SlySoft cracks Blu-ray BD+ encryption
Summary: SlySoft, the makers of AnyDVD HD, have released an updated version of the copy-protection removal tool which allows Blu-ray owners to back up their discs.
[UPDATE 03/26/08 - Exercising its "Right to Reply" I have the following to share from Macrovision Corp, the company who currently owns the rights to BD+ technology:
“Macrovision does not comment on specific techniques or procedures that may directly impact the BD+ security technology. BD+ is a security response system designed to react to security attacks, not prevent them entirely. As part of this system, updated BD+ security code is continuously developed so that BD+ customers obtain ongoing value from the use of this technology.”
Eric Rodli, Executive Vice President & General Manager of Entertainment, Macrovision Corporation]
SlySoft, the makers of AnyDVD HD, have released an updated version of the copy-protection removal tool which allows Blu-ray owners to back up their discs.
Antigua, West Indies - March, 19th 2008
AnyDVD HD now with BD+ support
Film studios that have switched to Blu-ray may have crowed a little too early because the much-praised BD+ copy protection is an ad absurdum affair now, too. With today's release of version 6.4.0.0 of AnyDVD HD it is now also possible to make backup security copies of Blu-ray discs protected with BD+.
BD+ is the DRM protocol used to protect Blu-ray discs. It's a very sophisticated scheme that makes use of a small virtual machine environment to enforce compliance. BD+ was considered much harder to crack than the encryption used on HD DVD discs (which SlySoft cracked last year). In fact, faith in BD+ was so strong that Richard Doherty of Envisioneering Group was quoted in July of last year as saying:
BD+, unlike AACS which suffered a partial hack last year, won't likely be breached for 10 years.
Can Blu-ray be tightened up following this crack? Sure. Even SlySoft admits that a future tweak to BD+ could put an end to this crack, although the company is optimistic that a a crack could be found.
Peer van Heuen, head of High-Definition technologies at SlySoft adds: "Admittedly, we are not really so fast with this because actually we had intended to publish this release already in December as promised. However, it was decided for strategic reasons to wait a bit for the outcome of the "format war" between HD DVD and Blu-ray. On top of that, we first wanted to see our assumptions confirmed about the in the meantime released BD+ titles regarding the BD+ Virtual Machine. We are rather proud to have brought back to earth the highly-praised and previously "unbreakable" BD+. However, we must also admit that the Blu-ray titles released up to now have not fully exploited the possibilities of BD+. Future releases will undoubtedly have a modified and more polished BD+ protection, but we are well prepared for this and await the coming developments rather relaxed". Van Heuen adds jokingly: "The worst-case scenario then is our boss locks us up with only bread and water in the company dungeon for three months until we are successful again".
In other news, the other day I picked up an LG GGW-H20L Super Multi Blu-ray writer / HD-ROM reader drive.
Thoughts?
Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.
Antigua, West Indies - March, 19th 2008
Talkback
"BD+ won't be breached for 10 years"
Kinda like "Bring it on" - Doh!
::snicker::
Just like Bush Rethuglicans and their insistence that "inconvenience + crushing of civil liberties = 'safety'"....
Couldn't happen to a better standard.
Eventually, they will learn that people want cheap players who's PRIMARY role is to just play the movie stupid.
I am heartened to see this crack, and the movie studios salivating over the above mentioned DRM will start to see the futility of it all. They aren't ready yet though, the NEXT version of DRM will do the trick, just you wait and see.
TripleII
I couldn't agree more... Blu-Ray is bad!
I kinda wonder if the studios would have jumped on Blu-Ray so quickly if this crack had been released in December like it should have been. Makes you wonder doesn't it...
Did the crack influence your decision?
Not mine.
I'll wait until they lose the battle for good.
It is amazing that they still operate under the assumption that consumers NEED them, they don't need us.
I would have been OK if HD-DVD reader/writer was included in a computer I bought (would not pay a premium) because it is fully usable in Linux (no links, not wanting to be deleted) without the required monitoring connection, but the technology doesn't thrill me, my upconvert DVD player works great.
It is a nice to have at the very best.
TripleII
No ...
Can't say I'm not happy though!
RE: SlySoft cracks Blu-ray BD encryption
Secondary anti-consumer offering
However the studios still make it more expensive than necessary by using older MPEG2 compression rather than either of the other supported codecs. Typical movie files alone come in around 25G. Of course using a newer codec may mean that the movie would fit comfortably on a DVD9 at full 1080p. That would have made the whole HD-DVD/BluRay war moot, and we wouldn?t want to have missed that would we?
RE: SlySoft cracks Blu-ray BD encryption
I would not be surprised if the contacted Sony and
said "what does it worth to you if we wait a little
until the major studios decide and then come out with the
crack?"
Sony is not stupid b/c they know about the studios obsession with DRM
I'm sure that was a major part in their decision.
RE: SlySoft cracks Blu-ray BD encryption
Because electronic and software companies want to hook you and then move on.
RE: SlySoft cracks Blu-ray BD encryption
RE: SlySoft cracks Blu-ray BD encryption
They release a DVD, then the 2 disc special, the the 2 disc special directors cut, then the 3 disc, extended "as the director intended it" edition. Then they'll release the 3 movie "trilogy" box set, 6 months before they release a 4th movie in the "trilogy" to make the boxset worthless.
Then they have the nerve to say it's the customer ripping them off when it all goes pear shaped. Good on yer Slysoft, kick em where it hurts and kick em often.
So, they cracked it...
Now THAT's DRM doing wonders for the industry.
They will never learn as long as people keep handing them money by buying their over monitored, over oppressive, you're guilty until proven innocent, refuse. Let's all say it now folks: "Bah'ah" Yup, that's a good sheep. It's spring now so your wallet shearing is coming soon.
Many states, if I'm not mistaken, allow for one legal backup of your media, as long as it remains in your possession. I'm surprised nobody has class actioned the MPAA for blocking their legal rights yet.
So I'm glad they broke it. Not that it matters for me since I don't plan on buying HD until this DRM junk goes away anyways.
Anything That Can Be Programmed
Copy protection, DRM, encryption, you name it; it's new rehashes of the same old failed idea that software or something software-generated can be locked up with software. The hackers and crackers will work around it eventually, and everybody else will be inconvenienced (and some folks will use the cracks, hacks and patches just to be able to use the legit product they've paid for).
A quality product for an enticing price is the best defense against illegal copying. If that doesn't provide sufficient profit incentive, either something's wrong with the product or something's wrong with the business plan. And fixing the plan doesn't involve suing dead people, 12-year-old girls and people who don't have the product and wouldn't know how to use it it they did.
That's my 2c. So there.
Esepcially if you have all the keys.
DRM, on the other hand, has no hope no matter how clever or strong the encryption is because between the medium and the playback device all the keys are there and it all has to be fully unencrypted at some stage for the content to be at all usable. All that has to be worked out after that is the encryption algorithm and a little analysis of the Java Bytecode should reveal all.
Really, having part of it in software has made it easier to tease out the algorithms because it's a lot simpler to dissasemble bytecode and have it converted to human readable instructions than it is to dig around the inside of a player with probes and interpret the output signals.
In short: it doesn't matter how strong the encryption is unless at least on of the keys is hidden, everyone can access the algorithms used in PGP and it's still monumentally difficult to break because keys are hidden, but even that wouldn't matter with DRM because hiding any of the keys would render media unplayable.
The entire concept of DRM is bunk.
Bound to have happened
- John Musbach
RE: SlySoft cracks Blu-ray BD encryption
A note to the self-riteous/indignant: Don't think anyone believes that the bulk of CD / DVD copies are for legal purposes.