ie8 fix
madison

Hardware 2.0

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

The 'Year of the Linux desktop' isn't coming

By | November 4, 2011, 7:51am PDT

Summary: Holding your breath for the ‘Year of the Linux desktop’? Don’t. It’s not coming.

Linux is 20 years old this year, and for most of those years I’ve been hearing about how the ‘Year of the Linux desktop’ is coming. It’s not coming. Linux it’s stuck permanently at a 1% market share. And that’s where it’ll be ten years from now.

But that doesn’t mean that there’s no hope for the OS.

Let’s take a look at some data.

Exhibit A - NetmarketShare data, Nov 2009 - Oct 2011:

Exhibit B - StatCounter data, Nov 2009 - Oct 2011:

Data from both NetmarketShare and StatCounter shows that Linux usage share (that is, browser traffic to selected websites from Linux systems) as a total flatline for the entire period covered by both metrics firms.

Around 1%.

Now, I’m no anti-Linux zealot. I like Linux. I like it a lot. I happen to think that it serves a valuable purpose in offering the world a free operating system that people can do with as they please. I also think that Ubuntu is well beyond the point where it’s certainly easy enough for anyone who can install Windows to install it onto a PC. As long as there aren’t any hardware issues (which are more likely on portable systems than desktops), then it’s as easy, if not easier, to manage as Windows. Many consumers, in particular those who do most of their computing through the browser, would be more than happy with Linux … if they knew about it.

And that’s the problem. Sure, Linux is on servers and supercomputers. It’s also used by the film industry to bring us movies like ‘Cars’ and ‘Titanic.’ Linux also lives in many smartphones and tablets, TiVo devices, routers, in-car GPS receivers and much, much more. A huge number of people make use of Linux each and every day and don’t even know it.

The desktop/portable operating systems race is a one-horse race - Windows - and it seems set to stay that way for the foreseeable future. Even Apple, which has enjoyed enormous success over the past few years (especially since transitioning to Intel CPUs) can only manage a very distant second place with the Mac OS. When you consider that Apple, with all the resources the company has at its disposal, can only manage usage share measured in single percentage points, it’s pretty amazing really that Linux is only a few percentage points behind.

Microsoft dominates, and the only possible threat to them comes from Apple, not Linux. So let’s give up on the whole ’Year of desktop Linux’ thing. I predict (and I’d place a wager on this) that Linux usage share won’t be far from where it is today five years from now. I honestly don’t think that even ten years from now things won’t have changed much.

Around 1%.

But that doesn’t mean we have to give up on Linux. Oh no. While the desktop market is far too stitched up (OEMs pushing Windows, Apple pushing Mac OS), Linux is still very important. Not just servers and supercomputers, but in the mobile space.

Exhibit C - StatCounter data, Nov 2009 - Oct 2011:

Android, which has a kernel based on the Linux kernel, is doing well. It is rapidly catching up with Apple’s iOS, and with Symbian in decline now that Nokia has moved to Windows Phone, has a chance to be a really big player. I fully expect Android to become the dominant mobile OS in the next year or so.

People won’t know (or for that matter care) that they’re using Linux, but that doesn’t matter. I happen to think that Ubuntu could be a big player on smartphones and tablets. I also think that Unity is just what’s needed to make Linux less Linux-y for the average user (though folks such as my esteemed colleague Jason Perlow dislikes Unity with the heat of a thousand suns) and that these improvements might give it traction in the mobile market.

The ‘Year of mobile Linux’ IS coming!

Related:

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes is an internationally published technology author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology.

Disclosure

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

All opinions expressed on Hardware 2.0 are those of Adrian Kingsley-Hughes. Every effort is made to ensure that the information posted is accurate. If you have any comments, queries or corrections, please contact Adrian via the email link here. Any possible conflicts of interest will be posted below. [Updated: February 23, 2010] - Adrian Kingsley-Hughes has no business relationships, affiliations, investments, or other actual/potential conflicts of interest relating to the content posted so far on this blog.

Biography

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes is an internationally published technology author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology -- whether that be by learning to program, building a PC from a pile of parts, or helping them get the most from their new MP3 player or digital camera.

Adrian has authored/co-authored technical books on a variety of topics, ranging from programming to building and maintaining PCs. His most recent books include "Build the Ultimate Custom PC", "Beginning Programming" and "The PC Doctor's Fix It Yourself Guide". He has also written training manuals that have been used by a number of Fortune 500 companies.

Adrian also runs a popular blog under the name The PC Doctor, where he covers a range of computer-related topics -- from security to repairing and upgrading.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
193
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

The Year of the Linux desktop was a long time ago
Sergio1704 16th May
It was around 2003, with such beautiful distributions like Mandrake 9.1, SUSE Pro 9.0 (boxed), Libranet 2.8...
At the time only commercial plug-ins were not so good.
Then Linux began to go downhill. Ubuntu, which has always been utter crap, was probably the main reason. If Ubuntu had been invented by Micro$oft to destroy Linux, that would make a lot of sense.
But also SUSE being sold to Novell, KDE 4, now Gnome 3, all factors that contributed to so many people abandoning Linux, including many advanced ones who moved to OS X in despair.
Too late. Soon Linux on the desktop will be a hobby OS.
This is actually fairly reassuring. Thanks.
0 Votes
+ -
that's FUD and lack of vision
The Linux Geek 4th Nov
@epitax
Those numbers are fudged.
The year of Linux will be when the people will refuse to buy windoze 8 and will switch to Linux. That's circa 2012!
@The Linux Geek
Ironically, Linux got there before Windows 8 - that is, Unity is a tablet shell on a desktop OS that shipped in April 2011, as Metro is a tablet shell on a desktop OS that ships in 2013ish.

Of course, a lot of people refuse to switch to Unity, too. *shrugs*
@The Linux Geek
Don't be so optimistic. Switching OS/OS brand is never an easy task for any 30+ people. In fact, it is darn hard to even let them switch a restaurant!!!
I can wait to the next generation, when virtually blind Windows-advocates have been dead.
@The Linux Geek Are you seriously this stupid every day?
@The Linux Geek

Good luck on that. Even Apple right now only has about 5% worldwide marketshare of the desktop / laptop market. They're the only legitimate contender to Windows on the tablet, laptop, desktop space.

Linux's best chance is on the server, where they are doing very well.
0 Votes
+ -
@The Linux Geek And this differs from your announcement that the year of Linux will begin when the people will refuse to buy "windoze" 7 how? Or your proclamation that the year of Linux will happen when the people refuse to buy "Windoze" Vista is different because?

I hate to tell you this but the numbers are not fudged at all - the Linux desktop share is quite small... the ONLY way for Linux to become the dominant desktop platform is if somehow Microsoft is gone and every single copy of Windows is destroyed. Good luck with that - SkyNet may be a much easier windmill for you to face... just watch out for those pesky terminators.

Now go get me that shake I ordered before I complain to the manager and he puts you back on the fry station!
@RICEGF

Go back to the mid 80s and look at IBM TopView and early Windows with non-overlapping tiles if you want to see early versions of Metro
@The Linux Geek

'Windoze'

How 1998
'Windoze'

How 1998


Some things never change. Including monopolies.
@mswift@

I *used* Windows 1.0 and TopView, and Metro they were not.

The primary feature of Metro (IMHO) is that the tiles are desktop widgets (as on Maemo and later Android) with very regular sizes and limited to a rather strict array and color scheme. Sort of "desktop widgets for the non-technical", or a cross between the iOS static grid of app launcher icons and palmtop widgets.

Windows 1.0 et. al. had *nothing* on the desktop, and to launch an app you had to find the .EXE in the filesystem - truly painful. The "Program Manager" with an array of icons first made its appearance in Windows 3.0, if I recall.

I'm certainly not a *fan* of Metro, as I prefer great reconfigurability to a dumbed down shell. Same with Unity, though I'm giving it a fair run with Ubuntu 11.10 before making a final decision.

BTW, Ubuntu had 20 million active desktops in 2010 (this is by direct measure, as in unique IPs to hit the update server that year). Given about 1.25 billion PCs estimated to be active that year, Ubuntu's share of the desktop market would be about 1.5% - and that doesn't count Red Hat and Suse, which are far more popular in the corporate world than Ubuntu.

So claiming that Linux has "less than 1%" based on surveys of web traffic is obviously wrong, as also shown by iOS dominating web traffic for phones even though Android and Symbian devices are far more popular in terms of sales volume.

Linux actual share of installed base on desktops is probably closer to 3%, but that is a fairly static share, and I don't expect any Linux product to disrupt Windows from its stranglehold as Linux has in virtually every other market. Microsoft is master of leveraging their monopoly there.
@The Linux Geek
LOL!!!!! That's what they said about Vista! Vista 32-Bit crashed and burned big-time and Linux is none the better for it.

Vista 64-Bit was rock solid! I still use it and would install it first before Ubuntu.

I use Megia Linux as my host to Windows XP, Vista 64, and Windows 7. It's the only safe way to run Windows!

Mr. Kingsley-Hughes' comments are exactly right. The only way the "Year of the Linux Desktop" is going to happen is if Microsoft fails miserably and they pack it in permanently.

Until there's an O.S. vacuum, Linux has no chance! - And I am a Linux User too.

It has many hardware, install and version-to-version full upgrade catastrophes that leave you with a flat machine every time and so Linux is still for Geeks. Ha, and look who I commenting to, a Linux Geek. That just further makes my point. Things you think nothing of are big reasons why most Windows Users walk away and buy the next version.

For the first time, I would agree with Loverock Davidson and his comments! Yikes! - But this time around I would.
@The Linux Geek There ain't "Year of the LInux on desktop" as it is just FUD made long time ago by MS fans.

The idea was to make a static that shows Linux is terrible on desktop usage.

I have converted hundreds of people to use Linux on PC's (and even few on Mac's) and so far it has much smaller support call rating than what even Windows 7 gives.

What is different? I install other distribution than Ubuntu (what is causing lots of problems) and especially with custom made default setup, avoiding almost every most known problem.

When you know software configuration, install process and needs of the user, then you can actually make almost a single click installation with pre-configured systems.

Then almost only thing what is needed to do, is to create user accounts, copy a updated help document to home directory and make a link to it to desktop.
Run a update (I use rolling release distribution) and write down the passwords.

Example, If I make 20 installations a month, I receive about 2-3 calls from those. And they are usually very personal features what they did not even know before they learn over the basic functions and usually not even touching the software, but services like having a another email account, a way to get access to their email trough webmail on another computer or where they can send their photos so they can send just links in Email.

It is just so damn easy when compared to Windows and it is one reason why I have moved more and more away supporting Windows computers as they really are pain in the mind.

For me, "Year of the Linux" was 1998. For normal users, it was 2007. For my avarage tech-minded friends, it was 2002-2003.

And when KDE, GNOME or others are not the answer and money is not the problem, I suggest to invest to Mac's. Even that I don't personally like OS X or iOS, I know when it is best choice.

One of the greatest thing what Microsoft have never done, has been XBox. As with that, people have turn PC's away as gaming platform and chosed Playstation or XBox and it has done great thing for people to abandon Windows.

There will never be a "Year of the Linux desktop" as there never were "Year of the Windows desktop". It is per user situation when they are ready to switch or take in use something else than Windows.

Some people wait like "Year of the Linux desktop" would be like iPad release or iPhone when tens of millions customers buy such device in few months.
@The Linux Geek No, they will not because 2 Application Developers refuse to support the platform! Adobe and Microsoft!

If people could get Photoshop and MS Office on Linux then OS X wouldn't be the big alternative believe me.

As for Unity, it is weak and if Ubuntu insists on staying with it they will likely lose Market Share.

As for the Stats, Linux Usage World Wide is estimated to b around 10% but you don't surf the Net from Servers and Servers make up a fraction of the Dektops.
@The Linux Geek

Ive used Linux. Linux SUSE to be exact and I thought it was pretty good for the most part. I was quite impressed to say the least with the whole installation package and the programs that came with it. In short it was a good little OS with lots of programs all to be had for free. Very compelling I must admit.

But sorry to say it wasn't as good as Windows, and that was a few years back with XP. And I have seen nothing in any version of Linux that leads me to think that Linux is ever going to be better then Windows, at least for my purposes and the purposes of the numerous Windows users I know.

I'm not going to go through the things that Linux isn't good enough at, but suffice to say they are often mentioned and my opinion of Linux is the same today as a few years ago, and that is; its good enough for the folk who don't do much beyond web surf and send emails, and its an interesting OS for the very computer savvy, the pro's who want an OS that responds to tinkering and fiddling and the particular user knows just what they are doing and how to do it.

Its not so great for the semi power users who know quite a bit and do quite a bit but are not experts. Trying to do many things with Linux that such a user has come to do on Windows with ease will soon turn into a series of events where your not only learning the nuts and bolts of your OS all over again, a process that can take months to get down with out any training, but your also going to find out just how user friendly Windows is when the "difference" in the way Linux does so many things actually can add up to more work, sometimes a lot more work when you don't have a clue how to do it and you find yourself getting tiered of reading message boards that often tell you to "TRY READING THE MESSAGE BOARD BEFORE YOU ASK", and often tell you with attitude.

Linux is not for the feint of heart users who don't want to spend a lot of time relearning how to do what used to be simple tasks in a new and often slightly more complex way. Sure, easy, for experienced Linux users, and probably a fascinating challenge and great learning experience for those interested in such challenges and learning experiences.

I know that many Linux users will simply never understand why it is that so many Windows users are not interested in Linux. They are rife with excuses about "well thats what comes on computers so thats the reason they use Windows". Only partly true.

Yes its what comes pre-loaded on almost all PC's and thats what get people started using Windows, but its not in any way what keeps them using Windows. Linux is free. Lets keep that in mind. And free got Firefox and Google Chrome and even Open Office for many, where they are today. Its not like people will not take up free software when it does just what they want and does it well. Linux has been around long enough.

Think about it, people download low quality Free movies to watch all the time. People download all kinds of free things they are not supposed to, risking malware and all sorts of potential problems, and all because its FREE. People love free, they love it to death.

But sorry, they don't love Linux.
@The Linux Geek

Problem is that people do not have a change to choose would they buy or not a Windows, it is forced to buy it by OEM's and Microsoft.

And every single person who comes to say that you can order a PC with Linux from somewhere... it ain't the answer. As most people walk in the malls and other stores and they buy PC's from shelf in their local stores.
1 Vote
+ -
my my aren't you a bit militant,
PCLinuxOS(user) 20th Nov
@The Linux Geek reality check 1.02% to 1.19% over the course of 2 years is not an indicator of a year of Linux more like the 2 decades of Linux. Growth is happening and needs to be nurtured an installation at a time. Don't ramble and make the rest of us look like tools.
@ smulji

Even the server market isn't a safe haven for Linux.

According to IDC, from 1996 to 2004, Unix (which doesn't include Linux) was the market leading OS in server hardware revenue -- if you added up the prices of servers (hardware, not OS) running Unix, Windows, Linux, etc., Unix was in the lead. I don't know which OS was the market leader before 1996, but it was probably some minicomputer or mainframe OS. Windows NT Server and Linux existed in 1995, but were insignificant.

2005 was a crucial turning point. It was the year in which Windows Server overtook Unix for the first time ever. This happened both because Windows was gaining market share and because Linux was cannibalising Unix. By Q4 of 2010, Windows was up to 42 per cent, nearly as much as Unix (26 per cent) and Linux (17 per cent) combined. The most important OS in the other 15 per cent was IBM's z/OS, which represented 11 per cent of server hardware revenue.

In Q2 of this year (2011), more than 45 per cent of server hardware revenue came from servers running Windows. The article reporting this didn't give details of Unix and Linux, but unless z/OS suffered a sudden drop, 45 per cent would mean that Windows has, for the first time ever, overtaken Unix and Linux combined. If it's happened, it would be a stunning victory for Windows, which has strangely gone almost unreported (most journalists probably just think servers and Microsoft are boring).

The trend has been that Windows gains a few percentage points in the server market each year. Linux has been gaining too, but less than Unix has been losing (i.e. Linux has been cannibalising Unix). If Windows's 45 per cent share holds for 2011 as a whole, it means that by 2013 or 2014 we could see Windows Server winning a majority of server hardware revenue. Sustained share of more than 50 per cent of the market is when scale advantages can take on a life of their own (as happened with MS-Dos/Windows on PCs in the late 80s), so the next few years will be very interesting times in the server market.
0 Votes
+ -
That won't happen
Sergio1704 Updated - 17th May
@The Linux Geek
Where have you been in the last 10 years? That didn't happen with the Vista fiasco, why should it happen now? People will keep using Windows 7, as they did (and many still do) with XP, OR, if anything, they'll move to OS X.
Apple, Macs and OS X are what people want now, not Linux.
Many "advanced" (by that I mean developers and similar) users have already moved to Macs.
Unless you mention Android, but Android is not a desktop OS.
@toddybottom Since when is it not safe to surf the net with Linux? Any data to accompany that statement? As far as the article goes, I think that it's a pretty accurate appraisal... although I am not sure how Unity is going to fare in the future and how it will impulse/diminish Linux adoption on tablets and such.
Don't feed the troll. Let them vanish.
1 Vote
+ -
I'm making fun of Linux weenies
toddybottom 4th Nov
@Ale82
Whenever browsing based statistics come out showing that Linux desktop is going nowhere, the defense is that there are a lot of Linux desktops out there that are never used for browsing the Internet. I've always found that defense very interesting considering we are constantly told that using Linux is the only safe way to surf the Internet. If Linux actually is safer than Windows then why do all these people with all these Linux desktops refuse to use their Linux desktops to surf?

The more reasonable explanation is that there are very few Linux desktops out there.
@toddybottom

If you really want to know how many linux desktops there are in use, go to Richard Stallman's house. I'm sure you'll find them all there.
  • Flagged
0 Votes
+ -
@smulji There are probably a couple at SJVN's house too - Stallman isn't hoarding all 10 of them...
  • Flagged
@toddybottom

The ACTUAL explanation is that commissioned net stats are always going to paint a rosey picture for their patrons with deep pockets. Add the "other" to the Linux side, unless you really believe that between 4&6% "Other" browsers are using Commodore Amiga OS & BSD...
@toddybottom
And here I thought the defense was that the browser's identification being sent to web sites were set up to report that they were IE on a windows box so that the website would work. Or at least to pass those annoying browser checks that keep reporting that I'm running an outdated browser and please update to at least IE6. Siily assumptions.
@toddybottom Funny... I have Dell Inspiron 17R with Windows 7 OEM install... but I use Mint Katya for productivity, internet, messaging, etc... I only use Windows for games... and I think it's been about two months (or more, not sure) since I last went into Windows.
@scorpioblue exactly right scorpio i mean just consider the source of this article, it reeks of desperation ,they can see the writing on the wall and thats why they have to keep printing articles like this to try and convince people that its not relevant
0 Votes
+ -
I hope that was a joke
LiquidLearner 4th Nov
@Ale82

Or heavy sarcasm. I think it was a parody of one of the crazy desktop Linux advocates as a reason why browser usage is so low.
@LiquidLearner
One does not need to parody many of the "crazy" Windows advocates in here, because their posts do that for them. LD, for instance, is so far off the planet that his posts are almost amusing for their rampant self-delusion.
0 Votes
+ -
Oh, don't get me wrong
LiquidLearner 5th Nov
@Rahbm

There is plenty of over zealousness in both camps. Still it's funny that something that was obviously sarcasm should get such a rise out of so many.
0 Votes
+ -
Keep asking yourself...
ScorpioBlue 5th Nov
...why these corporate shills are so afraid of a widdle old 1%, the most greatest, most powerful 1% in the whole wide world.
0 Votes
+ -
'And thats where itll be ten years from now.'

I was just wondering, 5 years ago when we would have never assumed Linux would be the dominant mobile OS, and with chrome OS, yes its not hit it off yet, but how can we tell that it wont be, or of course another linux derived product. So I think its a bit stupid to be so sure about its market share in ten years time. Its fine to say that it does not look like it will be a big player in the conventional desktop market, but as the pc and tablets merge why couldn't android become a big player in the market?
@Will T
While you can't know for certain, it helps to recognize that the desktop is a contracting and stagnant market. That's why Microsoft is following Linux' lead by implementing a tablet shell on Windows 8 - they know that staying on the desktop, which is their current cash cow, is death in the long run, and a desktop OS on a tablet won't sell (see 10 years of Windows tablet sales for confirmation).

Microsoft owns the desktop, and Linux almost everything else (with a greedy Android eye toward the iPad wink. He who laughs last laughs best!
@ricegf The desktop market isn't contracting; it's just not growing as fast as it used to (below 10% p.a., as opposed to 40% a few years back). There are still a hell of a lot more desktops around than there used to be, which of course means that there are more Linux desktop users. Even conservative estimates predict the number of desktops and laptops in use to hit two billion in the next few years, and 1% of two billion is a hell of a lot of Linux users. Even with no increase in market share, the growth in total users makes it more worthwhile for hardware manufacturers to provide Linux drivers, game companies to provide Linux versions etc. That in turn _could_ lead to an increase in market share.
1 Vote
+ -
@ricegf
MS is following Linux's lead. LOL!

The truth is, Unity was rushed out (not hearing lots of great things about it)and is just that- a rushed UI thrown on top of an OS, while MS decided to go the better route, and create an ARM based OS for both ARM based desktops and tablets, with both needs in mind.

Seems Linux took the "lazy" route. wink
0 Votes
+ -
@William Farrell
You do know that Linux has been ported to ARM since the late '90s, right?
The complaints you're are hearing are from h@rdcore Linux users who want to tweak every little thing. Unity doesn't allow this (ala iOS) but is very stable from what I have seen.
@William Farrell

For that matter, they beta'ed Unity in their netbook release for over a year before making it the default on their desktops. Unity just isn't worth making a stink over. The power user can still change it easily enough. The morons that buy the most volume of PCs never leave default, though. So it makes sense to have the most simplistic interface as the default. For that matter, why is everyone still so obsessed with marketshare? Market share was really important when the market consisted of thousands. Maybe even when the market was in the millions. Frankly, if 1% of a billion people want to give me $1, I'll spend the rest of my life building them whatever they want.
@Will T
Well, was that so unimaginable? Symbian has Linux roots, right? Linux was considered for the first Apple iPhone.

But. But. Desktops are mature. Even the thought "The desktop as a metaphor is dead and we are ready for the next big thing" is not only mature, but senile. (I was hearing those pronouncements on the desktop back in 1999. The anticipated next big thing? 3D representations of the file systems. Someone probably put that in the trunk of a flying car.)

My belief? It is necessary to have a vendor who collects money for a Linux-based desktop operating system for there to be a material increase in its desktop share. My evidence? Look where vendors do wrap products around Linux, such as routers and servers, and see that it does very well.

Though, the first point to be made as that LinDesk company ventures off to seek a nudge from the Invisible Hand: dozens of others are giving away their product for free. Thus the crux of the dilemma. To succeed one has to be different, but in order to be different one has to match in spending what communities provide competitors for free.

Hey. Not my problem. If I thought Linux adoption on the desktop increased the chances for world peace, I'd be more passionate about it. You like what you're using? Cool. I like what I'm using. You'd rather I was using Linux? Bummer, man, that's a bummer. For you.
It is really only the "iPhone" datapont. Statcounter does not count the iPad as either Mobile or desktop. It shows up as that rising line above Linux in the desktop.
0 Votes
+ -
ZDNet itself reported Android phones at about 40% of the smartphone market, iOS only powering 18%. If that's only poised, Apple better be very worried.
0 Votes
+ -
@NotMSUser

Big difference. Likewise, if:

1) Apple can muster between 55 and 66% of all the profit in the handset business...
2) iOS developers can reap 20X the profit when compared to Android when unit share is about the same....
3) iOS still hase 2.5X-3X the mobile web usage when compared to Android. Not iPhone VS Android (statcounter data) but iOS VS Android (Net Market Share data)

when Apple only has 5-6% of the market share of handsets...

Whey should Apple be worried when they tripple to quadruple their market share to 18-22%? I think you miss the fact that 20% market share is a HUGE HUGE number of products.

Sometimes I think tech heads don't have the slightest understanding of business.
@Bruizer

There are techies on here? Apple sycophants have been pushing the marketshare metric for years. Yeah, techies don't care. They just think that the people who have been pushing that metric should eat crow when it turns on them.
0 Votes
+ -
Now, if you want to say that Android (a platform) outsells iPhones (a product brand), then you would have a factually correct, and totally irrelevant statement.
0 Votes
+ -
Visit a college campus.
Joe.Smetona Updated - 4th Nov
99% of Android users don't know it's Linux. I think most Android users would want the same quality on their desktop if they had the opportunity.

I'm sure the Android Desktop is just around the corner, Google is prepping for it with Android..

My daughter has been using Linux Mint and Open Office since freshman year in HS and is now still using it as a junior in college. She tells me her friends know all about it. (no AV and no service calls the entire time).
@Joe.Smetona
So much for that mythical Linux security.
0 Votes
+ -
Android Isn't Really Insecure
CFWhitman 4th Nov
@toddybottom
Android isn't really insecure. At this point, even Windows is pretty secure. However, good security doesn't stop people from installing Trojans. If you have rights to install software, then you can install malware and no amount of operating system security can stop you.

I'm not a fan of Android, but pointing to trojans and blaming them on operating system security is silly.
0 Votes
+ -
@Joe.Smetona

"Android" and "quality" should never be used in the same sentence.
0 Votes
+ -
@Joe.Smetona
yet still choose a Windows PC (or Mac) over a Linux PC.

Kind of blows the blogger's "nobody uses it because nobody knows about it" theory out of the water. wink
0 Votes
+ -
@William Farrell
>>yet still choose a Windows PC (or Mac) over a Linux PC.

If you want to buy "a Linux PC", your options are pretty limited.I never ran Linux on a PC that hadn't run Windows first.
It was around 2003, with such beautiful distributions like Mandrake 9.1, SUSE Pro 9.0 (boxed), Libranet 2.8...
At the time only commercial plug-ins were not so good.
Then Linux began to go downhill. Ubuntu, which has always been utter crap, was probably the main reason. If Ubuntu had been invented by Micro$oft to destroy Linux, that would make a lot of sense.
But also SUSE being sold to Novell, KDE 4, now Gnome 3, all factors that contributed to so many people abandoning Linux, including many advanced ones who moved to OS X in despair.
Too late. Soon Linux on the desktop will be a hobby OS.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix