ie8 fix
madison

Hardware 2.0

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

UPDATE: Apple launches App Store subscriptions, clarifies (or perhaps not) in-app purchases

By | February 15, 2011, 7:24am PST

Summary: Apple has announced that its new subscription service is now available to all content publishers in the App Store.

Apple has announced that its new subscription service is now available to all content publishers in the App Store.

Here are the details:

Subscriptions purchased from within the App Store will be sold using the same App Store billing system that has been used to buy billions of apps and In-App Purchases. Publishers set the price and length of subscription (weekly, monthly, bi-monthly, quarterly, bi-yearly or yearly). Then with one-click, customers pick the length of subscription and are automatically charged based on their chosen length of commitment (weekly, monthly, etc.). Customers can review and manage all of their subscriptions from their personal account page, including canceling the automatic renewal of a subscription. Apple processes all payments, keeping the same 30 percent share that it does today for other In-App Purchases.

Apple also clarifies its position on In-App Purchases, and how the new rules will NOT affect apps such as Amazon’s Kindle and Barnes & Noble’s NOOK app (emphasis added):

Publishers who use Apple’s subscription service in their app can also leverage other methods for acquiring digital subscribers outside of the app. For example, publishers can sell digital subscriptions on their web sites, or can choose to provide free access to existing subscribers. Since Apple is not involved in these transactions, there is no revenue sharing or exchange of customer information with Apple. Publishers must provide their own authentication process inside the app for subscribers that have signed up outside of the app. However, Apple does require that if a publisher chooses to sell a digital subscription separately outside of the app, that same subscription offer must be made available, at the same price or less, to customers who wish to subscribe from within the app. In addition, publishers may no longer provide links in their apps (to a web site, for example) which allow the customer to purchase content or subscriptions outside of the app.

Why does this not affect the likes of Amazon and Barnes & Noble? because they are NOT the publishers of the content. 

There’s also clarification of the associated privacy policy:

Protecting customer privacy is a key feature of all App Store transactions. Customers purchasing a subscription through the App Store will be given the option of providing the publisher with their name, email address and zip code when they subscribe. The use of such information will be governed by the publisher’s privacy policy rather than Apple’s. Publishers may seek additional information from App Store customers provided those customers are given a clear choice, and are informed that any additional information will be handled under the publisher’s privacy policy rather than Apple’s.

Makes sense.

[UPDATE: Or maybe not ... that said, at this point there's no clear comment from either Apple or Amazon about this issue. I've yet to see a direct quote from anyone at Apple saying that these new rules apply to apps such as the Kindle. The best is this from ComputerWorld:

"Later Tuesday, Apple spokeswoman Trudy Muller confirmed that those rules apply not only to newspaper and magazine publishers, but also to content sellers like Amazon.com, which offers a Kindle app for the iPhone, iPod Touch and iPad."

But again, there's no direct quote.

My guess now is that this ruling might apply to subscriptions (such as magazine subscriptions) that Amazon has on offer. I really don't see how it will be viable for third parties to hand over 30% of a sale to Apple. This level of pricing is far too enthusiastic and a cash-grab too far.

We'll have to wait and see.]

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes is an internationally published technology author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology.

Disclosure

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

All opinions expressed on Hardware 2.0 are those of Adrian Kingsley-Hughes. Every effort is made to ensure that the information posted is accurate. If you have any comments, queries or corrections, please contact Adrian via the email link here. Any possible conflicts of interest will be posted below. [Updated: February 23, 2010] - Adrian Kingsley-Hughes has no business relationships, affiliations, investments, or other actual/potential conflicts of interest relating to the content posted so far on this blog.

Biography

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes

Adrian Kingsley-Hughes is an internationally published technology author who has devoted over a decade to helping users get the most from technology -- whether that be by learning to program, building a PC from a pile of parts, or helping them get the most from their new MP3 player or digital camera.

Adrian has authored/co-authored technical books on a variety of topics, ranging from programming to building and maintaining PCs. His most recent books include "Build the Ultimate Custom PC", "Beginning Programming" and "The PC Doctor's Fix It Yourself Guide". He has also written training manuals that have been used by a number of Fortune 500 companies.

Adrian also runs a popular blog under the name The PC Doctor, where he covers a range of computer-related topics -- from security to repairing and upgrading.

16
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Apple launches App Store subscriptions, clarifies in-app purchases
Jimster480 16th Feb 2011
@james347 Wtf Ru saying.
0 Votes
+ -
Sounds great!
P. Douglas 15th Feb 2011
.
Is it just me, or is Apple becoming more transparent? They publish the audits of their suppliers, and what corrections are made. They are working hard to make sure that the rules of the iTunes store are well known. They are still super secretive about upcoming products, but do well when they do announce these products. Maybe other companies should start to seriously take a look at how it should be done, and follow suit?
0 Votes
+ -
Nuts!
kenosha77a 15th Feb 2011
@Rick_K
It was so much more fun having Apple as the Evil Empire bogeyman than what Apple has evolved into. Remember all the negative Apple blog print coverage over the "endangered" App Store Amazon content of just a few weeks ago?

Only Adrian has published a clarification of this matter so far. Good for you, Adrian.
0 Votes
+ -
A reasonable policy
oncall 15th Feb 2011
@kenosha7777

Who would have thought Apple capable of such a thing.

*raises hand*
@ matthew_maurice

Actually, their App Store Review Guidelines are relevant to many people. This blog post is an example. The review guidelines make clear that the post's interpretation based on use of the word "publisher" in the press release is incorrect.
0 Votes
+ -
Because they're not stupid.
matthew_maurice 15th Feb 2011
@rlawler Why telegraph what they're doing to the whole world? Their review guidelines are only relevant to developers who've enrolled in their program anyway. So it makes sense to only let people who've signed the NDA have access.
0 Votes
+ -
They may be of interest to many, including me
matthew_maurice 15th Feb 2011
@rlawler But they're only relevant to people who have developed an iOS app that they want to distribute through the App Store, by definition Registered Apple Developers (under NDA).
0 Votes
+ -
Also relevant to a lot of consumers
use_what_works_4_U 15th Feb 2011
@Matthew_maurice
I am a prime example. I have been an iPhone owner since the first iPhone arrived. I busted my iPhone 3G and now I'm back to my original iPhone. My contract is about to roll over and I am thinking about whether or not I want an iPhone4, an EVO, or possibly a feature phone and an iPod touch for email when I'm near WiFi.

The thing is, the way I use my phone has, and continues to, evolve over time. As an example, I am now a *very* happy Kindle user. If there were any credible threat to the Kindle app on iPhone, I would jump ship without a 2nd thought. Apple knows that there are a lot of consumers like me and they want a certain amount of transparency in their dealings so that we are comfortable with choosing the iPhone. It's a delicate balance of too much information and too much doubt. A balance that Apple gets wrong quite a bit. In this case, though, I think they are just doing the prudent thing in letting customers, potential customers, and potential defectors know what you can expect to work on the device going forward.
0 Votes
+ -
That might be the "distance" of Steve Jobs
matthew_maurice 15th Feb 2011
@Rick_K 9 months ago he would have said the publishers were "publishing it wrong." Now he may have mellowed some. Of course he could just be a in really good mood watching Microsoft and Nokia engage in a desperate embrace in an effort to stay relevant in the mobile space.
0 Votes
+ -
So Apple wants wants a cut from those who publish (and sell) through the app store, but not those who only sell content through it? That doesn't quite make sense to me, since Apple is a major retailer of digital content and would want to reign in others that space trying to build businesses on Apple App Store platform.

Now the exemptions for Amazon and Barnes and Noble do make sense from the standpoint of avoiding anti-trust regulations and wanting to place nice with publishers.
0 Votes
+ -
Wrong!
rlawler Updated - 15th Feb 2011
I'm afraid you've got this wrong.

Amazon Kindle app and B&N Nook app are up against the wall.

They will have to remove the in-app links to their web-based stores (although they may still operated those stores). They will have to offer the same content through Apple in-app purchase as is available through their website stores at the same or better price.

Due to the agency model now used by many ebook publishers, that means Apple will get all the profit from in-app Kindle and Nook ebook purchases.

It will be interesting to see whether Amazon and the others are willing to forgo profit just to be on the iDevices.

Apple is giving existing apps until June 30 to comply with their new rules.
@rlawler All Apple is doing is requiring the apps offer the same content within the app as it does outside the app. That's it.
@athynz which means when you open the kindle app and purchase a book all the money goes to apple. And amazon can't link to their site instead.
0 Votes
+ -
First off...
james347 15th Feb 2011
...you must know Apple products to speak about them. You know nothing of Apple, nor of their Services, therefore you know NOT of which you speak.
@james347 Wtf Ru saying.
This is great news to everyone not on Apples platform. As people are sure to jump ship and refocus on other more profitable platforms.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix