ie8 fix
madison

Will Apple license AirPlay to HDTV manufacturers for iPad, iPhone video streaming?

By | March 23, 2011, 3:50pm PDT

Summary: Here’s a way for Apple to have its TV and eat it, too. Bloomberg is reporting that the computing giant may have a simpler plan to make its products dominate the living room than building its own HDTVs. Instead, it’s apparently mulling over whether to license its AirPlay technology to television manufacturers to build into [...]

Here’s a way for Apple to have its TV and eat it, too. Bloomberg is reporting that the computing giant may have a simpler plan to make its products dominate the living room than building its own HDTVs. Instead, it’s apparently mulling over whether to license its AirPlay technology to television manufacturers to build into their sets, allowing video streaming from all of those iPads and iPhones Apple is selling.

Currently, you can stream audio using third-party devices that have licensed AirPlay, but only Apple TV provides access to AirPlay’s video streaming capabilities. Other home theater devices that would have AirPlay built in may come to market by the end of 2011, according to Bloomberg.

If Apple is serious about these rumored plans, it would seem to be almost an anti-Google TV strategy. Instead of bringing everything about the PC into the TV, you would just stream what you want to the set from your handheld device, which, in the case of the iPad, will already let you surf the Web much better than any TV-based browser could. It also doesn’t hurt that the purported license fee for AirPlay is currently $4 (though that price could rise for video streaming features), and doesn’t require any of the technical heavy lifting that’s marred the introduction of more Google TV devices.

Would you buy a television or other video device with built-in AirPlay? Is this a better approach to merging the PC and TV than the one Google is taking? Let us know in the Comments section.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily e-mail newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Topics

Sean Portnoy is a freelance technology journalist.

Disclosure

Sean Portnoy

Sean Portnoy is a freelance technology journalist; currently, all work that Sean does is on a contractural basis. Sean has also written corporate communications documents for CA.

Sean does not accept gifts from companies he covers. All hardware products he writes about are purchased with his own funds or are review units covered under formal loan agreements and are returned after the review is complete.

Biography

Sean Portnoy

Sean Portnoy started his tech writing career at ZDNet nearly a decade ago. He then spent several years as an editor at Computer Shopper magazine, most recently serving as online executive editor. He received a B.A. from Brown University and an M.A. from the University of Southern California.

Related Discussions on TechRepublic

Did you know you can take part in these discussions with your ZDNet membership?
29
Comments

Join the conversation!

Just In

RE: Will Apple license AirPlay to HDTV manufacturers for iPad, iPhone video streaming?
hmoazed 22nd Nov
Most people are missing the point, DLNA and AirPlay are totally different.
DLNA lets you take content, such as an MPEG4 video file, say stored on your PC, and stream it to another device, say your HDTV, and have it decoded and displayed on the receiver.
AirPlay on the other hand is like a wireless HDMI cable. It simply takes whatever is on the display of one device and lets you display it on another device. The receiver does not have to have a separated codec for every single stream type is supports.
0 Votes
+ -
Makes more sense than Google-TV.
Bruizer 23rd Mar 2011
Have you seen that remote? Dude. Fail.
It is a worthless idea, Apple TV costs money per movie when in reality a lot of the same movies are already available elsewhere and often for less money.

Crud, I would rather see Amazon On Demand on my TV or Bluray Player.
@Peter Perry

Who knows, Amazon may eventually offer its On Demand service to iPad and iPhone owners, who will then simply stream it over to their TV (AirPlay). If they don't not a big loss, there's plenty other services (Netflix, Hulu etc).
0 Votes
+ -
Any service provider that cares to create an app..
doctorSpoc Updated - 23rd Mar 2011
@Peter Perry.. could stream over AirPlay.. including Amazon.. even more than that.. anyone that has a website offering services, media etc can do the same..

Your comment shows incredible ignorance of this tech and its possibilities..
0 Votes
+ -
Apple TV works with NetFlix
Bruizer 23rd Mar 2011
@Peter Perry

As always, you know nothing about Apple.
Why should TV makers license a proprietary protocol from Apple? Apple should join the Digital Living Network Alliance (DLNA) instead and use those technologies rathern than its own proprietary, non-interoperable technologies. DLNA-compliant products support various standards like UPnP which are standardized by ISO/IEC.

I'm surprised that Apple even supports standards like USB -- oh wait, it doesn't on iDevices, only on its Macs.
@PB_z
"I'm surprised that Apple even supports standards like USB -- oh wait, it doesn't on iDevices, only on its Macs."

More FUD from someone who knows nothing about what he is talking about. There is a USB adapter for the iPad and there has been since not long after the original was released. Yes, it is limited, but it does exist.
0 Votes
+ -
More lies from the Apple haters.
Bruizer 23rd Mar 2011
@PB_z

Or you just don't know anything about iDevices.
@PB_z
Sure, Apple could implement the monopoly standard that is DLNA but isn't it better for consumers to have a choice of standards? Thanks to Apple, now consumers have a choice. They can choose the monopoly standard (DLNA) or they can choose the standard from the company that has the highest marketcap and the highest customer satisfaction in the world.

I know which one I'm picking!
@PB_z DLNA is actually a little more daunting to use than Apple's Airplay, for the typical consumer. My example would be my sister - she had no idea how to stream movies from her Droid X to her network-connected Samsung TV, yet the moment she took her AppleTV 2 out of it's box and hooked it up, she clicked the AirPlay button in iTunes and was watching movies on the big screen.

She now has a Verizon iPhone because of this one feature working this well and this easily.
0 Votes
+ -
HDTV oems would have to be STUPID to pay for airplay.
Johnny Vegas Updated - 23rd Mar 2011
DLNA already exists for this and lots of devices already support it. That way you can play from a multitude of devices like tablets and smartphones and media players and laptops to a multitude of devices like tvs and stereos. How any consumer or oem could think going proprietary for this instead would be a good idea is mind numbing...
0 Votes
+ -
Everyone else's implementation SUCKS!!
doctorSpoc 23rd Mar 2011
@Johnny Vegas ..it's not a natural workflow and is too many steps.. and no one uses it or even knows it exists and even if they did no one would use it anyway because it's too difficult to use. With AirPlay it' 2 clicks to go from iOS device to big screen
0 Votes
+ -
Exactly right
edtimes 23rd Mar 2011
@doctorSpoc
My friend has a DLNA compatible HDTV and it takes at least 3 clicks of the remote to play anything on it. That and I'm pretty sure he has to pay for an anti-virus subscription on his TV. How ridiculous is that!!??!!

You are totally right though. DLNA sucks big time. I'm pretty sure that Apple can do a better job. Thanks for your very detailed thoughts on DLNA doctorSpoc. It is refreshing to read comments from someone who thinks just like me.
0 Votes
+ -
Proprietary BS
dazzlingd 24th Mar 2011
@doctorSpoc
DLNA is the protocol. They could keep the same workflow for Airplay in iOS and use DLNA behind the scenes. True, setting up DLNA is slightly different for every vendor but I can stream content to any DLNA device in the house from either my Cisco router, Win 7 PC, iMac, NAS etc. Set up takes one or button mouse clicks but once it's on, it just works.

On my PS3, select Media Servers then select videos or music. In my Xbox 360, just go to video library or music library.

Your comment makes no sense. It's like saying that we should all use Appletalk as a networking protocol because TCP/IP is too hard to configure on a Sun box.

Why should I have to buy an Apple TV to stream video/music from my iPad when every other device in the house "just works?"
0 Votes
+ -
@dazzlingd.. DLNA allows for play from one certified DLNA device to another..
AirPlay doesn't actually work like that.. AirPlay takes anything that is currently playing in the audio or video or photo player(s) (the player check the credentials that you are allowed to play) and beams that to an AirPlay receiver.. so that includes devices on your network like DLNA does, but also includes audio and video and pictures from a browser (e.g. Vimeo videos), from apps (e.g. games), from internet connected apps (e.g. youTube, Vevo.. and in future possibly Hulu, Netflix, Amazon etc..)

and because it just beams it from the audio or video player or photo players you don't break your normal workflow.. you're just going along doing your thing web surfing, playing music, looking at videos in through whatever app you normally use on the device or on a network connected device or on the web... and when/if you want to show it on the big screen you press the airplay button and pick where you want to send it.. BOOM.. that's it. you don't have to go dig down to some special DLNA section pick what you want etc, etc.. that totally sucks.. you need to break your normal workflow..

with AirPlay you don't have to change the way use or access anything.. just going along normally and say put that on the big screen that's it.. not that simple with DLNA.. and DLNA doesn't allow for beaming of web or internet media.. so it's much more limited..
@dazzlingd

"Why should I have to buy an Apple TV to stream video/music from my iPad when every other device in the house "just works?"

You won't have to buy an Apple TV to use it, it will be built into TVs. If you have a DLNA compatible setup now, this shouldn't concern you. But for the millions and millions of iOS devices out there, this will be excellent news.
0 Votes
+ -
They would be stupid not to
oncall 23rd Mar 2011
@Johnny Vegas

It's a simple business and marketing decision. There are how many millions of active iTunes accounts?

As one who has a substantial iTunes library. 4 dollars or 10, the next TV I buy will have this or I'll buy from the next best competitor that does have it.
@Johnny Vegas "That way you can play from a multitude of devices like tablets and smartphones and media players and laptops to a multitude of devices like tvs and stereos."

Is that multitude as in "200 people are now using DLNA" or as in "20,000 poeple are now using DLNA".

I bet airplay has already been used by 10mm happy Apple customers. Just 4 devices in toto, not a multitude, but the 10mm will be 20mm and 100mm eventually.

DLNA, OTOH, will be approaching its 1st mm in late 2012.
0 Votes
+ -
I would buy that
oncall 23rd Mar 2011
But only if it can stream movies and music directly from my iTunes library without needing to also use an iPad or iPod touch. IMHO this is the way it's going though, freestanding devices like the Apple TV and similar streaming devices are on the way out as that functionality can be handled by the processors built into TV's and Blu-ray players.
0 Votes
+ -
There's an app for that...
dazzlingd Updated - 24th Mar 2011
@oncall
There are DLNA apps that can do that for iTunes, and iOS. img border="0"

Check out TVersity, Firefly, Vuze.
0 Votes
+ -
DLNA doesn't meet my specific needs
oncall Updated - 24th Mar 2011
@dazzlingd

But yes, that one is already a given. My shopping list for my next TV includes: Airplay, DLNA, Hulu, Netflix, Blockbuster on demand, Amazon streaming, wifi, and 3D ready (I am not paying extra for 3D they, can throw it in and I will buy the goggles later) and probably Google TV ready. A rather fair shopping list and I'll add to it when the day comes but hey that's how else is one to seperate the wheat from the chaff? I am all done with add-on boxes, the only "media boxes" that will be attached to my next TV will be a Bluray player and the cable box.

P.S. and I expect to get most of the above shopping list from my next Bluray player anyway.
This is another way to cut the cable bill out of my budget. You don't need cable TV. Almost everything is already available online. I use a service from the SeeTVPC website that consolidates all the streaming and on-demand TV content into one place so you can find it easily. For movies, I use Netflix. Between these 2 services, which integrate into the internet seamlessly, I have no Cable TV bill and I don't miss it.
This is not about protocols. The question is whether you would buy an AirPlay enabled TV and whether this is a better approach than Google's. I'd say yes to both and I bet millions of consumers would also agree.
This is certainly a much better and consumer friendlier approach than Google TV. There's a reason why that approach never really took off in the past (WebTV/MSNTV, AOLTV) and why it's not taking off again with Google TV. Consumers don't want a cumbersome PC experience on their televisions, with keyboards and an extra-large pc mouse-pointer on their screens for navigation. The TV experience is a lean back experience and will continue to be. Plus most consumers TV's are shared family experience. Who wants to sit there watching someone else navigate the web for content to watch, each time?

With smart phones, iPads and other tablet uses on the rise, TV's of the future should be relegated for just pushing/beaming of one's content, not managing and navigating with mouse-pointer and keyboard. I should be able to walk into my house and push whatever I was watching on my iPad to my TV of choice in the house. While I continue to use the iPad for other things (maybe cueing-up the next show). This is possible today with an Apple TV but I would welcome the technology being built directly into TV sets.
Well the current Google TV is great. This has some killer apps. I like that fact that with the integration it will do a search from the receiver as well as the web. Weather you want to record it or not. Watching Netflix is great too. This is one great product and as the apps get better so is the Google TV.
What for when it can release an iTV and everyone will rush to buy it. There's more money to be made this way. Let the rest tinker with their Goggle TV and/or Amazon stuff. Apple sells less but made more this way.
0 Votes
+ -
attent
Firat31 15th Aug
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
sohbet kanallari ? radyo dinle ? radyo dinle ?
mirc ? cet ? dul sohbet ? chat odalari ? chat odalari ?

? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? sohbet odalari ? cet ? cet

turk chat - turk chat - cet
odalari
islami sohbet
dini sohbet
sohbet odalari
sohbet odalari
Beni takip edenin gotune koyim =)7
Most people are missing the point, DLNA and AirPlay are totally different.
DLNA lets you take content, such as an MPEG4 video file, say stored on your PC, and stream it to another device, say your HDTV, and have it decoded and displayed on the receiver.
AirPlay on the other hand is like a wireless HDMI cable. It simply takes whatever is on the display of one device and lets you display it on another device. The receiver does not have to have a separated codec for every single stream type is supports.

Join the conversation!

Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]
ie8 fix
Click Here
ie8 fix

The best of ZDNet, delivered

ZDNet Newsletters

Get the best of ZDNet delivered straight to your inbox

Facebook Activity

White Papers, Webcasts, & Resources
ie8 fix
ie8 fix