On bet the company issues, it's far better to be a litigant than a bystander

On bet the company issues, it's far better to be a litigant than a bystander

Summary: As I mentioned last week, the most telling insights for me on the news of Google's acquisition of YouTube came from EFF's Fred von Lohmann, who discussed the importance for a company like Google of participation in the judicial lawmaking process.  Members of Google's legal team underscore this point in their comments to New York Times writer Katie Hafner for her story, We're Google, So Sue Us:Michael Kwun, a senior litigation counsel at Google, agreed that "the Geico case was very important.

SHARE:
TOPICS: Google
0

As I mentioned last week, the most telling insights for me on the news of Google's acquisition of YouTube came from EFF's Fred von Lohmann, who discussed the importance for a company like Google of participation in the judicial lawmaking process.  Members of Google's legal team underscore this point in their comments to New York Times writer Katie Hafner for her story, We're Google, So Sue Us:

Michael Kwun, a senior litigation counsel at Google, agreed that "the Geico case was very important." Mr. Kwun said that establishing a body of precedent was a priority for Google, especially as legal interpretations continued to evolve. "If we don’t at least litigate to the point where we get rulings on the issues that matter to us, we're left with less clarity in the law," he said.

Mr. Kwun has a gift for understatement.  Thanks Jason, for pointing me to the story. 

Topic: Google

Denise Howell

About Denise Howell

Denise Howell is an appellate, intellectual property and technology lawyer who enjoys broad industry recognition for her expertise on the intersection of emerging technologies and law.

Kick off your day with ZDNet's daily email newsletter. It's the freshest tech news and opinion, served hot. Get it.

Talkback

0 comments
Log in or register to start the discussion