So
Michael Alan Goff 1st Jun
You have no evidence and are just spouting off about how Microsoft is wrong and evil?

Gotcha.

Oh, and I wasn't taking a stab at him. I was merely stating why I believe everyone else was insulting him. Take whatever stance you want, though, I'm sure it'll be anti-Microsoft.

Come back when you have a single bit of evidence that Microsoft is behind this.
@Economister

You promised you'd bow out. Just leave then.
0 Votes
+ -
Somebody is a doofus
Gis Bun 30th May
Mr. Kingsley-Hughes should get his facts straight. Microsoft bought Skype but the sale hasn't been finalized. Until then [as per usual legal stuff], Skype can't change the way they do business without Microsoft's approval.

JUdging from what Skype has said, that it's been around already for 5 years, this is a non-Microsoft issue. In fact, I suspect that once Microsoft completes the purchase, third party crap will disappear. Have you ever seen Microsoft [recently] include third party software? Unlike Adobe, Sun/Oracle, etc.

That said, I installed the updated Skype for someone just last night and I didn't see any crap. [Maybe it's disabled.]

You want a crap-free Skype? Get the business edition. Still can be used by home users. I use it at home.
0 Votes
+ -
journalism at its finest
bran.e.murray 30th May
While the deal with Microsoft is a way off from being finalized, and Microsoft management will be in no way responsible for this goof-up, that won't stop Adrian Kingsley-Smith from suggesting it in his headline in order to get a few more cheap clicks.
@bran.e.murray : Watch it or Economoron will call you an idiot.
0 Votes
+ -
Microsoft downward spiral
bdasilva@... 30th May
Microsoft's better days are in the rear view mirror...

The rumblings about de-throning Ballmer will soon become a deafening noise... Nothing new has come on his watch to sustain growth... Losing the phone wars - NOKIA is a loser, Skype does not make sense..
0 Votes
+ -
Go portable!
danwdoo 30th May
This is why I only use the version from portableapps.com It avoids all the browser toolbar and other add-ins the normal version wants to install. It's the only way to go!
how does this headline indicate MS were responsible? .. if you morons had even a small clue about 'anything' other than jumping into one blog after another making childish comments just to see your 'name'... we'd have a good read here.. but other than passing through i, (and many others) am unlikely to return because of all you groupies looking for a reason to whine.. ha ha

yawn..

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix