ie8 fix
madison

Hardware 2.0

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

It's time for iTunes and Xbox Live to put spending limits in place

By | February 8, 2011, 10:37am PST

Summary: It’s time for the insanity to come to an end and for Apple And Microsoft to put spending limits in place for purchases made through iTunes and Xbox Live.

It’s time for the insanity to come to an end and for Apple And Microsoft to put spending limits in place for purchases made through iTunes and Xbox Live.

Here’s two examples just from today. First, over to the Washington Post:

Over the winter break from school, 8-year-old Madison worked to dress up her simple mushroom home on the iPhone game Smurfs’ Village. In doing so, she also amassed a $1,400 bill from Apple.

$99 for a “wagon of Smurfberries” or $19 for “a bucket of snowflakes” … seriously? In a kids game? Who set these prices? Are they insane? Does anyone - other than kids - spend a Benjamin on such things?

OK, sure, it’s also insane for parents to give their kids full-on access to an iTunes account that is linked to a back account or credit card, but to me there’s as certain scammy quality to “wagon of Smurfberries” being on offer for $99. And on top of that, with Apple grabbing $30 from the sale of those Smurfberries (what the hell are Smurfberries anyway???) there’s little incentive for Apple to do anything about it.

Here’s another example, this time from WinRumors (I’m not linking to the Daily Mail):

Brendan Jordan racked up a bill of £1,082,52 on his Xbox LIVE account “without realising” the purchases were being billed to his mothers’s card. The schoolboy purchased accessories and new games for his Xbox using an Xbox LIVE account his mother had setup. Single mum-of-two, Dawn Matthews, is furious with Microsoft and blames the software giant for the purchases.

Again, putting aside the insanity of linking a credit/debit card to a kid’s Xbox Live account, again to me it sounds highly irresponsible to allow hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars to be spent on virtual goods.

Sure, people should be allowed to spend their money on whatever they want, so I’m not saying there should be a ban or a maximum spending ceiling, but I do feel that after a certain daily/weekly/monthly limit that the account holder should get an email or a quick call.

There’s a fine line between something being lucrative, and starting to feel scammy. Apple is certainly sailing close to the wind with some of the in-app purchases it is allowing, and Microsoft could certainly do more to prevent this kind of bad publicity. Putting in place a spending limit that triggered a call or an email wouldn’t harm anyone.

And it’s clear that the current mechanism of relying on parental controls isn’t enough.

Both companies need to get their act together.

Poll

Is it time for iTunes and Xbox Live to put spending limits in place?

And no, my kids DON’T have access to a credit/debit card fed iTunes/Xbox Live accounts!

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes is an internationally published technology author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology.

Disclosure

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

All opinions expressed on Hardware 2.0 are those of Adrian Kingsley-Hughes. Every effort is made to ensure that the information posted is accurate. If you have any comments, queries or corrections, please contact Adrian via the email link here. Any possible conflicts of interest will be posted below. [Updated: February 23, 2010] - Adrian Kingsley-Hughes has no business relationships, affiliations, investments, or other actual/potential conflicts of interest relating to the content posted so far on this blog.

Biography

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes is an internationally published technology author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology -- whether that be by learning to program, building a PC from a pile of parts, or helping them get the most from their new MP3 player or digital camera.

Adrian has authored/co-authored technical books on a variety of topics, ranging from programming to building and maintaining PCs. His most recent books include "Build the Ultimate Custom PC", "Beginning Programming" and "The PC Doctor's Fix It Yourself Guide". He has also written training manuals that have been used by a number of Fortune 500 companies.

Adrian also runs a popular blog under the name The PC Doctor, where he covers a range of computer-related topics -- from security to repairing and upgrading.

50
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

I have to agre with the blog...
VerusAnimus 25th Jan
I can understand how it can be the parents fault. But the company is to blame to. End of story. Think about it. If you take your kid to Chucky Cheese or what ever. Your kid asks can I go down the slide, you say sure why not. But some one is standing at the steps to the slide saying, 5 dollars a go. You would scream scam! And that is just how it is in the game. You get to play for free, and every thing is simple, there is no fun. So you want a new in game item. Say a chair for your mushroom home (xD odd) you do not want a simple one that is ugly and plain your a kid you want the colorful one. Its 5 bucks each. Oh and the matching table is 15 bucks because its larger. And what is one chair for a full table you need 4 or 6. That is 35-45$ right there. If that is not a scam I do not know what is. And the ones that say well you have to say its ok to spend money once in the game before it will let you buy anything. Well that is just how they get you. One day your kid will be playing a game they cant spend any money in. But there will be this one super awesome item on sale that week only 99 cents. What is 99 cents right? So you ok it and you activate spending money in the game. Now the kid can do what ever they want. And money means nothing to a kid, even more so a little one and a lot of those games are aimed at very young kids.

100% scam.
Is it time for parents to take responsibility for their children's actions?
@msalzberg

Exactly... Both iTunes and XBox have pretty decent parental controls. I know in XBox you can set an account to not be able to order anything but not sure in iTunes.

You can also do what many parents do and just get them gift cards or buy cards for Microsoft points. If a parent is stupid enough to associate their credit card blindly to a child's account then that is their problem.
@msalzberg

Is it time for parents to take responsibility for their children's actions?

Yes, but let's not give these companies a pass.

If my kid breaks your window of course I will make you whole. We're talking about people who would market $99 virtual smurfberries to children. I don't think they are expecting adults to make that purchase.

I think by publicizing this in mainstream media more parents will be alerted to danger of typing credit card numbers into products after they've already got them home.






happy
0 Votes
+ -
I agree with writing about it
LiquidLearner 8th Feb 2011
@none none

I don't agree that we should call on Microsoft, Apple or anyone to "fix" this. Be a responsible parent.
@none none

Still do not see how they are in the wrong here. There are measures in place to prevent things like this using parental controls or simply not associating a credit card for unauthorized purchases. People are just too lazy and take the easy road instead of setting some restrictions or parenting their kids. Like I said before there are options that you can use iTunes Gift Cards to give the account credit therefore setting a limit. The same for XBox by purchasing MS Point cards associated with the account to set a limit. The gift card runs out or points are used up then simply do not buy any more.

If the child steals the credit card and does that then punish them. At some point people need to be responsible for their own actions. Microsoft or Apple are not doing ANYTHING wrong with these services in the area of how things are paid for by the consumer.
0 Votes
+ -
@msalzberg
Cylon Centurion 8th Feb 2011
You're asking too much. "responsibility" is a big word, most people don't understand in today's digital world.
@Cylon Centurion 0005
Digital smigdetal... Credit cards have been around for a longggggg time. If a parent is dumb enough to associate their CC with an account that can make purchases and then give their kid access to it... It is the parents fault.

This is not a digital age thing, this is a stupidity thing.
@msalzberg

+1000

iTunes purchasing can be disabled on children's devices.

It's up to parents to manage these things, there are prepaid voucher options.

There's another one that has been overlooked, Facebook in-game purchases eg from Zynga.
@msalzberg
Agreed
0 Votes
+ -
AMEN!
SAStarling 9th Feb 2011
@msalzberg

Why should we have companies limit our purchasing ability, when it's really up to parents to control what their kids buy? And if they don't, guess what? It's too damn bad. If they link their credit card to their kids' Xbox or other gadgets, then they cannot claim ignorance if they try to deny the charges.

Jeez, I've had enough of this nanny-state crap for a LIFETIME!
0 Votes
+ -
Vote with your pocketbook.
terry flores 8th Feb 2011
"Dear Steve Balmer,

I am canceling my Live account today because your company engages in harmful and shameful practices that endanger my finances. When you have this problem fixed, I will be happy to resume buying your service.

Yours truly,
XXXXXXXXXX"

This is how capitalism works.
0 Votes
+ -
Dear Sir/Madam:
adornoe@... 9th Feb 2011
We'll take whatever appropriate actions we deem necessary on our end, and we're sorry that we might lose you as a customer, but...

If you would learn how to take responsible actions to control your spending and that of your family members, then you wouldn't be having any problems with our company or any other.

That's where responsibility begins.

Yours truly...
XXXXXXXXXXX

P.S.: Capitalism is not a one way street.
0 Votes
+ -
re: Dear Sir/Madam:
none none 9th Feb 2011
@adornoe@...

LOL!

Or put another way:

Dear Company,

Your product contains poison harmful to health. I am not going to buy it until you take the poison out.

Sincerely,
XXXXXXX


Dear XXXXXX

Yes, our product does contain poison and we heavily promote the use of poison. Especially to children. However it is your responsibility to not eat poison or feed it to your kids. Now go suck eggs.

Best regards,
Company




happy
0 Votes
+ -
I don't believe it...
condelirios 8th Feb 2011
Via iOS.. you have to input the password of the iTunes account whenever you make a purchase in an app for the first time since that app has been started. It forces this to ensure the right person is authorizing the purchase. Now.. I suppose "Mom" could have made a purchase in the game and then not exited the game and let the little kid purchase smurfberries... but I see it as unlikely. Sounds like someone is trying to make a mountain out of a molehill.
0 Votes
+ -
I have to disagree.
TripleII-21189418044173169409978279405827 8th Feb 2011
Looks like I am in the minority here but no, it is time for people to take personal responsibility for their actions. From the above to wireless overages to "it is the banks fault they fooled me into borrowing more money than I can afford", the answer is no. We need to stop enabling (and infantalizing) people to not have to take any responsibility for the things they do.

If there is a "scam" involved such as making it look like the child is spending "virtual dollars" when in fact they are real or in the xbox example, pricing hidden in fine print (no idea if that is the case, just an example) then I will be her slamming those companies and demanding their money back, but if that is not the case, learn your lesson, don't give your kids free access to all your money.

TripleII
0 Votes
+ -
re: I have to disagree.
none none 8th Feb 2011
@TripleII

From the above to wireless overages to "it is the banks fault they fooled me into borrowing more money than I can afford", the answer is no.

Disagree. You would make buyer beware the law of the land and give legitimacy to economic predation.




happy
0 Votes
+ -
It's called reading.
TripleII-21189418044173169409978279405827 8th Feb 2011
@none none
If you can't read, you probably shouldn't sign a contract. Over the years I have bought and sold a few homes (moved, not a realtor) and each and every time I was presented with truth in lending forms (national requirement) and explicitly told everything about financing. If I don't read it or understand it, I shouldn't sign it.

And please note that if anything slimey or scammy is uncovered, I will fully support holding the companies accountable.

So, if you sign up for AT&T on their 2GB plan and use 5GB and have to pay an extra $500 because you didn't understand it is ENTIRELY your fault unless they lied to you or otherwise called it "unlimited" when it isn't.

TripleII
0 Votes
+ -
It's called the new American Dream
LiquidLearner 8th Feb 2011
@TripleII

It makes me sick to know that the majority here seems to think companies should act to protect them. America was built on the idea that your own hard work could get you somewhere. No matter where you were born, no matter who you were, if you worked hard enough you could make something of yourself. Of course if you failed it was also on you.

Apparently because the last couple of generations did so well people today just feel as though their entitled to being protected by someone else at every turn. It's the bank's fault that they didn't know I couldn't afford $2000/month for my mortgage. It's Microsoft's fault I ignored the three warnings that popped up and insisted on installing this video codec to watch the Kim K video. It's Apple's fault I didn't block my kid from being able to buy stuff in an app or on iTunes. It's Microsoft's fault I didn't use parental controls to prevent this from happening. It's always someone else's fault.
0 Votes
+ -
re: It's called reading.
none none Updated - 8th Feb 2011
@Triplell

If you can't read, you probably shouldn't sign a contract.

The iTunes/Store contract is 15,000 words meticulously crafted by the best lawyers money can buy. You're telling me you're going to read and understand that without legal advice?

Did you buy and sell those homes without your lawyer going over the paperwork? I'm certain your lender had a lawyer. Must be because he can't read. Right?

Slimey? Scammy? There's no such thing in your view. In your view, as you peresent it, there's legal and not legal. If they've covered their you-know whats in their fine print, then anything they do is fine because anyone who is simply able to read would know whether a court has ruled similar terms unenforceable in the past.

Furthermore, I'd wager the $99 basket of smurfberries ultimately doesn't even belong to the hapless child who "purchased" it. If mom stops paying the subscription fees, or violates a contract term and gets booted, those expensive smurfberries are history.

So Apple is charging $99 for NOTHING. On the face of it, that's not slimey or scammy to you?




happy
0 Votes
+ -
@LiquidLearner

It's the bank's fault that they didn't know I couldn't afford $2000/month for my mortgage.

No. The bank knew you couldn't afford the mortgage. But the bank loaned it to you anyway to make it's origination fees before it magically transformed your worthless paper into AAA securities to sell off to some other poor schmuck investors.

So now you've been foreclosed, the investors are holding the bag, and the bank is raking in more fees servicing the foreclosures.

It makes me sick to know that some people think everything is the people's fault and that people don't need protection from predation by big companies.
sure the banks are not without fault, but, the bigger culprit in the whole lending mess in the real-estate/banking industry came from the regulations which essentially "forced" banks into making those risky loans.

To the banks, the risk was going to be absorbed by uncle Sam, with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and the regulations which forced the lending on the banks was the CRA (passed under Carter) and the enforcement regulations which were passed back in the mid 1990s by congress and signed into law by Clinton.

The banking industry didn't have the kind of problem they got into until the CRA was passed, and the enforcement regulations threatened those lending institutions with penalties and/or loss of lending privileges if they didn't comply with the law.

Oftentimes, it's a lot easier to blame the "greedy Wall-Street crooks" than to research what the real causes were.
0 Votes
+ -
Perhaps the government should step in
LiquidLearner 8th Feb 2011
and restrict online purchases. I mean, why not?

When I was a teenager I did the online chat thing and ran up nearly $1000 phone bill. Did my parents blame the phone company? Nope. Did my parents kick my A? You better believe it and I had to pay them back pretty quick. And no, parents couldn't afford that kind of phone bill either.

There are systems in place on XBox and I'm guessing for iTunes to prevent this from happening. Because the parents were too lazy or stupid to make sure they were protected from this situation does not mean the responsibility should fall on the company that writes the software. That's completely absurd.

Adrian, do you have children? Because I do. And if I screwed up and left my daughter in this situation I'd be pissed but mostly at myself and I wouldn't expect any sympathy from the companies involved. Of course I'm not naive enough to blame TV for anything she does wrong, or the school, or the teachers. Guess where the responsibility falls? On me. As long as people, parents and bloggers continue to have this "they should protect me from myself" mentality America will continue to fail. Thanks Adrian, good to know we can count on you to blame someone else!
0 Votes
+ -
Coun't have said it better myself.
TripleII-21189418044173169409978279405827 8th Feb 2011
@LiquidLearner

TripleII
0 Votes
+ -
@LiquidLearner

As long as people, parents and bloggers continue to have this "they should protect me from myself" mentality America will continue to fail.

Everybody knows what sharks do, so if you swim with the sharks and get eaten it's your own damned fault.

True enough. But sharks don't have free will so you can't blame the shark for being a shark. I can and do, however, blame the $99 smurfberries developer for being a shark.


Because the parents were too lazy or stupid to make sure they were protected from this situation does not mean the responsibility should fall on the company that writes the software.

I have noticed that no one in this thread has remarked that the $99 basket of smurfberries is a good value. The only thing I hear is "If they are stupid they deserve what they get."

Probably because in fact it's a horrible value. It's a complete waste of money. I'm just surprised some people think that billing people who are not smart enough to avoid being billed while delivering nothing of value is a legitimate business model.




happy
0 Votes
+ -
buying real games and accessories are one thing
Ron Bergundy Updated - 8th Feb 2011
and i would say i'd be cool with it though how stupid is the kid's mother that she doesn't see these things being shipped to her door, or realizing that people can shop online.

the apple thing is TOTALLY different in that apples/smurfs are selling virtual (not real) items for a vitual (not real) world for 99 freaking REAL (not virtual) dollars?!?
thats the part i can't believ that apple would allow something like that to happen to loyal customers!
@Ron Bergundy

Wanna buy some Farmville dollars?

Make your farm look real nice on Facebook.
0 Votes
+ -
Voluntary or involuntary ...
Rick_R Updated - 8th Feb 2011
Something else for them to consider--just as the movie industry did. If they don't voluntarily impose some type of limits, various states such as California and Texas will start passing legislation either requiring it or saying that purchasers aren't liable for purchases totaling more than a certain amount. Or, various debit/credit card companies will start making it an option, at least with certain vendors (i.e., "If you want have us continue processing XYZ debit/credit cards for you, you'll have to make spending limits an option.")
Apple in app purchases don't ask for the iTunes password so that is a shame on Apple, but parents really need to take some responsibility. As a parent, I have turned off iTunes in App purchases for my son's iPod Touch. This isn't hard and is just good practice. I love my son, but don't trust that a 6 year old won't hit a button when prompted.

The X-Box Live account example is not Microsofts fault at all (I need a shower after saying that, but it is true). As an adult I don't even have my credit card linked to my Live account. Sure it's annoying when I decide to purchase something, but I don't trust MS to keep my information safe.

Take responsibility, read parental notices provided by the vendors and implement what you feel is safe BEFORE giving your child access to these accounts.
0 Votes
+ -
@stinsora

Developers who sell their Apps and by extension in-App purchases don't you mean?

The password is required for in App purchases just like for any other purchases and as you said iTunes purchasing can be disabled on devices.

On new devices additional information is also required when linking to an iTunes account for the first time.
0 Votes
+ -
I forgot to add in a previous topic that I agree with Adrian and many other that these practices are completely immoral and unethical, and consumers should never tolerate being bilked or deceived in any fashion. I just differ in how to approach getting things changed.
@terry flores

What are they doing that is immoral and unethical? Are you that dense? They are not making you enter a credit card and let it be used blindly. Seriously. I bet you agree with the people that sue fast food joints for making them fat too.

Do yourself a favor and research the parental controls available to iTunes and XBox live will ya? You will see there are decent measures in place to prevent things like this.
@bobiroc

You will see there are decent measures in place to prevent things like this.

Wow. Not a note of irony. Putting products (for lack of a better word) up for sale along with measures to preven their sale.

Maybe they should not offer worthless items for exhorbitant prices in the first place.



happy
0 Votes
+ -
Re: Wow. Not a note of irony.
bobiroc 9th Feb 2011
@none none

How is that irony? They have options that the end user needs to set up to protect themselves. What a concept right. People do something to protect themselves and take responsibility for their actions. What this blog is asking for is for them to set forced limits on spending which is not the thing to do. The company should not tell you how much you can spend with them but the user should live within their means and take steps to make sure things are not being purchased without authorization.

As far as worthless items goes, it may be junk to you but maybe to others it is worth something.
0 Votes
+ -
And if they were, you are right.
TripleII-21189418044173169409978279405827 8th Feb 2011
@terry flores
Please outline where they were deceived or bilked? Nothing I have read indicates that they have been. It's a shame the parents are learning an expensive lesson, but unless you can show anything sleazy, your statement has no bearing on these cases.

TripleII
Don't give your kids XBox Live or iTunes accounts? Problem solved.
@Droid101
It doesn't even need to be that severe. Just don't put your credit card on the account. Reload it with the cards that are purchased offline in the stores. No muss, no fuss, no $1300 dollars in Smurf Berries!
0 Votes
+ -
Either that or,
adornoe@... 9th Feb 2011
don't purchase anything from XBox Live or from iTunes online.

People should have to go to their local software/hardware store to get their gimmicks/gadgets/music/games/accessories/apps, and when they're there, only an adult will be allowed to produce a payment method, be it cash or debit card or credit card.

Problem solved!

More of a hassle, but less second guessing and fewer money problems.
Duh, prepaid cards, they sell them at your local Wal-Mart, Target, some gas stations, the Game Stop down the street, pretty much anywhere. My kids use PSN, MS Live and iTunes, they have their own accounts that I simply add credit to via a prepaid card. Why are MS, Apple and soon to be Sony being asked to limit what people spend?
0 Votes
+ -
This is only going to become a bigger problem
matthew_maurice 8th Feb 2011
As iPhones and iPads penetrate more and more consumer households. Apple should get ahead of the curve and institute some account features like sub-account monthly maximums, per session pre-approval amounts or even temporary authorization codes. Any enhancements to the purchasing model that makes it easy for parents to give children money to spend with sensible limits will return far more value than it costs to implement.
@matthew_maurice
Why should Apple be responsible for this? Why aren't the parents being parents, watch what their kids are doing and punish if needed? Or maybe the could do as I do and use prepaid cards?
@matthew_maurice

It has already been done. Buy the kid a point card or an iTunes card. Tell the kid that when it is gone, it is gone. Your credit card is not in harms way.

See, that was easy.
@matthew_maurice

Yes and fast food restaurants should stop people at the door so they don't eat their food too much to get fat or tell them they cannot have the double Qtr Pounder. Cars should stop people from speeding or texting while driving. TV or internet Providers should find a way to recognize who is actually watching to prevent mature content from reaching sensitive eyes.

The answer to all of that is no. Unless someone is holding a gun to their head or threatening their life or the lives of loved ones unless they make all these purchases then the responsibility is in the hands of the end user. I too am sick of the blame game and people not owning up for their own actions. If you are a parent and you let your children do whatever they want with the technology they use then you are a piss poor parent. Set some rules, stick to them, and by all means be involved with what your kids do. I know technology can be scary to some but it is not that hard and if you think it is too hard then don't use it.
Xbox already has safeguards put into place, not to mention that an 11-year-old should understand that he is charging to his mom's credit card when he makes purchases on Xbox Live. If he can't comprehend that yet, maybe he shouldn't have an Xbox Live account. Just saying! You can read my full thoughts here: http://creditrestorationservices.wordpress.com/2011/02/08/gaming-kid-charges-1700-to-mothers-credit-card-mother-blames-microsoft/
0 Votes
+ -
It's interesting.
TripleII-21189418044173169409978279405827 8th Feb 2011
The silent majority (66%) voted yes to essentially making it up to the companies to protect consumers from themselves yet I have not read one valid argument or position where the companies ARE responsible.

I did read (and like) the opinion that Apple or XBox (or any of them) could enhance their service to publish more controls or sub account totals, that's probably just a good service, but it is still somewhat troubling that 2/3's believe it's someone else's job to save ourselves from ourselves.

TripleII
@TripleII

but it is still somewhat troubling that 2/3's believe it's someone else's job to save ourselves from ourselves.

I'm with Adrian on this one, but I disagree with your characterization. Here's a snip from the blog. Tell me what you disagree with.

"$99 for a wagon of Smurfberries or $19 for a bucket of snowflakes seriously? In a kids game? Who set these prices? Are they insane? Does anyone - other than kids - spend a Benjamin on such things?

OK, sure, its also insane for parents to give their kids full-on access to an iTunes account that is linked to a back account or credit card, but to me theres as certain scammy quality to wagon of Smurfberries being on offer for $99."

Is it unreasonable to say to Apple don't be scammy? People don't need "protection from themselves" when dealing with businesses employing ethical practices.


yet I have not read one valid argument or position where the companies ARE responsible.

Yes, you have pointed out that they're not doing anything not allowed in the contract. A businessman I respect once told me that contracts are for protecting yourself in the event a relationship sours. In a healthy business relationship no one need ever pull out the contract and say, "See!"



happy
0 Votes
+ -
I voted no in the poll.
none none Updated - 9th Feb 2011
Asking Apple or MS to take steps themselves to prevent parents from being bilked is still leaving the wolf guarding the hen house.

What I would like to see are laws passed in the states that require a 3 or 5 day opportunity for parents to reverse these stupid charges.

For a start, the law would apply to any business selling virtual goods that requires agreement to a contract more than 100 words in length.



happy
because, until the statement or bill "arrives", the card owner might not be aware of purchases made on-line until a whole month has passed.
0 Votes
+ -
Arguments can be made both ways, but...
tkeller@... 9th Feb 2011
"Parent responsibility" or "Vendor responsibility". Both sides have some valid points. But I think it is ludicrous of anyone here to assert that one side or the other is entirely to blame. Yes, parents have a responsibility in the way the kids use such services. And Apple has a responsibility as well. C'mon, $99 smurfberries? How is that anything but a blatant attempt by the purveyors of that app to take advantage of unwary parents who have not ideally configured the way their kids have access? They know full well that many parents will not set things up "right". And they know full well that many kids are clueless about money. They are depending on the confluence of those two things to rake in some fast, easy cash.
So they take advantage - and Apple should be both chastised for allowing it and outraged at the blow to their image. That Walled Garden has some serious breaches.
0 Votes
+ -
I have to agre with the blog...
VerusAnimus 25th Jan
I can understand how it can be the parents fault. But the company is to blame to. End of story. Think about it. If you take your kid to Chucky Cheese or what ever. Your kid asks can I go down the slide, you say sure why not. But some one is standing at the steps to the slide saying, 5 dollars a go. You would scream scam! And that is just how it is in the game. You get to play for free, and every thing is simple, there is no fun. So you want a new in game item. Say a chair for your mushroom home (xD odd) you do not want a simple one that is ugly and plain your a kid you want the colorful one. Its 5 bucks each. Oh and the matching table is 15 bucks because its larger. And what is one chair for a full table you need 4 or 6. That is 35-45$ right there. If that is not a scam I do not know what is. And the ones that say well you have to say its ok to spend money once in the game before it will let you buy anything. Well that is just how they get you. One day your kid will be playing a game they cant spend any money in. But there will be this one super awesome item on sale that week only 99 cents. What is 99 cents right? So you ok it and you activate spending money in the game. Now the kid can do what ever they want. And money means nothing to a kid, even more so a little one and a lot of those games are aimed at very young kids.

100% scam.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix