Google Chrome is insanely fast ... faster than Firefox 3.0
Summary: Google Chrome is fast ... insanely fast ... faster than Firefox 3.0.
Google Chrome is fast ... insanely fast ... faster than Firefox 3.0.
Here's Chrome vs. Firefox 3.0.1 vs IE7 vs. IE8b2 in a head-to-head shootout running the SunSpider JavaScript benchmark.
Here Google Chrome completed the SunSpider JavaScript benchmark in a average of 1,791 milliseconds, nearly half the time that Firefox 3.0.1 took to complete the test. In this test Google Chrome absolutely blows away IE.
UPDATED
Let's see how the browsers compare to each other when tested using the V8 benchmark suite. This suite carried out five tests:
- Richards OS kernel simulation benchmark, originally written in BCPL by Martin Richards (539 lines).
- DeltaBlue One-way constraint solver, originally written in Smalltalk by John Maloney and Mario Wolczko (880 lines).
- Crypto Encryption and decryption benchmark based on code by Tom Wu (1689 lines).
- RayTrace Ray tracer benchmark based on code by Adam Burmister (3418 lines).
- EarleyBoyer Classic Scheme benchmarks, translated to JavaScript by Florian Loitsch's Scheme2Js compiler (4682 lines).
With this benchmark, the higher the score, the better ...
As you can see, Google Chrome savagely beats all the opposition running the V8 benchmark suite a whopping ten times faster than Firefox 3.0.
Google Chrome certainly has delivered on the speed it promised, and so far testing indicates that the browser is very robust - over the past few hours I've been hammering it very hard and I've yet to have a crash.
Here's a single Google Chrome Window with 70+ tabs open and the browser is still nice and responsive and there's not even a hint that it's struggling under the weight of the open tabs.
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback
how about with Safari 3.x /4.x & Opera
RE: Google Chrome is insanely fast ... faster than Firefox 3.0
Tell me about it
I don't find the ZDNet ads that obtrusive. And, for me it is interesting to
I did once have a big problem with ZDNet ads consuming tons of CPU, but, after complaints, they resolved that very quickly.
Well...
I thought you were all about choice
Having a screen full of ads is great!
On the other hand, we should all be thankfull that Google's looking out for us, serving us screen full of ads on things we really need...
:)
I can think for myself
The Ads on ZDNet Are Not That Bad
I agree with you but ...
One site I visited was NOTHING but one big ad disgused as a "legitimate" web site.
Adblock
Adblock?
FWI I don't mind the ads. Someone needs to fork over the bucks to pay for the time and effort required. But if there are too many ads (not currently the case with ZDNet) it's not worth my time or trouble to visit...especially since there are so many other places where I can get the information/news I want.
I am under no obligation
Awwwwwww
What a bunch of whining crybabies. Not like you're forced to click on an ad or buy the products and services they're promoting. Your "I am under no obligation to ensure a company makes money" has zero relevance to ad blocking, since you're under no more obligation to support advertisers whether their ads are visible or hidden.
Unless you're such a mindless, moronic drone that you have no self control and must purchase products and services you see advertised out of uncontrollable compulsion.
So take your pick: Whining crybaby or mindless, moronic drone...which are you?
re: awwwwww
451." I am of course referring to the scene in which
the main character is pummeled with advertising while
riding a subway. Sure, we can ignore them, but not
completely. Eventually they get to us, especially when
they blend right into the actual content. Sure, ZDNet
isn't terrible, but it's still pretty bad. Usually, I
barely notice, but just now taking the time to
actually look, and it is pretty ridiculous.
Basically, I'm just pointing out the only "mindless,
moronic drone" is the one who likes to have "mindless,
moronic" advertising crammed down his throat all the
time.
re: awwwwww
I tell ya what...if you're ever in a situation where you're actually, physically pummeled, why don't you then think about this post of yours and then consider which you'd rather do again: Go to a web page with ads on it, or be physically pummeled in real life.
And yes, you can ignore them.
I've been on the web for about 14 years. I don't use ad blockers. I spend most of my work day and some of my personal day on the web.
So far, the ads have not "gotten to me".
Oh, gee, I wonder if it's because I don't have the immature mental capacity of a 1-year-old and I can actually tell the difference between an ad and the content I went to the site to find in the first place.
I'm not sure who you're referring to when you write about the mindless, moronic drone who likes to have advertising crammed down his throat, because ignoring ads isn't anything like having them crammed down your throat.
Because you're ignoring them.
Get it yet?
I imagine not, since you're too busy trying to dream up parallels to works of fiction that are entirely irrelevant to this discussion.
Next you'll probably tell me that all the advertising is subliminally telling you who to vote for in the election and you KNOW it's really happening because you can see it clearly using your "They Live" sunglasses!
bandwidth
I don't mind ads, since they pay for the content - BUT - is it really necessary to create and use flash ads, animated gif ads, full blown multimedia ads, etc..., aka bandwidth hogs?
Please know what you are taking ...
F451
You don't sound terribly 'free'
:)