HP single-handedly destroys non-iPad tablet market
Summary: After getting a taste for $99 tablets, will consumers continue to stomach $500 price tags?
After less than two months on sale, HP has pulled the plug on the TouchPad tablet and is so desperate to get rid of them that it is having a firesale, selling the 16GB TouchPad for $99 and the 32GB model for $149. But not only has HP killed the TouchPad, it has also single-handedly destroyed the entire non-iPad tablet market.
So what went wrong with the TouchPad? I think that several factors contributed to the death of the TouchPad:
- No app ecosystem
- An OS that people didn't care about
- HP's own lack of confidence in the product - I agree with John Gruber: HP's new CEO, Léo Apotheker, has no interest in playing in the consumer market at all
- The iPad effect - Probably the biggest reason that the TouchPad withered and died on the vine is the iPad
Let's look at that 'iPad effect' in a little more detail.
Apple sell millions of iPads every quarter, and it seems that most tech companies have no idea why it sells. In order to try to compete with the iPad, HP developed a tablet with a design and the tech specs similar to that of the iPad, priced it like the iPad, spent a ton of money on commercials featuring celebrities, and pushed the tablet out to big retailers in huge quantities.
And still no one cared about the TouchPad.
The reason: People are buying the iPad not because it's a tablet, but because it is an iPad. Apple has NOT carved out a market for tablets, Apple carved out a market for the iPad. Think about it: When Apple released the iPod back in 2001, did this create an enormous market for media players? No. It created an enormous market for the iPod.
And why should the iPad carve out a market for tablets? Apple doesn't even refer to the iPad as a tablet! Sure, Apple refers to them as amazing, magical, even revolutionary, but not as tablets.
Price is another factor. When Apple unveiled the iPad, tech pundits were bowled over by the price. $499 was seen as cheap. And it was cheap - for an Apple product. Was $499 cheap for a tablet? Well, the TouchPad (which, remember, was a pretty decent tablet) didn't sell at $499, and even a drop to $399 didn't invigorate sales much. However, once HP dropped the price to $99 as part of its firesale, this move resulted in overwhelming demand for a product that was essentially dead and that HP would no longer release updates for. This price drop was enough to push the TouchPad to the top of Amazon's electronics chart, above the Kindle.
So there you have it. Unless you're selling iPads, the stampede-inducing price point for a 16GB tablet is $99. OK, maybe this is a little on the low side, but the price definitely lies between $399 and $99, maybe around the $250 mark. But according to iSuppli, the bill of materials and manufacture of the 16GB TouchPad comes in at $298.
Which is why HP has destroyed tablets. The demise of the TouchPad has uncovered the dirty truth - the $500 tablet price point is too high ... way too high. This applies to webOS tablets, Android tablets, and it will likely apply to Windows 8 tablets, although the Windows might have a bit more oomph than webOS and Android and might be able to sustain this price for a while -- but eventually OEMs will engage into a race to the bottom and prices will fall.
[poll id="672"]
See also:
- HP's TouchPad fire sale: The fallout
- HP TouchPad: HP and Best Buy to refund price differences for early buyers
- Five lessons tablet OEMs can learn from HP TouchPad fiasco
- The incredible shrinking tablet landscape
- HP’s TouchPad launch, inventory under the microscope
- Michael Dell: We like Android, but work on Windows 8 tablets ‘encouraging’
- Dell: Does it need a better answer to tablets?
- Should I drink the Apple Kool-Aid?
- Report: Android steals 20% of tablet market share from iPad
- Next wave of tablets land: Will lower prices equate to volume?
- HP TouchPad now cheaper than the iPad
- CNET: Tablet Buying Guide
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback
RE: HP single-handedly destroys non-iPad tablet market
RE: HP single-handedly destroys non-iPad tablet market
No, Slate would be dead even faster; as to non-iPad tablet market, it is,
Samsung sold about 1 million SGT 10.1 in two months, all the others sell also few hundred thousand per quarter. So in <b>non-iPad tablets sell up to 1.5 million units per quarter</b> (some "analyst" firms give nonsensical figures such as 2.5 million, but this additional million is pure fantasy).
It is not like 1 million per week sales of iPad, but still some value, which will grow.
The key question is whether this volume will grow as fast as some predict, or slower.
RE: HP single-handedly destroys non-iPad tablet market
As folks here often point out...
RE: HP single-handedly destroys non-iPad tablet market
Enterprise
These were focused on enterprise use, not consumer use.
You cannot really match these to tablets of now.
I bought one (price = ouch!) and found it to work perfectly fine just that the portability factor was not really there.
Heavy with minimal battery life. OS was fine.
At work we have a few (lab) and they work great there!
Now if I could load Win7 on my iPad2 or Transformer that would be sweet ;)
RE: HP single-handedly destroys non-iPad tablet market
There's a big difference between shipped and sold.
250,000 Galaxy Tabs 10.1's were shipped to best buy. Only around 26,000 sold. That isn't even close to Apple, which sells millions of iPads a quarter. >:(
RE: HP single-handedly destroys non-iPad tablet market
RE: HP single-handedly destroys non-iPad tablet market
HP did invest with Windows tablets and realized they were DOA for at least two more years until Win 8 showed up. By that time it will probably be too late and even if it wasn't, HP would still have to compete with all the el cheapo Win 8 tablet OEMs and be stuck with 5% margins like their PC business.
HP should have made at least a three year commitment to developing Palm OS and they should have got the first Pre upgrade out the door at least six months ago to keep the ecosystem moving. The tablet idea was probably a distraction this early in their timeline. PalmOS simply wasn't ready.
DeRSSS, why would you consider that fantasy?
Because you do not like the tought of that, or do you have some knowledge that these analysts do not?
:|
pdq, because of their costs, nothing more.
Many of those tablets are full features computers in tablet form, at a cost of 2000 or more.
A very niche product as it is not an item someone purchases just to "play around with".
Indeed, even with the iPad, only a very tiny percentage of people have justified the need for one, even at the price of 499 dollars, in which they have purchased one.
:|
Because in Q2 SGT10.1 was only in sale for a months, and tablets producers
If you add all of those sales together, you can not count more than like 1.5 million non-iPad tablets sold in Q2.
RE: HP single-handedly destroys non-iPad tablet market
[i]Indeed, even with the iPad, only a very tiny percentage of people have justified the need for one..[/i]
That argument can be applied to everything other than food, clothing and shelter to some degree. It's always interesting how it is manipulated in tech discussions. Is an MP3 player necessary? Or a game console or a television?.. How do you justify anything you like using that is not vital to your life or livelihood? You enjoy it, you use it. It's that simple.
My iPad has subsumed 90% or more of my non work-related computer use. I very rarely turn on my home computer anymore except to do home-content creation (photos etc.) that I can't do as well on the ipad.
RE: HP single-handedly destroys non-iPad tablet market
GET an iPad 2 and install Splashtop, that gives you windows on the iPad and is by far the very best app I've ever purchased, now I can browse Google news on my iPad using Chrome, simply amazing!
RE: HP single-handedly destroys non-iPad tablet market
RE: HP single-handedly destroys non-iPad tablet market
RE: HP single-handedly destroys non-iPad tablet market
Excellent article. I wasn't in the market for any non-iPad device until I heard about the $99 price. I immediately tried to get one but was too late. $100 to $200 is really what I want to pay for a tablet. I paid $400 for my iPad and feel it was a good purchase, but it really is different than the non-Apple tablets. I haven't handled (or owned) an Android tablet yet that operates the way my iPad does. But for $100 I'm willing to put-up with the little problems that the Android tabs seem to be plagued by.
I personally have been bewildered by anyone who has purchased a non-iPad for the same price they could get it for! A man at my work bought the Xoom for $800 at the same time I bought the iPad for $400. After six months, mine is still getting tons of use while his hardly ever gets picked-up off the desk.
Give me a $100 tablet and I won't care if I use it or not!!
A simple answer, clokverkorange
Acording to recent sales figures, Windows is still the top selling OS, easilly outpacing other operating systems.
That is because people see the need for Windows, Android on a tablet, according to recent sales figures, shows no so much for Android.
:|
RE: HP single-handedly destroys non-iPad tablet market